YU55 will crash into the Earth in about an hour! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1528894 Canada 11/09/2011 09:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1420792 United States 11/09/2011 09:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
A Voice In The Wilderness User ID: 1506783 United States 11/09/2011 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The most effective form of deception is when 99% of truth is mixed with 1% error. However, the 1% is often the difference between life and death. Quoting: A Voice In The Wilderness True, most of what he says is correct. But this is only when it comes to non-consequential and non-vital information which no one has a problem with the public knowing. Think of Astromut as NASA. How much does NASA tell you? Just enough to keep you in the dark. Thank you! I've been trying to get that point across re: Glenn Beck and it seems like they just don't get it. Of course he's right about almost everything. But when it came to those FEMA camps, and his oh-so-serious effort to prove them to exist, or not, he denied they existed. An example of that 1% that 'they' do not want to be confirmed. Precisely. I agree about Beck. In fact, anyone who is allowed to REMAIN on cable TV, while 'exposing' what is taking place in the world or behind the scenes, is 100% controlled by the very powers they profess to expose. The Truth About Thread: The FINAL EVENTS Of Bible Prophecy "We here are of the conviction that the papacy is the seat of the true and real Antichrist." - Martin Luther (Aug. 18, 1520) "While God has given ample evidence for faith, He will never remove all excuse for unbelief. All who look for hooks to hang their doubts upon will find them. And those who refuse to accept and obey God's Word until every objection has been removed, and there is no longer an opportunity for doubt, will never come to the light" (The Great Controversy, p. 527). "Jesus did not come to change the law, but he came to explain it, and that very fact shows that it remains, for there is no need to explain that which is abrogated." - Charles Spurgeon "Jesuit Adam Weishaupt established the modern version of the Illuminati specifically to be a front organization behind which the Jesuits could hide. After being formally abolished by Pope Clement XIV in 1773, the Jesuits used the Illuminati and other organizations to carry out their operations. Thus, the front organizations would be blamed for the trouble caused by the Jesuits." Bill Hughes (Author of The Secret Terrorists and The Enemy Unmasked) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 935589 United States 11/10/2011 12:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Full O' Fail! Excellent call, Asshat.... OP...What you're saying makes sense to me. Do you or anyone else knows where YU55 will hit? Did you say YU55 hits tonight (9th) or on the 11th? Quoting: Hells Truant YU55 will hit tonight in the Aleutian islands. |
MONSTER User ID: 2122560 United States 11/10/2011 12:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4403440 United States 11/10/2011 12:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
jilly23810 User ID: 1542157 United States 11/10/2011 08:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Olgoth666 User ID: 1266851 United States 11/10/2011 08:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sergman User ID: 1340151 Canada 11/10/2011 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 11/10/2011 03:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did any of you actually witness the asteroid getting farther away from the earth? I doubt it. And if you think you did you were deceived. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1518519 The OP does have a point that none of you can actually be certain that you were watching YU55. Wrong. It was fully possible to not only confirm that you were seeing YU55, but you could have even plotted its orbit and determined that it was getting farther away from earth using nothing but the video feed I provided you and knowing that I was in Florida (a fact I mentioned in the chat room at least once that night). I determined the orbit using just that data myself. What you all watched last night was the streaming video from Astromut who is nothing but a disinfo agent who has swayed a lot of uneducated and common-sense-lacking people on this forum to believe every little thing he says. Quoting: voiceWrong again. I'm an amateur astronomer, not a "disinfo agent." I back up what I say and what I presented was completely confirmable. It is not my problem if you are too "uneducated" to know how to confirm it yourself. I calculated the orbit of YU55 myself using nothing but amateur data before the approach happened. My results confirmed the JPL trajectory of the approach. Using the video from my broadcast I've now been able to confirm that my prediction was right and the asteroid followed the trajectory I said it would. That's not trivial information, it completely debunks the OP, and it debunks your claim that I'm a "disinfo agent." I'll be posting the results of my orbital calculation from the video along with the data later tonight. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 11/10/2011 04:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah, I know that's what the MSM keeps saying. They want you to think the danger has already passed. NASA & JPL both say the closest point is on 11/9. Kinda hard to say that when people on this site had a live stream of yu55 lastnight. So how will it double back on itself True but what if you all were just watching a satellite???? Just sayin' Astrometrically solving several images from the video and using the data on the object's position to calculate its orbit would have told you that. I did just that last night, and I'll upload a video showing the results tonight. Just saying, that is something you can figure out. Not only does it show you the fact that it was indeed YU55, it shows that YU55 was following the trajectory JPL said it would follow. |
MrOysterhead User ID: 1546790 United States 11/10/2011 04:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Astromut, I got a serious question. What were all the streaks in the foreground and if they were stars what were the white spots in the background? There are two kinds of people who come to GLP: Those who want to know and those who want to know who wants to know. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 11/10/2011 04:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MrOysterhead User ID: 1546790 United States 11/10/2011 04:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Astromut, I got a serious question. Quoting: MrOysterhead What were all the streaks in the foreground and if they were stars what were the white spots in the background? In which video? Mine, or clay center? If mine, do you mean the occasional streaks whenever I moved the telescope? sorry, Clay Center. There were tons of them. There are two kinds of people who come to GLP: Those who want to know and those who want to know who wants to know. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 11/10/2011 04:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Astromut, I got a serious question. Quoting: MrOysterhead What were all the streaks in the foreground and if they were stars what were the white spots in the background? In which video? Mine, or clay center? If mine, do you mean the occasional streaks whenever I moved the telescope? sorry, Clay Center. There were tons of them. Ah yeah, those were stars. [link to lightsinthedark.files.wordpress.com] They were tracking on the asteroid, so the stars streaked by. The other dots were hot pixels. Notice how they don't form what astronomers call a "point spread function" in the image, whereas the asteroid does; the asteroid's light isn't confined to a single pixel and is spread out a bit, even though they're focused properly. |
MrOysterhead User ID: 1546790 United States 11/10/2011 04:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Astromut, I got a serious question. Quoting: MrOysterhead What were all the streaks in the foreground and if they were stars what were the white spots in the background? In which video? Mine, or clay center? If mine, do you mean the occasional streaks whenever I moved the telescope? sorry, Clay Center. There were tons of them. Ah yeah, those were stars. [link to lightsinthedark.files.wordpress.com] They were tracking on the asteroid, so the stars streaked by. The other dots were hot pixels. Notice how they don't form what astronomers call a "point spread function" in the image, whereas the asteroid does; the asteroid's light isn't confined to a single pixel and is spread out a bit, even though they're focused properly. ah, thank you. that makes sense. i kept asking about that when it was going on but no one seemed to relay to me that they were "tracking" yu55. I thought i was looking at a "fixed" feed and maybe the streaks were debris moving with yu55 or something. thanks. There are two kinds of people who come to GLP: Those who want to know and those who want to know who wants to know. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1470031 United States 11/10/2011 04:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1420792 United States 11/10/2011 05:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5119267 United States 11/10/2011 07:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4809957 United States 11/10/2011 07:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Astromut In which video? Mine, or clay center? If mine, do you mean the occasional streaks whenever I moved the telescope? sorry, Clay Center. There were tons of them. Ah yeah, those were stars. [link to lightsinthedark.files.wordpress.com] They were tracking on the asteroid, so the stars streaked by. The other dots were hot pixels. Notice how they don't form what astronomers call a "point spread function" in the image, whereas the asteroid does; the asteroid's light isn't confined to a single pixel and is spread out a bit, even though they're focused properly. ah, thank you. that makes sense. i kept asking about that when it was going on but no one seemed to relay to me that they were "tracking" yu55. I thought i was looking at a "fixed" feed and maybe the streaks were debris moving with yu55 or something. thanks. Stay on topic... Now back to telling OPie how much of a retarded moran he is and how he fails at life. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 11/10/2011 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1518519 Yeah, I know that's what the MSM keeps saying. They want you to think the danger has already passed. NASA & JPL both say the closest point is on 11/9. Kinda hard to say that when people on this site had a live stream of yu55 lastnight. So how will it double back on itself True but what if you all were just watching a satellite???? Just sayin' Astrometrically solving several images from the video and using the data on the object's position to calculate its orbit would have told you that. I did just that last night, and I'll upload a video showing the results tonight. Just saying, that is something you can figure out. Not only does it show you the fact that it was indeed YU55, it shows that YU55 was following the trajectory JPL said it would follow. Here are the results: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5101102 United States 11/10/2011 10:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | . Quoting: Wisconsin ... I'm monitoring this post and deleting all the other 2005YU55 threads in my collection ... . ... this would be the only possible event now ... . Just go ahead and delete this thread to. It will fail pretty soon and the op will go back into hiding . ... no ... I'll give it a week ... . |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 11/10/2011 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | . Quoting: Wisconsin ... I'm monitoring this post and deleting all the other 2005YU55 threads in my collection ... . ... this would be the only possible event now ... . Just go ahead and delete this thread to. It will fail pretty soon and the op will go back into hiding . ... no ... I'll give it a week ... . A week? It missed the moon, in fact it missed the moon on precisely the trajectory JPL said it would miss on. |
Silent Wind User ID: 1426743 United States 11/10/2011 10:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: G0D1337 Kinda hard to say that when people on this site had a live stream of yu55 lastnight. So how will it double back on itself True but what if you all were just watching a satellite???? Just sayin' Astrometrically solving several images from the video and using the data on the object's position to calculate its orbit would have told you that. I did just that last night, and I'll upload a video showing the results tonight. Just saying, that is something you can figure out. Not only does it show you the fact that it was indeed YU55, it shows that YU55 was following the trajectory JPL said it would follow. Here are the results: Fear not. I trust you like I do NASA. Comforting the disturbed and disturbing the comfortable. "So long as it harms no other, do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law" |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 922113 United States 11/10/2011 10:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Astrometrically solving several images from the video and using the data on the object's position to calculate its orbit would have told you that. I did just that last night, and I'll upload a video showing the results tonight. Just saying, that is something you can figure out. Not only does it show you the fact that it was indeed YU55, it shows that YU55 was following the trajectory JPL said it would follow. Here are the results: Fear not. I trust you like I do NASA. Not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing... In any case, the point I was trying to make is that these things are all verifiable, in fact the solution is quite elegant, I would even say beautiful. With just a regular amateur telescope and a sensitive video camera it's entirely possible to calculate and verify the orbit of an asteroid by yourself from your own sidewalk. To me... that's amazing. By the same token, anyone can validate the orbital solution themselves using the video I streamed the other night. Last Edited by Astromut on 11/10/2011 10:45 PM |
MrOysterhead User ID: 1546790 United States 11/11/2011 08:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ah yeah, those were stars. [link to lightsinthedark.files.wordpress.com] They were tracking on the asteroid, so the stars streaked by. The other dots were hot pixels. Notice how they don't form what astronomers call a "point spread function" in the image, whereas the asteroid does; the asteroid's light isn't confined to a single pixel and is spread out a bit, even though they're focused properly. ah, thank you. that makes sense. i kept asking about that when it was going on but no one seemed to relay to me that they were "tracking" yu55. I thought i was looking at a "fixed" feed and maybe the streaks were debris moving with yu55 or something. thanks. Stay on topic... Now back to telling OPie how much of a retarded moran he is and how he fails at life. touche There are two kinds of people who come to GLP: Those who want to know and those who want to know who wants to know. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 11/11/2011 08:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Did any of you actually witness the asteroid getting farther away from the earth? I doubt it. And if you think you did you were deceived. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1518519 The OP does have a point that none of you can actually be certain that you were watching YU55. Wrong. It was fully possible to not only confirm that you were seeing YU55, but you could have even plotted its orbit and determined that it was getting farther away from earth using nothing but the video feed I provided you and knowing that I was in Florida (a fact I mentioned in the chat room at least once that night). I determined the orbit using just that data myself. What you all watched last night was the streaming video from Astromut who is nothing but a disinfo agent who has swayed a lot of uneducated and common-sense-lacking people on this forum to believe every little thing he says. Quoting: voiceWrong again. I'm an amateur astronomer, not a "disinfo agent." I back up what I say and what I presented was completely confirmable. It is not my problem if you are too "uneducated" to know how to confirm it yourself. I calculated the orbit of YU55 myself using nothing but amateur data before the approach happened. My results confirmed the JPL trajectory of the approach. Using the video from my broadcast I've now been able to confirm that my prediction was right and the asteroid followed the trajectory I said it would. That's not trivial information, it completely debunks the OP, and it debunks your claim that I'm a "disinfo agent." I'll be posting the results of my orbital calculation from the video along with the data later tonight. |