"We dance with the skulls in the church" MODERATED. UPDATED WITH CURRENT PAEDOPHILE ISSUES//LINKS P268.

It's almost as if all the pieces are falling into place. I wonder what will happen when everyone's minds will be synchronized with the idea of international pedo rings?

FBI Study of Childhood Ritual Abuse:

DYNAMICS OF CASES What are "these kinds of cases"? (Note 1) They were and continue to be difficult to define. They all involve allegations of what sounds like child sexual abuse, but with a combination of some atypical dynamics. These cases seem to have the following four dynamics in common: multiple young victims, multiple offenders, fear as the controlling tactic, and bizarre or ritualistic activity.
MULTIPLE YOUNG VICTIMS In almost all the cases the sexual abuse was alleged to have taken place or at least begun when the victims were between the ages of birth and six. (Note 2) This very young age may be an important key to understanding these cases. In addition the victims all described multiple children being abused. The numbers ranged from three or four to as many as several hundred victims. (Note 3)
MULTIPLE OFFENDERS In almost all the cases the victims reported numerous offenders. The numbers ranged from two or three all the way up to dozens of offenders. In one recent case the victims alleged 400-500 offenders were involved. Interestingly many of the offenders (perhaps as many as 40-50 percent) were reported to be females. (Note 4) The multiple offenders were often family members and were described as being part of a cult, occult, or satanic group.
FEAR AS CONTROLLING TACTIC Child molesters in general are able to maintain control and ensure the secrecy of their victims in a variety of ways. These include attention and affection, coercion, blackmail, embarrassment, threats, and violence. In almost all of these cases I have studied, the victims described being frightened and reported threats against themselves, their families, their friends, and even their pets. (Note 5) They reported witnessing acts of violence perpetrated to reinforce this fear. It is my belief that this fear and the traumatic memory of the events may be another key to understanding many of these cases.
BIZARRE OR RITUALISTIC ACTIVITY This is the most difficult dynamic of these cases to describe. "Bizarre" is a relative term. Is the use of urine or feces in sexual activity bizarre, or is it a well-documented aspect of sexual deviancy, or is it part of established satanic rituals? As previously discussed, the ritualistic aspect is even more difficult to define. How do you distinguish acts performed in a precise manner to enhance or allow sexual arousal from those acts that fulfill spiritual needs or comply with "religious" ceremonies? Victims in these cases report ceremonies, chanting, robes and costumes, drugs, use of urine and feces, animal sacrifice, torture, abduction, mutilation, murder, and even cannibalism and vampirism. All things considered, the word "bizarre" is probably preferable to the word "ritual" to describe this activity.
[link to www.religioustolerance.org]

full 77 page police report has landed on Sabines drive.

[link to drive.google.com (secure)]

As wrong as it may seem, my over-riding concern of this report is of the absolute near illiteracy of the authors. This is an official report, yet it is littered with misspellings and basic grammatical errors. Isn't this supposed to be a clinical and clear representation of the facts, set out in unequivocal terms? Or are we now so enmired in a lack of basic, clear, functional language that we have to make a "best guess" at what the reporters mean?

Surely it should not be too much to ask that professionals have the ability to represent their thoughts and findings in a direct way , not open to misunderstanding.

As for the content....

As wrong as it may seem, my over-riding concern of this report is of the absolute near illiteracy of the authors. This is an official report, yet it is littered with misspellings and basic grammatical errors. Isn't this supposed to be a clinical and clear representation of the facts, set out in unequivocal terms? Or are we now so enmired in a lack of basic, clear, functional language that we have to make a "best guess" at what the reporters mean?

Surely it should not be too much to ask that professionals have the ability to represent their thoughts and findings in a direct way , not open to misunderstanding.

As for the content....