Could CERN Create a Black Hole?

POOF! Best way for us all to die.

learn about gravity in the few seconds before they get destroyed?

No.

If they did it would be microscopic and would collapse almost as soon as it was created

I entirely agree. Like a video game shutting off we'd just wake up in the living room.

yes and i believe they have created small ones that fade quickly but nothing significant

Just if they hire one :racist5:

Cern will not produce blackholes for jhfc....
The energy used to smash particles so cern can take a look at what particles spring out of nothing is nothing compared to the energy found just several miles above our heads. If particles travelling fast could produce blackholes then the EArth would have been swallowed up a very long time ago....

Yes it makes them so small you need a microscope to see them and they last for less than a microsecond.

i hope some christfanatic apcaliptic reveals himself
and put a puece of play doh on that glass....

what the fuck, why not. It can't be any worse on the other side.

Unless there's Borg. I hate the Borg. It's always assimilate this Assimilate that with them.

Intuitively, messing with previously un-tested energies seems like a very dangerous idea to me.

One of the pandora box issues of cosmos, life,reality and existence..and to a lesser degree humans and human development..is the process of interaction and reaction.

Therefore the more we human blindly or theoretically quest to find answers to all manner of things within the cosmos and our lives on earth, through direct research, experimentation or trying to put our idea and theories into physical practice... is our nieve and often ignorant inability to appreciate risk of the unknown.. which is both in the fiddling and also not really always being that sure what the outcomes will be.

Basically it is an informed suck it and see process but often practitioners designer enginners and scientist are often just playing often logically but sometimes ilogically..as the quest is deemed more important than the risk .

But looking at our historic technological and scientific development it is clear most practioners try to theorise risk, but often fail to take into account a fundemental constant.

Which is ....Every action (either positive or negative or the variables inbetween) will have an inverse reaction at some point....sometimes instant sometimes taking longer to reveal itself...and ironnically this will get more and more apparent when playing with the cosmological questions.

So it is only rational to assume the are great risks trying to recreate conditions regarding the principle of cosmic power, creation and formations..because the risks do theoretically higher the closer we get to fundementals.

But curiousity and our desire to know everything in the universe and then harness it for personally advanatage (and worse just to profit) may be the thing that eventually causes our demise.

Simply because most humans aren't totally rational or able to be and most are still clueless about the bipolar and recycling nature of the cosmos...so think they are in control when in fact they are just adding more bipolar chaos to the mix.

Now I am not saying that is wrong or right..because everything in the cosmos is chaotic and unstable , so will come, then go and then get recycled into new forms and expressions (infinitely..between the light and dark matter phases of the cosmic cycle).and all thing will flip and fluctuate between the opposing positive and negative polar extremes (that electrical energy ensures).

But our wonder and weakness is our delusional hierarchical perceptions and ongoing arrogance that the cosmos was built for us...when infact it is just a cyclic part of what the cosmos can create, as and when conditions allow...and as such we (and everything else in the cosmos) are one and the same thing and are as bipolar, unstable and fragile, creative, destructive and infinite. But only our elemental energy and matter...our physical forms are always temporary and transient.

My point is that it actually matters little (in the greater schemes and cycles of reality) whether unstable bipolar humans accidentally, purposely or through ignorance or action eventually kill this planet and eachother through our ongoing endevours to understand ourselves and the cosmos and play and think we can control it..which is absurd.

.or that the cyclically nature and eventual demise of our sun, solar system or an external cosmic event or even a humble desease kills us all...

The truth is all things will return to their elemental states...but it is not death and we often mistake but just the cyclic end of physical eras and epochs of life and light.

Problem is that it is tough for highly complex bipolar organic creation, such and evolved humans..who often in the desire to exist amd fear of their demise...naturally want to understand and find ways to hold back time and remain in their physical forms as long as possible, some even want to live forever..so seek ways to do so.

Especially as the more aware know quite well, that to continue our species..we will have to learn to travel into space and find a new host to colonise oneday...because bipolar reality ensures this planet will die, lr lose its capacity to sustain and maintain organic life ...somewhen.

But whether we humans go out with a bang beforehand is the real worry and of course big never ending question?.playing will weapons, bombs, genetics, biology, robots and elemental particle physics and cosmic light and dark matter..all inclusively have positve and negative potentials and outcomes.

But while we are still mainly ignorant divided and focussed more on all of man made hierarchically deluded and exploitation dog eat dog survival and existence and our individual personal aspirations for profit, power and gains..the future just seems more of the same booms and busts and huge divisions and disparities anyway.

So maybe a black hole (which is not a hole but simply the inverse phase of light matter) might wake people up..or put them to rest...only time will tell.

[link to www.google.com.au (secure)]

Shiva at the LHC

Most likely, but they will collapse in an instant, and the resulting data will give us a better understanding of gravity.

Which is like the most important thing ever!!!

Thread: "CERN CANNOT CONTINUE LHC EXPERIMENT"..............micro blackholes arise quicker than expected,DO NOT EVAPORATE and undetected

Thread: SCIENTISTS DISCOVER SMALL BLACK HOLES PRODUCE 20 MILLION MPH WINDS....same as SUPER MASSIVE BLACKHOLES..

STOP that BS about CERN DOOM!!!

What they are not telling you is THAT IS their primary objective, to contain a singularity, limitless free energy, data storage and processing power

also applications such as but not limited to; wormhole tech, weaponry, replication tech, time travel etc

interdimensional gateway

Black holes do not exist. They are a fiction created to explain a mathematical equation which divides by zero. You can't divide by zero, it is undefined.

But, a black hole is a singularity, which means the point where continuity of all physics laws cease to exist. What if it breaks the law of preservation of energy? What if it create a time turnnel or whatever with an opening at another massive black hole where all the stars and planets nearby are pulled into and its energy comes out through this tiny tiny micro black hole and makes it getting bigger and bigger until it eventually suck the whole planet into?

Just a basic understanding of science would tell you no, Cern cannot create a blackhole.

per Stephen Hawkings

"The Higgs potential has the worrisome feature that it might become metastable at energies above 100 [billion] gigaelectronvolts (GeV). … This could mean that the universe could undergo catastrophic vacuum decay, with a bubble of the true vacuum expanding at the speed of light. This could happen at any time and we wouldn't see it coming."

If one believes in supersymmetry sting theory, then the above states that due to matter being created at a stabilized rate an opposite creation of dark matter inevitability ensues. As per black holes, dark matter accumulates with an unlimited appetite for matter.

The Lord of Time that destroys and creates. Wow, people ask us to say stop the bs about CERN. Hey, CERN with your big scary demi god devil out front...you stop first.

black holes would be a best case dooms scenario because it would be fast.

At present, the Cern experiments create limited potential higg boson reactions. The plans however include larger and larger colliders. Where the tipping point for Dark matter productions meets the potential for metastable energies remains unknown possibly unknowable.

Cerns goal is dark matter production. A byproduct of dark matter is antimatter.

[link to www.foxnews.com]

Stephen Hawking, who once cautioned that both artificial intelligence and invading aliens could wipe out the human race, now has another dire prediction – the Higgs boson, or “God particle,” might destroy the universe. In a preface to a new book, Hawking describes his concern that if the particle became unstable, the “universe could undergo catastrophic vacuum decay,”

According to Hawking, the vacuum decay “could expand at the speed of light” and that this could “happen at any time and we couldn’t see it coming.” While that statement might be cause for alarm, Hawking acknowledges in the essay that this threat is highly theoretical. A particle accelerator that could even reach 100bn GEV would need to be larger than the Earth itself, and would “unlikely to be funded in the present economic climate.”

No.

Also, don't read blogs looking for scientific content. You WILL be mislead.