The turning point of the largest brainwashing experiment in American history.

That's why he's got the salespeople on overtime, keep the brandname on the front page.

“America was born on guns and whiskey,” he said. “It’s true we are a violent society.

When Morgan managed to work in a question like, “How many gun murders were there in Britain?” Jones answered, “How many great white sharks kill people and yet they’re afraid to swim?”

Alex got his ass handed to him.

It doesn't matter if we know Alex's overall message is correct.

^^^^^THIS^^^^^

^^^AND THIS^^^

^^^^And finally this^^^^

controlled opposition

Be on your own side, not what the TV people set up for you. The only people that matter are not the TV people, it's what is in your physical area...what is real. They are not real - just actors.

Alex's handlers want him to discredit what is real by acting crazy, stupid and dangerous.

And I have thoughtfully considered and watched ** as well. Have some discernment. If you are going to go out in front of million of people with a message, carefully think about what you will say and how you will say it to be persuasive. I have a brother who is a judge. I see how measured his responses have been in life. He thinks very carefully before he replies to everything. He is not a mason. He is a christian. ** does not make any effort at all to reach people. He just blathers. Why is that...because it's intentional. IT'S ACTING. Wise up those who listen to that man. Don't rely on "a voice" to follow. Follow yourself.

Far different situation. Put the judge up against some professional talking head on his ground and see how the judge does.

If by some miracle these anchors launched a quest for truth, the whole scene would devolve into uncertainty and even chaos.

“There was a man in the woods. You people chased him. You pinned him down and brought him back into town. Who is he? What’s his name? Where is he? Is he under questioning? What are you asking him? What gave you a clue that he might be a second shooter? Come on. Talk to us. People want to know. We aren’t going anywhere. We want some answers.”

This is called reporting, a foreign enterprise to these blown-dried kings and queens of media news.

“Sir, I know ABC definitively reported there was a second shooter. They said you gave them that information. Where did you get it?…No, I’m sorry, that’s not an answer, that’s a non-sequitur.”

Those of us reporting online declare there is something amiss when the second-shooter story is dropped like a hot potato…and we are called conspiracy theorists.

Get it? Trying to ask relevant questions becomes conspiracy only because the major media didn’t do their job in the first place.

“Sir, was it one gun found in trunk of the car or three? Show me the car. Yes. Let’s see it. I want to get the license plate. Excuse me? The car is what, some kind of state secret? I don’t think so. There are twenty dead children in that school over there, and we want to get to the bottom of this. Take me to the car.”

It’s called an investigation. Reporters do that.

“Sir, your newspaper ran a story about a man’s body being found in Adam’s brother’s apartment. Then that became Adam’s mother found dead in her own house here in Newtown. What exactly happened there? A mistake? Wouldn’t you say that was a pretty big mistake? How did it happen? What’s that? Typical confusion in the early reporting of a crime? I don’t think so. Thinking a woman was a man and thinking he or she was found in New Jersey instead of Connecticut, that’s not typical at all. Did police find a man’s body. Speak up.”

Your typical American television viewer would cringe at such demanding questions. You know why? Because he has been conditioned by news anchors to refrain from digging below the surface. In other words, that viewer is hypnotized.

Newtown is presented as a television event. From the outset, the mood is funereal. It has that tinge and coloration. The audience absorbs it and wants no intrusion on it.

The anchor is not only the priest, but also the teacher. He/she shows the audience how to experience the event and what to feel and what to think and how to act.

Entrainment also makes the recipient feel he is part of something larger. This is a key component. The recipient senses he is a member of a collective that is sharing a moment, an experience.

“I feel this way, and everybody else does too.”

Events like Newtown are extraordinary teaching moments for television. Network newscasts display a constellation of emotions that are deemed “acceptable and appropriate” for the audience to experience. And the audience is thereby trained to mirror those emotions, to feel them, to express them, to soak in them.

It’s a closed system.

This is how, incidentally, gun control works so well. It’s part of the overall message. The audience, existing inside that closed system, in that state of mass hypnosis, can be pointed to exactly the wrong remedy for the tragedy.

All the network anchor has to do is frown and shake his head a little, when the subject of guns arises. That’s all it takes, and the brains of the audience suck it in:

“Yes, of course. Take away the guns. If no one had guns, no one could shoot guns. No one would die. No crimes would be committed. How obvious.”

[link to questionall.tumblr.com]

On top of everything else I've covered... Why didn't Alex mention deliver any kind of message along these concepts?

“America was born on guns and whiskey,” he said. “It’s true we are a violent society.

When Morgan managed to work in a question like, “How many gun murders were there in Britain?” Jones answered, “How many great white sharks kill people and yet they’re afraid to swim?”

If I was Alex I would have memorized these lines and explained calmly...

"Official crime figures show the UK also has a worse rate for all types of violence than the U.S. and even South Africa - widely considered one of the world's most dangerous countries."

"In the UK, there are 2,034 offences per 100,000 people, way ahead of second-placed Austria with a rate of 1,677. The U.S. has a violence rate of 466 crimes per 100,000 residents."

"Switzerland has a gun homicide rate of 0.5 per 100,000 and the UK has a murder rate of 1.49 per 100,000. They also boast the highest violent crime rate in Europe at 2.0 per 100,000. That is 3 times the violent crime rate in America."

Alex failed to even make an attempt to debate Morgan with evidence we all know is available everywhere. There were very easy arguments to make if he wanted to defeat the flawed thoughts Morgan kept repeating to his to-be brainwashed audience of sheeple.

Why did Alex challenge Morgan to a fight?

Why mock his accent when the overall goal is to get the sheeple to listen to you and me because we're smarter than they are(that's how most sheeple take it when we try to confront them about 9/11)

Alex acted like a toddler and of course, no one wants toddlers to play with semi-assault weapons...

for more eyes

Shall we compare Switzerland 2012 to the United States 2012 because both countries have lots of guns owned by citizens?

0.7 homicides per 100,000 in Switzerland.
4.8 homicides per 100,000 in the United States.

Switzerland even has less homicides than the UK!

Alex should have taken the passion of the sheeple away from Morgan by demanding the media stop ignoring the only solution that satisfied both sides because he is SICK AND TIRED OF SEEING CHILDREN MURDERED IN THE COUNTRY HE LOVES! (that is when he can start yelling and should be passionate)

Switzerland is doing it right when it comes to gun safety.

100,000 views later on the single YouTube video I stated the thread with---

MrDeppness 1 minute ago
This is why people think Alex is crazy and won't listen to him. He doesn't know how to communicate anything without losing it. His diplomacy skills could not be worse if he had Aspergers. All that he did was shout at Piers the whole time and looked like such a dick. Alex, you are hurting our cause by your psychotic behavior. You are weakening the movement and making us look like a joke.

Look, ANYTHING which gets the population's attention off Dancing With the Stars and onto our real problems can only help!

Jesse is trying to wake people up.

Alex is not.

I hate the production of Jesse's show on TruTV with a passion but ffs he doesn't sound like a crazed lunatic. Sometimes I wonder if he had to agree to the shitty production in order to be on Cable TV.

Conspiracy Theory has been taken off TV.

At this point--

Alex is just helping the brainwashing of the sheeple because they are THAT BRAINWASHED.

"Remember, Alinsky when he wrote that ridicule is the most potent weapon, and there is no defense because it's irrational and infuriating. Trust me when I tell you that you are going to get hit hard and called crazy, this time with much greater intensity. Expect it the closer we get to the end game." DHS Insider

Everyone in that room had a life-changing event.

Jesse Ventura is very impressive.

The difference should be obvious to everyone.

I don't like that he says he is an atheist. Not because it matters to me personally but because it gives the TPTB-controlled conspiracy cults an easy target to scare the sheeple with antichrist prophecies except this time the MSM will teamup with what our strange breed of awakened thinkers has come to learn as home on the infinity of the Internet.

but only if Ventura/Paul run for president in 2016 and either earn the Republican Nomination or are giving equal debating time as a 3rd party.


Simple requests that no one has a logical answer for...

WHY NOT?

Divide and Conquer...seems to be working out

If "deranged killers on psychotropic drugs" don't have easy access to guns, fewer people/kids get killed.

No. Morgan intended no such thing . . . he said it today, give someone enough rough and . . . just what the fat guy did!

You seem mighty jealous of progressive thinking . . . evidently, you don't even know what it means.

From the DHS Insider August 28th, 2012

Before Superstorm Sandy and Sandy Hook.

“It’s going hot. The plan, or whatever specific operation that was devised, is going hot, being put into motion. You’ve got to let people know that something is up, approval has been given, and unless somebody stops it, we’re going to have a staged event inside the U.S., and it’s being set up so that it gets real ugly real fast.” Obviously, I asked for clarification and more details.

“Look, I’ll tell you everything I know, what I’ve heard and seen, and some of what I’ve been told, but you’ve got to get this public. Even then, I’m not sure we know enough about the specific operational details, have enough time, or have the ability to overcome the characterizations of lunacy they’re going to throw at you, at us, for even talking about this. I’ve heard you talk about the ‘normalcy bias’ of most Americans, and that’s part of what we’re fighting. Look at what they did to you and the content of last information I gave to you. It was like that pass a secret game in first grade, you know, where one student whispers something in the ear of the kid next to him and it’s passed around the room until it gets to the last student. By that time, it’s nothing like the original ‘secret.’ It’s the lesson kids learn about spreading gossip. There was some state representative from Tennessee that sent out a mass e-mail of a screwed up version of what you wrote and then later retracted it,” he stated.

I reminded him that it was Tennessee State Representative Kelly Keisling who sent an e-mail to his constituents based on what amounted to third-hand information he read on the Internet. It centered around an alleged fake assassination attempt, something I never wrote, I told him. “Yes, that’s it. Didn’t you find the timing of that odd? I mean, the information I gave you was back in late April. When did Keisling send that e-mail and then make his very public retraction? Two or three weeks ago? Give me a break. They wanted to discredit you and anyone who makes public their intentions as bad as they want to know where the leaks are coming from,” he stated. “Believe me when I tell you they are desperate on a number of levels.”

My source continued: “Don’t think for one second that the sudden resurrection of the information, as incorrect as it was by that state rep, was an accident, because it wasn’t,” he replied. “Maybe the rep was played and clueless to the original story, but the way the story was managed after the fact made you look like a fool, like a real nutcase,” he said. I thanked him for the reminder.

“That’s their playbook,” he emphasized. “[Glenn] Beck, you on CFP, your show and others who talk about Alinksy tactics are right. Remember, Alinsky when he wrote that ridicule is the most potent weapon, and there is no defense because it irrational and infuriating. Trust me when I tell you that you are going to get hit hard and called crazy, this time with much greater intensity. Expect it the closer we get to the end game. But, pay attention to who is exploiting the false rumors, and you’ll get an idea who is behind the larger agenda,” he added.

“Okay, from what I’ve been able to learn, there have been a couple different plans or scenarios developed, ready to be implemented at a moment’s notice, but each are distinctly different in nature and timing.” stated my source. “This is done for a few reasons. Look how the weather changed the plans for [Vice-President Joe] Biden’s visit to Tampa. That’s just one example. They’ve got contingencies. They are watching the poll numbers. They are closely monitoring public sentiment. But the objective of the plan is that they want to portray Obama as a victim of racist hatred by the white gun owners, the people concerned about the Constitution, the people they consider fringe. They want to silence their critics, prove that talk show hosts are causing hatred, and that all gun owners are behind the recent shootings. That’s at the heart of the plan.

In what’s become the clip heard ‘round the world, Jones, who started the White House petition (now with over 100,000 signatures) to have Morgan sent back to England, joined him for what could politely be called a “spirited conversation,” but which played more like the unhinged ramblings of an extremist.

- L.A. Times

On Tuesday morning, as the clip made its way around the Internet, Morgan spoke to Politico about Jones’ appearance on the show, describing it as “undignified, unedifying” and “the best advertisement for gun control you could wish for.

- L.A. Times