Scientist confirms extinction event asteroid to hit earth | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35140855 United Kingdom 03/17/2013 12:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Something caused a universal time shift on Wednesday 13th March, something very extraordinary that must have a colossal mass to bend time. This could have been a super nova exploding or a black hole imploding, but the real problem is the shock wave that has yet to hit earth. My prediction is the wave will hit Tuesday over North America. Look for senates to be overseas on this day. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35140855 [link to oi48.tinypic.com] [link to www.haarp.alaska.edu] |
Raymond Brown (OP) User ID: 10917219 United Kingdom 03/17/2013 12:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28948108 United States 03/17/2013 12:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 03/17/2013 12:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | WOW! Would he have given it in that format to throw TPTB off of his posting? i.e. they arent tooking for "TLE's" so he could post it without it being sniffed out? And was he "showing" one that JUST missed then saying that the next one was a hit? No. His second one is even more fucked up than the first, to the point it's not even something you can parse. You people keep missing the point. It's fake, the orbit is ridiculous, there is not a population of near earth asteroids that have aphelion distances between Uranus and Neptune with eccentricities just below 1. He constructed it to hit earth (and got close, but no cigar when taking into account things like relativity and the gravity of the planets) which is why he simplified things by setting inclination to an arbitrary and low value (0.005000 - yeah right .005000 exactly) and the longitude of ascending node to 0 exactly. It was a way of simplifying so all he'd have to worry about was a 2 dimensional situation. A real orbit determination would have some sort of real value there for the LAN, even if inclination were small (and the odds of inclination being that nice round number?). The second set given are even more ridiculous, an epoch of what exactly? It's so screwed up that it looks like it's saying January 1st 2000, in which case the epoch is hell and gone from the supposed impact date. But ok, you want me to run those numbers too with the assumption that I should parse it like it's some super-secret spy code, I'll do it. Just a thought.... What if the epoch was changed to the mar 25 date. Am I sort of understanding this right? Does that change anything? Is that how it works? But that's not what it says, at all. I'm running an integration right now with it set to January 1st 2000, since that's the date it seems to indicate if you take it using the same logic used for the first set presented. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 03/17/2013 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Okay the reason we have waited before making the announcement is because we have at this very moment, a trained team in space ready to try and blow the object up. Quoting: Raymond Brown 10917219 We will know in the next hour if they have been succesfful. If not, an immediate television broadcast will be made You sir, are pathetic to the point that I actually feel sorry for you. Astro why feed the troll? Why bother? It's time for this.... I'm not even concerned about the OP troll at this point, I just feel kinda bad that somehow I managed to make someone else feel concerned due to my analysis so I'm trying to resolve that and make it right. |
Raymond Brown (OP) User ID: 10917219 United Kingdom 03/17/2013 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36157640 Canada 03/17/2013 12:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BadMoonRising User ID: 4583236 United Kingdom 03/17/2013 12:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28948108 United States 03/17/2013 12:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Call me any sort of ridicule name again.. and i leave this thread forever Quoting: Anonymous Coward Corky?I am fast as breaking point! Retard, cock gobbler, cockmonger, idiot, extra-chromosome cowboy, mother fucker, father fucker, stupid fuck, I could go on if you want. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23559912 United States 03/17/2013 12:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23559912 WOW! Would he have given it in that format to throw TPTB off of his posting? i.e. they arent tooking for "TLE's" so he could post it without it being sniffed out? And was he "showing" one that JUST missed then saying that the next one was a hit? No. His second one is even more fucked up than the first, to the point it's not even something you can parse. You people keep missing the point. It's fake, the orbit is ridiculous, there is not a population of near earth asteroids that have aphelion distances between Uranus and Neptune with eccentricities just below 1. He constructed it to hit earth (and got close, but no cigar when taking into account things like relativity and the gravity of the planets) which is why he simplified things by setting inclination to an arbitrary and low value (0.005000 - yeah right .005000 exactly) and the longitude of ascending node to 0 exactly. It was a way of simplifying so all he'd have to worry about was a 2 dimensional situation. A real orbit determination would have some sort of real value there for the LAN, even if inclination were small (and the odds of inclination being that nice round number?). The second set given are even more ridiculous, an epoch of what exactly? It's so screwed up that it looks like it's saying January 1st 2000, in which case the epoch is hell and gone from the supposed impact date. But ok, you want me to run those numbers too with the assumption that I should parse it like it's some super-secret spy code, I'll do it. Just a thought.... What if the epoch was changed to the mar 25 date. Am I sort of understanding this right? Does that change anything? Is that how it works? But that's not what it says, at all. I'm running an integration right now with it set to January 1st 2000, since that's the date it seems to indicate if you take it using the same logic used for the first set presented. Ah. Definitely waiting for it! Thx! |
Rabid Wolf User ID: 30909609 United States 03/17/2013 12:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36361832 United Kingdom 03/17/2013 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 03/17/2013 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 03/17/2013 12:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro No. His second one is even more fucked up than the first, to the point it's not even something you can parse. You people keep missing the point. It's fake, the orbit is ridiculous, there is not a population of near earth asteroids that have aphelion distances between Uranus and Neptune with eccentricities just below 1. He constructed it to hit earth (and got close, but no cigar when taking into account things like relativity and the gravity of the planets) which is why he simplified things by setting inclination to an arbitrary and low value (0.005000 - yeah right .005000 exactly) and the longitude of ascending node to 0 exactly. It was a way of simplifying so all he'd have to worry about was a 2 dimensional situation. A real orbit determination would have some sort of real value there for the LAN, even if inclination were small (and the odds of inclination being that nice round number?). The second set given are even more ridiculous, an epoch of what exactly? It's so screwed up that it looks like it's saying January 1st 2000, in which case the epoch is hell and gone from the supposed impact date. But ok, you want me to run those numbers too with the assumption that I should parse it like it's some super-secret spy code, I'll do it. Just a thought.... What if the epoch was changed to the mar 25 date. Am I sort of understanding this right? Does that change anything? Is that how it works? But that's not what it says, at all. I'm running an integration right now with it set to January 1st 2000, since that's the date it seems to indicate if you take it using the same logic used for the first set presented. Ah. Definitely waiting for it! Thx! Ha. Ha ha. That's funny, actually. Ok, so the second set misses earth by a bigger margin than the first set (no doubt because whoever tried to construct this probably did so without taking into account the gravity of the planets, relativity, etc - they probably thought this was another impactor orbit) BUT the asteroid does cross earth's orbit at midnight on April 1st, 2013. Cute. Whoever did this at least had a sense of humor. |
acuk User ID: 36235101 United Kingdom 03/17/2013 12:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36366888 Venezuela 03/17/2013 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23559912 United States 03/17/2013 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23559912 Just a thought.... What if the epoch was changed to the mar 25 date. Am I sort of understanding this right? Does that change anything? Is that how it works? But that's not what it says, at all. I'm running an integration right now with it set to January 1st 2000, since that's the date it seems to indicate if you take it using the same logic used for the first set presented. Ah. Definitely waiting for it! Thx! Ha. Ha ha. That's funny, actually. Ok, so the second set misses earth by a bigger margin than the first set (no doubt because whoever tried to construct this probably did so without taking into account the gravity of the planets, relativity, etc - they probably thought this was another impactor orbit) BUT the asteroid does cross earth's orbit at midnight on April 1st, 2013. Cute. Whoever did this at least had a sense of humor. WAIT....WHAT!!??? You mean it wasn't gibberish???!!! Holy Crap! So what is going on with this guy? He's obviously NOT the OP! But what does that now mean? Back behind |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16797046 United States 03/17/2013 12:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Raymond You may indeed prove to be a fraudster, but my gut says no- YOU ARE TELLING THE TRUTH AS YOU SEE IT (Just as Dr Astro is earnest in his rebuttal) Please ignore those who think you are crying wolf I thank you for your efforts and please do not leave And look @ HAARP now by the way |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36357344 Portugal 03/17/2013 12:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Call me any sort of ridicule name again.. and i leave this thread forever Quoting: Anonymous Coward Corky?I am fast as breaking point! thats what u really want to be able to run away and pretend to feel safe cause u know the Police is on your back probably u moron u think u can suplant GLP Wisdom??? hey at this moment are psyWizards on your back be aware u will have the worst moments of your life for what u ve ddun.... u were not open enough with Us hey guys GLP effect on him!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36370606 Venezuela 03/17/2013 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Raymond You may indeed prove to be a fraudster, but my gut says no- YOU ARE TELLING THE TRUTH AS YOU SEE IT (Just as Dr Astro is earnest in his rebuttal) Please ignore those who think you are crying wolf I thank you for your efforts and please do not leave And look @ HAARP now by the way What are you saying? That HAARP can save us or what? |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 03/17/2013 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro But that's not what it says, at all. I'm running an integration right now with it set to January 1st 2000, since that's the date it seems to indicate if you take it using the same logic used for the first set presented. Ah. Definitely waiting for it! Thx! Ha. Ha ha. That's funny, actually. Ok, so the second set misses earth by a bigger margin than the first set (no doubt because whoever tried to construct this probably did so without taking into account the gravity of the planets, relativity, etc - they probably thought this was another impactor orbit) BUT the asteroid does cross earth's orbit at midnight on April 1st, 2013. Cute. Whoever did this at least had a sense of humor. WAIT....WHAT!!??? You mean it wasn't gibberish???!!! Holy Crap! So what is going on with this guy? He's obviously NOT the OP! But what does that now mean? Back behind It wasn't gibberish, but it also wasn't a good idea to set the epoch at January 1st when constructing the elements. That meant a larger amount of error in trying to construct a fake impact trajectory - a decade worth of error between the epoch and the would-be impact. It was obviously a joke, I don't know why you're all "hiding" unless you were actually the one who posted the joke and trying to play along. Cute, if so. I lol'ed when I saw the date that it crossed earth's orbit. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23559912 United States 03/17/2013 12:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ha. Ha ha. That's funny, actually. Ok, so the second set misses earth by a bigger margin than the first set (no doubt because whoever tried to construct this probably did so without taking into account the gravity of the planets, relativity, etc - they probably thought this was another impactor orbit) BUT the asteroid does cross earth's orbit at midnight on April 1st, 2013. Cute. Whoever did this at least had a sense of humor. WAIT....WHAT!!??? You mean it wasn't gibberish???!!! Holy Crap! So what is going on with this guy? He's obviously NOT the OP! But what does that now mean? Back behind It wasn't gibberish, but it also wasn't a good idea to set the epoch at January 1st when constructing the elements. That meant a larger amount of error in trying to construct a fake impact trajectory - a decade worth of error between the epoch and the would-be impact. It was obviously a joke, I don't know why you're all "hiding" unless you were actually the one who posted the joke and trying to play along. Cute, if so. I lol'ed when I saw the date that it crossed earth's orbit. You are definitely smart! you actually nailed it on the head! Hope I don't get banned and more importantly... Hope you don't feel like I waisted your time! Just trying to give a little fun mystery to play with. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23559912 United States 03/17/2013 12:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Ha. Ha ha. That's funny, actually. Ok, so the second set misses earth by a bigger margin than the first set (no doubt because whoever tried to construct this probably did so without taking into account the gravity of the planets, relativity, etc - they probably thought this was another impactor orbit) BUT the asteroid does cross earth's orbit at midnight on April 1st, 2013. Cute. Whoever did this at least had a sense of humor. WAIT....WHAT!!??? You mean it wasn't gibberish???!!! Holy Crap! So what is going on with this guy? He's obviously NOT the OP! But what does that now mean? Back behind It wasn't gibberish, but it also wasn't a good idea to set the epoch at January 1st when constructing the elements. That meant a larger amount of error in trying to construct a fake impact trajectory - a decade worth of error between the epoch and the would-be impact. It was obviously a joke, I don't know why you're all "hiding" unless you were actually the one who posted the joke and trying to play along. Cute, if so. I lol'ed when I saw the date that it crossed earth's orbit. You are definitely smart! you actually nailed it on the head! Hope I don't get banned and more importantly... Hope you don't feel like I waisted your time! Just trying to give a little fun mystery to play with. And for the record... I AM NOT the OP. He's just a nut. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 33360181 United States 03/17/2013 12:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Ha. Ha ha. That's funny, actually. Ok, so the second set misses earth by a bigger margin than the first set (no doubt because whoever tried to construct this probably did so without taking into account the gravity of the planets, relativity, etc - they probably thought this was another impactor orbit) BUT the asteroid does cross earth's orbit at midnight on April 1st, 2013. Cute. Whoever did this at least had a sense of humor. WAIT....WHAT!!??? You mean it wasn't gibberish???!!! Holy Crap! So what is going on with this guy? He's obviously NOT the OP! But what does that now mean? Back behind It wasn't gibberish, but it also wasn't a good idea to set the epoch at January 1st when constructing the elements. That meant a larger amount of error in trying to construct a fake impact trajectory - a decade worth of error between the epoch and the would-be impact. It was obviously a joke, I don't know why you're all "hiding" unless you were actually the one who posted the joke and trying to play along. Cute, if so. I lol'ed when I saw the date that it crossed earth's orbit. You are definitely smart! you actually nailed it on the head! Hope I don't get banned and more importantly... Hope you don't feel like I waisted your time! Just trying to give a little fun mystery to play with. Thanks, I don't think you'll be banned, I admit I found that last bit humorous. Well played. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36370606 Venezuela 03/17/2013 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ha. Ha ha. That's funny, actually. Ok, so the second set misses earth by a bigger margin than the first set (no doubt because whoever tried to construct this probably did so without taking into account the gravity of the planets, relativity, etc - they probably thought this was another impactor orbit) BUT the asteroid does cross earth's orbit at midnight on April 1st, 2013. Cute. Whoever did this at least had a sense of humor. WAIT....WHAT!!??? You mean it wasn't gibberish???!!! Holy Crap! So what is going on with this guy? He's obviously NOT the OP! But what does that now mean? Back behind It wasn't gibberish, but it also wasn't a good idea to set the epoch at January 1st when constructing the elements. That meant a larger amount of error in trying to construct a fake impact trajectory - a decade worth of error between the epoch and the would-be impact. It was obviously a joke, I don't know why you're all "hiding" unless you were actually the one who posted the joke and trying to play along. Cute, if so. I lol'ed when I saw the date that it crossed earth's orbit. Ok MR.Astro forget about this mr.frankfurt or so but we still have a chance to get hit of one of these rocks YES? So lets got a crap arguing here and focus on real things... peace, e |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23043540 United States 03/17/2013 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Call me any sort of ridicule name again.. and i leave this thread forever Quoting: Anonymous Coward Corky?I am fast as breaking point! Retard, cock gobbler, cockmonger, idiot, extra-chromosome cowboy, mother fucker, father fucker, stupid fuck, I could go on if you want. thanks for the belly laugh AC108! |
mclinking User ID: 35961410 France 03/17/2013 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36370606 Venezuela 03/17/2013 01:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Call me any sort of ridicule name again.. and i leave this thread forever Quoting: Anonymous Coward Corky?I am fast as breaking point! Retard, cock gobbler, cockmonger, idiot, extra-chromosome cowboy, mother fucker, father fucker, stupid fuck, I could go on if you want. thanks for the belly laugh AC108! Breaking Bad aHHHA |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23559912 United States 03/17/2013 01:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23559912 WAIT....WHAT!!??? You mean it wasn't gibberish???!!! Holy Crap! So what is going on with this guy? He's obviously NOT the OP! But what does that now mean? Back behind It wasn't gibberish, but it also wasn't a good idea to set the epoch at January 1st when constructing the elements. That meant a larger amount of error in trying to construct a fake impact trajectory - a decade worth of error between the epoch and the would-be impact. It was obviously a joke, I don't know why you're all "hiding" unless you were actually the one who posted the joke and trying to play along. Cute, if so. I lol'ed when I saw the date that it crossed earth's orbit. You are definitely smart! you actually nailed it on the head! Hope I don't get banned and more importantly... Hope you don't feel like I waisted your time! Just trying to give a little fun mystery to play with. Thanks, I don't think you'll be banned, I admit I found that last bit humorous. Well played. Yeah. No one paid any attention to my original thread (trail of bread crumbs) so I had to hijack this nut's thread to have some fun. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35928808 United States 03/17/2013 01:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |