"Chemtrails" in 1979

No it is called circumstantial evidence and is admissible in the courts of this nation and many others. . . Your ignorance regarding reasonable inferential evidence is not my problem. . . .


"Circumstantial Evidence is also known as indirect evidence. It is distinguished from direct evidence, which, if believed, proves the existence of a particular fact without any inference or presumption required. Circumstantial evidence relates to a series of facts other than the particular fact sought to be proved. The party offering circumstantial evidence argues that this series of facts, by reason and experience, is so closely associated with the fact to be proved that the fact to be proved may be inferred simply from the existence of the circumstantial evidence."
[link to legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com]

It's not believed by anyone except chemtards...and they don't matter...

No, because they all have the same information.

Asking for a specific title is stupid...

You have failed to quote *one* title - stupid is as stupid does....

I am not Noble. It is simply an understanding of physics and chemistry that allow the statements to be made.

And just what war zone are you referring . . . ? Detroit?

From:

[link to www.archive.org]


Cold Uar ERA Hunan Subject Experine.. 

HEARING BEFORE THE 

LEGISLATION AND NATIONAL 
SECURITY SUBCOMMITTEE 

OF THE 

COMMITTEE ON 

GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS 

HOUSE OP REPRESENTATIVES 

ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

SEPTEMBER 28, 1994 

"In one case, we have evidence that in the late 1950's the Army 
Chemical Corps conducted a biological warfare test from an aircraft 
flying over Detroit and dispersing particles of a cancer-causing 
compound. Although the Army assured us there was no likelihood 
of injury, I am deeply concerned about usin|^ our citizens as guinea 
pigs, no matter how safe the Army might thmk a test is. "

Last Edited by George B on 01/30/2012 07:22 PM

That's like asking me to quote a book that says gravity exists.

It's basic and simple science. It's in EVERY book on the subject of atmospheric science.

You are a a fucking idiot. You are just too stupid to understand that.

I haven't read a book on the subject in several years. I learned these things a long time ago.


It's obvious you either don't care..or are too lazy to go to the library to get a book (ANY book) on this subject. Go ahead...accept crap you find through google searches as "fact" and I'll just continue to laugh at you because you don't understand the basic science that explains air saturation and condensation....which you should have learned in 7th grade!



Go ahead...be a chemtard...

You are my stooge..and you always will be.

I love the fact that you chemtards are completely incapable of understanding just how ignorant you are.

Which book on 'atmospheric science' would you recommend for 'a fucking idiot'?

I am more interested in the statistical anomaly of more planes leaving trails on certain days.....

Ever thought maybe there are more books written in them 'several' years since? Why did you stop reading? Did the books you read still say the world was flat? Please quote any books which you feel I should read....



*irony*

See above - there have been more books written since you was at college...

Circumstantial evidence may be used as a starting point in a scientific inquiry but it is not valid for verification of a theory. Science is based on measurable and verifiable evidence along with a theoretical underpinning. It is never acceptable to rely only on circumstantial evidence.

Earth to George. Earth to George. It is 2012 here, not 1950.

[link to www.barnesandnoble.com]

Probably a bit advanced for people round here...

I'm looking at you Noble and Snake....

Now who said earlier that planes spraying chemicals would not be allowed to do so - Noble - Snake?

Here is evidence that in the 1950's the United States Government was already experimenting with spraying chemicals - then there was Agent Orange in the 60's and 70's and following that chemical spraying which is now world wide.

Imagine all those soldiers and civilians (who through no fault other than being born in the areas sprayed) were poisoned, and thier children and children's children...

The most sickening part of all of this - is the utter contempt for humanity, nature, and the planet.

No it's not...

You don't even have 'Circumstantial' "evidence"...

You have "I know what I see"...

Why do you insist on proving what a fuckwit you are???

You Prove that what has been presented is not circumstantial evidence. . . It fits the definition. . . . You simply refuse to accept it. . .

1) Past history of identical behavior . . .
2) Refusal to admit this behavior for decades. . .
3) Past history of disregard for public notice or informed consent before human experimentation on millions of American citizens. . .
4) US Code which allowed the legal use of biological and chemical warfare agents on US citizens without their consent or knowledge until 1997 . . .
5) Supreme Court cases which disallowed the damages to compensate the public even when the government admitted their human experimentation without the knowledge or consent of the US citizens . . . The same thing the Nazi leaders were convicted of after WWII. . .

Last Edited by George B on 01/30/2012 10:55 PM

Earth to whomever you are. . . They didn't admit they did the act until 1994 . . . Based on those time parameters . . . It could take from 30 to 40 years to admit what they may have started in the late 1990s. . . Which means they may be forced to admit what they are doing sometime between 2020 and 2040. . .

You could help us all understand if you put your mind to it, most of us are not stupid and allso not drunk all the time.
I am thinking you enjoy anoying people that watch the sky.
You have no real job of shilling, you are not getting paid for doing this you, you have nothing else to do...
So you just keep talking over people heards, you dont really vant any logical conclusion that could benefit those you talk with.
You are like a black vortex sucking all the white in.

OP , if chemtards dont matter why do you insist on posting threads about chemtrails nonexistence? Sort of makes me wonder if you are just a lonely guy who needs someone to argue with? BtW What does itchange if the OP does notbelieve? Changes nothing for me thats for sure, and Ive read every single post. Its been my experience "A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still"

Yea you got the gist of it, its really not about the subject, when the ego blocks the way.

There was evidence that agent orange was being sprayed...

There is no evidence that we are being sprayed with chemicals other than what is in contrails. Water vapor and combustion gases.

Sorry! That's my whole point...that you people are too stupid to understand that you have nothing but ignorance and paranoid assumption.

What George fails to tell you is that they released a chemical to map dispersal patterns to see how a chemical biological attack would happen. They thought the chemicals they released were safe. It turned out years after the fact they found they weren't as safe as they thought. There is now a law preventing the military from spreading any chemicals on civilian populations.

It's not about "ego"...it's about pointing out that people are unaware that they are ignorant about several subjects when it comes to this "chemtrail" bullshit!

There is no evidence to support the claims...how is that anything to do with "ego"?!

Show me where I said any such thing!

Again, all I'm saying is that there is NO EVIDENCE to support the claims that anything is being sprayed. How can you fault me for that?!? It's a fact!

OK, show me a single NON-FICTION book that uses peer reviewed science to show that what I know about air saturation and condensation has EVER changed since the beginning of fucking time!

It's BASIC and SIMPLE science! It NEVER changes! These are constants! Water vapor will always behave as expected!!!

YOU are unaware of how ignorant YOU are about these subjects!

No one needs to read your pseudo-science any further than this...

Show me any 'evidence' whatsoever that anyone has systematically 'sprayed' anything from planes at 30,000+ feet for years on end...

As I said...

You don't even have 'circumstantial' evidence...

You have "I know what I see"...

Dear Posters -

Please stop believing what you 'see' with your own eyes. What you 'see' happening with planes spraying is not true.

I repeat what you 'see' is a lie.

I am here to help you remember the real truth, not what your eyes think they see. I may be harsh and abusive in my delivery of this truth, but it is for your own good, that is, until you 'see' my truth and believe it.

Signed
"your" eyes in the skies
Snake Airlines