NYTimes: “Oregon could lie in the path of any new radioactive plumes” from Fukushima | |
S.I.A. 222 User ID: 12588343 United States 05/26/2012 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16722598 United States 05/26/2012 03:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 03:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wyden Discusses a Recent Onsite Tour of Fukushima, Japan & Recovery Efforts [link to video.godlikeproductions.com] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 03:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11076873 Canada 05/26/2012 04:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.radiationnetwork.com] Fukushima Day 439 - US Nuclear Sub Fire & Radiation Doomsday Date...start packing! [link to www.youtube.com] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fourteen months after the accident, a pool brimming with used fuel rods and filled with vast quantities of radioactive cesium still sits on the top floor of a heavily damaged reactor building, covered only with plastic. The public’s fears about the pool have grown in recent months as some scientists have warned that it has the most potential for setting off a new catastrophe [...] The fears over the pool at Reactor No. 4, amplified over the Web, are helping to undermine assurances by Tepco and the Japanese government that the Fukushima plant has been brought to a stable condition and are highlighting how complicated the cleanup of the site, expected to take decades, will be. [link to www.nytimes.com] [link to enenews.com] |
Anne O'Mally User ID: 8565311 United States 05/26/2012 04:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anne O'Mally User ID: 8565311 United States 05/26/2012 04:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | was checking out a geiger counter site this morning and they had a 'demo map' up for radiation readings in the us. the map was dated 2004, and had the 4 corners area at a whopping 139 CPM. MUCH MUCH higher than any of the readings NOW, even after fukushima. if you look at any of the radiation monitoring sites (and are fortunate enough to find one actually loading and current), 100 CPM is considered alarm level and nowhere in the us does it show levels even remotely that high. worth my weight in squirrels. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | An internal audit has confirmed observers’ concerns that many of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s radiation monitors were out of service at the height of the 2011 Fukushima power plant meltdown in Japan [...] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14972493 RadNet consists of 124 stations scattered throughout U.S. territories and 40 deployable air monitors that can be sent to take readings anywhere, according to the IG report. [...] At the time of the Fukushima crisis, “this critical infrastructure asset” was impaired because many monitors were broken, while others had not undergone filter changes in so long that they could not be used to accurately detect real-time radiation levels, the IG report says. “On March 11, 2011, at the time of the Japan nuclear incident, 25 of the 124 installed RadNet monitors, or 20 percent, were out of service for an average of 130 days,” the report says. “In addition, six of the 12 RadNet monitors we sampled (50 percent) had gone over eight weeks without a filter change, and two of those for over 300 days,” the report adds, noting that EPA policy calls on operators to change the filters twice per week. Currently, “EPA remains behind schedule for installing” radiation monitors and has not resolved contracting issues identified as causing similar problems with the system in a 2009 audit, the report says. “Until EPA improves contractor oversight, the agency’s ability to use RadNet data to protect human health and the environment, and meet requirements established in the National Response Framework for Radiological Incidents, is potentially impaired.” [...] [link to www.nti.org] [link to enenews.com] was checking out a geiger counter site this morning and they had a 'demo map' up for radiation readings in the us. the map was dated 2004, and had the 4 corners area at a whopping 139 CPM. MUCH MUCH higher than any of the readings NOW, even after fukushima. if you look at any of the radiation monitoring sites (and are fortunate enough to find one actually loading and current), 100 CPM is considered alarm level and nowhere in the us does it show levels even remotely that high. Quoting: Anne O'Mally Thread: RadNet was “potentially impaired” for Fukushima — Officials questioned why they were using “dramatically less strict” standards for radiation |
Anne O'Mally User ID: 8565311 United States 05/26/2012 05:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | yep, aware of that. thanks. however, even the 'citizen' radiation watchers don't give us anything different. i've just gotten to the point that i think everything is bullshit. it's all based on lies. i'd just like some straight truth for once, as do we all i am sure. worth my weight in squirrels. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 05:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 05:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 05:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ehecatl User ID: 16730178 Mexico 05/26/2012 05:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Some people are just waking up to the basic realities of wind currents over a year after the fact. Heck the Japanese had those facts down many decades ago. And you who think that ambient readings of radiation indicates risk, maybe deceiving yourselves seriously. The risk here is not radiation per-se, but rather radioactive material. Much of this radioactive material are emitters that will be little or hardly noticed by a Geiger counter, but if they lodge or concentrate in places inside the body they cause permanent damage in a small area and seed cancers. Natural background levels in most places on the planet and in most of the US before Fuku was around 25cpm. If people are getting readings of 60 or 100 they are already well above natural background levels. How long have you owned your Geiger counters? Knowing what readings you were getting before Fukushima is helpful in making up you own mind on the issue. The hitch is, is at these levels it is not the radiation itself that is a hazard, but ingestion of radioactive material. People who have regular Geiger counters need to test air filters, like from cars or buildings, and see if there is a significantly higher rate in the air filter than in normal ambient readings. If there is, that is cause for concern. Last Edited by ehecatl on 05/26/2012 05:58 PM |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 05:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Download the 19 minute broadcast here. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1505250 At 8:45 in We’re going to see another year of these rainouts Rainout= When hot particles get dropped from radioactive clouds during rainstorms Official say radiation levels minute and no health risk Working with scientists who are publishing paper that will definitively prove that to be wrong Rainouts are occurring not just in Pacific NW… we will continue to see rainouts [link to solarimg.org] Thread: Radioactive Clouds: Rainout of hot particles to continue for another year — Not just in Pacific northwest, says Gundersen |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 05:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1295673 United States 05/26/2012 06:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Some people are just waking up to the basic realities of wind currents over a year after the fact. Heck the Japanese had those facts down many decades ago. Quoting: ehecatl And you who think that ambient readings of radiation indicates risk, maybe deceiving yourselves seriously. The risk here is not radiation per-se, but rather radioactive material. Much of this radioactive material are emitters that will be little or hardly noticed by a Geiger counter, but if they lodge or concentrate in places inside the body they cause permanent damage in a small area and seed cancers. Natural background levels in most places on the planet and in most of the US before Fuku was around 25cpm. If people are getting readings of 60 or 100 they are already well above natural background levels. How long have you owned your Geiger counters? Knowing what readings you were getting before Fukushima is helpful in making up you own mind on the issue. The hitch is, is at these levels it is not the radiation itself that is a hazard, but ingestion of radioactive material. People who have regular Geiger counters need to test air filters, like from cars or buildings, and see if there is a significantly higher rate in the air filter than in normal ambient readings. If there is, that is cause for concern. .. including bio-accumulation and concentration up the food chain. We are at the top. ~ |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Burt Gummer User ID: 7702124 United States 05/26/2012 06:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NYTimes: “Oregon could lie in the path of any new radioactive plumes” from Fukushima Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16725632 Note to the NY Times.... NO SHIT SHERLOCK. At least you finally woke up......albeit 1 year late. Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 05/26/2012 06:56 PM |
samanthasunflower User ID: 14930415 United States 05/26/2012 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's a fact that a certain percentage of people in the US will develop cancer from Japan. It's also a fact that asteroids, lighting, tornadoes, earthquakes, and flesh eating bacteria will claim some people's lives in the US. I'm choosing not to crawl in a hole and hide from all of them. |
SOFA-KING-COOL User ID: 16536463 United States 05/26/2012 07:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | oregon is full of liberals so long libtards! Last Edited by CRIMSON-KARMA on 05/26/2012 07:04 PM SLAM THAT CLAM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 580163 United States 05/26/2012 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16725632 United States 05/26/2012 07:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16738125 Japan 05/26/2012 08:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5648569 United States 05/26/2012 09:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I take readings in Calif. frequently, but none have been beyond the pale. And they are random throughout my property, like really divergent. And the rain has not altered them to any significant degree as I had expected because of March 2011 readings. I realize my equipment is rudimentary and unable to detect many radionuclides but I bought a more expensive apparatus assuming it would be worthwhile, to no avail. At any rate I am documenting mutations in the plant life of my garden and area consistently so I know the radiation is there, but clearly periodic. This a giant nightmare wrapped in an enigma...... . |
ar-15 nut User ID: 1281306 United States 05/26/2012 09:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Meow... User ID: 3650237 United States 05/26/2012 09:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |