Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,196 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,336,029
Pageviews Today: 1,829,401Threads Today: 468Posts Today: 7,812
02:30 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13849872
United Kingdom
05/04/2014 07:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
Sorry to be harping on about the "micro-volts" thing guy's, but I think it's quite important. If we can compare apples with apples regarding the seizo's we can more accurately see where the epicentre of a shake really was. In the example of E.M.'s 3.8 on the 3rd, we can easily see it came from the direction somewhere outside of Moose Creek. Irrespective of what USGS "reports", we can confirm if thier report is resonably accurate as to location of the quake, and even if they don't report it at all, but we see it on the seiso's, we would be able to determine the approximate area, if it originates in Yellowstone, that it occured in.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24889765


yep. they fuck with our heads alright. lowering and raising the microvolts to throw us off the scent.

they do it with all seismos that are being watched by the woos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24889765
United Kingdom
05/04/2014 08:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
Sorry to be harping on about the "micro-volts" thing guy's, but I think it's quite important. If we can compare apples with apples regarding the seizo's we can more accurately see where the epicentre of a shake really was. In the example of E.M.'s 3.8 on the 3rd, we can easily see it came from the direction somewhere outside of Moose Creek. Irrespective of what USGS "reports", we can confirm if thier report is resonably accurate as to location of the quake, and even if they don't report it at all, but we see it on the seiso's, we would be able to determine the approximate area, if it originates in Yellowstone, that it occured in.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24889765


yep. they fuck with our heads alright. lowering and raising the microvolts to throw us off the scent.

they do it with all seismos that are being watched by the woos.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13849872


Ah...well if that's the case - AND if the "reported" sensitivity at the bottom of the chart has nothing to do with the actual sensitivity the thing is set to - then we are royally fucked. We are then able to extract precious little, if any, useful info from the instrumentation, bar trying to determine if what we see is actually harmonics, breaking, magma movements etc.......
LOU512

User ID: 57647674
United States
05/04/2014 08:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
thanks for all the updates hf
The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.
Sun Tzu
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57690952
United States
05/04/2014 08:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
No, no E.M. - I know it looks like it, but it's very misleading, it WASN'T felt especially hard at Madison River, that's what I was trying to explain in the long post's on the other thread.

"Now Maddison River is set to 125 uV, and the shake was well into "clipping" at 5 divisions, so best we can see is 625 uV, but since it was so heavily clipped, the shake was way more than 625 - my guess? Around a 1000 uV."


It was felt hardest at Moose Creek, which is set to 1,600 uV, and the shake was 5 divisions = 8000 uV


so that shake was felt at least 8 times stronger at Moose Creek than it was at Maddison River - even though the graphs appear to show otherwise.

The size of the shake depicted on the chart is NOT relative to the actual size of the shake. One has got to multiply the number of vertical divisions with the sensitivity setting, which is shown at the very bottom of the chart for each seismo, to get the reading in micro-volts, then comparison is one for one.

Hope this helps us now when looking at the charts....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24889765


Yes, by setting the micro-volts at different levels, the visual images that we see are comparing apples and oranges.

The next action for the USGS to keep us in the dark is either to (falsely) show that all of the micro-volt settings are the same, or to simply stop displaying the micro-volts at all.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24889765
United Kingdom
05/04/2014 10:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
No, no E.M. - I know it looks like it, but it's very misleading, it WASN'T felt especially hard at Madison River, that's what I was trying to explain in the long post's on the other thread.

"Now Maddison River is set to 125 uV, and the shake was well into "clipping" at 5 divisions, so best we can see is 625 uV, but since it was so heavily clipped, the shake was way more than 625 - my guess? Around a 1000 uV."


It was felt hardest at Moose Creek, which is set to 1,600 uV, and the shake was 5 divisions = 8000 uV


so that shake was felt at least 8 times stronger at Moose Creek than it was at Maddison River - even though the graphs appear to show otherwise.

The size of the shake depicted on the chart is NOT relative to the actual size of the shake. One has got to multiply the number of vertical divisions with the sensitivity setting, which is shown at the very bottom of the chart for each seismo, to get the reading in micro-volts, then comparison is one for one.

Hope this helps us now when looking at the charts....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24889765


Yes, by setting the micro-volts at different levels, the visual images that we see are comparing apples and oranges.

The next action for the USGS to keep us in the dark is either to (falsely) show that all of the micro-volt settings are the same, or to simply stop displaying the micro-volts at all.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57690952


Too me THAT would be downright scary - then I would know FOR SURE something I SHOULD be scared of is definitely going down...
Esoteric Morgan
...in awe of many things

User ID: 26943919
United States
05/04/2014 12:30 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
...


These are fractures with harmonic magma intrusion, a prelude to an eruption, according to this report on youtube: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44325972



As I have stated in the past... the magma is moving. it is slowly rising upward and putting pressure on the the water chamber that is located under the geysers.
 Quoting: Elfsong


While I don't question that magma is moving, the trace in Mayfield occurred seconds after the 3.8 in Challis, Idaho.

[link to www.globalincidentmap.com]

This is how it registered in Missoula Montana [link to mbmgquake.mtech.edu]

It was a widespread event for a 3.8, most likely causing a bit of rearranging and jostling in the park, while felt especially hard at Madison River [link to www.seis.utah.edu]


I hope the cam is fixed by tomorrow...and hope it's still mounted to the tree! It was crazy shaking today.
 Quoting: Esoteric Morgan


No, no E.M. - I know it looks like it, but it's very misleading, it WASN'T felt especially hard at Madison River, that's what I was trying to explain in the long post's on the other thread.

"Now Maddison River is set to 125 uV, and the shake was well into "clipping" at 5 divisions, so best we can see is 625 uV, but since it was so heavily clipped, the shake was way more than 625 - my guess? Around a 1000 uV."


It was felt hardest at Moose Creek, which is set to 1,600 uV, and the shake was 5 divisions = 8000 uV


so that shake was felt at least 8 times stronger at Moose Creek than it was at Maddison River - even though the graphs appear to show otherwise.

The size of the shake depicted on the chart is NOT relative to the actual size of the shake. One has got to multiply the number of vertical divisions with the sensitivity setting, which is shown at the very bottom of the chart for each seismo, to get the reading in micro-volts, then comparison is one for one.

Hope this helps us now when looking at the charts....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24889765


oops!

I guess I need a day studying why they have these variations!

Is there an easy answer as to why they are calibrated so differently?
-- TRUST THE PLAN --
.......WWG1WGA......
____________________________
still in awe of many things
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13849872
United Kingdom
05/04/2014 12:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
if they were all calibrated the same they know we'd figure out where they are coming from. they constantly change the microvolts to muddy the waters

it's not just them who do this. the british site do it too
Esoteric Morgan
...in awe of many things

User ID: 26943919
United States
05/04/2014 12:39 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
Sorry to be harping on about the "micro-volts" thing guy's, but I think it's quite important. If we can compare apples with apples regarding the seizo's we can more accurately see where the epicentre of a shake really was. In the example of E.M.'s 3.8 on the 3rd, we can easily see it came from the direction somewhere outside of Moose Creek. Irrespective of what USGS "reports", we can confirm if thier report is resonably accurate as to location of the quake, and even if they don't report it at all, but we see it on the seiso's, we would be able to determine the approximate area, if it originates in Yellowstone, that it occured in.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24889765



Understandable. If we are going to do this at all, we should be doing it right.
-- TRUST THE PLAN --
.......WWG1WGA......
____________________________
still in awe of many things
Esoteric Morgan
...in awe of many things

User ID: 26943919
United States
05/04/2014 12:43 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
if they were all calibrated the same they know we'd figure out where they are coming from. they constantly change the microvolts to muddy the waters

it's not just them who do this. the british site do it too
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13849872


wow.

no more 'easy' looking to find out what's cooking.

blink
-- TRUST THE PLAN --
.......WWG1WGA......
____________________________
still in awe of many things
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24889765
United Kingdom
05/04/2014 03:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
...



As I have stated in the past... the magma is moving. it is slowly rising upward and putting pressure on the the water chamber that is located under the geysers.
 Quoting: Elfsong


While I don't question that magma is moving, the trace in Mayfield occurred seconds after the 3.8 in Challis, Idaho.

[link to www.globalincidentmap.com]

This is how it registered in Missoula Montana [link to mbmgquake.mtech.edu]

It was a widespread event for a 3.8, most likely causing a bit of rearranging and jostling in the park, while felt especially hard at Madison River [link to www.seis.utah.edu]


I hope the cam is fixed by tomorrow...and hope it's still mounted to the tree! It was crazy shaking today.
 Quoting: Esoteric Morgan


No, no E.M. - I know it looks like it, but it's very misleading, it WASN'T felt especially hard at Madison River, that's what I was trying to explain in the long post's on the other thread.

"Now Maddison River is set to 125 uV, and the shake was well into "clipping" at 5 divisions, so best we can see is 625 uV, but since it was so heavily clipped, the shake was way more than 625 - my guess? Around a 1000 uV."


It was felt hardest at Moose Creek, which is set to 1,600 uV, and the shake was 5 divisions = 8000 uV


so that shake was felt at least 8 times stronger at Moose Creek than it was at Maddison River - even though the graphs appear to show otherwise.

The size of the shake depicted on the chart is NOT relative to the actual size of the shake. One has got to multiply the number of vertical divisions with the sensitivity setting, which is shown at the very bottom of the chart for each seismo, to get the reading in micro-volts, then comparison is one for one.

Hope this helps us now when looking at the charts....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24889765


oops!

I guess I need a day studying why they have these variations!

Is there an easy answer as to why they are calibrated so differently?
 Quoting: Esoteric Morgan


Under "normal" conditions, the sensitivity would be set just high enough so that back-ground noise only just shows. That means that anything above background would register, if set way too high, then one wouldn't see any changes unless they were real big. They will be set differently, since back-ground noise will be different in each location. Certain ones could be set really high if one isn't particularly interested in everything thats going on, but only wants to see specifically big events that one is expecting. So, under normal conditions I would expect different settings, but they shouldn't keep changing. Am busy trying to track down dates when settings were changed to see how frequent changes really are, and possibly the reason for the change. Am posting on the other thread....

Thread: Yellowstone Caldera - Hydro-Thermal Super Volcanic Eruption 2014 -update 10/07/14 - Eruption Drills, Magmatic Evolution & USGS Data Cover Up (Page 46)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24889765
United Kingdom
05/04/2014 03:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
O.K., here is what the sensitivity settings do in real pictures.

This is Pitchstone Plateau on the October 19th 2009, when it was set at 50 uV per division.

[link to www.isthisthingon.org]

and this is Pitchstone the next day when it was changed to 800 uV per division overnight.

[link to www.isthisthingon.org]

The sensitivity settings must be logrithmic or something, because working on a linear thing, this equates to a 16 times reduction in the size of shakes we would see. Doubt the boff's would decrease the sensitivity THAT much in one go to reduce back ground noise, so either I am wrong, or the boff's are not even looking at these same seiso's us sheeple are being fed.

Looks very much to me like some harmonics looking stuff was happening on the 19th, and the change in sensitivity got rid af that sharpish for the 20th onwards......
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24889765
AllThatCanBe

User ID: 50695025
South Africa
05/04/2014 06:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
Let me make this easier for everyone scratching their heads about the strange pulses. I wasn't convinced before, but after having spent far too much time watching timelapses, certain 'big picture' patterns have emerged and are now recurring.

I'm talking about the weather patterns, the chemtrails, and the webcam warping.

Most of these seismic anomalies are HAARP pulses. You can't tell this by looking at seismos alone.

You have to watch the cams because the pulsing is coming from the sky.

The webcam effect of warping every mountain in sight, far and near? That is now showing up in timelapses at Mt. Washburn. The two cams at Mt. Washburn are looking far into the distance in nearly opposite directions...

If you watch these videos from yesterday on each webcam, you see the same incredible warping occurring for what LOOKS like many dozens of miles. Which is impossible.






Want to see the chemtrails?

Yesterday (3 May), at Electric Peak:




Summary points of the above 3 videos:

1. Impossible visual warping of the mountains for dozens of miles in two opposite directions, over Mt. Washburn.

2. HUGE chemtrails over Electric Peak, resulting in bizarre glowing clouds spontaneously condensing into existence and disappearing as suddenly. Once the chemtrail grid is sufficient, a thin cloud layer begins bursting with brilliant over-exposed light pulses while smaller puffs appear/disappear at the same time as these pulses.


Conclusions so far:

Now we might know why HAARP has been 'abandoned'. It is most likely being used at full power, right here in Yellowstone.

Remaining questions:

Are they using the chemtrail + HAARP combo to cool the Beast? Calm it down pre-emptively before it boils to eruption point below?

Considering the temperatures at Tantalus Creek at Norris have skyrocketed for three days from May 1st to May 3rd, but are now NORMAL again... I would say it's absolutely possible that this is the intended effect of the chemtrailing and atmospheric energy manipulation.

[link to waterdata.usgs.gov]

If they are in fact using it to explode the damn thing, well, I hope someone powerful in America figures that out soon...

This message brought to you by Timelapse Guy. Please don't ask me questions about how any of the above works. I simply don't know yet, though I am in research mode and I will update with new insights as they come.

Last Edited by AllThatCanBe on 05/04/2014 06:07 PM
Elfsong

User ID: 57673850
United States
05/04/2014 08:12 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
Those seismo readings are scary lookin..
 Quoting: Colonisation


Livecam being offline is no coincidence.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56935253



I have tried off and on for the last 10 minutes trying to reply to this Thread.

I smell a rat.
It seems that someone back East has heard about us. Or at least some of the 'Like" threads. They are state that we are spreading "fear and panic" around the people that live in the area.
working with Positive Thoughts will result in Positive Outcomes.
AllThatCanBe

User ID: 50695025
South Africa
05/04/2014 09:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
Amount of steam now coming out of the valley below Mt. Washburn is truly alarming.

[link to www.nps.gov]
HollyWho

User ID: 57291262
United States
05/04/2014 09:07 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
And? Is there an element of truth to all of this? If they believe it's not a serious threat, why would they care?

I am posing a serious question. What do you believe Elf?

Those seismo readings are scary lookin..
 Quoting: Colonisation


Livecam being offline is no coincidence.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56935253



I have tried off and on for the last 10 minutes trying to reply to this Thread.

I smell a rat.
It seems that someone back East has heard about us. Or at least some of the 'Like" threads. They are state that we are spreading "fear and panic" around the people that live in the area.
 Quoting: Elfsong
Elfsong

User ID: 57673850
United States
05/04/2014 09:23 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
And? Is there an element of truth to all of this? If they believe it's not a serious threat, why would they care?

I am posing a serious question. What do you believe Elf?

Those seismo readings are scary lookin..
 Quoting: Colonisation


Livecam being offline is no coincidence.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56935253



I have tried off and on for the last 10 minutes trying to reply to this Thread.

I smell a rat.
It seems that someone back East has heard about us. Or at least some of the 'Like" threads. They are state that we are spreading "fear and panic" around the people that live in the area.
 Quoting: Elfsong

 Quoting: HollyWho



Truthfully, that is a good question. Since my Hubby is a geologist, and has told me that things do happen, but not in the time line that others would expect.
Do I think Yellowstone is going to blow? Sort of. I think that the northern area is going to erupt with something, and then like a Tupperware dish, it is going to burp, then roll over and go back to sleep for a while.
How long will it take before it blows? that is another good question. Hubby has canceled our trip to CO this year, and told me to look to CA. I am figuring that something is going to happen between 7 months to a year. (in Geologist's tems... that can be at any time.) Geologist have a weird sense of time. To them, a reasonable short amount of time can be anywhere from 1 year to 5 years. A standard set of time can be around 1,000 years. And this is why he drives me nuts.
working with Positive Thoughts will result in Positive Outcomes.
HollyWho

User ID: 57291262
United States
05/04/2014 09:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
Thanks!
kundalinichi

User ID: 55137666
United States
05/05/2014 12:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
So, I am planning taking a coast to coast drive with family starting in the next ~50 hours. We are 100% stopping by Yellowstone for 2 days to sightsee - So, I will be in the Yellowstone area next week Wednesday-Sunday, given any 2 days combination (most likely will be Wed+thurs given previous travel times) -

That said, we will be bringing 1 Canon 5D MKII DSLR camera with several professional grade lenses for shooting in all sorts of conditions and distances, and 1 GoPro Black edition - given the activity\uptick currently going on there, do any of you here want on site, high res pictures of areas you might not be able to get\easily see online? No, I am not going trekking 2 miles to take a picture of a lake, but if you give me co-ords or a description of the area\known landmarks, and a target, I will gladly search for a shot when there.

Last Edited by kundalinichi on 05/05/2014 12:32 AM
Elfsong

User ID: 57673850
United States
05/05/2014 01:13 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
So, I am planning taking a coast to coast drive with family starting in the next ~50 hours. We are 100% stopping by Yellowstone for 2 days to sightsee - So, I will be in the Yellowstone area next week Wednesday-Sunday, given any 2 days combination (most likely will be Wed+thurs given previous travel times) -

That said, we will be bringing 1 Canon 5D MKII DSLR camera with several professional grade lenses for shooting in all sorts of conditions and distances, and 1 GoPro Black edition - given the activity\uptick currently going on there, do any of you here want on site, high res pictures of areas you might not be able to get\easily see online? No, I am not going trekking 2 miles to take a picture of a lake, but if you give me co-ords or a description of the area\known landmarks, and a target, I will gladly search for a shot when there.
 Quoting: kundalinichi




I wish you safe journey and an easy road.
working with Positive Thoughts will result in Positive Outcomes.
kundalinichi

User ID: 55137666
United States
05/05/2014 02:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
So, I am planning taking a coast to coast drive with family starting in the next ~50 hours. We are 100% stopping by Yellowstone for 2 days to sightsee - So, I will be in the Yellowstone area next week Wednesday-Sunday, given any 2 days combination (most likely will be Wed+thurs given previous travel times) -

That said, we will be bringing 1 Canon 5D MKII DSLR camera with several professional grade lenses for shooting in all sorts of conditions and distances, and 1 GoPro Black edition - given the activity\uptick currently going on there, do any of you here want on site, high res pictures of areas you might not be able to get\easily see online? No, I am not going trekking 2 miles to take a picture of a lake, but if you give me co-ords or a description of the area\known landmarks, and a target, I will gladly search for a shot when there.
 Quoting: kundalinichi




I wish you safe journey and an easy road.
 Quoting: Elfsong


Well thank you very much Elfsong that means a lot :) I haven't been to yellowstone since I was a kid, and then I remember being ecstatic everytime ol faithful went off - so very excited to see it in person again.

We are noticing a lot of snow on the yellowstone cams like Mt. Washburn one, hoping roads will be okay.
OpenlyCoward

User ID: 56674568
Germany
05/05/2014 03:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
So, I am planning taking a coast to coast drive with family starting in the next ~50 hours. We are 100% stopping by Yellowstone for 2 days to sightsee - So, I will be in the Yellowstone area next week Wednesday-Sunday, given any 2 days combination (most likely will be Wed+thurs given previous travel times) -

That said, we will be bringing 1 Canon 5D MKII DSLR camera with several professional grade lenses for shooting in all sorts of conditions and distances, and 1 GoPro Black edition - given the activity\uptick currently going on there, do any of you here want on site, high res pictures of areas you might not be able to get\easily see online? No, I am not going trekking 2 miles to take a picture of a lake, but if you give me co-ords or a description of the area\known landmarks, and a target, I will gladly search for a shot when there.
 Quoting: kundalinichi




I wish you safe journey and an easy road.
 Quoting: Elfsong


Well thank you very much Elfsong that means a lot :) I haven't been to yellowstone since I was a kid, and then I remember being ecstatic everytime ol faithful went off - so very excited to see it in person again.

We are noticing a lot of snow on the yellowstone cams like Mt. Washburn one, hoping roads will be okay.
 Quoting: kundalinichi


Yes, safe journey from here as well!
OpenlyCoward
OpenlyCoward

User ID: 56674568
Germany
05/05/2014 03:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
And? Is there an element of truth to all of this? If they believe it's not a serious threat, why would they care?

I am posing a serious question. What do you believe Elf?

...


Livecam being offline is no coincidence.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56935253



I have tried off and on for the last 10 minutes trying to reply to this Thread.

I smell a rat.
It seems that someone back East has heard about us. Or at least some of the 'Like" threads. They are state that we are spreading "fear and panic" around the people that live in the area.
 Quoting: Elfsong

 Quoting: HollyWho



Truthfully, that is a good question. Since my Hubby is a geologist, and has told me that things do happen, but not in the time line that others would expect.
Do I think Yellowstone is going to blow? Sort of. I think that the northern area is going to erupt with something, and then like a Tupperware dish, it is going to burp, then roll over and go back to sleep for a while.
How long will it take before it blows? that is another good question. Hubby has canceled our trip to CO this year, and told me to look to CA. I am figuring that something is going to happen between 7 months to a year. (in Geologist's tems... that can be at any time.) Geologist have a weird sense of time. To them, a reasonable short amount of time can be anywhere from 1 year to 5 years. A standard set of time can be around 1,000 years. And this is why he drives me nuts.
 Quoting: Elfsong


Thank you so much for all the valuable updates Elfsong.
God bless & of course your husband too!
OpenlyCoward
OpenlyCoward

User ID: 56674568
Germany
05/05/2014 04:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
-





Yellowstone Live Camera Off







This video was published short before the two YS cams were shut down





---

Plus This One Here...

Earthquakes Along The New Madrid Fault Zone











-
OpenlyCoward
saviour12631

User ID: 40349329
United Kingdom
05/05/2014 05:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
So, I am planning taking a coast to coast drive with family starting in the next ~50 hours. We are 100% stopping by Yellowstone for 2 days to sightsee - So, I will be in the Yellowstone area next week Wednesday-Sunday, given any 2 days combination (most likely will be Wed+thurs given previous travel times) -

That said, we will be bringing 1 Canon 5D MKII DSLR camera with several professional grade lenses for shooting in all sorts of conditions and distances, and 1 GoPro Black edition - given the activity\uptick currently going on there, do any of you here want on site, high res pictures of areas you might not be able to get\easily see online? No, I am not going trekking 2 miles to take a picture of a lake, but if you give me co-ords or a description of the area\known landmarks, and a target, I will gladly search for a shot when there.
 Quoting: kundalinichi


Would you mind taking the pic of when the lava shoots thousands of feet into the air for me preferably from Old faithful if you can get it ......rofl
Del Boy: All the things that we've ever got out of life have come from my intelligence and my foresight
Rodney: Well, I'm glad somebody's owned up, ....He who dares wins Rodders
...eekerstard also
Esoteric Morgan
...in awe of many things

User ID: 26943919
United States
05/05/2014 10:59 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
Morning All!

I see that GLP is still under attack! I have been tryint to post this for about one hour!

Anyhoo, as per now the live cam is still out...thus, so is the still cam for Upper Falls.

But, all looks well as per the still at Old Faithful, and the still looking South from Mount Washburn...as do all other available cams. Biscuit is still down.

I will say that for early morning, the still at Old Faithful looks very quiet -as in 'I do not see steam drifting into view from anywhere else' --yet, that does seem pretty normal with that cam focused so tightly on that geyser alone.

The temp at the moment is 35°F with the lightest breeze, while the forecast after lunch, and going into tomorrow, does call for some rian and storms...maybe even some snow by Tuesday.

Today Isolated showers between noon and 1pm, then isolated showers and thunderstorms after 1pm. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 55. Breezy, with a southwest wind 13 to 23 mph, with gusts as high as 32 mph. Chance of precipitation is 20%.

Tonight A slight chance of rain showers before midnight, then scattered snow showers. Some thunder is also possible. Mostly cloudy, with a low around 32. Breezy, with a southwest wind 16 to 21 mph becoming west 5 to 10 mph after midnight. Winds could gust as high as 29 mph. Chance of precipitation is 30%.

Tuesday Scattered rain and snow showers before noon, then rain showers likely. Some thunder is also possible. Mostly cloudy, with a high near 49. North wind around 7 mph. Chance of precipitation is 60%. New snow accumulation of less than a half inch possible.

[link to forecast.weather.gov]


The quake seen around 9:28:30 UTC in park helicorders was recorded the earliest at Denny Creek.
[link to www.seis.utah.edu]

I believe this is closest to the epicenter...where ever it was.

The next three closest were Hegben Lake to the north, and both West Boundary and Moose Creek to the south.

This was also recorded two minutes or later outside the park, at Newport, Washington: [link to mbmgquake.mtech.edu]

and at Lewis and Clark Caverns in Montana [link to mbmgquake.mtech.edu]

as well as at Mayfield, Idaho, which I am adding because others have looked at traces there in recent weeks [link to mbmgquake.mtech.edu]


I see no quake recorded for Challis, Idaho at this time, nor anywhere else in the world...so this is why I am thinking that the area around Denny Creek is where this quake occurred.

Interestingly enough, once again -as at Denny Creek-- the traces show those clips or pops or electrical signals on a rather constant and what looks like a continuing basis, like clockwork...but, not in all areas, such as Hegben Lake.


I am including the earthquake trace for Maple Creek, solely because it looks rather unusual when seen against the others: [link to www.seis.utah.edu] Just a vertical line.

One might mention to look at the difference on the microvolts, which I have. It is the same as at Norris River and Mommouth Vault, which traced the quake much differently
[link to www.seis.utah.edu] [link to www.seis.utah.edu]


Anyway, as I do not have access to Idaho helicorders near Challis, I can't even begin to guess where that quake originated, but it was recorded at Denny first. I will look elsewhere, now.


Okay! On with the day....

UPDATE:

The quake was recorded South of Yellowstone very soon after Denny [i/] at Flagg Ranch, WY [link to www.seis.utah.edu]

And, was felt to the South in a good number of places, including at:
Indian Meadows, Grand Teton Park: [link to www.seis.utah.edu]

Black Mountain, UT [link to www.quake.utah.edu] around the Great Salt Lake, and down to Utah’s SW corner.

As I mentioned, the USGS had not noted any quakes around the same time prior to my writing this.

Last Edited by esotericMorgan on 05/05/2014 11:25 AM
-- TRUST THE PLAN --
.......WWG1WGA......
____________________________
still in awe of many things
Dragonface

User ID: 57207839
United Kingdom
05/05/2014 11:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
So, I am planning taking a coast to coast drive with family starting in the next ~50 hours. We are 100% stopping by Yellowstone for 2 days to sightsee - So, I will be in the Yellowstone area next week Wednesday-Sunday, given any 2 days combination (most likely will be Wed+thurs given previous travel times) -

That said, we will be bringing 1 Canon 5D MKII DSLR camera with several professional grade lenses for shooting in all sorts of conditions and distances, and 1 GoPro Black edition - given the activity\uptick currently going on there, do any of you here want on site, high res pictures of areas you might not be able to get\easily see online? No, I am not going trekking 2 miles to take a picture of a lake, but if you give me co-ords or a description of the area\known landmarks, and a target, I will gladly search for a shot when there.
 Quoting: kundalinichi


Awesome! If it blows when you're there, well, we've all got to go sometime and what a spectacular way to go that would be! Seriously though, hope you have a good time :)
AllThatCanBe

User ID: 46789769
South Africa
05/05/2014 11:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
Well, I found out who is using HAARP at the moment.

DARPA.

[link to www.arrl.org]

"The only bright spot on HAARP’s horizon right now is that the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is expected on site as a client to finish up some research this fall and winter. DARPA has nearly $8.8 million in its FY 14 budget plan to research “physical aspects of natural phenomena such as magnetospheric sub-storms, fire, lightning and geo-physical phenomena.”

From another article from April 11, 2014:

[link to www.arrl.org]

"The news account cites an Air Force spokesman as saying that final research experiments funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) are set to wrap up next month."

----

Good job, America! Let the Mad Scientist Squad (alias DARPA) loose on your weather systems with no oversight and you get... TORNADOES! EVERYWHERE!

And chemtrailing + HAARP experiments over a supervolcano. Because science. It's going to be an interesting month as DARPA 'wraps up' their weather bastardization experiments.

By the way, someone in Jackson Hole has been personally filming these geo-engineering experiments since August 8, 2013:

Jackson Hole Skywatch - [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]



Don't forget...

worthless5
Esoteric Morgan
...in awe of many things

User ID: 26943919
United States
05/05/2014 11:30 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
Well, I found out who is using HAARP at the moment.

DARPA.

[link to www.arrl.org]

"The only bright spot on HAARP’s horizon right now is that the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is expected on site as a client to finish up some research this fall and winter. DARPA has nearly $8.8 million in its FY 14 budget plan to research “physical aspects of natural phenomena such as magnetospheric sub-storms, fire, lightning and geo-physical phenomena.”

From another article from April 11, 2014:

[link to www.arrl.org]

"The news account cites an Air Force spokesman as saying that final research experiments funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) are set to wrap up next month."

----

Good job, America! Let the Mad Scientist Squad (alias DARPA) loose on your weather systems with no oversight and you get... TORNADOES! EVERYWHERE!

And chemtrailing + HAARP experiments over a supervolcano. Because science. It's going to be an interesting month as DARPA 'wraps up' their weather bastardization experiments.

By the way, someone in Jackson Hole has been personally filming these geo-engineering experiments since August 8, 2013:

Jackson Hole Skywatch - [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]



Don't forget...

worthless5
 Quoting: AllThatCanBe



damnedlaladamned

We all know there is nothing we can do to stop what they are doing.

I think it's time to give a look-see to what helicorder traces LOOK LIKE where tornadoes are occurring...just for reference.

Any good doctor who is baffled will begin by ruling out WHAT it's NOT.
-- TRUST THE PLAN --
.......WWG1WGA......
____________________________
still in awe of many things
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57726135
United Kingdom
05/05/2014 12:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
Mornin' E.M......

I've been thinking more about the "weirdness" regarding the helicorders, the different sensitivity settings, weird spikes and so on. They are not necessarily "designed to confuse us".

The sensors have many settings, but I'll just take 3 for simplicity. The sensor can be set to measure movement North/South, or East/West, or Up/Down. Now let's say someone was watching Up/Down movement in a specific area, and so has set the sensitivity, filters etc to the appropriate level, and all is well. Everyone using that device knows what they are looking at. Now let's say that they see, from other instruments, GPS and so on, that the ground at that location is moving centimeters per year North. They already have loads of data for the Up/Down movement, and now want to know if the ground is sliding - like moving smoothly over magma, or if it's "rumbling", like rocks grinding over each other, or if it's "jerking" etc. They then inform all the "users" of that data that as of midnight on a specific day that sensor will be changed accordingly. So first they change it to see North/South movement instead of Up/Down, then reset all the other parameters, including sensitivity, and from the next day the chart looks entirely different - spikes that were never there before etc. Everyone "using" the info now knows that what they are looking at is to be interpreted quite differently, so everyone is happy. We are not geoligists and don't get the "memo", so suddenly we are speculating wildly, when in reality it's just normal procedure.

Personally, I think just calculating shakes we are interested in into uV readings, as shown for each sensor at the time, is good enough to more or less determine the direction it came from, or the epicentre.

For those who want to go full tard, I imagine an email to NPS/USGS requesting a listing of each sensor, what it's set to measure, what all it's parameters are and so on, would probably be answered. Dunno, am not interested enough myself to ask.

Thanks for all the interesting posts E.M.
RefreshPage

User ID: 57184870
Canada
05/05/2014 01:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: YELLOWSTONE UPDATES (2014) : ... Strange things happening @ Yellowstone...
Ugh, Upper Geyser Basin cam is frozen again.
The Internet is a confusing place, where nothing is as it seems - Joshuah Bearman





GLP