Flat Earth is the DUMBEST SHIT EVER

A cube always has 6 FACES Six sides would make a hexagon

A HEXCUBE IS BUT A CUBICAL SHAPE IS NOT ALWAYS 6 SIDES IT EVEN SAYS IT IN THE FUCKING WIKI PAGE YOU POSTED STUPID FUCK

Octahedron
(dual polyhedron)

8 SIDES

WHERE'S THE DUNGEONS AND DRAGONS TABLETOP ROLEPLAYERS TO TEACH THESE DUMBASS PEOPLE THE DIFFERENT SIDED DICE THAT ARE USED WHICH REPRESENT CUBICAL SHAPES.


Lol
You are so stupid it hurts.
A octahedron is not a cube...
You should have stayed in school

Although there is no movement in this thread and it is completely all over the place i am very proud of the glpers here.
Lets just say IAM God, I would show a huge amount of respect and favoritism to my children that could see through the lies of satanism. I wouldnt let to many people into Heaven that didnt understand that the earth is the center of the universe and flat and stationary as stated in the Bible. Luckily iam not god.

Last Edited by -a on 10/16/2020 01:53 PM

I was just about to post this exact video - simple easy tool that anybody can make to absolutely prove that the horizon does indeed drop, dependent on elevation. Did this myself many many years ago when traveling for school - 3 different oceans, continents, and both hemispheres. All provided exact same results.

New York is so cool because as ships come in at a certain point the buildings look like they are leaning away from you do to the fact we are living on a ball.

This anomaly of buildings leaning is especially pronounced when people hike up Mt Rainer, the photos of the Seattle skyline when the weather is clear with leaning buildings really hits the soul that we are on a ball.

Lighthouse were such a waste of time due to the curvature, you practical have to be on land before they work so IDK why they spent so much money on those buildings.

It's so cool to go up in a plane and feel like you are leaving the ball but the pilot corrects this by adjustments otherwise the trajectory would be space the final frontier.


Some of the photos of the leaning Eifel tower are the best.

Infact i would easily state that there are around 144k Flat earth believers on earth..... is this starting to make more sense? God speaks through me. He has no need for children who dont understand the basic fact the the earth is the center of the universe and it is flat and stationary bc god made it that way.

A HEXCUBE IS BUT A CUBICAL SHAPE IS NOT ALWAYS 6 SIDES IT EVEN SAYS IT IN THE FUCKING WIKI PAGE YOU POSTED STUPID FUCK Octahedron (dual polyhedron) 8 SIDES WHERE'S THE DUNGEONS AND DRAGONS TABLETOP ROLEPLAYERS TO TEACH THESE DUMBASS PEOPLE THE DIFFERENT SIDED DICE THAT ARE USED WHICH REPRESENT CUBICAL SHAPES. Lol You are so stupid it hurts. A octahedron is not a cube... You should have stayed in school

WELL THAT'S NOT WHAT SCIENCE SAYS FUCKING MORON - IT IS A CUBICAL SHAPE

CUBICAL CUBICAL CUBICAL

YOU'RE SO NARROW MINDED YOU'RE ONLY CAPABLE OF SEEING MINECRAFT

There are infinitely many non-similar shapes of icosahedra, some of them being more symmetrical than others. The best known is the (convex, non-stellated) regular icosahedron—one of the Platonic solids—whose faces are 20 equilateral triangles.

Funny to think that the rapture would only include flat earth believers. How the world works is always quite interesting.

It probably would if only because they follow what GOD SAYS

Not what Carl Sagan says who didn't even fucking know about this

A man 6 feet tall disappears on the ball earth in 3 miles!

The ball earth is just so cool.


I would not have it any other way I love the blue ball!

Very good.

Key word here is "calculated". He created a representational (mathematical) model, based on the "shadows" of vertical objects (he created a mathematical model based the assumption of spheres and their interactions, then called it as a globe... he never proved spheres through observation), before we had the ability to see significant distances (powerful telescopes) and use "observation" to verify their mathematics.

Their "model" does not fit direct observation of the earth.

Nice try though using ancient mathematics... we've come a way since then, and still haven't provided an accurate "model" of the earth. There are literally hundreds of geodetic's used in spatial sciences... none accurate.

Not to mention that even when it's time to land the pilot does NOT point the nose down. Nose down equals crashing, whether on a plane or a globe.
The nose down argument is the argument of one who has no argument.

LOL...

That is the BEST one yet!

So you are saying that whatever process saves from the high res to the low res...

SPECIFICALLY hammers the BLUE MARBLE object!

How HEAVY a DOSE of anti-depressants are you on?

You should run out and make a video...

And then POST it in this thread!

LOL

Oh... It's pretty OBVIOUS what we've found!

You have an extra special low res jpeqs FLAT EARTH day... now you hear?

IDK why the leaning tower of Pisa is such a big deal all buildings can have that effect from the right distance.


These flatties think the leaning tower is somehow unique.


whatever.

Have you verified this with a telescope yourself?

I have... and guess what? On a clear day, with no noticeable atmospheric disturbances, I have seen the base of buildings with people walking at approximately 15km distance, with a good telescope and an observation height of a few inches.

They should be 9 metres below the horizon at that distance!

It blew my mind!

...and I work in the spatial sciences and have always "assumed" a round earth without ever having previously verified it.

Now I've verified something I can't explain.

Can you?

Yeah, you must love BALLS a lot.

Cuz your EXPLANATION is NOT the only thing that sucks.

Who's NEXT?

Video or IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!

Not you sucking balls...

The man disappearing at 3 miles on a planar expanse...

Such as the Salt Flats.

Lol You are so stupid it hurts. A octahedron is not a cube... You should have stayed in school

WELL THAT'S NOT WHAT SCIENCE SAYS FUCKING MORON - IT IS A CUBICAL SHAPE

CUBICAL CUBICAL CUBICAL

YOU'RE SO NARROW MINDED YOU'RE ONLY CAPABLE OF SEEING MINECRAFT

There are infinitely many non-similar shapes of icosahedra, some of them being more symmetrical than others. The best known is the (convex, non-stellated) regular icosahedron—one of the Platonic solids—whose faces are 20 equilateral triangles.


"Cubical shape" ...
You should stop..
You are confusing the word solid with cubical.
You really are making a fool of yourself.
You can CAP yell how much you need to.
I studied this.. I know what I am talking about.
A cube is a a regular shape with 6 identical faces PERIOD

No the only one confusing shapes is you with your 4th grade understanding of geometry and being too stupid to know that there are cubes with less or more than 6 sides.

You're just desperately arguing semantics instead of actually looking it up because such a pathetic counter argument is all you can come up with.

Fucking moron.

Some of you globe tards aren't even worth the oxygen you consume.

You can't actually be this stupid, can you?

No, I'm saying that those who make the claim that it is cut and paste have a bad habit of getting the shittiest low-res images they can find that have likely been saved and resaved multiple times. And they NEVER try the same thing on a hi res non compressed image. Especially funny when they do it on digital scans of images that were originally on film.

Last Edited by LHP598 on 10/16/2020 02:22 PM

Some questions for flat earthers:

Why are there zero photos of the ice wall?

Why are there zero photos of the supposed forces that keep people away from the 60,000 miles in circumference ice wall?

Do you have any FACTS or PHOTOS pertinent to the composition of the the dome?

What causes tides on flat earth?

What causes wind inside the sealed dome?

Why does the sun appear larger at the horizon during sunset even though it is supposedly getting farther away as opposed to dipping below the horizon due the rotation of earth?

In the flat earth 'south' (i.e., the outer edge of the disc) does the sun travel faster during summer?
If not why are the hours of sunlight summer in the south not longer than in the north given the greater distance for the sun to travel?
If so, how is it that the hours of daylight in the south during summer are not shorter in each discrete location, given the necessarily greater speed of the sun?

I've never been into the theory but this is a cool video i watched recently

Can you actually address this science or are you too stupid to comprehend??

Researchers now find a fundamental truth in that premise. Studying the shapes and fragmentation patterns of a variety of rocks, they found that the average of all their forms is a cube.

[link to www.sciencedaily.com (secure)]

Yeah flat earthers are pretty fucking stupid though the anti-mask anti-vaccine idiots got them beat then again almost all anti-mask anti-vaccine idiots are also flat earth idiots too.
Go figure.

[link to youtu.be (secure)]

Add white supremacists to that too. Of course all of them seem to go hand in hand.

Lol
Again with the same link that talks about the shapes rocks break into. Lolz...
Please kind sir.. Can you get the defenition of cubical shape so I can learn from you.

(as it does not exist I hope you keep trying to find it)

Flat? Unlikely.