DHS official: Border security bill does not contain ‘amnesty’ poison pills | |
DeplorableOldMan User ID: 76928898 United States 02/16/2019 09:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
CK Dexter Haven User ID: 77047820 Netherlands 02/16/2019 09:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Timur2020 User ID: 72772498 United States 02/16/2019 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Me too - but i still have ZERO trust of mini merkel.... "Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind" Covid, fake riots, communist organizers - keep your powder dry America. This was not the disease or the riots, those both are still on down the line. Garden garden grow spices and medical plants too. I am a VeterAid volunteer for Arrogant Mushroom Healers of Alamogordo. |
abeliever Members User ID: 75691410 Malta 02/16/2019 09:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Proskiracer User ID: 73541539 United States 02/16/2019 09:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Last Edited by Proskiracer on 02/16/2019 09:54 AM THINK ABOUT THIS! The universe created life to be observed, without an observer, it never existed. So it is a mathematical proof that the universe created life. |
Proskiracer User ID: 73541539 United States 02/16/2019 09:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9606458 United States 02/16/2019 09:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thw truth you got cucked by Trump stop trying to do damage control [link to m.washingtontimes.com (secure)] Tucked inside the new spending bill is a new deportation amnesty that security experts fear will lead to a new surge of illegal immigrant children smuggled to the border. The provision in Section 224 of the Homeland Security portion of the bill, creates a loophole in immigration enforcement, giving a safe harbor to illegal immigrants who say they’re willing to take Unaccompanied Alien Children into their homes It puts hundreds of thousands of people off limits for deportation,” said Jessica Vaughan, policy studies director at the Center for Immigration Studies. The provision, sought by Democrats, grows out of the increasingly thorny situation of the tens of thousands of children whose parents pay to smuggle them into the U.S. each year to reunite with their families. Under existing policy, the children are usually processed and quickly released to sponsors — often the very parents or relatives who paid to smuggle them and, in most cases, who are in the U.S. illegally themselves. ‌ Under the Trump administration, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had been conducting legal status checks on households where children were to be placed and had begun to try to deport some people found to be here illegally. The new provision would ban that. The new provision applies not only to households that already sponsor a child — more than 200,000 children have already been released into the U.S. — but also to “prospective” households, meaning those that might take a child in eventually. “If you don’t have a kid here yet to protect you from deportation this is a huge incentive to hire a criminal smuggler to bring your child here,” Ms. Vaughan said. It’s not clear who qualifies as a “prospective family,” but Rosemary Jenks, government relations manager at NumbersUSA, predicted liberal-leaning judges will create an expansive protection for illegal immigrants. |
bobdrake User ID: 77174879 United States 02/16/2019 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75658817 United States 02/16/2019 10:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Been saying this since yesterday. Quoting: DeplorableOldMan Thank you for posting. Five stars and some green! Lots of soy boys half baked Trump “supporters” melted their underwear about this. Definitely lots of Americans aren’t cut off for hard rides,they think that filling their basements with boxes of ammo is enough,but they lack the nerve. We elected Trump through union in consciousness and we have to be strong in belief,supporting him doesn’t matter what. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37488882 United States 02/16/2019 10:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hmm? Quoting: Proud Trump Supporter SNIP "a DHS official told Fox News that terms like "potential sponsor" have precise meanings in Department of Homeland Security regulations -- meanings that severely limit the number of people the budget keeps safe from deportation." Further, because the bill only applies to kids who are unaccompanied, it does not provide protection for those bringing kids into the US. Another major alleged “poison pill” that may be misunderstood is a clause requiring the federal government to "confer and seek to reach mutual agreement" with local governments before building any wall. The Center for Immigration Studies, which favors lower immigration levels, tweeted that “the spending bill would give local governments in the Rio Grande (all of which are *heavily* Democratic) the ability to veto the fence. If those blue municipalities don't agree with DHS, the fence can't get built.” But the DHS official told Fox News on background that the exact language in the budget -- "confer and seek to reach mutual agreement" – nowhere requires the federal government to actually reach an agreement before building fences. Rather, it just requires DHS to consult with local governments – something DHS already generally does, the official noted. [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] You believe the gov man? When you can read it yourself , they fuked us. Get it through your damn skull , nothing good , it’s all bad . Nothing has changed |
SaveUSa User ID: 76789673 United States 02/16/2019 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thw truth you got cucked by Trump stop trying to do damage control Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9606458 [link to m.washingtontimes.com (secure)] Tucked inside the new spending bill is a new deportation amnesty that security experts fear will lead to a new surge of illegal immigrant children smuggled to the border. The provision in Section 224 of the Homeland Security portion of the bill, creates a loophole in immigration enforcement, giving a safe harbor to illegal immigrants who say they’re willing to take Unaccompanied Alien Children into their homes It puts hundreds of thousands of people off limits for deportation,” said Jessica Vaughan, policy studies director at the Center for Immigration Studies. The provision, sought by Democrats, grows out of the increasingly thorny situation of the tens of thousands of children whose parents pay to smuggle them into the U.S. each year to reunite with their families. Under existing policy, the children are usually processed and quickly released to sponsors — often the very parents or relatives who paid to smuggle them and, in most cases, who are in the U.S. illegally themselves. ‌ Under the Trump administration, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had been conducting legal status checks on households where children were to be placed and had begun to try to deport some people found to be here illegally. The new provision would ban that. The new provision applies not only to households that already sponsor a child — more than 200,000 children have already been released into the U.S. — but also to “prospective” households, meaning those that might take a child in eventually. “If you don’t have a kid here yet to protect you from deportation this is a huge incentive to hire a criminal smuggler to bring your child here,” Ms. Vaughan said. It’s not clear who qualifies as a “prospective family,” but Rosemary Jenks, government relations manager at NumbersUSA, predicted liberal-leaning judges will create an expansive protection for illegal immigrants. Unless of course Trump utilizes his broad powers under the latest (and previous) National Emergency declaration(s). One of which our friend Oblahblah enacted under his watch, that continues to remain in force to this day. That said, given the very real crisis on our border (that the media cannot hide from the public anymore, no matter how hard they try), and given Trump’s history of very effectively wielding his Executive authority over these last two years, do you actually think he won’t “do what he says” this time? If you haven’t noticed, he’s been working under the previous declaration already these past two years. He just expanded those powers on Friday. Within the surreal depths of "reality" lies the truth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77301115 United States 02/16/2019 10:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76077911 United States 02/16/2019 11:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77301115 United States 02/16/2019 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hmm? Quoting: Proud Trump Supporter SNIP "a DHS official told Fox News that terms like "potential sponsor" have precise meanings in Department of Homeland Security regulations -- meanings that severely limit the number of people the budget keeps safe from deportation." Further, because the bill only applies to kids who are unaccompanied, it does not provide protection for those bringing kids into the US. Another major alleged “poison pill” that may be misunderstood is a clause requiring the federal government to "confer and seek to reach mutual agreement" with local governments before building any wall. The Center for Immigration Studies, which favors lower immigration levels, tweeted that “the spending bill would give local governments in the Rio Grande (all of which are *heavily* Democratic) the ability to veto the fence. If those blue municipalities don't agree with DHS, the fence can't get built.” But the DHS official told Fox News on background that the exact language in the budget -- "confer and seek to reach mutual agreement" – nowhere requires the federal government to actually reach an agreement before building fences. Rather, it just requires DHS to consult with local governments – something DHS already generally does, the official noted. [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] You believe the gov man? When you can read it yourself , they fuked us. Get it through your damn skull , nothing good , it’s all bad . Nothing has changed They prefer to live in fantasy land. This is why you don't make someone an Idol. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76572524 United States 02/16/2019 11:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hmm? Quoting: Proud Trump Supporter SNIP "a DHS official told Fox News that terms like "potential sponsor" have precise meanings in Department of Homeland Security regulations -- meanings that severely limit the number of people the budget keeps safe from deportation." Further, because the bill only applies to kids who are unaccompanied, it does not provide protection for those bringing kids into the US. Another major alleged “poison pill” that may be misunderstood is a clause requiring the federal government to "confer and seek to reach mutual agreement" with local governments before building any wall. The Center for Immigration Studies, which favors lower immigration levels, tweeted that “the spending bill would give local governments in the Rio Grande (all of which are *heavily* Democratic) the ability to veto the fence. If those blue municipalities don't agree with DHS, the fence can't get built.” But the DHS official told Fox News on background that the exact language in the budget -- "confer and seek to reach mutual agreement" – nowhere requires the federal government to actually reach an agreement before building fences. Rather, it just requires DHS to consult with local governments – something DHS already generally does, the official noted. [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] Anonymous, unnamed "officials"...hhhmmmmm? I believe it 100%. |
Loup Garou User ID: 75241593 United States 02/16/2019 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Sky is falling, the sky is falling.. Chicken Little What TPTB want is a Nation filled with Pollyanna's.. the name becoming a popular term for someone with a very optimistic outlook: * a subconscious bias towards the positive is often described as the Pollyanna principle. Everyone has become so accustomed to our Government betraying our trust and our interests that half of us automatically doubt everything and believe nothing, and the other half gullibly believe every word they see or hear blindly. Is there no middle ground? [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Just because YOU don’t believe in the Rougarou; or the Loup Garou, don’t make you safe; No ! The Constitution is a blend of 'moral certitude' -- which is one of the reasons that criminals are determined to be rid of it and We the People must be even more determined to defend it. "If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." - Thomas Paine The only thing the Illuminati fears is an independent person who can live, eat, sleep, stay warm and defend themselves separate from Federal help. Pray that the Lord gives us more time! The End is near and time is short! A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion. ~Proverbs 18:2 For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible "A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle" - James Keller Checkd, Keked, and Rekt! #Kids2 |
Vaellene User ID: 74136110 United States 02/16/2019 12:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77313496 United States 02/16/2019 12:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76678898 United States 02/16/2019 01:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Loup Garou User ID: 75241593 United States 02/16/2019 01:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Congress allotted 1,433,709 (1.4 million) annually per member for their support staff, MRA. There is a total of 535 Members of Congress. 100 serve in the U.S. Senate and 435 serve in the U.S. House of Representatives [link to www.senate.gov (secure)] The Members’ Representational Allowance (MRA): Supporting Personnel, Office Expenses, Travel to the District, and Mail for Members of the House The Members’ Representational Allowance (MRA) is available to support Representatives in their official and representational duties. in 2017, each Member’s MRA was equivalent to that “Member’s 2016 amount ... increase[d] ... by approximately 3.9% of the average MRA. In June 2017, all MRAs were increased by $25,000 in response to heightened security concerns.” 20 MRAs ranged from $1,251,177 to $1,433,709, with an average of $1,315,523. The FY2017 legislative branch appropriations act (P.L. 115- 31) increased MRA funding to $562.6 million. No more than 18 permanent employees per each Congress Person. Fair Use 'Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for 'fair use' for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use' Last Edited by Loup Garou on 02/16/2019 01:12 PM Just because YOU don’t believe in the Rougarou; or the Loup Garou, don’t make you safe; No ! The Constitution is a blend of 'moral certitude' -- which is one of the reasons that criminals are determined to be rid of it and We the People must be even more determined to defend it. "If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." - Thomas Paine The only thing the Illuminati fears is an independent person who can live, eat, sleep, stay warm and defend themselves separate from Federal help. Pray that the Lord gives us more time! The End is near and time is short! A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion. ~Proverbs 18:2 For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible "A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle" - James Keller Checkd, Keked, and Rekt! #Kids2 |
In Yer Neck User ID: 72590658 United States 02/16/2019 01:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For example, to be a "potential sponsor" according to the DHS regulations, one must file significant paperwork -- such as showing ID (U.S. or foreign) and proof of residency. The adult applying must also submit documents about the child. I'd like to know what kind of documents are needed for the child. And why this DHS "official" is not named. As far as an ID, and proof of residence, those are very easily obtained by illegals, at least in California. It's been swell, but the swellings gone down.- Tank girl "To hell with them fella's. Buzzards gotta eat, same as the worms." - Josey Wales. |
In Yer Neck User ID: 72590658 United States 02/16/2019 01:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's also worthwhile to note, that this "official" is only correcting the potential sponsor wording. So, we can assume that sponsors are still exempt from deportation. It's been swell, but the swellings gone down.- Tank girl "To hell with them fella's. Buzzards gotta eat, same as the worms." - Josey Wales. |
Mental Case User ID: 68729216 United Arab Emirates 02/16/2019 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76695553 United States 02/16/2019 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76809044 United States 02/16/2019 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hmm? Quoting: Proud Trump Supporter SNIP "a DHS official told Fox News that terms like "potential sponsor" have precise meanings in Department of Homeland Security regulations -- meanings that severely limit the number of people the budget keeps safe from deportation." Further, because the bill only applies to kids who are unaccompanied, it does not provide protection for those bringing kids into the US. Another major alleged “poison pill” that may be misunderstood is a clause requiring the federal government to "confer and seek to reach mutual agreement" with local governments before building any wall. The Center for Immigration Studies, which favors lower immigration levels, tweeted that “the spending bill would give local governments in the Rio Grande (all of which are *heavily* Democratic) the ability to veto the fence. If those blue municipalities don't agree with DHS, the fence can't get built.” But the DHS official told Fox News on background that the exact language in the budget -- "confer and seek to reach mutual agreement" – nowhere requires the federal government to actually reach an agreement before building fences. Rather, it just requires DHS to consult with local governments – something DHS already generally does, the official noted. [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] well, all of that is so stupid, garbled and confusing, Trump needs to ignore the whole thing. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75810306 United States 02/16/2019 03:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73775972 United States 02/16/2019 03:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Been saying this since yesterday. Quoting: DeplorableOldMan Thank you for posting. Five stars and some green! Lots of soy boys half baked Trump “supporters” melted their underwear about this. Definitely lots of Americans aren’t cut off for hard rides,they think that filling their basements with boxes of ammo is enough,but they lack the nerve. We elected Trump through union in consciousness and we have to be strong in belief,supporting him doesn’t matter what. The only soy boys are Trump tards like yourself who defend Trump after every failure. |
In Yer Neck User ID: 72590658 United States 02/16/2019 04:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh, and for the record, the definition of unaccompanied minor includes any child brought over by a parent. As soon as they are removed from their parents, they are legally "unaccompanied". This was put in the bill to make sure illegals who claim these children are not deported. Nothing else. In a 5 month period, ICE identified 80% of "sponsors", as undocumented. It's been swell, but the swellings gone down.- Tank girl "To hell with them fella's. Buzzards gotta eat, same as the worms." - Josey Wales. |
Vicious Deplorable dollop You ain't seen nothing yet! User ID: 77351778 United States 02/16/2019 04:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hmm? Quoting: Proud Trump Supporter SNIP "a DHS official told Fox News that terms like "potential sponsor" have precise meanings in Department of Homeland Security regulations -- meanings that severely limit the number of people the budget keeps safe from deportation." Further, because the bill only applies to kids who are unaccompanied, it does not provide protection for those bringing kids into the US. Another major alleged “poison pill” that may be misunderstood is a clause requiring the federal government to "confer and seek to reach mutual agreement" with local governments before building any wall. The Center for Immigration Studies, which favors lower immigration levels, tweeted that “the spending bill would give local governments in the Rio Grande (all of which are *heavily* Democratic) the ability to veto the fence. If those blue municipalities don't agree with DHS, the fence can't get built.” But the DHS official told Fox News on background that the exact language in the budget -- "confer and seek to reach mutual agreement" – nowhere requires the federal government to actually reach an agreement before building fences. Rather, it just requires DHS to consult with local governments – something DHS already generally does, the official noted. [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] Kamala Harris is not a Natural Born Citizen. She's illegally running. Used by the Founders... Book I of The Law of Nations, Chapter XIX, § 212 (Joseph Chitty numbering) – “Citizens and natives” reads: 'The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.' 1758 Emerich de Vattel Oh' What the Hell, do I look like I want to die in some nursing home one day... America must have 4 new Constitutional Amendments... 1. Drug Tests and Mental Evaluations on all politicians and judges randomly five times per year. 2. Term Limits for Federal politicians and judges. 3. Mental and health standards for Supreme Court Justices and retirement age set. 4. A 'Star Chamber' of elected Natural Born Citizens (no attorney's) to ivestigate, try, and prosecute the politicians and government employee's as they see fit. Mandatory death penalty by public hanging is the merciful sentence for pedos and their associates. Democrats are a WMD, literally. Let Justice Be Done Though The Heavens Fall. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17924229 United States 02/16/2019 04:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |