Scientists discover the soul

So it's a form of Hawking radiation?

Utter nonsense.

There is no more a "soul" than there is an "ether".

What you are 'seeing' is merely an inference of the consciousness of the 'thinker'.

The understanding of every aspect of consciousness, which is what these scientists are looking for, is simply beyond the framework or paradigm of the scientific method itself.

In other words, they are not really trying to understand consciousness at all; they are doing nothing more than trying to preserve the scientific paradigm as being sufficient to apprehend reality.

It simply isn't.

Michael

Last Edited by 4Q529 on 02/06/2013 05:02 PM

dust all over the universe so what they really discovered interference-loops?

[link to www.youtube.com]
10 dimensions of it

"According to the theory, consciousness is derived from"

This is a logical inference of the consciousness of the 'thinker'.

There is no "derived from".

The connection between cause and effect is an intrinsic assumption of the consciousness of the 'thinker'; which is used not only to describe the space-time reality; but, also, to preserve the continuity over time of the consciousness of the "self"; that is, to prevent the consciousness of the "self" from collapsing into psych*sis, as described in the opening passages of the Second Meditation of Descartes.

Michael

Last Edited by 4Q529 on 02/06/2013 05:16 PM

Enlighten us oh great one. How great must your intelect be. You must feel so lonely in this world. I praise you for such insight.
PS: Go fuck yourself.

(Sigh)

You are merely articulating the general assumption of the consciousness of the 'thinker' that it is the consciousness of the 'thinker' itself which is the end all and be all of consciousness itself, the only dimension of consciousness capable of apprehending reality.

There is also the consciousness of the "self", which is expressed in such things as poetry and the lyrics of songs.

And there is also a third dimension of consciousness beyond the "self" and the 'thinker' which cannot be apprehended by the scientific method since it originates in the consciousness of the 'thinker'.

This third dimension of consciousness is, for example, capable of receiving memories of previous lives and such things as telepathy.

Michael

hmmm....very nice.

This post actually makes me think, and want to do follow up research.

Thanks! good post.

Rediscovering Biology - Home


www.learner.org/courses/biology/index.html


A professional development course for high school biology teachers: The Rediscovering Biology Web site is designed as a companion to the video series, ...

Anger is a typical response when a consciousness of the 'thinker' has its 'Revelations' which have come down from 'Mt. Sinai' challenged. Because it considers itself 'God', it considers its thoughts to be 'Revelations' from 'God'; that is, something which should not be challenged.

Anger comes from the consciousness of the "self".

Michael

Title says "discovered"... summary says "hypothesise".. which is it?

It sounds more to me like the scientists are being forced to try and preserve the outdated superstitious paradigm that invented the concept of the soul.

:facepalm:

We will all live again after we die. The soul returns to grow and gain perceptive.

Soulless pickled dicks set out to discover a soul... WTF?!

That's just word salad and has no meaning. Our science only aims to objectively observe and explain reality, there is no bias in it.

Your arguments are the same as they have ever been when it comes to trying to discredit science, the funny thing is though things that are deemed to be "beyond scientific understanding" are usually understood not too far down the line.

Of course. Of course.

Both the scientists and the theologians operate on the basis of the consciousness of the 'thinker'.

Don't be naive.

Doctors do not want to heal you. They want to 'manage' your disease. Because, if they were to heal you, you would no longer have to pay them.

Theologians don't care about Truth; they care about theology. Because if they ever allowed you to understand the Truth, they would be out of a job.

Similar for the scientists of consciousness, who have their pride, their publishing careers and their jobs to preserve.

All they care about is self-preservation of the scientific paradigm rather than a genuine understanding of consciousness.

They don't want to be unemployed.

Michael

Simply because it has no meaning for the consciousness of the 'thinker', does not mean that it has no meaning.

So, tell me, how do you objectively observe the 'thinker'?

How do you objectively observe thought?

There is the bias of the 'thinker'; the function of which is to preserve the "self" from psychosis.

It has a 'dog in the fight'.

If the consciousness of the 'thinker' collapses, psychosis emerges.

That's a fact.

Michael

nirvlayanI f. cast-off skin of a snake [link to spokensanskrit.de]

nirvANa n. final liberation
laya m. place of rest
yannAman adj. having which name

jana m. person

surA f. snake
ahi m. snake
jihmaga adj. snake
nAga m. snake

Dig up some ancient Tibetan texts on the nature of consciousness, you'll find that consciousness is also just a side effect, and that there actually are 7 consciousnesses in action in your head (one for each senses, and yes.. 7 not 5. 7 seals.)

there are in the 'uni-verse' all the book of dead [link to www.archpatent.com]

i saw a vid by a brain surgeon expert guy and he was talking along that line, but in a hard science way. pretty fascinating.

to see a moving picture means 24 frames per second
and some light as a kelping hand

See when people think of consciousness, they think that their organ of thought is the consciousness, but that is just one of the sensory parts!

What is the "you" is the "thing" that is "watching", that is to say, the intersection of awareness with consciousness, sort of thing

The higgs boson cannot exist without an ether, for there would be no reason for matter to collate. What that ether is, is up for debate. Personally I do not believe they have found the soul, but that does not mean a soul doesnt exist.

We must reserve judgement, blind faith in something that may exist is a stupid as blind faith that something doesnt exist.

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" - Aristotle :)