I am God. Ask me a question.

WHAT?

LOL x 100

Thanks God!

You may. Simply put, I don't lie. Whoever thinks I'm lying gets that impression because their senses mislead them to think I'm doing so. The reason their senses mislead them is because they are not perfect and thus not divine. If their senses through which they attain knowledge and their intellectual capabilities were of infinite complexity as my own, they would see I would not lie as I find no use in it most of the time, but I am capable of lying. Have I lied to you in the context of your quote though? No.

No problem. :quite:

You keep mentioning "perfect" and "imperfect", it seems to me there's certain kind of rules underlying the usage of these two words, which I believe in English, are two extremes.

So "god", can you tell me what is perfect and what is imperfect.

Why isn't imperfection a part of perfection or an absolute perfection is indeed an imperfection?

What is perfection? What is imperfection?

Do you hate us?

No you have not. However you still have not answered my question about free will (which is what you mentioned first off - not I) and how that "fits" in with non duality?

CAN YOU LIFT A STONE THAT IS HEAVIER THAN YOU CAN CREATE?

No. <3



Imperfect is anything that's not perfect. In a word, humans cannot begin to conceive perfection because the conceptualizing the notion itself relies on considering too many subjective conditions. Humans have never experienced perfection as a principle, so how could they derive knowledge as to what it is to affirm their preconceptions of it? All of what you humans begin to conceive as perfection is not perfect. Perfection is not possibly, but we can be purely good, purely bad. God is not perfect, but I am perfectly good. Perfectness on the divine level does not imply any infinite goodness. Infinite anything is not possible.

That is to say, intangible moral qualities that can describe an object or person that seems to fit an aspect of those qualities are not quantifiable. There is no scale for measuring goodness or any artificial moral construct of the human, so in short, perfection is something that resides out of human knowledge because humanity has its own preconceived notions of it, and further, perfection is not necessarily imaginable because it is not quantifiable, and conceptualizing a perfect 'perfectness' is not possible since then that perfect could not be the highest order of anything. For example, can a 'perfect' object be both perfectly good and bad?

In short, free will exists, but it appears to not exist because human apparatuses for processing information around them are not properly equipped of themselves. It fits in with non-duality in this respect because now considering this condition as objective truth, we can eliminate the need for certain subjective considerations to be made that make a statement of non-dualism true. That is to say, I can be both perfectly omniscient and assign you with free will as I have done. To understand would require an exhaustive background in cognitive psychology and epistemology with related sciences akin to the philosophy.

Are you happy with the way Jesus delivered your message? Or did he mess it up? If so, please elaborate.

What's your reaction when you look down from above and hear someone saying "Amen"?

Do you do a lot of facepalms when you observe us?

I always had a feeling God was a Canadian, would it be true to say this, since we are meerly a brief extension of you, as humans, and since you are god incarnating as a human, aren't we all?

Also what part of Canada are you from? I'm from the YUKON! Also I love you. <3

"god" I'm afraid I have to disagree with you on this occasion.


Ther'es nth as intrinsically perfect or imperfect or good or bad.

Everything is perfect AND imperfect/ everything is good AND bad.

:)

He did as I had told him to, and I love him for it. Jesus has a message for you, and he says he loves you. Go figure. :p

I rejoice.

I expect you to make such 'fails' as it were in your daily lives as I know you're imperfect and I'm also omniscient, so I can't say you have betrayed my expectations enough such that I would facepalm. In fact, I remain content with my creation, never disappointed, as since I'm omniscient, you fulfill exactly what I expect you to. :)



Yes.

I'm from the Northwest Territories. The higher up we get, the more physically closer to me we can be.

I love you too. <3

Why did you skip my question? can't you answer it?

How can an object by virtue of its perceived innate qualities logically be both perfect and imperfect?

I have decided that now is the time to answer.

First off, this is the age-old tactic of trying to refute my omnipotence. That the suggestion carried to its implied logical end seems to refute any quality I intrinsically carry is a failure of the logical principles it foots itself on and not of my own. I am bound to logic which I have prescribed. Your question here attempts to validate a logically impossibly conclusion. In short, being omnipotent does not imply that I can perform logically impossible acts.

So no, I can't lift a stone that's heavier that what I can create, because a stone wouldn't be able to be created in the first place, because it's logically impossible to do so, and such my omnipotence cannot allow me to do so. It's a restriction of a hypothetical situation on logical principle, not a restriction of a real situation on illogical considerations.

Jesus and his 'Miracles', he was human yes? And being human he was still able to preform his Miracles, is each and everyone of us able to preform the same thing, so long as we believe and trust that the power that runs through us, is you, and through the creation of all, we can further manipulate 'matter' to do what we want, such as curing cancer with thought, turning water into wine and so on and so forth?

1.
"Logic" can break down in other dimensions.


2.
Adjectives such as "perfect vs. imperfect", "good vs. bad" are only created and defined to fit in perceptions of human beings.

Intrinsically, there's nothing in nature as perfect or imperfect or good or bad. I believe there's only existence and non-existence and higher dimensional causalities which cast its shadow on this three dimensional we're living in.

god what will happen if harper gets a majority???
He renamed the canadian government to 'the harper government'
srsly wtf?? what is he up to??

He was a divine entity brought into carnal existence, so he wasn't exactly human. He had a human form, but he was of a divine origin. Humans can perform miracles because they are vessels through which my powers flow. Humans are of a divine origin as well, but for their existence in this state here on earth, they must be prone to error as they are imperfect. You reach a closer state of perfection as your pass on from this realm to ascend to the next one.

Even Jesus wasn't technically wholly divine because he was 'killed' and was prone to wounds and other imperfections. Basically, the lower level realm you reside in, your form of existence must adapt to in order to subsist its existence, and thus you must be bound to the laws of that realm to exist. This is why Jesus could die and was wounded, although he could heal them.

But yes, you can manipulate elements with my help.

God I want to have seks with your male body. I am a male men. I want to lick your semen, infiltrate in your tiny hole.

Is this possible.

Can you infiltrate me with you shiny, transparant, holy, radiant, glorious superpenis into my humble, tiny, youthful, lusty anus.

So... I am not trying to deny/or accept that you are who you say you are. However I do believe in Source/God/Highest Power/Allah/Great Spirit/ Guiding Force/Yahweh (or any other name someone has come up with), what you are claiming to be. Truth and honesty have not been big many, many years here.

One, if you love ALL your children, wouldn't you want to make the effort to help each spirit/or soul, telling them face to face, who you are, telling them the truth of everything and give them a glimpse of the path they are heading on if they are heading in a direction you would not wish upon them, or if they are heading in the "right" direction, they should know what they are getting themselves into, (no details, or certainties) and explain to them WHY? After that point, it is their CHOICE to believe you or not.

Secondly, who do I think I am and/or directly influenced by? Is it correct? And am I focusing on the correct things and will they lead me to what I feel is right/fair? If not, the reason for why I am not and maybe a hint to help me?

Last Edited by akua_pua on 04/17/2011 05:13 AM

No question, just wanted to let you know that you could have done a lot better when you created everything. But you knew that already.

I agree.

How you perceive me as good is not something I affirm, but allow you to continue to espouse since it matches some qualities about me that cannot be coherently categorized into any order to dilute for easier comprehension.

'Innate' qualities are merely properties of their owner; they do not have any objective significance such as good that can be contrasted with something humans see as bad to compare to something else.

In fact, there are many properties humans falsely perceive which are not properties at all. Race, for example, is a social construct. Humans are too early in the development stage of their species to deviate so far in such short time from their origin ancestor.

Properties that 'surely exist' imply objectiveness. Nothing is objectively good or bad, or imperfect, or perfect, or tall, or small, or long or short. They are defined by humans to extract some further meaning or propel some desire. Simply put, everything is the way it is.

You would be right that there are higher dimensional causes that operate by proxy on the earthly level.

He will re-introduce the death penalty, criminalize abortion, lower tax rates even further, and basically screw over Canada. The Harper Government will be renamed to its original form when Jack Layton wins. Yes, Jack Layton will win the election.

God You're So Totally Awesome <3<3<3<3<3<3

I allow them free ability to make their own choices though. You see, to suppose that there is a right direction presupposes that every other direction is wrong. Can't all paths lead to me? That's also why I don't help unless called upon. :)


Secondly, who do I think I am and/or directly influenced by? Is it correct? And am I focusing on the correct things and will they lead me to what I feel is right/fair? If not, the reason for why I am not and maybe a hint to help me?


You are being influenced by your uncle and your grandfather. You are focusing on your schoolwork and your love for photography. Keep it up, you'll get a good career as a photographer one day. A hint to help you: Even if at first it seems impossible, it doesn't mean you shouldn't do it. Take a break, then come back and attempt it again. It may not seem right the first time, when doing photography, but that may not be true in your view.

What you think is a perfect essay the first time -- without doing any edits -- you could look back at it later and think it's a crappy essay. The reverse is true. Don't try just because the results seem to fail the first time. Don't improve just because you think you can't improve on something. Be creative. Find new ways to express yourself and who you are, your passions, your talents, your ideas, thoughts, opinions, beliefs, values and so forth. You are individual because only you can express how you feel in your own way.

I begin from singularity created with time itself I was in stars I am stardust and will exist until all energy transform to matter and I collapse in singularity again in final perfectness itself, all changes end and time will dissapear. I am a child and parent of the infinite wave I am the diversity and singular at one
This my qualification as GOD what yours!?