Stanley Kubric How he showed the world he faked the moon landings in "The Shining"

Notice the Carpet,

they are cubes within cubes,

which are Tesseracts:

Tesseract



In geometry, the tesseract, also called an 8-cell or regular octachoron or cubic prism, is the four-dimensional analog of the cube. The tesseract is to the cube as the cube is to the square. Just as the surface of the cube consists of 6 square faces, the hypersurface of the tesseract consists of 8 cubical cells. The tesseract is one of the six convex regular 4-polytopes.

A generalization of the cube to dimensions greater than three is called a "hypercube", "n-cube" or "measure polytope". The tesseract is the four-dimensional hypercube, or 4-cube.


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

There may be more than one revelation in that film.

Stanley was clever and pretty pissed off too.

Hexagon

In geometry, a hexagon (from Greek ἕξ hex, "six") is a polygon with six edges and six vertices. A regular hexagon has Schläfli symbol {6}. The total of the internal angles of any hexagon is 720°.

2D^ Shadow of the Cube



The Star of David, known in Hebrew as the Shield of David or Magen David (Hebrew מָגֵן דָּוִד; Biblical Hebrew Māḡēn Dāwīḏ, Tiberian [mɔˈɣen dɔˈvið], Modern Hebrew [maˈɡen daˈvid], Ashkenazi Hebrew and Yiddish Mogein Dovid [ˈmɔɡeɪn ˈdɔvid] or Mogen Dovid) is a generally recognized symbol of Jewish identity and Judaism.[1] Its shape is that of a hexagram, the compound of two equilateral triangles. The hexagram has been in use as a symbol of Judaism since the 17th century, with precedents in the 14th to 16th centuries in Central Europe, where the Shield of David was partly used in conjunction with the Seal of Solomon (the hexagram) on Jewish flags. Its use probably derives from medieval (11th to 13th century) Jewish protective amulets (segulot).

The term "Shield of David" is also used in the Siddur (Jewish prayer book) as a title of the God of Israel.

2D

Star Tetrahedron 3D

pretty damn revealing, so many symbols I've overlooked

Notice when she goes to read whats on the Type writer, the spaces in the railing look like:

11 11 11 11 11 11 11

And,

then notice on the ceiling

there are Red Triangles,

and Blue Triangles

those 2 joined together are how you get the Star Tetrehaderon, 3d image

Well we agree on a couple of things at least. I'm a genius and Plan 9 is a great film.

Hated it so far as to release his own version in the form of a mini series. It's got the hedge animals in it, which was one of my favourite things in the book.

Moon Hoax By Way Of Hollywood Stanley Kubrick 1-3

... a mockumentary with some truths hidden for you to find.

SINCE IT HAS COME TO ATTENTION THROUGH VARIOUS TELEGRAPHING MEDIA AND,
EVIL MUST ANNOUNCE IT’S INTENTIONS AS PER UNIVERSAL LAW
IT IS ORDERED THUS FROM THE HOME OFFICE THAT:
THERE SHALL BE NO PERMISSION GIVEN FOR A CHICAGO NATO SUMMIT BLACK OPS NATIONAL
EMERGENCY, NUCLEAR DETONATION OR BOMBING EVENT. THE PLAYERS KROLL ASSOCIATES,
MOSSAD BOSS RAHM EMANUEL, CIA, MI6, NSA, ETC,ETC AND OTHER DARKSIDERS ARE NOT ALLOWED
TO PULL THIS “BLAME IT ON IRAN” OP.
BY ORDER OF AWARE HUMANS, THE ANGELIC KINGDOMS, EL SURYA, RAGU-EL, JESUS CHRIST,
AND TRANSCENDENTAL PRIME BEING GOD ITSELF, NO PERMISSION IS GIVEN FOR THE ABOVE
FEAR OP WAR SCENARIO IN CHICAGO AND MINNISOTA BEFORE, DURING OR AFTER THE NATO SUMMIT.
WITH THE FULL BACKING OF THE ABOVE-MENTIONED CREATED BEINGS AND GOD UNIVERSAL LAW
IS NOW INVOKED; NO PERMISSION GIVEN FOR THE DARKSIDER FEAR OP.
SO IT IS

No dipshit.

The book was commissioned by Kubrick himself. He received equal credit in the writing of the book but it was written in parallel with the movie development.

another thing the docu missed.

The guy in the movie who created
the contract with Jack Nicholson
had a name plate on his desk.
It read:

Stuart Ullman

Stuart Ullman is a real person
who works within the DOD Navy Branch
and went to Georgetown University.
Home of the Jesuits.

[link to www.linkedin.com]

Sorry, I'm the dipshit - I was referring to the Authur C Clarke novel 2001.

I take it back.

Exactly.

Aaaw man! The video is blocked in my country. Really wanted to see it.

It's pretty clear Kubrick is showing himself in the movie. Trying to describe what made him stressed can be debated but there's definitely a message.

No evidence was offered for this theory which ignores many facts.

You've never read the book, apparently.

LOL, yeah, and now every pre-marine with a hard on quotes the opening sequence with the drill sergeant.

Exactly, I grew up in Maine. My best friends dad attended college with Stephen King. Met him a few years ago, and asked over dinner his thoughts about The Shinning and the controversy that surrounded it.

He isn't impressed at how Kubrick morphed the story. He called it the worst adaptation of his work ever done (and after seeing Tommy Knockers, thats saying something).

After seeing Weidner's documentaries (part 1 & 2) I think he's on to something.

Many of humanities hopes and dreams have been crushed by the Van Allen radiation belt.

No Star Trek future for us unless we are modified genetically.

That's the way I see it.

I thought the book was better, as usual, but the film was OK.

But I totally agree with you about King. Totally predictable, formula, cliche', the list goes on. Like he's got a book writing program for his computer and just types in the name of a couple of characters and a place and time and he's got a huge selling story that makes serious readers of any kind of fiction ABOVE grocery store check-out line novel quality cringe with boredom.

I thought the Shining story was alright. Then I read Christine and was absolutely amazed at the lame, predictable, and unbelievable to the writers point of not giving the reader anything to relate to the story.

I always thought of King as a prime example of the dumbing-down of American's through increasingly worse and worse quality art and entertainment. But he makes pretty good bank. A lot better than me. And for that, I resent his "success".

Kind of like Seinfeld. Couldn't be a worse comedian out there. Sniveling, you know what he's going to make a lame joke out of next, knowing what the punch line will be in the first couple of words of a joke and like King I end up thinking to myself "no, he's not going to say... oh crap he did." And "no, this isn;t going to be what happens next...it is"

I have a hard time giving ultra-high payed pop authors and pop directors credit for being clever enough to put secret messages in their work. I spent 14 years in the film industry in Hollywood and have a different perspective on the "celebrity myth". And I also know that different directors have different roles and amounts of control over the end product of their "work".

You obviously haven't read the book. It is not an accurate representation at key plot points. The Weidner analysis is quite intriguing to say the least.

Kubrick on The Shining
[link to www.visual-memory.co.uk]

Why did the room number switch from 217 in the novel to 237 in the film?

The exterior of the hotel was filmed at the Timberline Lodge, near Mount Hood, in Oregon. It had a room 217 but no room 237, so the hotel management asked me to change the room number because they were afraid their guests might not want to stay in room 217 after seeing the film. There is, however, a genuinely frightening thing about this hotel which nestles high up on the slopes of Mount Hood. Mount Hood, as it happens, is a dormant volcano, but it has quite recently experienced pre-eruption seismic rumbles similar to the ones that a few months earlier preceded the gigantic eruption of Mount St. Helens, less than sixty miles away. If Mount Hood should ever erupt like Mount St. Helens, then the Timberline Hotel may indeed share the fiery fate of the novel's Overlook Hotel.

Brilliant.

the collative learning analysis is my favorite. glad somebody posted it.