| Users Online Now: 1,479 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 596,483 | |
| Pageviews Today: 763,980 | Threads Today: 207 | Posts Today: 2,580 |
| 06:44 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,479 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 596,483 | |
| Pageviews Today: 763,980 | Threads Today: 207 | Posts Today: 2,580 |
| 06:44 AM | ||
Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... | |
Neim-Ya'shar  User ID: 28411395  United States11/28/2012 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... Again... someone is trying to rob white folks of their ancestry. Wake up people... don't believe these lies. Adam was a ruddy complected man. That means he was white, people. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18225135 All races are good according to God. But the Adamic (Ancient Hebrew) bloodline was created later after the indigenous peoples of the world. Archaeology and modern scientific dating technologies prove this. Don't be fooled by idiots telling lies. I can show you that misintepretation in your bible. the original wording wass he was well colored...ruddy was put in after the original first translated english bibles were taken and redone by rome Why are you lying? There is no misinterpretation. I'm reading the Hebrew right here. Look up Strong's Concordance Hebrew word 120(aw-dawm): ruddy derived from Strong's Concordance Hebrew word 119(aw-dam): to show blood in the face; i.e. flush or turn rosy; red; ruddy So if the word is in Hebrew from the original manuscripts no matter what language you translate it in, the word will always be Adam and it is derived from the phonetic pronunciation. He was named as such because of his appearance. And all offspring were known as the sons of Adam because of their appearance. Adam is also translated "man", the first man of that bloodline. The other word used in biblical scripture for "man" is "ish" which refers to the other men when it is usually not directly referring to the adamic bloodline. Look it up and study it for yourself. This is Hebrew I am speaking here, not English. my bible is way older than yours.i have a 1526 which rome confiscated and changed around 1 But these took this counsel among themselves, that they would leave the multitude of the heathen, and go forth into a further country, where never mankind dwelt, 42 That they might there keep their statutes, which they never kept in their own land. 43 And they entered into Euphrates by the narrow places of the river. 44 For the most High then shewed signs for them, and held still the flood, till they were passed over. 45 For through that country there was a great way to go, namely, of a year and a half: and the same region is called Arsareth. 46 Then dwelt they there until the latter time; and now when they shall begin to come, :knoup: |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27211004  Canada11/28/2012 10:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... No of course they're not. Quoting: TheSeventhGate And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman. Numbers 12:1 Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. Deuteronomy 7:3 Ham (Kam > Kamit) is the biblical ancestor of black people, it is irrefutable judging by the genealogy that is given by the bible; (Genesis ch.10 v.6) “And the sons of Ham: Cush and Mizraim, and Punt and Canaan.” • Cush (Kush) is an hebraic word meaning « black » and it indicates Nubia, today’s Sudan, a country mainly populated by black people. • Mizraim (Mizraim) is also a hebrew ("semitic") word to name Egypt (Kemet), Thanks to the work of Cheikh Anta Diop, we know for certain that ancient Egypt was inhabited by black people. • Punt, according to "The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt", designates an country in Africa: [...] Punt, an African country somewhere between the upper reaches of the Nile and the Somali coast. [...] East African land of Punt [...] African region of Punt (probably located somewhere in the vicinity of modern Eritrea) Christianity has never laboured under a greater curse than the many mistranslations in the King James Version - and some of them are even followed in some other translations because these errors have become traditional. Bible scholars know that there are many thousand mistranslations in the King James’ Version of the Bible; the eminent scholar Robert Young, author of Young’s Analytical Concordance to the Bible and of Young’s Literal translation of the Bible says in the preface to his Literal Translation, that in the King James’ version, “there are scarcely two consecutive verses where there is not some departure from the original and these variations may be counted by tens of thousands, as admitted on all hands.” There were two different countries named “Cush” in Bible times. One was Ethiopia, lying south of the Sudan in Africa. But there was another “Cush” in ancient times: it was in eastern Mesopotamia, or what at other times was part of the Babylonian Empire. These people were certainly not a black race, at any time. This “Cush” flourished about 1,500 B.C.- in other words, in Moses’ time, for the Exodus from Egypt occurred in 1,486 B.C. Now, who can we expect to find living in this Cush, on the east of the Rivers Tigris and Euphrates? From what people there did Moses take his wife? [link to www.ensignmessage.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 18225135 United States11/28/2012 10:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... Again... someone is trying to rob white folks of their ancestry. Wake up people... don't believe these lies. Adam was a ruddy complected man. That means he was white, people. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18225135 All races are good according to God. But the Adamic (Ancient Hebrew) bloodline was created later after the indigenous peoples of the world. Archaeology and modern scientific dating technologies prove this. Don't be fooled by idiots telling lies. I can show you that misintepretation in your bible. the original wording wass he was well colored...ruddy was put in after the original first translated english bibles were taken and redone by rome Why are you lying? There is no misinterpretation. I'm reading the Hebrew right here. Look up Strong's Concordance Hebrew word 120(aw-dawm): ruddy derived from Strong's Concordance Hebrew word 119(aw-dam): to show blood in the face; i.e. flush or turn rosy; red; ruddy So if the word is in Hebrew from the original manuscripts no matter what language you translate it in, the word will always be Adam and it is derived from the phonetic pronunciation. He was named as such because of his appearance. And all offspring were known as the sons of Adam because of their appearance. Adam is also translated "man", the first man of that bloodline. The other word used in biblical scripture for "man" is "ish" which refers to the other men when it is usually not directly referring to the adamic bloodline. Look it up and study it for yourself. This is Hebrew I am speaking here, not English. To help understand better, go pick up The Interlinear Bible (Hebrew, Greek, English) by Green and an Exhaustive Strong's Concordance by James Strong. KJV 1611 original English translation that was translated by 50 scholars. Their is a letter in the beginning of the bible from the translators that talks about the task of translating. Until you've done the work, you are speaking from a position of ignorance. Don't perpetuate lies and only show truth. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1184364 United States11/28/2012 10:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... What a crock of Afro-Centrism...in almost every facet of life, African's ignorant of their own history, seek to inject themselves into every other cultures achievements and history. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1184364 I realize that true African culture and history is disappointing, but please quit deluding yourselves with the fantasy interpretations and street thug "experts". This is your "culture and history" when no one steps in to help: They are the descendants of Ham (the father of homosexuality), cursed to be tillers of the soil, which is why NO African nation ruled by blacks has ever amounted to anything other than death, disease, disgusting rape rituals and a total waste of humanity. You are a fucking moron. Kemet (egypt) was without a doubt a black nation and one of the greatest (if not the greatest and longest lasting) civilization on earth. Here is a link to artifacts from the 18th dynasty (mostly) and they are without a doubt BLACK aka NEGRO. [link to www.egyptsearch.com] And this is also around the time that Moses and the Israelites were in Egypt. self-owned  So you posting images of tan skinned ruling class Egyptians with black skinned slaves working, proves the civilization and accomplishments of Egypt were of black origin?  You monkey's never learn, do you? You've been so many advanced cultures slaves, that you actually believe you're the reason for those cultures and their heritage....LOL Here's a little bit of science to help you better grasp your "heritage" in Egypt and most of the Cushite areas (and south of them) [link to www.eutimes.net] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28682905  Australia11/28/2012 11:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... So you are denying Negro slaves were captured from africa and brought to the USA? Your credibility goes to zero right there. Quoting: Ryan Hardy 28677716 What part of africa did columbus go to? Judah in the days of jeremiah and in the days of the Roman invasion sought refuge over the atlas mountains into nmorocco and other lands outside tha Hamite lands which were also then called africa. The hebrews blended in seeking refuge. I can prove this to you ACTS CHAPTER 13 ¶ There were at Antioche, in the congregation, prophets and doctors, as Barnabas and Simeonb called Nyger, And Lucius of Cerene, and Manahen Herod the tetrarkes nursefellow, and Saul. As they served God, and fasted, The holy ghost said: separate me Barnabas and Saul, for the work whereunto I have called them. Then fasted they and prayed, and put their hands on them, and let them go. BARNANBAS AND SIMEON WERE FROM NIGER AFRICA. They apparently got back to Isarael or maybe born there to returning parents. For whats its worth i just cast a lot to find out the answer. I basically said "God, are the Israelites generally the people known as Jews today (for the South, and Israelite lost tribes scattered around the world for the North) and a small remnant in Ethiopia. The answer came back yes. Maybe you should try it to. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 18225135 United States11/28/2012 11:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... No of course they're not. Quoting: TheSeventhGate And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman. Numbers 12:1 Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. Deuteronomy 7:3 Ham (Kam > Kamit) is the biblical ancestor of black people, it is irrefutable judging by the genealogy that is given by the bible; (Genesis ch.10 v.6) “And the sons of Ham: Cush and Mizraim, and Punt and Canaan.” • Cush (Kush) is an hebraic word meaning « black » and it indicates Nubia, today’s Sudan, a country mainly populated by black people. • Mizraim (Mizraim) is also a hebrew ("semitic") word to name Egypt (Kemet), Thanks to the work of Cheikh Anta Diop, we know for certain that ancient Egypt was inhabited by black people. • Punt, according to "The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt", designates an country in Africa: [...] Punt, an African country somewhere between the upper reaches of the Nile and the Somali coast. [...] East African land of Punt [...] African region of Punt (probably located somewhere in the vicinity of modern Eritrea) Christianity has never laboured under a greater curse than the many mistranslations in the King James Version - and some of them are even followed in some other translations because these errors have become traditional. Bible scholars know that there are many thousand mistranslations in the King James’ Version of the Bible; the eminent scholar Robert Young, author of Young’s Analytical Concordance to the Bible and of Young’s Literal translation of the Bible says in the preface to his Literal Translation, that in the King James’ version, “there are scarcely two consecutive verses where there is not some departure from the original and these variations may be counted by tens of thousands, as admitted on all hands.” There were two different countries named “Cush” in Bible times. One was Ethiopia, lying south of the Sudan in Africa. But there was another “Cush” in ancient times: it was in eastern Mesopotamia, or what at other times was part of the Babylonian Empire. These people were certainly not a black race, at any time. This “Cush” flourished about 1,500 B.C.- in other words, in Moses’ time, for the Exodus from Egypt occurred in 1,486 B.C. Now, who can we expect to find living in this Cush, on the east of the Rivers Tigris and Euphrates? From what people there did Moses take his wife? [link to www.ensignmessage.com] First and foremost, all you people need to figure out what happen to Noah's sons and their offspring and you will have your answers. The 12 tribes existed in Egypt for over 400 years and it is accounted for historically. Joseph even took wives of Egypt. But if people think that they were black, then they are highly mistaken. Nothing wrong with being black cause black is beautiful, but to say that Hebrews were black is actually historically inaccurate. It is also a means to rob white folks of their ancestry. Look at Israel today... all of Israel, not black people folks. Do the math. Don't perpetuate lies. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28682905 Australia11/28/2012 11:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... So you are denying Negro slaves were captured from africa and brought to the USA? Your credibility goes to zero right there. Quoting: Ryan Hardy 28677716 What part of africa did columbus go to? Judah in the days of jeremiah and in the days of the Roman invasion sought refuge over the atlas mountains into nmorocco and other lands outside tha Hamite lands which were also then called africa. The hebrews blended in seeking refuge. As they always did, from Joseph, to Moses to our Savior. We always ran into that land to blend in with the hamites/africans. Babylon, Assyria and Egypt are not what many would call Africa. Arabs (descendants of Ishmael) are not Africans. Africa is places like Niger, Sudan etc. In any case just be concerned with weather you are grafted into Judah through Jesus Christ. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27211004 Canada11/28/2012 11:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... No of course they're not. Quoting: TheSeventhGate And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman. Numbers 12:1 Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. Deuteronomy 7:3 Ham (Kam > Kamit) is the biblical ancestor of black people, it is irrefutable judging by the genealogy that is given by the bible; (Genesis ch.10 v.6) “And the sons of Ham: Cush and Mizraim, and Punt and Canaan.” • Cush (Kush) is an hebraic word meaning « black » and it indicates Nubia, today’s Sudan, a country mainly populated by black people. • Mizraim (Mizraim) is also a hebrew ("semitic") word to name Egypt (Kemet), Thanks to the work of Cheikh Anta Diop, we know for certain that ancient Egypt was inhabited by black people. • Punt, according to "The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt", designates an country in Africa: [...] Punt, an African country somewhere between the upper reaches of the Nile and the Somali coast. [...] East African land of Punt [...] African region of Punt (probably located somewhere in the vicinity of modern Eritrea) Christianity has never laboured under a greater curse than the many mistranslations in the King James Version - and some of them are even followed in some other translations because these errors have become traditional. Bible scholars know that there are many thousand mistranslations in the King James’ Version of the Bible; the eminent scholar Robert Young, author of Young’s Analytical Concordance to the Bible and of Young’s Literal translation of the Bible says in the preface to his Literal Translation, that in the King James’ version, “there are scarcely two consecutive verses where there is not some departure from the original and these variations may be counted by tens of thousands, as admitted on all hands.” There were two different countries named “Cush” in Bible times. One was Ethiopia, lying south of the Sudan in Africa. But there was another “Cush” in ancient times: it was in eastern Mesopotamia, or what at other times was part of the Babylonian Empire. These people were certainly not a black race, at any time. This “Cush” flourished about 1,500 B.C.- in other words, in Moses’ time, for the Exodus from Egypt occurred in 1,486 B.C. Now, who can we expect to find living in this Cush, on the east of the Rivers Tigris and Euphrates? From what people there did Moses take his wife? [link to www.ensignmessage.com] First and foremost, all you people need to figure out what happen to Noah's sons and their offspring and you will have your answers. The 12 tribes existed in Egypt for over 400 years and it is accounted for historically. Joseph even took wives of Egypt. But if people think that they were black, then they are highly mistaken. Nothing wrong with being black cause black is beautiful, but to say that Hebrews were black is actually historically inaccurate. It is also a means to rob white folks of their ancestry. Look at Israel today... all of Israel, not black people folks. Do the math. Don't perpetuate lies. read the article bub. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 18225135 United States11/28/2012 11:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... So many people talking about the Bible and it's so-called misinterpretations and flawed translations. There are a few bad translations that are easily corrected by looking at the original language. Problem solved. Why is that so hard? Why is it such a mystery? The KJV is one of the most faithful translations to date. I should know since I actually do study the languages. But alas, I am not here to fight over scripture, but I won't let people ignorantly perpetuate undocumented lies. Document it in the original languages or shut the HELL up literally. Because it is another trick of the devil to confuse people. Confusion is of the devil and causes people to be easy prey for the wicked. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 18225135 United States11/28/2012 11:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... ... Quoting: TheSeventhGate Ham (Kam > Kamit) is the biblical ancestor of black people, it is irrefutable judging by the genealogy that is given by the bible; (Genesis ch.10 v.6) “And the sons of Ham: Cush and Mizraim, and Punt and Canaan.” • Cush (Kush) is an hebraic word meaning « black » and it indicates Nubia, today’s Sudan, a country mainly populated by black people. • Mizraim (Mizraim) is also a hebrew ("semitic") word to name Egypt (Kemet), Thanks to the work of Cheikh Anta Diop, we know for certain that ancient Egypt was inhabited by black people. • Punt, according to "The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt", designates an country in Africa: [...] Punt, an African country somewhere between the upper reaches of the Nile and the Somali coast. [...] East African land of Punt [...] African region of Punt (probably located somewhere in the vicinity of modern Eritrea) Christianity has never laboured under a greater curse than the many mistranslations in the King James Version - and some of them are even followed in some other translations because these errors have become traditional. Bible scholars know that there are many thousand mistranslations in the King James’ Version of the Bible; the eminent scholar Robert Young, author of Young’s Analytical Concordance to the Bible and of Young’s Literal translation of the Bible says in the preface to his Literal Translation, that in the King James’ version, “there are scarcely two consecutive verses where there is not some departure from the original and these variations may be counted by tens of thousands, as admitted on all hands.” There were two different countries named “Cush” in Bible times. One was Ethiopia, lying south of the Sudan in Africa. But there was another “Cush” in ancient times: it was in eastern Mesopotamia, or what at other times was part of the Babylonian Empire. These people were certainly not a black race, at any time. This “Cush” flourished about 1,500 B.C.- in other words, in Moses’ time, for the Exodus from Egypt occurred in 1,486 B.C. Now, who can we expect to find living in this Cush, on the east of the Rivers Tigris and Euphrates? From what people there did Moses take his wife? [link to www.ensignmessage.com] First and foremost, all you people need to figure out what happen to Noah's sons and their offspring and you will have your answers. The 12 tribes existed in Egypt for over 400 years and it is accounted for historically. Joseph even took wives of Egypt. But if people think that they were black, then they are highly mistaken. Nothing wrong with being black cause black is beautiful, but to say that Hebrews were black is actually historically inaccurate. It is also a means to rob white folks of their ancestry. Look at Israel today... all of Israel, not black people folks. Do the math. Don't perpetuate lies. read the article bub. Already did. Take a look at the genealogy of Moses and then Aaron. Bub. Which one ended and which one continued? I'll give you a hint. Aaron's bloodline continued in the priesthood. You don't hear too much about children of Moses do you? Hmmmmmm..... Doesn't really matter anyways because by the time the Hebrews were in the wilderness, there were hundreds of thousands of them. I've done my homework, folks. Nothing you can say or links you can post can refute historical extra-biblical record. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19271799 Canada11/28/2012 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... What a crock of Afro-Centrism...in almost every facet of life, African's ignorant of their own history, seek to inject themselves into every other cultures achievements and history. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1184364 I realize that true African culture and history is disappointing, but please quit deluding yourselves with the fantasy interpretations and street thug "experts". This is your "culture and history" when no one steps in to help: They are the descendants of Ham (the father of homosexuality), cursed to be tillers of the soil, which is why NO African nation ruled by blacks has ever amounted to anything other than death, disease, disgusting rape rituals and a total waste of humanity. You are a fucking moron. Kemet (egypt) was without a doubt a black nation and one of the greatest (if not the greatest and longest lasting) civilization on earth. Here is a link to artifacts from the 18th dynasty (mostly) and they are without a doubt BLACK aka NEGRO. [link to www.egyptsearch.com] And this is also around the time that Moses and the Israelites were in Egypt. self-owned So you posting images of tan skinned ruling class Egyptians with black skinned slaves working, proves the civilization and accomplishments of Egypt were of black origin? You monkey's never learn, do you? You've been so many advanced cultures slaves, that you actually believe you're the reason for those cultures and their heritage....LOL Here's a little bit of science to help you better grasp your "heritage" in Egypt and most of the Cushite areas (and south of them) [link to www.eutimes.net] Wow You a truly a moron. It's hard to believe that your ilk thought they were superior to my ancestors. lol Well, the Most High did say that we were going to get punished. Anyway.... The DNA evidence that you posted is FALSE. The company never had an official DNA sample from king tut. The company saw the DNA sample on a TV screen that was in a movie/Doc about King TUT. Let's look at king tut's funeral mask to see how "western european" he looks. [link to i2.mirror.co.uk] Do you have ANY fucking common sense? Does that look like anyone "western european" to you? Use what little common sense that you have... If an "alleged" DNA sample says that specimen X has Western European genes...shouldn't the visual sample have some resemblance to Western Europeans? Do you need to see pictures of Tut's parents and grand parents for more evidence of his "Negroness"? lol I love toying with you edomites. |
| Neim-Ya'shar User ID: 28411395 United States11/28/2012 11:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... So you are denying Negro slaves were captured from africa and brought to the USA? Your credibility goes to zero right there. Quoting: Ryan Hardy 28677716 What part of africa did columbus go to? Judah in the days of jeremiah and in the days of the Roman invasion sought refuge over the atlas mountains into nmorocco and other lands outside tha Hamite lands which were also then called africa. The hebrews blended in seeking refuge. As they always did, from Joseph, to Moses to our Savior. We always ran into that land to blend in with the hamites/africans. Babylon, Assyria and Egypt are not what many would call Africa. Arabs (descendants of Ishmael) are not Africans. Africa is places like Niger, Sudan etc. In any case just be concerned with weather you are grafted into Judah through Jesus Christ. ACTS CHAPTER 13 ¶ There were at Antioche, in the congregation, prophets and doctors, as Barnabas and Simeonb called Nyger, And Lucius of Cerene, and Manahen Herod the tetrarkes nursefellow, and Saul. As they served God, and fasted, The holy ghost said: separate me Barnabas and Saul, for the work whereunto I have called them. Then fasted they and prayed, and put their hands on them, and let them go. BARNANBAS AND SIMEON WERE FROM NIGER AFRICA. They apparently got back to Isarael or maybe born there to returning parents 1 But these took this counsel among themselves, that they would leave the multitude of the heathen, and go forth into a further country, where never mankind dwelt, 42 That they might there keep their statutes, which they never kept in their own land. 43 And they entered into Euphrates by the narrow places of the river. 44 For the most High then shewed signs for them, and held still the flood, till they were passed over. 45 For through that country there was a great way to go, namely, of a year and a half: and the same region is called Arsareth. 46 Then dwelt they there until the latter time; and now when they shall begin to come, :knoup: |
| bigD111 User ID: 14034394 United States11/28/2012 11:26 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... I am from the tribe of Judah. I am white, Irish heritage. Since God scattered the Israelites all over the world, expect them to come from every culture and every color. Won't be long now! Peace to you all. deplorably republican |
| Neim-Ya'shar User ID: 28411395 United States11/28/2012 11:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... The older bible my 1526 does not use that word ruddy but it uses "well coloured" The dark skinned races were always refferred to as coloured by the caucasions,even today. eg. from the 1526 bible 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 Now whan the Philistyne loked an sawe Dauid, he thoughte scorne of him : for he was but a childe, well coloured, and beutyfull to loke vpon. And the Philistyne sayde vnto Dauid : Am I a dogg then, that thou commest vnto me with a staffe ? ************************************************ NOW LOOK AT THE LIE OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance. RUDDY WIKIPEDIA> A pinkish tone of ruddy called ruddy pink is often referred to simply as ruddy when describing the colour of the cheeks of some Caucasians. 1 But these took this counsel among themselves, that they would leave the multitude of the heathen, and go forth into a further country, where never mankind dwelt, 42 That they might there keep their statutes, which they never kept in their own land. 43 And they entered into Euphrates by the narrow places of the river. 44 For the most High then shewed signs for them, and held still the flood, till they were passed over. 45 For through that country there was a great way to go, namely, of a year and a half: and the same region is called Arsareth. 46 Then dwelt they there until the latter time; and now when they shall begin to come, :knoup: |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 18225135 United States11/28/2012 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... Again... someone is trying to rob white folks of their ancestry. Wake up people... don't believe these lies. Adam was a ruddy complected man. That means he was white, people. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18225135 All races are good according to God. But the Adamic (Ancient Hebrew) bloodline was created later after the indigenous peoples of the world. Archaeology and modern scientific dating technologies prove this. Don't be fooled by idiots telling lies. I can show you that misintepretation in your bible. the original wording wass he was well colored...ruddy was put in after the original first translated english bibles were taken and redone by rome Why are you lying? There is no misinterpretation. I'm reading the Hebrew right here. Look up Strong's Concordance Hebrew word 120(aw-dawm): ruddy derived from Strong's Concordance Hebrew word 119(aw-dam): to show blood in the face; i.e. flush or turn rosy; red; ruddy So if the word is in Hebrew from the original manuscripts no matter what language you translate it in, the word will always be Adam and it is derived from the phonetic pronunciation. He was named as such because of his appearance. And all offspring were known as the sons of Adam because of their appearance. Adam is also translated "man", the first man of that bloodline. The other word used in biblical scripture for "man" is "ish" which refers to the other men when it is usually not directly referring to the adamic bloodline. Look it up and study it for yourself. This is Hebrew I am speaking here, not English. my bible is way older than yours.i have a 1526 which rome confiscated and changed around Man you are dense, you know that? Translators dude. Letter? 1611? Sheesh... I doubt it is older than the original language that I am reading from. But I'm not here for a pissing contest. It's good nonetheless that you are reading the scripture. Doesn't matter how old the bible you read from is, it matters if you read it with understanding. That can only be granted from above. The tools used will only help you read the words on the page, but do you know what it means? Do you have eyes to see and ears to hear? Do you have a destiny? There are people in the world that whether they know it or not are being used to try and destroy Christians in the most subtle ways possible. One of them is by hiding the ancestry. There are those that have yet to fulfill their destiny in these final days. There is a reason why the kings and queens have the stone of destiny in the UK. Why is that? The very stone that Jacob rest his head on. It is currently in the throne of the queen of England. How did it get there and why? So many awesome revelations for those that are willing to look for the answers and discover their true heritage. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28682905 Australia11/28/2012 11:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... ... Quoting: Neim-Ya'shar What part of africa did columbus go to? Judah in the days of jeremiah and in the days of the Roman invasion sought refuge over the atlas mountains into nmorocco and other lands outside tha Hamite lands which were also then called africa. The hebrews blended in seeking refuge. As they always did, from Joseph, to Moses to our Savior. We always ran into that land to blend in with the hamites/africans. Babylon, Assyria and Egypt are not what many would call Africa. Arabs (descendants of Ishmael) are not Africans. Africa is places like Niger, Sudan etc. In any case just be concerned with weather you are grafted into Judah through Jesus Christ. ACTS CHAPTER 13 ¶ There were at Antioche, in the congregation, prophets and doctors, as Barnabas and Simeonb called Nyger, And Lucius of Cerene, and Manahen Herod the tetrarkes nursefellow, and Saul. As they served God, and fasted, The holy ghost said: separate me Barnabas and Saul, for the work whereunto I have called them. Then fasted they and prayed, and put their hands on them, and let them go. BARNANBAS AND SIMEON WERE FROM NIGER AFRICA. They apparently got back to Isarael or maybe born there to returning parents Assuming Nyger is Niger, it doesn't mean Simeon was Negroid. There is nothing wrong with being negroid. It's just another group of people. |
| Neim-Ya'shar User ID: 28411395 United States11/28/2012 11:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... ... Quoting: Neim-Ya'shar I can show you that misintepretation in your bible. the original wording wass he was well colored...ruddy was put in after the original first translated english bibles were taken and redone by rome Why are you lying? There is no misinterpretation. I'm reading the Hebrew right here. Look up Strong's Concordance Hebrew word 120(aw-dawm): ruddy derived from Strong's Concordance Hebrew word 119(aw-dam): to show blood in the face; i.e. flush or turn rosy; red; ruddy So if the word is in Hebrew from the original manuscripts no matter what language you translate it in, the word will always be Adam and it is derived from the phonetic pronunciation. He was named as such because of his appearance. And all offspring were known as the sons of Adam because of their appearance. Adam is also translated "man", the first man of that bloodline. The other word used in biblical scripture for "man" is "ish" which refers to the other men when it is usually not directly referring to the adamic bloodline. Look it up and study it for yourself. This is Hebrew I am speaking here, not English. my bible is way older than yours.i have a 1526 which rome confiscated and changed around Man you are dense, you know that? Translators dude. Letter? 1611? Sheesh... I doubt it is older than the original language that I am reading from. But I'm not here for a pissing contest. It's good nonetheless that you are reading the scripture. Doesn't matter how old the bible you read from is, it matters if you read it with understanding. That can only be granted from above. The tools used will only help you read the words on the page, but do you know what it means? Do you have eyes to see and ears to hear? Do you have a destiny? There are people in the world that whether they know it or not are being used to try and destroy Christians in the most subtle ways possible. One of them is by hiding the ancestry. There are those that have yet to fulfill their destiny in these final days. There is a reason why the kings and queens have the stone of destiny in the UK. Why is that? The very stone that Jacob rest his head on. It is currently in the throne of the queen of England. How did it get there and why? So many awesome revelations for those that are willing to look for the answers and discover their true heritage. The older bible does not use that word but it uses "well coloured" The dark skinned races were always refferred to as coloured by the caucasions,even today. eg. from the 1526 bible 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 Now whan the Philistyne loked an sawe Dauid, he thoughte scorne of him : for he was but a childe, well coloured, and beutyfull to loke vpon. And the Philistyne sayde vnto Dauid : Am I a dogg then, that thou commest vnto me with a staffe ? ************************************************ NOW LOOK AT THE LIE OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance. RUDDY WIKIPEDIA> A pinkish tone of ruddy called ruddy pink is often referred to simply as ruddy when describing the colour of the cheeks of some Caucasians. Last Edited by Neim-Ya'shar on 11/28/2012 11:33 PM 1 But these took this counsel among themselves, that they would leave the multitude of the heathen, and go forth into a further country, where never mankind dwelt, 42 That they might there keep their statutes, which they never kept in their own land. 43 And they entered into Euphrates by the narrow places of the river. 44 For the most High then shewed signs for them, and held still the flood, till they were passed over. 45 For through that country there was a great way to go, namely, of a year and a half: and the same region is called Arsareth. 46 Then dwelt they there until the latter time; and now when they shall begin to come, :knoup: |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 12878115 United States11/28/2012 11:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Neim-Ya'shar User ID: 28411395 United States11/28/2012 11:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26538352 As they always did, from Joseph, to Moses to our Savior. We always ran into that land to blend in with the hamites/africans. Babylon, Assyria and Egypt are not what many would call Africa. Arabs (descendants of Ishmael) are not Africans. Africa is places like Niger, Sudan etc. In any case just be concerned with weather you are grafted into Judah through Jesus Christ. ACTS CHAPTER 13 ¶ There were at Antioche, in the congregation, prophets and doctors, as Barnabas and Simeonb called Nyger, And Lucius of Cerene, and Manahen Herod the tetrarkes nursefellow, and Saul. As they served God, and fasted, The holy ghost said: separate me Barnabas and Saul, for the work whereunto I have called them. Then fasted they and prayed, and put their hands on them, and let them go. BARNANBAS AND SIMEON WERE FROM NIGER AFRICA. They apparently got back to Isarael or maybe born there to returning parents Assuming Nyger is Niger, it doesn't mean Simeon was Negroid. There is nothing wrong with being negroid. It's just another group of people. Why you people try to twist evidence when it is written in your face.This why some people get upset and start name calling.This is biblical proof now you giving a Plato version of your opinion Last Edited by Neim-Ya'shar on 11/28/2012 11:35 PM 1 But these took this counsel among themselves, that they would leave the multitude of the heathen, and go forth into a further country, where never mankind dwelt, 42 That they might there keep their statutes, which they never kept in their own land. 43 And they entered into Euphrates by the narrow places of the river. 44 For the most High then shewed signs for them, and held still the flood, till they were passed over. 45 For through that country there was a great way to go, namely, of a year and a half: and the same region is called Arsareth. 46 Then dwelt they there until the latter time; and now when they shall begin to come, :knoup: |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1305588  Puerto Rico11/28/2012 11:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... No of course they're not. Quoting: TheSeventhGate And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman. Numbers 12:1 Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. Deuteronomy 7:3 This guy is an idiot ^^^^ They criticized moses for not marrying an Israelite. This means that moses did not marry within his ethnic group/tribe. This has absolutely nothing to do with skin color. Till this day in Africa couples from different ethnic groups have to jump through hoops to get married. they were sodomites/fags/screwed goats/thats why we get circumcized--to keep your pecker clean from being up an ass hole.the virgin mary was a virgin yo a sodomite,as long as her asshole wasnt penetrated she was a virgin,makes no differance about her vagina.but people dont want to believe this,why do you think the priest get little boys,there sodomites.the sacrifices in the old test.,were screwing people and animals in the ass.there city was destroyed but they werent,or we wouldnt have fags today |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 18225135 United States11/28/2012 11:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... The older bible my 1526 does not use that word ruddy but it uses "well coloured" Quoting: Neim-Ya'shar The dark skinned races were always refferred to as coloured by the caucasions,even today. eg. from the 1526 bible 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 Now whan the Philistyne loked an sawe Dauid, he thoughte scorne of him : for he was but a childe, well coloured, and beutyfull to loke vpon. And the Philistyne sayde vnto Dauid : Am I a dogg then, that thou commest vnto me with a staffe ? ************************************************ NOW LOOK AT THE LIE OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance. RUDDY WIKIPEDIA> A pinkish tone of ruddy called ruddy pink is often referred to simply as ruddy when describing the colour of the cheeks of some Caucasians. Why are you trying to redefine "ruddy"? That scripture is accurate but it does not mean black nor has it ever meant black. David was of a different color than the Philistines. He was a young man not like these older men rough and hardened. Dude, seriously. Is this a color thing with you? Are you black, latin, asian, middle-eastern? If you are there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. God made all men and they are all beautiful and unique. I don't know what the hang up is here. Ruddy is ruddy. Go tell a black man that he is ruddy. LOL.... he'll definitely look at you strangely. Or even and asian dude, tell him that. You cannot change aw-dawm and if you do then you are corrupting the holy scripture of God. Have to get past the idea of language here and understand that these words were spoken and these sounds meant a certain thing to people. And written language was used to try and capture a representation of that meaning. Aw-dawm meant ruddy. The sound that vibrated through the air when spoken to the native speakers of that language was interpreted to mean "ruddy". The did not say anything about the a black person. Don't get hung up on this. Truth is truth. Btw... I will trust my original source more than I would ever trust Wikipedia. I can find all kinds of bad info there. Just keep that in mind when using it in the future. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 18225135 United States11/28/2012 11:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... No of course they're not. Quoting: TheSeventhGate And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman. Numbers 12:1 Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. Deuteronomy 7:3 This guy is an idiot ^^^^ They criticized moses for not marrying an Israelite. This means that moses did not marry within his ethnic group/tribe. This has absolutely nothing to do with skin color. Till this day in Africa couples from different ethnic groups have to jump through hoops to get married. they were sodomites/fags/screwed goats/thats why we get circumcized--to keep your pecker clean from being up an ass hole.the virgin mary was a virgin yo a sodomite,as long as her asshole wasnt penetrated she was a virgin,makes no differance about her vagina.but people dont want to believe this,why do you think the priest get little boys,there sodomites.the sacrifices in the old test.,were screwing people and animals in the ass.there city was destroyed but they werent,or we wouldnt have fags today No you are highly mistaken. Having unnatural affection and do those thing with the body that are unnatural covers that. Sounds like a hateful person here and the devil has got a hold you. Why don't you get the hell outta here! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19271799 Canada11/28/2012 11:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18225135 Why are you lying? There is no misinterpretation. I'm reading the Hebrew right here. Look up Strong's Concordance Hebrew word 120(aw-dawm): ruddy derived from Strong's Concordance Hebrew word 119(aw-dam): to show blood in the face; i.e. flush or turn rosy; red; ruddy So if the word is in Hebrew from the original manuscripts no matter what language you translate it in, the word will always be Adam and it is derived from the phonetic pronunciation. He was named as such because of his appearance. And all offspring were known as the sons of Adam because of their appearance. Adam is also translated "man", the first man of that bloodline. The other word used in biblical scripture for "man" is "ish" which refers to the other men when it is usually not directly referring to the adamic bloodline. Look it up and study it for yourself. This is Hebrew I am speaking here, not English. my bible is way older than yours.i have a 1526 which rome confiscated and changed around Man you are dense, you know that? Translators dude. Letter? 1611? Sheesh... I doubt it is older than the original language that I am reading from. But I'm not here for a pissing contest. It's good nonetheless that you are reading the scripture. Doesn't matter how old the bible you read from is, it matters if you read it with understanding. That can only be granted from above. The tools used will only help you read the words on the page, but do you know what it means? Do you have eyes to see and ears to hear? Do you have a destiny? There are people in the world that whether they know it or not are being used to try and destroy Christians in the most subtle ways possible. One of them is by hiding the ancestry. There are those that have yet to fulfill their destiny in these final days. There is a reason why the kings and queens have the stone of destiny in the UK. Why is that? The very stone that Jacob rest his head on. It is currently in the throne of the queen of England. How did it get there and why? So many awesome revelations for those that are willing to look for the answers and discover their true heritage. The older bible does not use that word but it uses "well coloured" The dark skinned races were always refferred to as coloured by the caucasions,even today. eg. from the 1526 bible 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 Now whan the Philistyne loked an sawe Dauid, he thoughte scorne of him : for he was but a childe, well coloured, and beutyfull to loke vpon. And the Philistyne sayde vnto Dauid : Am I a dogg then, that thou commest vnto me with a staffe ? ************************************************ NOW LOOK AT THE LIE OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance. RUDDY WIKIPEDIA> A pinkish tone of ruddy called ruddy pink is often referred to simply as ruddy when describing the colour of the cheeks of some Caucasians. hey I am interested in a particular verse in your bible. Psalm 68:4 |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25504708 United States11/28/2012 11:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... The LORD is only dealing with the Children of Israel (so-called Negroes, Latinos and Native Americans) and will redeem the Elect (144,000 and the 1/3) of the Children of Israel from the Nuclear Destruction that is coming via WWIII. All nations who are not destroyed in America(Babylon the Great) will be put in slavery under the Children of Israel under the Power of who the World ignorantly call Jesus Christ in the Kingdom of Heaven, including the Children of Edom/Esau (so-called White people). Rev 13:9-10 - HE THAT LEADETH INTO CAPTIVITY SHALL GO INTO CAPTIVITY: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the SAINTS (THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL - Psalms 148:14) Revelation 2:26-27 - And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, TO HIM WILL I GIVE POWER OVER THE NATIONS: AND HE SHALL RULE THEM WITH A ROD OF IRON; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father. Isaiah 14:1-2 - For the LORD WILL HAVE MERCY ON JACOB, and WILL YET CHOOSE ISRAELl, and set them in their own land: and the strangers shall be joined with them, and they shall cleave to the house of Jacob. And the people shall take them, and bring them to their place: and the house of Israel SHALL POSSESS THEM IN THE LAND OF THE LORD FOR SERVANTS AND HANDMAIDS: and THEY SHALL TAKE THEM CAPTIVES, WHOSE CAPTIVE THEY WERE; and THEY SHALL RULE OVER THEIR OPPRESSORS. The downfall of this society (The Kingdom of Satan ruled by the Children of Esau) is quickly on a downfall and the LORD will establish his righteous Kingdom (Ruled by the Real Children of Israel) real soon! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 25504708 United States11/28/2012 11:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... The LORD is only dealing with the Children of Israel (so-called Negroes, Latinos and Native Americans) and will redeem the Elect (144,000 and the 1/3) of the Children of Israel from the Nuclear Destruction that is coming via WWIII. All nations who are not destroyed in America(Babylon the Great) will be put in slavery under the Children of Israel under the Power of who the World ignorantly call Jesus Christ in the Kingdom of Heaven, including the Children of Edom/Esau (so-called White people). Rev 13:9-10 - HE THAT LEADETH INTO CAPTIVITY SHALL GO INTO CAPTIVITY: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the SAINTS (THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL - Psalms 148:14) Revelation 2:26-27 - And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, TO HIM WILL I GIVE POWER OVER THE NATIONS: AND HE SHALL RULE THEM WITH A ROD OF IRON; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father. Isaiah 14:1-2 - For the LORD WILL HAVE MERCY ON JACOB, and WILL YET CHOOSE ISRAELl, and set them in their own land: and the strangers shall be joined with them, and they shall cleave to the house of Jacob. And the people shall take them, and bring them to their place: and the house of Israel SHALL POSSESS THEM IN THE LAND OF THE LORD FOR SERVANTS AND HANDMAIDS: and THEY SHALL TAKE THEM CAPTIVES, WHOSE CAPTIVE THEY WERE; and THEY SHALL RULE OVER THEIR OPPRESSORS. The downfall of this society (The Kingdom of Satan ruled by the Children of Esau) is quickly on a downfall and the LORD will establish his righteous Kingdom (Ruled by the Real Children of Israel) real soon! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 27211004 Canada11/28/2012 11:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 27211004 Christianity has never laboured under a greater curse than the many mistranslations in the King James Version - and some of them are even followed in some other translations because these errors have become traditional. Bible scholars know that there are many thousand mistranslations in the King James’ Version of the Bible; the eminent scholar Robert Young, author of Young’s Analytical Concordance to the Bible and of Young’s Literal translation of the Bible says in the preface to his Literal Translation, that in the King James’ version, “there are scarcely two consecutive verses where there is not some departure from the original and these variations may be counted by tens of thousands, as admitted on all hands.” There were two different countries named “Cush” in Bible times. One was Ethiopia, lying south of the Sudan in Africa. But there was another “Cush” in ancient times: it was in eastern Mesopotamia, or what at other times was part of the Babylonian Empire. These people were certainly not a black race, at any time. This “Cush” flourished about 1,500 B.C.- in other words, in Moses’ time, for the Exodus from Egypt occurred in 1,486 B.C. Now, who can we expect to find living in this Cush, on the east of the Rivers Tigris and Euphrates? From what people there did Moses take his wife? [link to www.ensignmessage.com] First and foremost, all you people need to figure out what happen to Noah's sons and their offspring and you will have your answers. The 12 tribes existed in Egypt for over 400 years and it is accounted for historically. Joseph even took wives of Egypt. But if people think that they were black, then they are highly mistaken. Nothing wrong with being black cause black is beautiful, but to say that Hebrews were black is actually historically inaccurate. It is also a means to rob white folks of their ancestry. Look at Israel today... all of Israel, not black people folks. Do the math. Don't perpetuate lies. read the article bub. Already did. Take a look at the genealogy of Moses and then Aaron. Bub. Which one ended and which one continued? I'll give you a hint. Aaron's bloodline continued in the priesthood. You don't hear too much about children of Moses do you? Hmmmmmm..... Doesn't really matter anyways because by the time the Hebrews were in the wilderness, there were hundreds of thousands of them. I've done my homework, folks. Nothing you can say or links you can post can refute historical extra-biblical record. the bible has been mangled. then too the bible is a shadow of earlier knowlege. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19271799 Canada11/28/2012 11:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... The older bible my 1526 does not use that word ruddy but it uses "well coloured" Quoting: Neim-Ya'shar The dark skinned races were always refferred to as coloured by the caucasions,even today. eg. from the 1526 bible 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 Now whan the Philistyne loked an sawe Dauid, he thoughte scorne of him : for he was but a childe, well coloured, and beutyfull to loke vpon. And the Philistyne sayde vnto Dauid : Am I a dogg then, that thou commest vnto me with a staffe ? ************************************************ NOW LOOK AT THE LIE OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance. RUDDY WIKIPEDIA> A pinkish tone of ruddy called ruddy pink is often referred to simply as ruddy when describing the colour of the cheeks of some Caucasians. Why are you trying to redefine "ruddy"? That scripture is accurate but it does not mean black nor has it ever meant black. David was of a different color than the Philistines. He was a young man not like these older men rough and hardened. Dude, seriously. Is this a color thing with you? Are you black, latin, asian, middle-eastern? If you are there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. God made all men and they are all beautiful and unique. I don't know what the hang up is here. Ruddy is ruddy. Go tell a black man that he is ruddy. LOL.... he'll definitely look at you strangely. Or even and asian dude, tell him that. You cannot change aw-dawm and if you do then you are corrupting the holy scripture of God. Have to get past the idea of language here and understand that these words were spoken and these sounds meant a certain thing to people. And written language was used to try and capture a representation of that meaning. Aw-dawm meant ruddy. The sound that vibrated through the air when spoken to the native speakers of that language was interpreted to mean "ruddy". The did not say anything about the a black person. Don't get hung up on this. Truth is truth. Btw... I will trust my original source more than I would ever trust Wikipedia. I can find all kinds of bad info there. Just keep that in mind when using it in the future. How many times does he have to tell you folks that RUDDY is NOT in the 1526 bible...at least not in the verse with king david... I could only imagine his frustration. And I have seen translations of Adam linked to dirt/soil (like earth). The "Blood" has links to Bloodline/Lineage. |
| Neim-Ya'shar User ID: 28411395 United States11/28/2012 11:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... ... Quoting: Neim-Ya'shar my bible is way older than yours.i have a 1526 which rome confiscated and changed around Man you are dense, you know that? Translators dude. Letter? 1611? Sheesh... I doubt it is older than the original language that I am reading from. But I'm not here for a pissing contest. It's good nonetheless that you are reading the scripture. Doesn't matter how old the bible you read from is, it matters if you read it with understanding. That can only be granted from above. The tools used will only help you read the words on the page, but do you know what it means? Do you have eyes to see and ears to hear? Do you have a destiny? There are people in the world that whether they know it or not are being used to try and destroy Christians in the most subtle ways possible. One of them is by hiding the ancestry. There are those that have yet to fulfill their destiny in these final days. There is a reason why the kings and queens have the stone of destiny in the UK. Why is that? The very stone that Jacob rest his head on. It is currently in the throne of the queen of England. How did it get there and why? So many awesome revelations for those that are willing to look for the answers and discover their true heritage. The older bible does not use that word but it uses "well coloured" The dark skinned races were always refferred to as coloured by the caucasions,even today. eg. from the 1526 bible 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 Now whan the Philistyne loked an sawe Dauid, he thoughte scorne of him : for he was but a childe, well coloured, and beutyfull to loke vpon. And the Philistyne sayde vnto Dauid : Am I a dogg then, that thou commest vnto me with a staffe ? ************************************************ NOW LOOK AT THE LIE OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance. RUDDY WIKIPEDIA> A pinkish tone of ruddy called ruddy pink is often referred to simply as ruddy when describing the colour of the cheeks of some Caucasians. hey I am interested in a particular verse in your bible. Psalm 68:4 i will check it give me a little time ..its in pdf and because of over 1000 pgs it drags my system But the rightuous shal be glad 5 reioyse before God, they shalbe mery 5 ioyful. Oh synge vnto God, synge prayses vnto his name : magnifie him y rydeth aboue the heauens (whose name is ^LORDE) 5 reioyse before hi. He is a father of y fatherlesse, he is a defender of widdowes : * eue God in his holy THERE YOU SEE HOW THEY INSERTED THE NAME JAH BECAUSE THE ORIGINAL TRANSLATOR APPARENTLY EITHER KNEW THE REAL NAME AND LEFT IT OUT DELIBERATELY OR DID NOT WANT TO SAY IT. REMEBER THESE BOOKS WERE TAKEN BY ROME AND REEDITED UNDER THE INSTUCTIONS OF THE POPE. YAH IS NOT THE NAME BUT IT SHOULD BE EH'YEH ASHER EH'YEH habitacio. Last Edited by Neim-Ya'shar on 11/29/2012 12:25 AM 1 But these took this counsel among themselves, that they would leave the multitude of the heathen, and go forth into a further country, where never mankind dwelt, 42 That they might there keep their statutes, which they never kept in their own land. 43 And they entered into Euphrates by the narrow places of the river. 44 For the most High then shewed signs for them, and held still the flood, till they were passed over. 45 For through that country there was a great way to go, namely, of a year and a half: and the same region is called Arsareth. 46 Then dwelt they there until the latter time; and now when they shall begin to come, :knoup: |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1305588 Puerto Rico11/29/2012 12:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... No of course they're not. Quoting: TheSeventhGate And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman. Numbers 12:1 Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. Deuteronomy 7:3 This guy is an idiot ^^^^ They criticized moses for not marrying an Israelite. This means that moses did not marry within his ethnic group/tribe. This has absolutely nothing to do with skin color. Till this day in Africa couples from different ethnic groups have to jump through hoops to get married. they were sodomites/fags/screwed goats/thats why we get circumcized--to keep your pecker clean from being up an ass hole.the virgin mary was a virgin yo a sodomite,as long as her asshole wasnt penetrated she was a virgin,makes no differance about her vagina.but people dont want to believe this,why do you think the priest get little boys,there sodomites.the sacrifices in the old test.,were screwing people and animals in the ass.there city was destroyed but they werent,or we wouldnt have fags today No you are highly mistaken. Having unnatural affection and do those thing with the body that are unnatural covers that. Sounds like a hateful person here and the devil has got a hold you. Why don't you get the hell outta here! im not a sodomite,and if there was a tribe of them that makes me read the bible differant/i have to read it as a sodomite would write it,or why else would it be talked about in the bible.im telling you sodomites had a big influance on the bible.because you dont like what i say just makes you blind to the truth,must be the devil in you,that you cant see,a few post back a scripture was quoted as,the old men were rough and hardend,how would you interpret that if you knew a sodomite wrote it. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19271799 Canada11/29/2012 12:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Who Are The True Biblical Israelites? The 144,000? Native American, Blacks & Latinos: Videos & Links, Etc... ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18225135 Man you are dense, you know that? Translators dude. Letter? 1611? Sheesh... I doubt it is older than the original language that I am reading from. But I'm not here for a pissing contest. It's good nonetheless that you are reading the scripture. Doesn't matter how old the bible you read from is, it matters if you read it with understanding. That can only be granted from above. The tools used will only help you read the words on the page, but do you know what it means? Do you have eyes to see and ears to hear? Do you have a destiny? There are people in the world that whether they know it or not are being used to try and destroy Christians in the most subtle ways possible. One of them is by hiding the ancestry. There are those that have yet to fulfill their destiny in these final days. There is a reason why the kings and queens have the stone of destiny in the UK. Why is that? The very stone that Jacob rest his head on. It is currently in the throne of the queen of England. How did it get there and why? So many awesome revelations for those that are willing to look for the answers and discover their true heritage. The older bible does not use that word but it uses "well coloured" The dark skinned races were always refferred to as coloured by the caucasions,even today. eg. from the 1526 bible 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 Now whan the Philistyne loked an sawe Dauid, he thoughte scorne of him : for he was but a childe, well coloured, and beutyfull to loke vpon. And the Philistyne sayde vnto Dauid : Am I a dogg then, that thou commest vnto me with a staffe ? ************************************************ NOW LOOK AT THE LIE OF THE KING JAMES BIBLE 1ST SAMUEL 17:42 And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance. RUDDY WIKIPEDIA> A pinkish tone of ruddy called ruddy pink is often referred to simply as ruddy when describing the colour of the cheeks of some Caucasians. hey I am interested in a particular verse in your bible. Psalm 68:4 i will check it give me a little time ..its in pdf and because of over 1000 pgs it drags my system Take your time... Thanks I will just do a title search sometime tomorrow. |
