WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68368689 United States 08/27/2015 05:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2179358 United States 08/27/2015 05:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70169103 United States 08/27/2015 05:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70176875 United Kingdom 08/27/2015 05:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage Yeah, too fucking late now, the footage is gone. Nothing's gonna come of this at all. What difference does it make..anyone with half a brain that's been following this event knows its totally fake and laughable. |
Doometropolis User ID: 69438474 United States 08/27/2015 05:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70174327 United States 08/27/2015 05:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage From the OP's link "Strasser tweeted that he and McKelvey were told the footage “could be evidence,” and that they were forced to delete it." That makes no sense. If it's evidence, the last thing the cops want to do is delete it. Do cops raid homes for drugs and then tell the home owner to flush the drugs because they could be used for evidence? Something is not right here. |
Esoterica User ID: 36668746 United States 08/27/2015 05:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage Great CATCH OP! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70100602 Sorry to spam on your thread but it directly points why the crisis actors got angry when the statementpointing additional footage was mentioned in my pinned thread Thread: Why Were The Crisis Actors Of Victim's Father and Boyfriend Get Angry Over Being Asked For Evidence? The title of your thread is greatly misleading. The so called "evidence" that was deleted has nothing to do with the Megan Kelly interview. She simply asked of the camera man was a hero for pointing the camera as the shooter. She said to "get more evidence of who the shooter " then was cut off. not asked for.. But you get the gist. Last Edited by Esoterica on 08/27/2015 05:42 PM "The more you know, the crazier you look" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 67923503 United States 08/27/2015 05:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5023449 United States 08/27/2015 05:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage Wait just a minute........... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70174327 From the OP's link "Strasser tweeted that he and McKelvey were told the footage “could be evidence,” and that they were forced to delete it." That makes no sense. If it's evidence, the last thing the cops want to do is delete it. Do cops raid homes for drugs and then tell the home owner to flush the drugs because they could be used for evidence? Something is not right here. LOL Where're you from AC; anytown, U.S.A.? Sounds like a swell place. I'd like to go there--but it is far, far away from here. |
TakingCues User ID: 28811174 United States 08/27/2015 05:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage First off, the reporter himself says the footage was poor footage anyhow. He didn't record anything worthwhile. Quoting: TakingCues Secondly, the evidence comment the reporter is so puzzled about isn't all that puzzling. The cop isn't saying he wants evidence destroyed. He's saying that that footage may contain evidence they are gathering and that they don't want it entering the public realm until the case is processed and what not. That's pretty common practice. Now whether he had a legal right to actually make the guy delete the footage, well, it appears he did not have that right. He overstepped his boundaries there. Which is another thing cops tend to do on an all too regular basis. The "evidence" deletion is explained above. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70174327 United States 08/27/2015 05:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage Wait just a minute........... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70174327 From the OP's link "Strasser tweeted that he and McKelvey were told the footage “could be evidence,” and that they were forced to delete it." That makes no sense. If it's evidence, the last thing the cops want to do is delete it. Do cops raid homes for drugs and then tell the home owner to flush the drugs because they could be used for evidence? Something is not right here. LOL Where're you from AC; anytown, U.S.A.? Sounds like a swell place. I'd like to go there--but it is far, far away from here. Why did you feel the need to make up a story about me because of what I posted? Something is not right about that too. What's your agenda here? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1527832 United States 08/27/2015 05:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage RT = Realism Transposed such a propaganda tool. some of you get too much fluoride in your water and watch too much TV. some times shit just happens. i dont care if this is a conspiracy web site, some of you are just batshit crazy. |
Esoterica User ID: 36668746 United States 08/27/2015 05:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage First off, the reporter himself says the footage was poor footage anyhow. He didn't record anything worthwhile. Quoting: TakingCues Secondly, the evidence comment the reporter is so puzzled about isn't all that puzzling. The cop isn't saying he wants evidence destroyed. He's saying that that footage may contain evidence they are gathering and that they don't want it entering the public realm until the case is processed and what not. That's pretty common practice. Now whether he had a legal right to actually make the guy delete the footage, well, it appears he did not have that right. He overstepped his boundaries there. Which is another thing cops tend to do on an all too regular basis. Common practice would be to confiscate the card so they could have more evidence. Not says it contains evidence and have them delete. Makes no sense. Imo "The more you know, the crazier you look" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70174327 United States 08/27/2015 05:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage First off, the reporter himself says the footage was poor footage anyhow. He didn't record anything worthwhile. Quoting: TakingCues Secondly, the evidence comment the reporter is so puzzled about isn't all that puzzling. The cop isn't saying he wants evidence destroyed. He's saying that that footage may contain evidence they are gathering and that they don't want it entering the public realm until the case is processed and what not. That's pretty common practice. Now whether he had a legal right to actually make the guy delete the footage, well, it appears he did not have that right. He overstepped his boundaries there. Which is another thing cops tend to do on an all too regular basis. The "evidence" deletion is explained above. Thanks. Too many cops are incompetent boobs these days. People have the right to film in public. Period. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70109020 United States 08/27/2015 05:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage This story is getting stranger by the minute. Quoting: koevtsibird Two BBC journalists say they were threatened by Virginia police after filming the scene where gunman Bryce Williams crashed and shot himself on Wednesday. They say a cop threatened to confiscate their camera and car if they did not delete their footage. <50% [link to www.rt.com] Wow, Russia Today? The news source that NEVER lies or exaggerates? This is to be taken seriously. This is me taking this seriously. You should all take this seriously. Has anyone checked with the World Weekly Star for corroboration? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70073403 United States 08/27/2015 05:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage The reporters could prove they aren't lying...It sounds like a simple delete operation was performed....If they don't use the device further, the video data should still be retrievable, right? Recover the video and broadcast it into the inter-webs. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70084770 Canada 08/27/2015 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage First off, the reporter himself says the footage was poor footage anyhow. He didn't record anything worthwhile. Quoting: TakingCues Secondly, the evidence comment the reporter is so puzzled about isn't all that puzzling. The cop isn't saying he wants evidence destroyed. He's saying that that footage may contain evidence they are gathering and that they don't want it entering the public realm until the case is processed and what not. That's pretty common practice. Now whether he had a legal right to actually make the guy delete the footage, well, it appears he did not have that right. He overstepped his boundaries there. Which is another thing cops tend to do on an all too regular basis. The "evidence" deletion is explained above. It's actually not explained. Just because it's 'common practice,' doesn't make it legit. Especially in such a high profile event. Come on. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16213727 United States 08/27/2015 05:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage Sorry but this asshole is BS too. the video journalist (Strasser): "Strasser said that he decided to delete the footage because “it was either not being able to work for the rest of the day, without camera or car, or delete crappy footage from far away.” He added that he “chose the latter.”...(MO - Oh boohoo, you can't work for the rest of the day - we'll see you in the poor house!!! crybaby! - Apparently he'll never go to jail to protect his sources!) ^^^what a bunch of f-in BS lazy ass video journalist!! Hell, I could contact my employer (that is if I was actually a good/great video journalist!) and say my car, camera and all was confiscated at the scene - --come get me, bring me another camera and I can continue with my work day here....what a bunch of BS! Oh gee, maybe they should have instant download to the station if shit like this might happen!!!! Gawd I hate this f-in corrupt BS media!!!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5023449 United States 08/27/2015 05:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage Wait just a minute........... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70174327 From the OP's link "Strasser tweeted that he and McKelvey were told the footage “could be evidence,” and that they were forced to delete it." That makes no sense. If it's evidence, the last thing the cops want to do is delete it. Do cops raid homes for drugs and then tell the home owner to flush the drugs because they could be used for evidence? Something is not right here. LOL Where're you from AC; anytown, U.S.A.? Sounds like a swell place. I'd like to go there--but it is far, far away from here. Why did you feel the need to make up a story about me because of what I posted? Something is not right about that too. What's your agenda here? Just to make fun of people who think TV is real life, is all. Nothing personal, I assure you. I can enjoy the entertainment of professional wrestling--but I don't try to tell myself that it is real. Why are you all so emotionally involved in things that are pure speculation? The hoaxers actually have something to lose, so I understand where they are coming from; but if your side is right--what do you gain exept a race war and a (more) totalitarian regime? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69573184 Canada 08/27/2015 05:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 67848085 United States 08/27/2015 05:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1527832 United States 08/27/2015 05:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage This story is getting stranger by the minute. Quoting: koevtsibird Two BBC journalists say they were threatened by Virginia police after filming the scene where gunman Bryce Williams crashed and shot himself on Wednesday. They say a cop threatened to confiscate their camera and car if they did not delete their footage. <50% [link to www.rt.com] Wow, Russia Today? The news source that NEVER lies or exaggerates? This is to be taken seriously. This is me taking this seriously. You should all take this seriously. Has anyone checked with the World Weekly Star for corroboration? maybe check with Socrcha Faal too? lol |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59604610 United States 08/27/2015 05:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage Wait just a minute........... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70174327 From the OP's link "Strasser tweeted that he and McKelvey were told the footage “could be evidence,” and that they were forced to delete it." That makes no sense. If it's evidence, the last thing the cops want to do is delete it. Do cops raid homes for drugs and then tell the home owner to flush the drugs because they could be used for evidence? Something is not right here. nothing is right on this one |
TakingCues User ID: 28811174 United States 08/27/2015 05:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage First off, the reporter himself says the footage was poor footage anyhow. He didn't record anything worthwhile. Quoting: TakingCues Secondly, the evidence comment the reporter is so puzzled about isn't all that puzzling. The cop isn't saying he wants evidence destroyed. He's saying that that footage may contain evidence they are gathering and that they don't want it entering the public realm until the case is processed and what not. That's pretty common practice. Now whether he had a legal right to actually make the guy delete the footage, well, it appears he did not have that right. He overstepped his boundaries there. Which is another thing cops tend to do on an all too regular basis. The "evidence" deletion is explained above. It's actually not explained. Just because it's 'common practice,' doesn't make it legit. Especially in such a high profile event. Come on. They weren't destroying actual evidence. They were destroying footage the guy had of them on the scene gathering evidence. Now if the guy happened to be on the scene and filmed the car crashing or something like that, then you would have something here. All that occurred though was the cop making him destroy footage that if it went public could have revealed info to the public prior to the case being processed and what not. It's not as of the footage captured anything the cops didn't gather as evidence already or were in the process of doing. And yes, the cop apparently didn't have the right to make the reporter delete the footage. Like I said, he overstepped his bounds by doing that. But again, cops behaving like that in general isn't all that uncommon. Many of them tend to abide their position of power or actually believe they are allowed to do certain things that aren't actually legal. Part of the reason they behave that way though is because they rarely get in trouble for it anyhow. Last Edited by TakingCues on 08/27/2015 06:00 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5023449 United States 08/27/2015 06:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65093267 United States 08/27/2015 06:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59067074 United States 08/27/2015 06:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage First off, the reporter himself says the footage was poor footage anyhow. He didn't record anything worthwhile. Quoting: TakingCues Secondly, the evidence comment the reporter is so puzzled about isn't all that puzzling. The cop isn't saying he wants evidence destroyed. He's saying that that footage may contain evidence they are gathering and that they don't want it entering the public realm until the case is processed and what not. That's pretty common practice. Now whether he had a legal right to actually make the guy delete the footage, well, it appears he did not have that right. He overstepped his boundaries there. Which is another thing cops tend to do on an all too regular basis. The "evidence" deletion is explained above. Thanks. Too many cops are incompetent boobs these days. People have the right to film in public. Period. Your RIGHTS are what they SAY they are. Unless you're willing to use force to protect your RIGHTS. which we never do, cause we're a bunch of sjw pussies. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 67594723 United States 08/27/2015 06:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage This story is getting stranger by the minute. Quoting: koevtsibird Two BBC journalists say they were threatened by Virginia police after filming the scene where gunman Bryce Williams crashed and shot himself on Wednesday. They say a cop threatened to confiscate their camera and car if they did not delete their footage. <50% [link to www.rt.com] they do not want anyone messing with the PsyOp. |
koevtsibird (OP) User ID: 70093593 Bulgaria 08/27/2015 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage Lets stay friendly please. Ignore the idiots Do not fear the great changes we face at this time. Simply acknowledge this as a grand process, as we move from the old to the new. Are you waiting for something? or are you setting yourself free? And as the old world falls, a new world may be born. And as we learn new things about our universe, may we be mature enough to take our place amongst the stars. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70084770 Canada 08/27/2015 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: WOW!!! BBC journalists covering Virginia shooting 'threatened by police,' forced to delete footage First off, the reporter himself says the footage was poor footage anyhow. He didn't record anything worthwhile. Quoting: TakingCues Secondly, the evidence comment the reporter is so puzzled about isn't all that puzzling. The cop isn't saying he wants evidence destroyed. He's saying that that footage may contain evidence they are gathering and that they don't want it entering the public realm until the case is processed and what not. That's pretty common practice. Now whether he had a legal right to actually make the guy delete the footage, well, it appears he did not have that right. He overstepped his boundaries there. Which is another thing cops tend to do on an all too regular basis. The "evidence" deletion is explained above. It's actually not explained. Just because it's 'common practice,' doesn't make it legit. Especially in such a high profile event. Come on. They weren't destroying actual evidence. They were destroying footage the guy had of them on the scene gathering evidence. Now if the guy happened to be on the scene and filmed the car crashing or something like that, then you would have something here. All that occurred though was the cop making him destroy footage that if it went public could have revealed info to the public prior to the case being processed and what not. It's not as of the footage captured anything the cops didn't gather as evidence already or were in the process of doing. And yes, the cop apparently didn't have the right to make the reporter delete the footage. Like I said, he overstepped his bounds by doing that. But again, cops behaving like that in general isn't all that uncommon. Many of them tend to abide their position of power or actually believe they are allowed to do certain things that aren't actually legal. Part of the reason they behave that way though is because they rarely get in trouble for it anyhow. That in itself is evidence. Do you not think HOW evidence is gathered is important in a case? Police mishandling of evidence, for example. Many a case has been thrown out for that very reason. |