I am an incredibly bright young person, ask me a question.

i may not be the op (or so it seems) but that is very good advice. thank you

See the question Op? It was asked TO life. Not OF life.

The secret to life is living.

The secret of life is entirely different.

op is off for the night. he may return (as op), or he may return as anon (they ban him alot), but know he is still watching the thread and will intervene if needed. godspeed young padawan

Notice the simplicity of the above answer.

0 = absolute infinite and finite simultaneously. Relational it is equil.

Hope that helps.

0

Sure thing.



Most of what mind shaft was presenting was suggestive. Projections found in implyed variables

he used a template and i took the bait? makes sense

Not exactly, he adds implications through auto suggested. Pushing positional stance through "hot" words. If obama is used it is a "hot" word because it is a known perceptive variable that voting for an independant implies you're throwing a vote towards obama. It also sugjest that his percieved stance is romney. There is also other postulates throughout the post sugjesting "this" position. Therefore to engage with him you would limited stances to associated positionally.

Basic stratagy.

Its a qualifing sugjestion that pushes a disposition. Then he postulates dominence, through dismissel then backs it through opeing another spot of disposition creating a space for you to move to. That is leading. The percieved "bait" is not presented, he is simply providing you with an attractive position of disposition through auto sugjestion. "Offence$ you take "defence" he postulatizes through domanance for you to move into a desired position, then he goes for the kill with "dismissal". Before you have an opportunity to adjust to the space provided to return in "offence" he escapes.

do you suffer from exhaustion related to over-masturbation?

wrong!

did your parents tell you that you are SPESHAL?

thanks guys,you really know your stuff. definitely noted for future encounters

actuallyyyyy....yup

If you're "bright" how come you can't spell "the nobody" correctly?

for anyone browsing this thread and is a bit confused as to whats going on, heres the op's intent in his own words

Same post id #. Not plural. Singular.


You're welcome.

Also note that all who come with attack energy are forcing you to accept a position of "perfection". Neither of Which in title of thread or in post did you claim such position. So any implications of such are imaginary by those pushing that adjenda. By accepting their imagined position you place yourself as such when that was never stated as a position.




You stated, you were here to teach and learn.

How could the OP be wrong when your question implies "figuring, in process of calculating, discovery.. etc. Etc.

Is that not what he is doing?

Your answer conflicts with your signature. With the statement "wrong" followed by exclamation it presents dominance of ego. But the bottom line of your post is "love all".

Where is "love all" in your post??

0

In fact your signiture says "do wrong to none"

Yet the word you chose to present to the OP says the opposite.

I definitely can believe this...my grandaughter is only 1 week old and she is doing things I have never seen before...truely amazed!

I definitely can believe this...my grandaughter is only 1 week old and she is doing things I have never seen before...truely amazed!

OP, do you use deodorant?

I'm surprised he got it wrong since he has self proclaimed himself to be 'incredibly bright' hence my use of an exclamation mark, so does the use of exclamation marks exclusively point to ego?! furthermore how is having ego in conflict with love all? Quasi psychological categorisation benefits no one, and 'marking me' with a zero '0' as you have just done conveys that you are indeed judging me, a demonstration of your ego, thus making yourself a hypocrite in seeking to repremand myself.

The universe can essentially be boiled down to vibrations as experiences are subjective not objective.

Disagreeing with a viewpoint held by someone is not 'doing wrong to them' it is challenging and engaging them in a reasonable debate in order to work through both our views in order to arrive at the correct one.

Holding the contrary view as you are pertaining to now therefore implies that you are doing wrong to me as you are challenging and disagreeing with me.

However, taking a rational view I understand the point you are making, it is always important to distinguish differing opinions with personal criticism.

I'm glad you noticed the quote though.

haters gonna hate, fine by me

I'm not trying to be mean, just trying to articulate where I'm coming from!




always laugh at that pic above!

thats fine athene, im the op. my thread title says ask me a question, so your opinion (whether good or bad) was requested by me and i wont hold that against you.

here's some food for thought from another thread, seems quite applicable here...
"These people are guilty of leading young people into error. First of all, they elicit material needs in the young which they cannot satisfy, which not only leads to frustration, but to the desire to obtain dishonestly what they cannot obtain honestly. Then, by trying to convince them that they absolutely need these objects and activities in order to feel well and happy, they turn them away from the true search for happiness and the meaning of life. These people should not be surprised if one day they have to suffer from the criminal behaviour which they have helped to create and nurture"

you reap what you sow eventually i guess

hows it going open your eyes? i knew you were nicer than you let on

I'm glad we can agree to disagree OP, I suppose that's the mark of civility! I'm not sure what the quote pertains to however, a bit of a non sequitur but anyway, I say vibrations, I am referring to assertions also made by the Rosicrucian. A popular cable website has the information.

No incredibly bright young person would come to GLP for questions...