| Users Online Now: 2,315 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,854,374 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,567,947 | Threads Today: 626 | Posts Today: 11,920 |
| 07:45 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,315 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,854,374 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,567,947 | Threads Today: 626 | Posts Today: 11,920 |
| 07:45 PM | ||
VIDEO: Lous obnoxious black woman tazed by store security guard - hilarity ensues | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33175464  France01/29/2013 01:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33175464 sure she attacked at the end, but he had no right in filming them and building the drama on public property. thats not very good security work, he was working. he could have simply diffused the situation and walking back inside to call the police, since they were on the sidewalk, which is the citys responsibility. but he didnt really want it diffused did he? he had the camera rolling. I can guarantee if the security company is worth a damn, he will be fired. He has every right to film what ever he pleases. That is the freedom of America. Diffusing a situation by just walking away does not work when you are trying to guard a door. People always like to get the last word in and if you do not guard that door the chance they will come back in is 100% higher. She attacked... he defended case closed. How an you defend such an act. It just sounds like you are making excuses. defending the door? lol prove that one bro. the guy should get fired, period. That's what security guards do when they throw people out.  Ive owned several nigh clubs, Ive had to deal with much worse then that shit with my security teams. trust me, besides whether or not you like the ebonics and temper tantrum, I would toss that guard off my team so fast his head would spin. you think that was irrational? try some 21 year old rich yuppie kids after a long night of drinking, who cant comprehend how "they" would ever be thrown out and how bad their daddys are gonna sue. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33175464 France01/29/2013 01:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | if a group of people were outside my place of business causing trouble, yelling, loitering, obstructing entry for my customers, then i have a right to put a stop to it. plain and simple. whether its with security personnel or the po-po Quoting: Salt you do not have the right to assualt someone, unless you are defending yourself. my only point is the security officer did not diffuse the situation and instead agitated it. A lack of understanding here of the law. She assaulted him repeatedly with terroristic threats. That is Assault. Her threat to do bodily harm. All he said to the kids was "Hey!" Then when she bumped him she repeatedly committed battery. In fact he had every right to throw a right cross and lay her on the ground the moment she committed battery. You need to understand the law. He had as much right to the freedom of speech to yell "Hey" as she did to yell at him. He had as much right to be out on the street as she did. But what she did not have the right to do was to assault him. She got exactly what she deserved. I just spit up on my keyboard with that one. lol verbal assault? too funny |
Éireann  User ID: 12071797  United States01/29/2013 01:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Manhattan He has every right to film what ever he pleases. That is the freedom of America. Diffusing a situation by just walking away does not work when you are trying to guard a door. People always like to get the last word in and if you do not guard that door the chance they will come back in is 100% higher. She attacked... he defended case closed. How an you defend such an act. It just sounds like you are making excuses. defending the door? lol prove that one bro. the guy should get fired, period. That's what security guards do when they throw people out. Ive owned several nigh clubs, Ive had to deal with much worse then that shit with my security teams. trust me, besides whether or not you like the ebonics and temper tantrum, I would toss that guard off my team so fast his head would spin. you think that was irrational? try some 21 year old rich yuppie kids after a long night of drinking, who cant comprehend how "they" would ever be thrown out and how bad their daddys are gonna sue. You should have tasered those little shits. I don't care who it is. Acting like that in public isn't responsible, productive, warranted, nor should it be tolerated - period. Eireann~ I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20 |
| Dr. Manhattan User ID: 28822130 United States01/29/2013 01:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Manhattan He has every right to film what ever he pleases. That is the freedom of America. Diffusing a situation by just walking away does not work when you are trying to guard a door. People always like to get the last word in and if you do not guard that door the chance they will come back in is 100% higher. She attacked... he defended case closed. How an you defend such an act. It just sounds like you are making excuses. defending the door? lol prove that one bro. the guy should get fired, period. That's what security guards do when they throw people out. Ive owned several nigh clubs, Ive had to deal with much worse then that shit with my security teams. trust me, besides whether or not you like the ebonics and temper tantrum, I would toss that guard off my team so fast his head would spin. you think that was irrational? try some 21 year old rich yuppie kids after a long night of drinking, who cant comprehend how "they" would ever be thrown out and how bad their daddys are gonna sue. This is not a nightclub with 350 lbs bouncers and rich spoiled kids. Even in that situation, that's pretty shitty that your security team gets dismissed from their job for defending themselves. The spoiled kids rich daddy suing is just another flaw in the court systems these days, which cost you money. He can't win, because your guard would justified in defending himself, but it would cost you money/time. Something seriously wrong with that. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23755430 United States01/29/2013 01:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: sonic doom Yeah the guard was in the right on that. He warned them over and over to back up and get out of the shop. Once should of been enough. they were on the street and out of the shop. the nazi security guard provoked further confrontation. "NAZI"? You Lose. It is a well known debate rule that when your argument turns to the Third Reich for Comparison you have lost the argument and it is time to give up. why did the security guard follow them out of the building onto the street with a camera if not to provoke an obvious hostile group? they left the store and were on public property, were they had every right to call the guy a fag or whatever they wanted to call him. ever heard of freedom of speech? he had plenty of opportunity to leave and did so a couple of times, only to return back to keep the drama going. Im sorry your a stupid fag yourself. Are you REALLY this stupid??? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33175464 France01/29/2013 01:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33175464 defending the door? lol prove that one bro. the guy should get fired, period. That's what security guards do when they throw people out. Ive owned several nigh clubs, Ive had to deal with much worse then that shit with my security teams. trust me, besides whether or not you like the ebonics and temper tantrum, I would toss that guard off my team so fast his head would spin. you think that was irrational? try some 21 year old rich yuppie kids after a long night of drinking, who cant comprehend how "they" would ever be thrown out and how bad their daddys are gonna sue. This is not a nightclub with 350 lbs bouncers and rich spoiled kids. Even in that situation, that's pretty shitty that your security team gets dismissed from their job for defending themselves. The spoiled kids rich daddy suing is just another flaw in the court systems these days, which cost you money. He can't win, because your guard would justified in defending himself, but it would cost you money/time. Something seriously wrong with that. we handle situations and we do so properly, it isnt about ego, the job is for the facility and the business not to submit for internet fame. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33076850  Australia01/29/2013 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| IRQ_1 User ID: 24600584 United States01/29/2013 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33175464 you do not have the right to assualt someone, unless you are defending yourself. my only point is the security officer did not diffuse the situation and instead agitated it. you are more than a little confused, or completely deluded. not sure which you are getting to caught up in your bias against the people, their appearance and choice of language. seperate all that out and ask, was the security officer not taking advantage of a situation for his video camera? did he not post it to the site, known for that kind of footage? or was he concerned with diffusing the situation for the protection of the store and the customers? the answer is clear. i dont see one shred of evidence that the security guard was taking advantage of the situation. that is bias on YOUR part. security officers SHOULD video tape things like this. the woman assaulted him, he defended himself, period end of sentence. how you could defend that behavior is incomprehensible. and, that these women could behave that way in front of their children.... unfuckingbelievable. i am an italian american. anybody of any race acting that way, my opinion would be the same. I agree with you. He was only backing up the reality and frustration of his job (as well as a legal defense) with that video. Jack of all trades master of none "shall not be infringed." BLUE RIBBON AWARNESS FOR MENS' HEALTH Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. --ISAAC ASIMOV I never 'Ad hominem' I don't need to. The Constitution means everything or nothing. You can't have both. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 13600966 United States01/29/2013 01:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| TidesofTruth User ID: 1838356 United States01/29/2013 01:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | if a group of people were outside my place of business causing trouble, yelling, loitering, obstructing entry for my customers, then i have a right to put a stop to it. plain and simple. whether its with security personnel or the po-po Quoting: Salt you do not have the right to assualt someone, unless you are defending yourself. my only point is the security officer did not diffuse the situation and instead agitated it. A lack of understanding here of the law. She assaulted him repeatedly with terroristic threats. That is Assault. Her threat to do bodily harm. All he said to the kids was "Hey!" Then when she bumped him she repeatedly committed battery. In fact he had every right to throw a right cross and lay her on the ground the moment she committed battery. You need to understand the law. He had as much right to the freedom of speech to yell "Hey" as she did to yell at him. He had as much right to be out on the street as she did. But what she did not have the right to do was to assault him. She got exactly what she deserved. I just spit up on my keyboard with that one. lol verbal assault? too funny Wow you are ignorant! In law, assault is a crime that involves causing a victim to apprehend violence. The term is often confused with battery, which involves physical contact. The specific meaning of assault varies between countries, but can refer to an act that causes another to apprehend immediate and personal violence, or in the more limited sense of a threat of violence caused by an immediate show of force.[1][2] Assault in some US jurisdictions[which?] is defined more broadly still as any intentional physical contact with another person without their consent; but in the majority of the United States, and in England and Wales and all other common law jurisdictions in the world, this is defined instead as battery. Some jurisdictions have incorporated the definition of civil assault into the definition of the crime making it a criminal assault to intentionally cause another person to apprehend a harmful or offensive contact. You might as well just quit writing because with each line you just show you are unlearned at best and a complete fool. |
| Dr. Manhattan User ID: 28822130 United States01/29/2013 01:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ive owned several nigh clubs, Ive had to deal with much worse then that shit with my security teams. trust me, besides whether or not you like the ebonics and temper tantrum, I would toss that guard off my team so fast his head would spin. you think that was irrational? try some 21 year old rich yuppie kids after a long night of drinking, who cant comprehend how "they" would ever be thrown out and how bad their daddys are gonna sue. This is not a nightclub with 350 lbs bouncers and rich spoiled kids. Even in that situation, that's pretty shitty that your security team gets dismissed from their job for defending themselves. The spoiled kids rich daddy suing is just another flaw in the court systems these days, which cost you money. He can't win, because your guard would justified in defending himself, but it would cost you money/time. Something seriously wrong with that. we handle situations and we do so properly, it isnt about ego, the job is for the facility and the business not to submit for internet fame. Does it effect business negatively? If not, then I see no issue with posting the video. I would not fire someone from my own business unless it negatively impacted my business. Then you enhance your rules and protocols for what ever caused the negative impact. That's me though. If it effected the business negatively I can see where firing the employee would be a good solution. That is up to the owner to decide, not for us. Legally the man had every right to do what he did, but from the owners point of view he may have handled procedures incorrectly. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33175464 France01/29/2013 01:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33175464 you do not have the right to assualt someone, unless you are defending yourself. my only point is the security officer did not diffuse the situation and instead agitated it. A lack of understanding here of the law. She assaulted him repeatedly with terroristic threats. That is Assault. Her threat to do bodily harm. All he said to the kids was "Hey!" Then when she bumped him she repeatedly committed battery. In fact he had every right to throw a right cross and lay her on the ground the moment she committed battery. You need to understand the law. He had as much right to the freedom of speech to yell "Hey" as she did to yell at him. He had as much right to be out on the street as she did. But what she did not have the right to do was to assault him. She got exactly what she deserved. I just spit up on my keyboard with that one. lol verbal assault? too funny Wow you are ignorant! In law, assault is a crime that involves causing a victim to apprehend violence. The term is often confused with battery, which involves physical contact. The specific meaning of assault varies between countries, but can refer to an act that causes another to apprehend immediate and personal violence, or in the more limited sense of a threat of violence caused by an immediate show of force.[1][2] Assault in some US jurisdictions[which?] is defined more broadly still as any intentional physical contact with another person without their consent; but in the majority of the United States, and in England and Wales and all other common law jurisdictions in the world, this is defined instead as battery. Some jurisdictions have incorporated the definition of civil assault into the definition of the crime making it a criminal assault to intentionally cause another person to apprehend a harmful or offensive contact. You might as well just quit writing because with each line you just show you are unlearned at best and a complete fool. do you know which ones? you may wanna look that up too  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33175464 France01/29/2013 02:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33175464 Ive owned several nigh clubs, Ive had to deal with much worse then that shit with my security teams. trust me, besides whether or not you like the ebonics and temper tantrum, I would toss that guard off my team so fast his head would spin. you think that was irrational? try some 21 year old rich yuppie kids after a long night of drinking, who cant comprehend how "they" would ever be thrown out and how bad their daddys are gonna sue. This is not a nightclub with 350 lbs bouncers and rich spoiled kids. Even in that situation, that's pretty shitty that your security team gets dismissed from their job for defending themselves. The spoiled kids rich daddy suing is just another flaw in the court systems these days, which cost you money. He can't win, because your guard would justified in defending himself, but it would cost you money/time. Something seriously wrong with that. we handle situations and we do so properly, it isnt about ego, the job is for the facility and the business not to submit for internet fame. Does it effect business negatively? If not, then I see no issue with posting the video. I would not fire someone from my own business unless it negatively impacted my business. Then you enhance your rules and protocols for what ever caused the negative impact. That's me though. If it effected the business negatively I can see where firing the employee would be a good solution. That is up to the owner to decide, not for us. Legally the man had every right to do what he did, but from the owners point of view he may have handled procedures incorrectly. the mere fact that the guard was laughing and filming and subsequently submitted the film to that site, tells me the guard was taking advantage of the situation for himself and not the business or the well-being of others. I will be shocked if he is not fired and the owner offers a apology to the community. |
| TidesofTruth User ID: 1838356 United States01/29/2013 02:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: TidesofTruth A lack of understanding here of the law. She assaulted him repeatedly with terroristic threats. That is Assault. Her threat to do bodily harm. All he said to the kids was "Hey!" Then when she bumped him she repeatedly committed battery. In fact he had every right to throw a right cross and lay her on the ground the moment she committed battery. You need to understand the law. He had as much right to the freedom of speech to yell "Hey" as she did to yell at him. He had as much right to be out on the street as she did. But what she did not have the right to do was to assault him. She got exactly what she deserved. I just spit up on my keyboard with that one. lol verbal assault? too funny Wow you are ignorant! In law, assault is a crime that involves causing a victim to apprehend violence. The term is often confused with battery, which involves physical contact. The specific meaning of assault varies between countries, but can refer to an act that causes another to apprehend immediate and personal violence, or in the more limited sense of a threat of violence caused by an immediate show of force.[1][2] Assault in some US jurisdictions[which?] is defined more broadly still as any intentional physical contact with another person without their consent; but in the majority of the United States, and in England and Wales and all other common law jurisdictions in the world, this is defined instead as battery. Some jurisdictions have incorporated the definition of civil assault into the definition of the crime making it a criminal assault to intentionally cause another person to apprehend a harmful or offensive contact. You might as well just quit writing because with each line you just show you are unlearned at best and a complete fool. do you know which ones? you may wanna look that up too Like I stated, you should just quit. Every single line you write just gets more ignorant. What in "the majority of the United States" is beyond your comprehension. Yes that goes for Georgia also: [link to law.justia.com] Now just please stop with your foolishness. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33175464 France01/29/2013 02:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33175464 I just spit up on my keyboard with that one. lol verbal assault? too funny Wow you are ignorant! In law, assault is a crime that involves causing a victim to apprehend violence. The term is often confused with battery, which involves physical contact. The specific meaning of assault varies between countries, but can refer to an act that causes another to apprehend immediate and personal violence, or in the more limited sense of a threat of violence caused by an immediate show of force.[1][2] Assault in some US jurisdictions[which?] is defined more broadly still as any intentional physical contact with another person without their consent; but in the majority of the United States, and in England and Wales and all other common law jurisdictions in the world, this is defined instead as battery. Some jurisdictions have incorporated the definition of civil assault into the definition of the crime making it a criminal assault to intentionally cause another person to apprehend a harmful or offensive contact. You might as well just quit writing because with each line you just show you are unlearned at best and a complete fool. do you know which ones? you may wanna look that up too Like I stated, you should just quit. Every single line you write just gets more ignorant. What in "the majority of the United States" is beyond your comprehension. Yes that goes for Georgia also: [link to law.justia.com] Now just please stop with your foolishness. didnt see verbal assault in there.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 14953663 Australia01/29/2013 02:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thank You,Easy,Cancelled. Quoting: Rachael123 ... Quoting: Evil_Twin Click on 'Your Profile' in the upper left portion of the screen, then scroll to the bottom of the page and click 'Cancel Subscription'. Easy peasy. You canceled your account because someone posted a video of a crazed negroid woman who got tazed after her and her friend physically threatened a security officer? Some people, like Rachael123, can't deal with reality...reality pokes all kinds of holes in their fantasy bubble. It's now officially racist (a word no one with a brain that works gives a shit about any more) to show videos, quote statistics, or say anything that could be construed as potentially derogatory against anyone other than whites Let her go. Sheep like her won't be missed ^^this^^ |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33249125 United States01/29/2013 02:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Useless Cookie Eater Interesting how that escalated from nothing. That black guy shows clearly why there will NEVER be true peace between blacks and whites. He thinks society and the white man owes him something. Sick. maybe he things you may be owing something to his entire RACE for bringing them from africa and working them to death as slaves for centuries. or maybe he may be thinking that you owe them something for implementing the biggest imprisonment program against the minorities through the sociopathic fucks you voted for (like reagan) so that the prisons would be overflowing with them for pathetically ridiculous crimes, paid by your taxpayer money. just a hunch. if you dont want a shitty world, dont vote for sociopathic fucks. I do not see the logic. Why would this poster owe this man on a bus in Florida and his "race" for something some rich immoral guy did 200 years ago? Why would this poster owe "them" some thing for a fraudulent police state's actions? simple. because ENTIRE country, its riches, advancement and history was built on that SLAVE LABOR. while you are still enjoying the country which was built with the wealth which was generated through investments with the money from slave labor, you dont have the right to say shit. You are full of shit. Almost all Blacks were field labourers, they picked cotton and did simple, no brain, "work". The problem was that their cash value was far higher than their intrinsic worth. My family had slaves, for dangerous or complex work we hired Whites to do the projects. Blacks would either screw it up or get hurt, then they were totally useless but you had to feed and house them for the rest of their lives. |
| antaya habraham User ID: 30925262 United States01/29/2013 05:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Useless Cookie Eater Interesting how that escalated from nothing. That black guy shows clearly why there will NEVER be true peace between blacks and whites. He thinks society and the white man owes him something. Sick. maybe he things you may be owing something to his entire RACE for bringing them from africa and working them to death as slaves for centuries. or maybe he may be thinking that you owe them something for implementing the biggest imprisonment program against the minorities through the sociopathic fucks you voted for (like reagan) so that the prisons would be overflowing with them for pathetically ridiculous crimes, paid by your taxpayer money. just a hunch. if you dont want a shitty world, dont vote for sociopathic fucks. I do not see the logic. Why would this poster owe this man on a bus in Florida and his "race" for something some rich immoral guy did 200 years ago? Why would this poster owe "them" some thing for a fraudulent police state's actions? simple. because ENTIRE country, its riches, advancement and history was built on that SLAVE LABOR. while you are still enjoying the country which was built with the wealth which was generated through investments with the money from slave labor, you dont have the right to say shit. ^^^^^ "...still enjoying...country which was built...from slave labor..." WRONG. Beginning in the 1500s MY 'ancestral families' ON BOTH my MOTHER and FATHER'S SIDES, "built:" NOVA SCOTIA, NEW BRUNSWICK, QUEBEC, MONTREAL, TROIS RIVIERES, MAINE, BOSTON...PLATTSBURG, BURLINGTON, DARBY, BEEBE, LEBANON, SYRACUSE, ROCHESTER...EVERY TOWN...EVERY VILLAGE...EVERY FARM...EVERY INDUSTRY...EVERY COMMERCE...EVERY ROAD...EVERY GARMENT DISTRICT...EVERY MILL...EVERY GRAINERY...EVERY MARKET...EVERY APPAREL STORE... EVERY SCHOOL...EVERY COLLEGE...EVERY HOSPITAL...EVERY LODGE...EVERY FACTORY...EVERY WAREHOUSE...EVERY RAILROAD...EVERY CHURCH...EVERY SYNOGOGUE...EVERY LAW OFFICE...EVERY COURTHOUSE...EVERY METROPOLIS...EVERY ART GALLERY...EVERY SKI RESORT...EVERY MANSION...EVERY SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF...EVERY MARINA...EVERY RESTAURANT... you name it...'WE' BUILT IT., with nan a black person in sight. In fact, MOST of the whole northeastern U.S. was BUILT BY these "founding" NATIONS. They intermarried mostly into their own families for the first SEVERAL HUNDRED YEARS...later they married into IRISH FAMILIES. They "intermarried" with the FIRST NATIONS . . . . . . . FROM DAY ONE . . . in the 1500s . . . These 'founding nations' I am speaking of, were: Sephardic- Hebrew/Portuguese/French Families There were NO BLACKS. STOP TELLING THAT BALD FACE LIE. MY PEOPLE 'BUILT IT.' AND they CONTINUED TO BUILD THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITHOUT 'BLACK SLAVE LABOR' clear across the St. Lawrence Seaway on BOTH the U.S. and CANADIAN SIDES OF THE BORDER. THERE WERE NO BLACKS. These robust, brave, smart, handsome and beautiful DARK TAN people with mostly (but not always) BLACK HAIR & BLUE & GREEN & AMBER & BROWN & HAZEL & LIGHT EYES, continued BUILDING THE WHOLE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE WESTWARDS ALL THE WAY TO THE PACIFIC OCEAN. The ONLY "SO CALLED" RACE OF 'COLOR' THEY INTERMARRIED WITH, WERE INDIANS. THERE WERE NO BLACKS INVOLVED IN ANY FORM SHAPE OR FASHION. After the SOUTHERN "SLAVES" were freed, and the so called 'underground railroad' movement began, MY ANCESTORS "HELPED" BLACK PEOPLE COME TO THE NORTH TO ESCAPE SLAVERY. My/These FOUNDING NATIONS = my 'family trees' includes: Levy, Habraham, Solomon, DeCosta, Gelinas, Berthomeu, DaSilva, Labarre, Lopez, Garcia Ezra, Barzilay, Provencal, Vizena, Moyse, Rodrigue, Barzillon, D'Aragon, D'Avignon DeLima, Saracen, LaRochelle, Leveseque, Pino, D'Arabi, Mohamet, Gabriel, Zecharie, Manuel, Benjamin, Jacobs, Eleazer, Eli, Gomes, Carcassone, Raphael, Simon, DeLeon (and many, many other 'old' Sephardic-French families) YOU ARE DISMISSED. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33162514  Canada01/29/2013 06:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 7465905 United States01/29/2013 06:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9107938 United States01/29/2013 08:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Atlanta is the shit hole of Georgia. If that place got nuked I wouldn't shed one tear. I can't even go down there without some black guy trying to tell me to park "right over hur cause itz free" so he can break into my car later. O and the amount of homeless black people who ask for my money is just ridiculous. Quoting: Dr. Manhattan I'm not racist, but every time I come out of Atlanta I become a racist. It was once a great city, wasn't it? I am not familiar with it, but that's what I have heard. Yes it once was a great city with great morals and hard working people. If you go out on the edges of the rural and suburb area you will find some of the nicest and hardworking people you will ever meet. They are forced to move out further and further as the disease spreads further. And as the disease spreads the area engulfed begins to looks like shit. I have seen this happen since I was a little kid and declare anyone who does not think it is race base to see what I have seen here in the suburbs of Georgia. Are there a lot of good black people who live in Georgia? Of course, but I can not help but watch as the black plague grows the area effected depreciates in quality. It's really sad. ^^ this ^^. See it myself where I live. Areas on the outskirts in Indianapolis 20 years ago were corn fields. Now they are subdivisions, restaurants, shopping centers. More and more the corn fields turn into communities as the white people have to move further out to get away from the ever growing jungle. |
| Citizenperth User ID: 33257404 Australia01/29/2013 08:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | she planked before shit hit the ground It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9107938 United States01/29/2013 08:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hmm, I still wonder to this day why Africa isn't the most prosperous nation on earth, I mean I understand the resources aren't all there but damn they were the first humans, wouldn't Africans of then built the most stuff by now? Quoting: Anonymous CowardNot being racist just a ponder I have. The culture hasnt moved in hundreds of thousands of years. That right there should tell you something. No one ever came along to hand them a better society. They just sit around starving to death waiting for someone to feed them, never understanding they have to feed themselves. Doesnt occur to them to be self reliant. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9107938 United States01/29/2013 08:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Citizenperth User ID: 33257404 Australia01/29/2013 08:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | that's sad, true and statistcally correct It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9107938 United States01/29/2013 08:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: sonic doom Yeah the guard was in the right on that. He warned them over and over to back up and get out of the shop. Once should of been enough. they were on the street and out of the shop. the nazi security guard provoked further confrontation. "NAZI"? You Lose. It is a well known debate rule that when your argument turns to the Third Reich for Comparison you have lost the argument and it is time to give up. why did the security guard follow them out of the building onto the street with a camera if not to provoke an obvious hostile group? they left the store and were on public property, were they had every right to call the guy a fag or whatever they wanted to call him. ever heard of freedom of speech? he had plenty of opportunity to leave and did so a couple of times, only to return back to keep the drama going. Im sorry your a stupid fag yourself. If you would pay attention you would have noticed the woman was tased while inside the store. He kept going back because they would not leave. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9107938 United States01/29/2013 08:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | if a group of people were outside my place of business causing trouble, yelling, loitering, obstructing entry for my customers, then i have a right to put a stop to it. plain and simple. whether its with security personnel or the po-po Quoting: Salt you do not have the right to assualt someone, unless you are defending yourself. my only point is the security officer did not diffuse the situation and instead agitated it. you are more than a little confused, or completely deluded. not sure which you are getting to caught up in your bias against the people, their appearance and choice of language. seperate all that out and ask, was the security officer not taking advantage of a situation for his video camera? did he not post it to the site, known for that kind of footage? or was he concerned with diffusing the situation for the protection of the store and the customers? the answer is clear. Perhaps he had issues similar to this in the past and felt the need to document the event this time. Perhaps he had been assaulted or accused of something. Stores use video cameras to record shoplifting and other actions. Perhaps the store did not have a video camera, probably stolen long ago. Perhaps he was instructed to record all incidents like this. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 4524052 United States01/29/2013 08:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The chest thrusting reminds me of the monkeys and apes you see in the zoo. Must be a inheirited behavior in that breed. Just a little short of flinging their own crap at passerbys. Not racist, watch the video, it's what I see. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 12814179  Austria01/29/2013 09:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27019763 maybe he things you may be owing something to his entire RACE for bringing them from africa and working them to death as slaves for centuries. or maybe he may be thinking that you owe them something for implementing the biggest imprisonment program against the minorities through the sociopathic fucks you voted for (like reagan) so that the prisons would be overflowing with them for pathetically ridiculous crimes, paid by your taxpayer money. just a hunch. if you dont want a shitty world, dont vote for sociopathic fucks. I do not see the logic. Why would this poster owe this man on a bus in Florida and his "race" for something some rich immoral guy did 200 years ago? Why would this poster owe "them" some thing for a fraudulent police state's actions? simple. because ENTIRE country, its riches, advancement and history was built on that SLAVE LABOR. while you are still enjoying the country which was built with the wealth which was generated through investments with the money from slave labor, you dont have the right to say shit. You're kidding, right? You do realize that blacks were a tiny portion of the population and rather isolated into argicultural areas where they did only the most unskilled labor? There were not enough of them to have made any difference and unless you consider picking cotton that essential, they had little to no bearing. It's hardly rocket science. And considering the work ethic, even that is questionable. Slavery was already on it's way out long before the Civil War as it was proving financially unfeasible. Cheaper to pay a wage per hour than incur cradle to grave upkeep. Shhhhhh. Blacks don't like facts. That they were less than 1% of the population back then doesn't matter. They build everything. They built the pyramids. Africa is a great advanced metropolis. The blacks are gods. Shhhhhh. Let's not confuse them with facts... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28720452  Germany01/29/2013 09:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
