BREAKING: Scientist claims comet ISON has companions!

He is Mathematician, Physicist, Master in Solid States and Nuclear Fusion. What is astronomy other than physicist, math and observations applied to the stars?? Don't forget that physicists have a lot of more physics than astronomers!

I dont post here much, but you mad Bro ?? seriously take time to take a deep breath and relax.

Comets travel, in the Suns Vortice and Asteroids, travel, in The Comets Vortice or Tail.Kind of double whamy

For a christian you sure sure are an arrogant cunt

I don't, and it seems I'm getting caught up on the wrong side.

I'm not defending a BSer, just pointing out my views. I suppose it all comes across different on your end.

Please, proceed with the intellectual lashing and expose the BSer.


After looking closer, it is obvious McCanney is out to make money on others collective fears stemming from post 2012 emotions. In this case, no one observed anything real, except for dreams of $$$.

Be honest Voltaic, you never looked to McCanney's work. Your opinion are being taken by one post in one forum in the internet about a real person and a real scientist. Nobody without professional high grade equipments can see anything else than a fuzzy light coming from Jupiter now. He qualifies this as giant comet due to other reasons, not direct observations. If you know so much about McCanney's work, why don't you tell us what is wrong in his comet model? I give you the path to find his theoretical work published by Cornell, go ahead, read and bring us your real PhD opinion.

Well, first off I trust Dr Astros word over many here, including you. Years of reading and, after the fact guess who was right time and time again.......your friend Dr Astro.

Not kissing ass or anything, just pointing that out. A wise man knows when to stop and reanalyze.

If you put blind faith into a person with a Phd, that is pretty lame.


I know Dr Astro gets aggressive often, but I see that is from dealing with mind numbing idiocy over and over again.

My last IQ test put me at 161, which doesn't prove shit.....but it does credit what I tell you.

And if you don't understand, that is simply because you are not any higher then 131 yourself.


I don't need to read the guys work to know shit doesn't orbit comets. At least not stuff over the size of an atom. That part I didn't read at first....but now, after re-reading I gotta say this much.....that McCanney is BSing for money.

IQ is a so subtle subject that I don't consider it for nothing.
I will forget about your friendship with Dr Astros. I will focus in only one point and is a question: why do you believe things cannot orbit comets at all?

I see the only mistake being made here is the claim of campanions orbiting the Comet.

We all know how Meteor showers are created. Right. Tail Debris.

This thing is huge. Why would it not have campanions as he put it in its tail.Big ones even.

That seems pretty likely to me.

Take out the ORBIT word and its all pretty plausible.

That is not what I said......I had a feeling you wouldn't understand.

What I said was, nothing large enough to be visible to us would orbit a comet. I did mention it possible for something the size of an atom to orbit but that is so small we can dismiss it.

I don't have to read McCanneys work to know about ISON. And I DO know ISON better then most. AS far as the path ISON is taking, that proves it's size. Which proves there are no orbiting bodies around ISON, being they would be so small you would need a microscope to see them.

And Dr Astro is just another GLPer, I know him no better then a few passing posts to each other. However, I have read his posts and I know his style. He is a wise person.

So you are assuming that comets are little dirty snow balls, nothing else?

Is this thing also to become a Sun Grazer...?
They said it wasn't a while back and then Spaceweather changed its tune and said it was.

NOTHING is certain. Anything is possible. This thing could hit satelites and tail debris could hit the Satelites and the Planet.

NONE of you and I don't care how high your IQ EGO is knows shit with 100% certainty.

It didn't take long for Dr. Asshole to jump on the shill wagon, did it. I have yet to see the Dr.s credentials, So is he REALLY a Scientist?

He failed to attain a PhD. A master's degree in physics is a consolation prize for someone who couldn't cut it in a PhD program. You are making a false appeal to authority, and amazingly you still fail to see that he's flat out lying now. He started this because of Pete's images, now that those images have been debunked he's now lying by claiming Pete's images are a NASA hoax because NASA showed his images "without the companions" (hot pixels). That is a flat-out lie. When NASA showed Pete's images, they still contained the hot pixels. He's just making shit up.

Yes, I really am, but thanks to the multiple death threats I have received here you will not be seeing any personally identifiable information about me here. Funny that you automatically believe a guy who couldn't hack it in a PhD program and is lying to you over a guy who actually did attain his PhD in a scientific field and is telling you the truth. All you have to do is look at NASA's YouTube video for yourself and you can see that McCanney lied. The hot pixels are still there in Pete's images (the first images presented of the comet) "following" the comet.

No, you're equivocating. He said, and I quote "WHEN SOMETHING LIKE THIS HAPPENS ONE HAS TO BE VERY CAUTIOUS BUT AFTER EXAMINING THE DATA THAT I HAVE SEEN I WOULD SAY THAT IT APPEARS TO BE REAL ... FURTHERMORE ONE OF THE POSSIBLE COMPANIONS APPEARS TO BE AT ABOUT TWO LUNAR DISTANCES (HALF A MILLION MILES) AND HAS NOT FORMED A COMA FOR SOME ODD REASON "
Despite his lame ass attempt at throwing in a "CYA" statement at the beginning, he said he has examined the data and "it appears to be real." He goes on to tell us how far these so-called companions are from the comet. Those are conclusions that he has now published despite not providing any data to back it up. Saying it's "too early to confirm" does not excuse his bullcrap conclusions that any real astronomer, even an amateur one, would have realized was garbage based on camera noise (hot pixels). This started right after Pete's images hit the web and people started claiming they showed "companions" on this forum and others.

Yes, he is. He changed his mind about it on his second post, after I debunked his bullshit on this forum as well as others. He makes reference to that as well, accusing me of being a "disinfo agent." I never linked to spaceweather, but I did accuse him of starting a heavens-gate like rumor and I did reference Pete's images. So of course now he tries to back pedal taking full advantage of the fact that he never actually posted any data to back up what he said and acts like that's a good thing... idiot. Yes, there are other videos of ISON that show hot pixels and known asteroids near the comet, including some from Italy which are arguably higher quality images than Pete's.
[link to 2.bp.blogspot.com]
There are still no "companions" to the comet however. Just hot pixels and known asteroids which are nowhere near the comet in space.

LMFAO! You're hilarious. Just blatantly assume it eh?

He based that conclusion in his first post about it based on the so-called companions which he says are orbiting. I explained all this already as well as why it WOULD have to be massive for objects to be orbiting it at 2 LD's. They aren't though, they're just freaking hot pixels.

He flat-out lied. He saw the video NASA posted, the hot pixels are right there. He is a liar, nothing more. Watch, he'll probably come out in a day or two and lie again and say NASA magically put the hot pixels back into the video to make him look like a liar.

Last Edited by Astromut on 01/29/2013 09:18 AM

1-) He never ever stated his thoughts regarding companions on C/2012 S1 with these Pete's images, he have his own source of informations. Every time in past 10 years of weekly radio shows that he uses NASA or any other publicly available sources, he states immediately;

2-) Generally people first take a MS or Doc degree before going to PhD, this is the path he followed. If you knew McCanney's history, you would know that he was about to take his PhD course on Cornell, but he decided to first get hired as a substitute teacher to use good space data. He had problems with Astronomic department at Cornell, who don't likes people around talking about Electric Universe, so he get fired and decided to not get a PhD status.

3-) You push authority and uses too much scold.

He has provided no images and no data. This started immediately after Pete's images were seized upon on this forum and others. He's just taking what conspiracy forums have put out and using it for his own site. Yes, there are other images of ISON that were used to claim "companions" as well, but Pete's images were first. He now retreats from Pete's images because they were thoroughly debunked and the astrophotographer himself contacted. Now that astrophotographer must be dismissed by him and regarded as part of the conspiracy.

He's a washout. An MS in physics is a consolation prize for someone who couldn't make it through a PhD program. At least he admits he got fired. Oh, but of course he has excuses for everything. Funny how you blindly believe this liar yet ignore the people who actually take pictures like this.

No I do not. I do not appeal to my own authority. I do not claim to be right because I have a PhD or because I'm an astrophotographer with 17 years experience in amateur astronomy and 13 years experience in astrophotography. I'm right because that's what the evidence shows. My experience and knowledge have nothing to do with it, they're just the tools I use to find the answers. I just find it ironic that you appeal to a false authority when someone who actually has the higher degree is telling you otherwise. It's just beautiful irony. It's clear that you will just believe whatever BS spills out of McCanney's mouth because you think he's some kind of authority on the subject. Well pal, this incident has proven he is no authority at all. In fact it proves he has no idea what the hell he's talking about. Where is his astrometric data? Where are his images? They don't exist. But don't worry, I think I can help with that...

IT APPEARS TO BE REAL
Appears to be is not conclusive.

Man, are you stalking Professor?? Are you paid for that??

First you assume with all your teeth that Professor used the Pete's images and, but now you assume that there are better sources than Pete's one. So how do you know which one he got?


Probably, will see.


You just assumed that there are other sources of information other then Pete's images, so why are you so affirmative that Professor got the one you want?


Download Professor's radio shows from October to past week and you will see how long he states this is a big comet.

Actualy he talks about this NASA's video days before all this hype started, and he does not talks about any companions.

*He is still analysing*, read that again. He always returns his data when is certified.


A MS degree in physicis is one step degree, PhD is another step degree. Nobody gets a MS because was not approved as PhD.


What the evidence shows? Be specific.


All this academic degrees are just in your mind. Nobody needs that to recognize the truth. The truth is that comets are not dirty snow balls, try to disprove it.

Stop equivocating. He is giving his "professional" opinion on the matter and people (like you) use him as an appeal to authority. It's his conclusion on the matter with a "cover your ass" statement attached.

Oh here we go, you just buy his bullshit, including his BS about debunkers like me being "disinfo agents." No, I'm not "paid" and I'm not "stalking" him. The claims I debunked are right there on his shitty site.

It's clear he did for the reasons already stated. You have not addressed those facts. His claim of "companions" originated on this forum and others, with some threads being made 3 days before he made his post about it. They all started with Pete's images. Other images were then added into those threads as well later on. He is copying those claims.

I didn't assume anything. Like I said, other images were presented on those threads as well from an observer in Italy. None of them show anything but hot pixels and known asteroids. Clearly McCanney is not an expert and doesn't know how to recognize these things.

Not just "probably." McCanney was wrong. He has presented nothing to back up his claims and you act like that gives him unlimited cover to make claims without having to defend them with actual data when the threads that he is clearly copying show that the claim is wrong and even when he is shouting his fucking claims in all caps.

No, I didn't. I participated in those threads, I know for a fact that there were other images presented as well, but in all of them Pete's was the first. That's where this claim got started.

I don't care which "he got," he probably "got" all of the ones I mentioned and linked to, but he's hilariously wrong about what they contain and now he's resorted to lying.

No, I will not do that nor do I have to in order to see how he's tried to support that claim in the last week or so.

Wow you're dense. And wrong on both counts. NASA's video came out on the 18th. This hype started on the 17th. McCanney talks about "companions" starting on the 20th. Now he claims that NASA's video from the 18th shows Pete's images sans "companions." The hot pixels are still there. He is a liar.

Last Edited by Astromut on 01/29/2013 11:50 AM

That is not an excuse to make false claims and lies. A real serious astronomer, even an amateur one, would be able to spot those as hot pixels on sight. Period.

Yes, they do. I know someone with an MS degree who got it because he couldn't make it through his PhD program.

I've already explained. Quit sucking on McCanney for 5 seconds and actually read what I already wrote with some attempt at understanding.

Oh, I just imagined I got a PhD then? You're a real piece of work. The truth is you swallow the shit of a liar.

Why do you guys still argue with Astro? He has yet to be wrong.

The tally so far is Dr. Astro 100--conspiracy nuts with no background in astronomy--0

^^^ This ^^^^

All these Post-Elenin dipshits are looking for something to latch onto.

Composition of the object I did not state. But regardless, if ISON were Ice, Lead, a feather, a ball of plasma, a ball of yarn......it will not support orbits of objects large enough to be visible to us.


The real question you are rising is orbiting bodies around ISON. Regardless of composition, ISON is too small to have orbiting satellites.

And be realistic, a dirty snow ball can be almost anything in space. Dirty with what? Iron, sulfur, Space Monkey Seamen.........What is the ice? Water ice, methane or other common gas frozen solid?



The universe has many surprises waiting for us to discover, but it isn't behind or in proximity to comet ISON. ISON is simply going to do it's comet thing and hopefully provide a beautiful show soon.

Dr Astro, sure thing. I seek the mysterious yet I mentally plant myself in reality. One of the biggest faults of human intelligence is the ability to falsely rationalize a scenario or fact for unqualified personal gain.....and I resist the trap of false worship. I support others of like mind.


To OP: It's not always enough to stand corrected. Sometimes we need to avoided laying with lies, even if it satisfies our fantastical imagination.


And the rest, comet ISON will be a great comet. But not because of some silly conspiracy, rather it will be large and easily viewable under coincidental circumstances.

Fucking hideous, unreadable websites like McCanney's are a dead giveaway that the owner is a nutter!

<--- McCanney!

I have no time now, but can you talk without offending? Or is your IQ too high to respect normal people?

Anyway, according to his theoretical work, this is already a planetary size comet. He made predictions in last October that the planet Earth would pass through a several storm conditions, including strong activity in the Sun and strong auroras in Earth in January 15 this year. I guess you knew from news that Earth and the Sun has had very active days from 14 to 15 January, do you agree? According to him, if this is a considerable sized comet, we would see such activities.

This is not coincidence, he did it a lot of times in the past, sometimes one year in advance with a lot of more information than this time. Just give him a chance.


Yes.

If you READ what mccanney has posted he says that he is qualifying his ideas that there MAY be companion objects, but he is not making any claims and that the disinfo agents are already out there trying to put words in his mouth.


Mccanny and Major Dames were the only two people who made correct projections about highly energetic effects IN ADVANCE during the years of the comets, 2003 - 2006.

Hoagland correctly projected effects of hyperdimentional physics but wasn't able to predict events.

Mccanney's plasma discharge model was proven correct multiple times in those years when multiple huge comets came through our system.

If ISON ends up being yet another comet with an estimated orbit of around 10,000 to 13,000 years then it is another in the comet stream that has been threatening us ever since Hale Bopp.