DHS official: Border security bill does not contain ‘amnesty’ poison pills

Been saying this since yesterday.

Thank you for posting.

Five stars and some green!

Eases my mind about it a bit.

Me too - but i still have ZERO trust of mini merkel....

Thw truth you got cucked by Trump stop trying to do damage control

[link to m.washingtontimes.com (secure)]




Tucked inside the new spending bill is a new deportation amnesty that security experts fear will lead to a new surge of illegal immigrant children smuggled to the border.

The provision in Section 224 of the Homeland Security portion of the bill, creates a loophole in immigration enforcement, giving a safe harbor to illegal immigrants who say they’re willing to take Unaccompanied Alien Children into their homes


It puts hundreds of thousands of people off limits for deportation,” said Jessica Vaughan, policy studies director at the Center for Immigration Studies.

The provision, sought by Democrats, grows out of the increasingly thorny situation of the tens of thousands of children whose parents pay to smuggle them into the U.S. each year to reunite with their families.

Under existing policy, the children are usually processed and quickly released to sponsors — often the very parents or relatives who paid to smuggle them and, in most cases, who are in the U.S. illegally themselves.

‌
Under the Trump administration, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had been conducting legal status checks on households where children were to be placed and had begun to try to deport some people found to be here illegally.

The new provision would ban that.


The new provision applies not only to households that already sponsor a child — more than 200,000 children have already been released into the U.S. — but also to “prospective” households, meaning those that might take a child in eventually.

“If you don’t have a kid here yet to protect you from deportation this is a huge incentive to hire a criminal smuggler to bring your child here,” Ms. Vaughan said.

It’s not clear who qualifies as a “prospective family,” but Rosemary Jenks, government relations manager at NumbersUSA, predicted liberal-leaning judges will create an expansive protection for illegal immigrants.

Lots of soy boys half baked Trump “supporters” melted their underwear about this. Definitely lots of Americans aren’t cut off for hard rides,they think that filling their basements with boxes of ammo is enough,but they lack the nerve. We elected Trump through union in consciousness and we have to be strong in belief,supporting him doesn’t matter what.

You believe the gov man?
When you can read it yourself , they fuked us.
Get it through your damn skull , nothing good , it’s all bad . Nothing has changed

Unless of course Trump utilizes his broad powers under the latest (and previous) National Emergency declaration(s). One of which our friend Oblahblah enacted under his watch, that continues to remain in force to this day.

That said, given the very real crisis on our border (that the media cannot hide from the public anymore, no matter how hard they try), and given Trump’s history of very effectively wielding his Executive authority over these last two years, do you actually think he won’t “do what he says” this time?

If you haven’t noticed, he’s been working under the previous declaration already these past two years. He just expanded those powers on Friday.

They'll send the kid across first which makes the kid unaccompanied.
The adult crosses later and cannot be deported.

hey where is that bitch Jake at to cry all over GLP hysterically, toss in a few of the other sock puppets for legitimacy.

They prefer to live in fantasy land.

This is why you don't make someone an Idol.

Anonymous, unnamed "officials"...hhhmmmmm? I believe it 100%.

The Sky is falling, the sky is falling.. Chicken Little

What TPTB want is a Nation filled with Pollyanna's.. the name becoming a popular term for someone with a very optimistic outlook: * a subconscious bias towards the positive is often described as the Pollyanna principle.

Everyone has become so accustomed to our Government betraying our trust and our interests that half of us automatically doubt everything and believe nothing, and the other half gullibly believe every word they see or hear blindly.

Is there no middle ground?

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

For the Truth.

Too many AC trolls spreading disinfo.

Them three fiddy shills.

This is what our Elected Officials give to themselves.

Congress allotted 1,433,709 (1.4 million) annually per member for their support staff, MRA. There is a total of 535 Members of Congress. 100 serve in the U.S. Senate and 435 serve in the U.S. House of Representatives

[link to www.senate.gov (secure)]

The Members’ Representational Allowance (MRA): Supporting Personnel, Office Expenses, Travel to the District, and Mail for Members of the House The Members’ Representational Allowance (MRA) is available to support Representatives in their official and representational duties.

in 2017, each Member’s MRA was equivalent to that “Member’s 2016 amount ... increase[d] ... by approximately 3.9% of the average MRA. In June 2017, all MRAs were increased by $25,000 in response to heightened security concerns.” 20 MRAs ranged from $1,251,177 to $1,433,709, with an average of $1,315,523.

The FY2017 legislative branch appropriations act (P.L. 115- 31) increased MRA funding to $562.6 million.
No more than 18 permanent employees per each Congress Person.
Fair Use

'Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for 'fair use' for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use'

Last Edited by Loup Garou on 02/16/2019 01:12 PM

For example, to be a "potential sponsor" according to the DHS regulations, one must file significant paperwork -- such as showing ID (U.S. or foreign) and proof of residency. The adult applying must also submit documents about the child.

I'd like to know what kind of documents are needed for the child. And why this DHS "official" is not named.

As far as an ID, and proof of residence, those are very easily obtained by illegals, at least in California.

It's also worthwhile to note, that this "official" is only correcting the potential sponsor wording. So, we can assume that sponsors are still exempt from deportation.

So all the BS to just meant to sepreate Trump from his supporters.

It failed didn't it. K

well, all of that is so stupid, garbled and confusing,
Trump needs to ignore the whole thing.

Bump

The only soy boys are Trump tards like yourself who defend Trump after every failure.

Oh, and for the record, the definition of unaccompanied minor includes any child brought over by a parent. As soon as they are removed from their parents, they are legally "unaccompanied".

This was put in the bill to make sure illegals who claim these children are not deported. Nothing else. In a 5 month period, ICE identified 80% of "sponsors", as undocumented.

Read my lips: Dems are screwed.

:agree720: