X Marks the Spot

ac uk,, lol,,

why do today,, that which you can defer until tommorrow,,




this is the intuitive resolve of all willful recognised mindful procrastinations,,



much love,,

Tesla vs. Einstein: The Ether & the Birth of the New Physics

May 11, 2012 By davidjones
By MARC J. SEIFER

Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) was an electrical inventor, well known as a competitor of arch rival Tom Edison. Where Edison’s inventions include the light bulb, the microphone in the telephone and the phonograph, Tesla’s inventions include fluorescent lighting, the AC hydroelectric power system and wireless communication. Tesla is therefore mostly billed as an inventor.
The fact is, Tesla was also a physicist who studied in college such courses as analytic geometry, experimental physics and higher mathematics.1 In his early 1890s lectures at Columbia University, the Chicago World’s Fair and at Royal Societies in Paris and London, building on the ideas of Isaac Newton and Lord Kelvin, Tesla demonstrated and discussed the structure of atoms as being similar to solar systems and wave-like and particle-like aspects to what later became known as the photon. Colleagues he lectured before and corresponded with included many Nobel Prize winners like Wilhelm Roentgen, J.J. Thompson, Lord Raleigh, Ernst Rutherford and Robert Millikan and other scientists such as Elmer Sperry, Sir William Crookes, Sir Oliver Lodge, Lord Kelvin, Heinreich Hertz and Hermann von Helmholtz.

As far as I know, no standard text on the history of physics mentions Tesla even though these ideas would lead to Nobel Prizes when they were further developed by Rutherford and Bohr (with their solar-system description of the atom with electrons orbiting the nucleus) and Einstein’s discovery of the photoelectric effect, which was equivalent to Tesla’s wave and particle-like description of light.

However, another idea which Tesla discussed was abandoned by modern physicists, and that was the concept of the all pervasive ether. This led to a number of key differences between Tesla’s view of the world as compared to that of Albert Einstein (1879-1955). Tesla disagreed with the findings of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity in a number of ways. As far back as the turn of the century, Tesla thought that he had intercepted cosmic rays emanating from the sun that attained velocities “vastly exceeding that of light.” In the last decade of his life he also claimed that these cosmic rays could be harnessed to generate electrical power. Tesla also saw radioactivity as evidence of the material body absorbing energy as much as it was giving it up.

On a separate front, the inventor stated that the impulses transmitted from his turn of the century Wardenclyffe wireless transmitting tower would also travel at velocities in excess of the speed of light. He likened the effect to the moon’s shadow spreading over the Earth.

It is very difficult to explicate the first two speculations concerning tachyonic (faster than lightspeed) cosmic rays and radioactivity. However, with regard to the third claim, this suggestion that he transmitted energy at speeds in excess of the speed of light can be discussed from a variety of points of view. As the Earth has a diameter of roughly 25,000 miles, and light travels at about 186,000 miles/second, one can see that it would take light approximately 1/7th of a second to circle the Earth. But does the Earth itself exist in its own realm, that by the nature of its size transcends the speed of light? For example, does the north pole, interact/exist with the south pole instantaneously? If so, in a sense the theory of relativity is violated as nothing, accordingly, can “travel” faster than the speed of light, yet the Earth’s very electromagnetic unity belies that theory.

Taking this concept a step further, does the solar system, or galaxy, when perceived as a functional unit, interact with itself in some way that by necessity makes a mockery of the speed of light? (The galaxy, of course, is hundreds of thousands of light years long.) In fact, when we look at photographs of galaxies, we are seeing entities that are hundreds of thousands of light years long. Certainly these systems have an orthorotational stability, and/or angular momentum which exists as a gestalt (totality) in a realm that easily transcends the speed of light and therefore, in that sense, violates relativity.2

Concrete proof that relativity can be violated can be found in George Gamow’s watershed book Thirty Years That Shook Physics. Gamow, one of the founding fathers of quantum physics, tells us that in the mid-1920’s, Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck discovered not only that electrons were orthorotating, but also that they were spinning at 1.37 times the speed of light. Gamow makes it clear that this discovery did not violate anything in quantum physics, what it violated was Einstein’s principle that nothing could travel faster than the speed of light. Paul Adrian Dirac studied the problem. Following in the footsteps of Herman Minkowski, who used an imaginary number i, (the square root of -1) to be equivalent to the time coordinate in space-time equations, Dirac assigned the same number i to electron spin. In this way he was able to combine relativity with quantum mechanics and won a Nobel Prize for the idea in the process (1966, pp. 120-121). That was the upside. The downside was that the finding that elementary particles spin faster than the speed of light as a matter of course went the way of the passenger pigeon. No physicist talks about this anymore. What this means is that the entire evolution of 20th and nascent 21st century physics is evolving ignoring this key Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck finding. The ramifications suggest that elementary particles, by their nature, interface dimensions. Because they are spinning faster than the speed of light, the idea is that they are drawing this energy from the ether, a pre-physical realm, and converting the energy into material form.

Continue to read:
[link to www.newdawnmagazine.com]

hey song,,

curves,, indeed,, never straight lines,,

lest angles be measurable by the bubble of a golden ratio,,

love is the vibration thus known,,

bubbles alter shape as does a torus,, when effected thus,,

the simplicity rebounds indeed,,

as all energy is thus subjective,, too a particular individual interpretation when realised,, as all is created by perception,, without a before or after,,

much love,,

As was discovered in the nineteen-twenties, a significant electric field exists in the solar corona as well as in the solar interior. This field is a consequence of the tendency of light electrons to segregate from heavier protons in the solar gravitational field. Since the principle is valid for a plasma in every star, the result can be generalized. The presented paper is intended to rehighlight this significant physical property of stars. In particular, we stress that there has to be charge Qr inside a stellar sphere with radius r, which is linearly proportional to mass Mr inside the sphere. Both quantities are related as Qr = 77.043 Mr, if Qr is given in Coulombs and Mr in solar masses. The global stellar electrostatic field is 918 times stronger than the corresponding stellar gravity and compensates for a half of the gravity, when it acts on an electron or proton, respectively. The external electric field has to cause an occurence of electric current and appropriate magnetic field in a highly conductive plasma, when, e.g., the plasma is in a turbulent motion or spirals onto a star in a hot accretion disc.

We live in a universe where electrons and ions can travel separately (not always bound together in atoms). Still,you might expect to find a nice, uniform distribution in space. No reason to expect electrons to pile up in one area, and ions in another. The thing is, we also live in a universe with gravitational force, and one in which protons are more massive than electrons. What this means, is that merely throwing some mass into that uniform sea of charge, is going to cause the more massive ions to sink slightly deeper in towards that mass. It is this gravitational segregation of charge, that is discussed in the article "On the Global Electrostatic Charge of Stars".
What is not mentioned in that article, is that this logic applies at all scales. If a star can have charge separation in the plasma at it's surface, why can there not be charge separation in the plasma around a galaxy? Or a cluster of galaxies? On any scale where gravitational fields exist, we should have gravitationally induced electric fields as well. Do you believe that we can have changing gravitational fields (either by adding mass to an object, or simply compressing it and increasing the gravity at it's surface)? Then logically, we must have a corresponding change in charge separation, at the same scale. That changing distribution of charge IS current flow.
There is no getting around it. In a universe where protons are more massive than electrons, gravity causes electric fields. Changing gravitational fields cause current flow. There may be other mechanisms causing "electricity in space", but this is one we can count on. [link to www.thunderbolts.info]

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Willful indeed my friend.

Leaving no stone unturned, some thunderstones may have acquired their association with lightning in still other ways.

As mentioned in part three of this article, a future realisation that the Australites may actually have precipitated within the past 10,000 years would certainly hit hard.

Yet even this hardly exhausts possibilities. Did some people anciently develop an awareness of the electric properties of some minerals, such as quartz – ‘thunder’ or ‘lightning’ being the closest lexical terms in the vocabulary to ‘electricity’? The equal popularity of quartz crystals and thunderstones among the world’s shamans, often febrile and sensitive to electromagnetic fields, points in this direction. And Pliny did compare ceraunia, the ‘thunderstone’, to rock crystal.

Or was the thunderstone, despite all this, at home in the actual phenomenology of lightning? Did sightings of ball lightning provide an impetus? The association is almost tangible in a tradition such as this one from Czechia: ‘The thunder strikes the earth in the shape of a ball; this ball makes one invisible … The thunder is a glowing stone as large as a walnut, placed under the timbers of the roof as a safeguard against lightning’..................

next... i want to focus on the "Explanatory tablet"

image here:

[link to imageshack.us]

now; let's "overlay" the "3-axes" on the "Explanatory tablet":

[link to imageshack.us]

i have "under-lined in Yellow" the "languages" that are "co-incident" with the "arrow-arcs" on the "3-axes":

45 degrees - English 4+5=9

135 degrees - Russian 1+3+5=9

225 degrees - Hebrew 2+2+5=9

315 degrees - Hindi 3+1+5=9


so.. i get 9999. 9+9+9+9=36. 3+6=9

so everything seems to lead to 9

maybe someone that understands Gematria can inform us if this can be interpreted?

Didn't notice till now the X formation



And saw some threads the guidestones will be 33 in a few weeks.

Great posts night crew!!


Much Love,

[link to www.youtube.com]

over the past 3 weeks the following has arisen
until 2012 humankind did not generally possess sufficient knowing of our recent discoveries to form practical use/application from them
in 2012 translation of our recent discoveries into practical emotional expression arose sufficiently distributed thereby confirming a future location (time) in our noticeable future (2117 approx) when our practical emotional expression within our environment prompts reincarnation process recommencement thus our as yet virgin rebirth ability becomes naturally expressed/accessed

this /z\ has prompted the notion that reduction of our global population to approx 500 million people is no longer an event awaiting to happen that conflicts with our desired future
this does never mean it will happen but it does mean it no longer something that will never happen
it`s affect has altered

over the past 3 weeks the following has arisen
until 2012 humankind did not generally possess sufficient knowing of our recent discoveries to form practical use/application from them
in 2012 translation of our recent discoveries into practical emotional expression arose sufficiently distributed thereby confirming a future location (time) in our noticeable future (2117 approx) when our practical emotional expression within our environment prompts reincarnation process recommencement thus our as yet virgin rebirth ability becomes naturally expressed/accessed

this /z\ has prompted the notion that reduction of our global population to approx 500 million people is no longer an event awaiting to happen that conflicts with our desired future
this does never mean it will happen but it does mean it no longer something that will never happen
it`s affect has altered

Georgia Guidestones are about 4 hours from where I live. My mason buddy of mine and my nephew have been thinking about going and camping some place close to there and visiting it.

Once they admit perpetual motion...man, that will begin crumbling everything. Perpetual motion violates their mechanistic view of reality. What happens to entropy? The Laws of Thermodynamics, etc.

What a massive step!

sounds like good news

Oh, wow. Excellent way of thinking about it, or understanding it. The errors of the old help define the accuracy of the new. Distillation.

exactly
we alter our past from our present utilizing our future

That has been a visible pattern but is buried in depth and most glaze over it at this time.

It is an underlying concept turning construct. Not only is it within the archetype, it is now within us. All of us are doing it now, to varying degrees.

This is the flow that should have always been, but was lost. Then found, what...late 1800's...we found it again without knowing exactly what we found. Until now. Due to the fact that we can 'express' it, lets us know it is working through us now.

Feels good. Smooth. And feels as if the flow is fuller.

thinking about it that /z\ is the description of motive (conscious process)
einstein was forced to change his formula in the opposite direction to what it was to hide conscious process because he could not and would not accept it could exist as he discovered it does

WTF -- sinkhole epidemic spreads worldwide!


Thread: WTF -- sinkhole epidemic spreads worldwide!

I came to a similar conclusion as well.

I called it companionship.

:)


Good morning everyone.

good morning
beautiful word