NEW ARMY MANUAL ORDERS SOLDIERS NOT TO CRITICIZE TALIBAN, PEDOPHILIA, "ANYTHING RELATED TO ISLAM" OR ADVOCATE FOR WOMEN'S RIGHTS

It was Hillary Clinton who pissed them off by saying women had to work on the goddamn thing.

If we're over there (where indeed we don't belong) we should speak truth to our own troops.

If we cannot do that, we must just get out. Should get out anyway.

What about the Afghan government troops who kill ours intentionally? Is it forbidden for our surviving troops to talk about that too?

Is it now forbidden to order the people to go against their Muslim traditions, like having women out working on a pipeline?

That would be too good to be true. Then we could actually just leave and let them live their own lives.

But it's probably not. We'll be attacking their way of life, while forbidding our troops to make any criticism of it.

Actually....soldiers dont have these rights in full...

Gi rights: [link to nlgmltf.org]

"YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SAY (MOSTLY) WHAT YOU THINK, ORALLY AND IN WRITING.

But there are some limits here, too. You can't say things that encourage violence or urge others to violate the regulations, you can't communicate with "the enemy" by writing letters to Iraqi officials or soldiers, and you can't call the President, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, or a few other high government officials what article 88 of the UCMJ calls "contemptuous words." Service people have gotten into trouble for using "fascist," "thief," murderer," "tyrant," "fool," and "gangster" in relation to such people (but officers didn't get in trouble for saying things like that about President Clinton). Article 88 says it only applies to an officer but if they really want to go after an enlisted person for saying these things they'd probably try to use the catchall, art. 134's "to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, or conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces."

Art. 117 of the UCMJ outlaws saying ugly things about people, but that's so broad it's probably unconstitutional unless used against really super awful statements. You're in more substantial danger if you say things that could make GI's desert, disobey lawful orders, or refuse to do their jobs.

You can, subject to all of these limitations, write, publish, and distribute things like newspapers, leaflets, and web pages. You can write letters to the editor as long as they're not part of an organized letter campaign for a political candidate or party (the Army deals with electoral political activity in its Regulation 600-20 Appendix B). It all has to be while you're off duty and without using military paper, ink, computers, phones, or other supplies or equipment.

You can put a bumper sticker on your car. Yard signs off base are governed by the same rules as other writings (unless it's displayed by a civilian resident and so gets the benefit of civilian free speech rules); in base housing they're iffy, subject to local orders, and probably with more leeway for those on issues ("No War") than for politicians (Vote for Bush").

And, of course, you can't say or imply that you are speaking on behalf of the military. Civilian spouses and children are just that-civilians. Off base, they aren't governed by the military's limitations. For on base activity, the command can issue orders that take away their right of expression almost the same as service members."

So now we see a reason why Gen. Allen is being attacked by Obama.

Maybe all the coup stories, nuclear attack on the US stories, etc. are just bullshit to protect Obama's purge of officers that insist on protecting their subordinates and won't go for his stupid destructive policies.

.


Do US sodomite troops stay in the closet ?



.

yup,it's in the manual. can't talk about who killed our soldiers. it's going to be too PC.

"PVT Smith was accidentally killed by walking into a bullet that was being fired from a person of interest. No information on the person of interest may disclosed due to national security. But if you want, here's all the information on PVT Smith.

Was watching hardball last night, and Mathews and their 3 guests brought out the fact that West and Bachman both said there are 75 or so communists in the White house and the 3 hosts started to laugh, but one of the guest was from mother jones website, a known communist hang out

My head will be missing before i fall on my knees before them fucks!

Are we pointing at the same thing?

Islam: Human – 5 Pillars – God
Christian: Human – Cross of Jesus – God
Jew: Human – Torah – God

Why don’t we just keep it simple: Human--God

Please no more fighting.

Fuck that

Fuck Islam

The first link shows a pic of a women being shot

The bullet just passed through her brain and hit the ground in front of her... look at it... you can see it...

You can see the dude walking in the foreground turn back and look cos he heard the shot


I'm sick of all this butt fucking Obummer is letting the Muslims do to him.

This makes me want to vomit fire

I'm with Brief

Just nuke the Middle East

Turn that whole area into glass

Nothing but heart ache and war await in the deserts of that shit hole region

Last Edited by Dr. Acula on 12/13/2012 03:04 PM

No labelling me, you prick - both sides are brain dead if u ask me. Only 2 choices out of a plethora of options? How dumb is that concept? I know stupid when I read it, and your post was STUPID. Either revise it or stfu.

It’s the tone and tint of the manual that offends. The Army of yesteryear would never feel it necessary to beg for an enemy’s mercy or cultural indulgence. Ike did not caution Americans not to speak ill of the Nazis on the eve of D-Day lest they abuse his soldiers. FDR did not describe the beheading of American pilots by the Japanese in 1942 as “workplace violence” lest he offend the men of Nippon. Ike and FDR counted on soldiers and Marines to be big enough to take care of themselves.



[link to www.washingtontimes.com]