| Users Online Now: 2,259 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,033,153 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,387,414 | Threads Today: 353 | Posts Today: 5,487 |
| 11:21 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,259 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,033,153 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,387,414 | Threads Today: 353 | Posts Today: 5,487 |
| 11:21 AM | ||
BREAKING: 'Sheriffs first,' gun bills clear Montana House committee!! | |
| TheTruthNeverLies Offer Upgrade  User ID: 28381736  United States02/16/2013 08:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33832742 United States02/16/2013 08:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| PBJ11 User ID: 24368890 United States02/16/2013 08:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| PIR User ID: 33479868 United States02/16/2013 08:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HELENA – Montana moved a step closer Friday to declaring that local sheriffs are the supreme law of the land and trying to nullify any federal crackdown on assault rifles. Quoting: TheTruthNeverLies The measures were among a slate of gun rights bills that cleared the Legislature’s House Judiciary Committee and now head to the House floor. Other measures that advanced would let college students bring guns on campus, allow high school students to leave guns locked in their cars, and clear the way for nearly anyone to carry concealed weapons without a permit. Several of the bills met with staunch opposition from Democrats. The so-called “sheriffs first” bill says federal agents must get a sheriff’s permission before making arrests or serving warrants – or risk local kidnapping or trespassing charges. If the bill clears the Republican-controlled House and Senate, it would go directly to voters in 2014. The direct referendum would avoid the potential veto pen of Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat. Supporters said it is a necessary check on the power of federal law enforcement agencies, The measure was opposed earlier in the week at a hearing by local law enforcement agencies, and critics have said such a measure most certainly would face a legal challenge. Opponents, led by Democrats, warned it would threaten the effectiveness of cooperative task forces tracking violent crime and drugs. [link to missoulian.com] Vote by 2014?  By that time anyone who would vote for it will be either A: Disarmed already B: Arrested already or C: Dead already. I am not saying it is a good thing...because it is but for this to have any value it should have been passed 10 years ago. As of now...stick a fork in it...were done. Sad but true. |
| Horus of the Two Horizons User ID: 34531932 United States02/16/2013 08:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Obviously banning an instrument is not an effective way to prevent violence, which existed before any particular weapon. Violence will be committed with whatever is available, especially if someone is crazy - whether with an assault rifle or a kitchen knife or acid in the face. Banning weapons is most effective at protecting THEM (who still get to enjoy protection from any "banned" weapons) from US. Bans on weapons are being passed (with the willing help of libtards) by tyrants afraid of the people they so miserably fail to represent. They want people disarmed before the masses realize just how much damage TPTB have caused. It is a necessary step to improve their odds of staying in power after collapse. Collapse is coming. This well-researched book is worth reading: [link to www.amazon.com] |
| nzreva User ID: 19624091 United States02/16/2013 08:47 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HELENA – Montana moved a step closer Friday to declaring that local sheriffs are the supreme law of the land and trying to nullify any federal crackdown on assault rifles. Quoting: TheTruthNeverLies The measures were among a slate of gun rights bills that cleared the Legislature’s House Judiciary Committee and now head to the House floor. Other measures that advanced would let college students bring guns on campus, allow high school students to leave guns locked in their cars, and clear the way for nearly anyone to carry concealed weapons without a permit. Several of the bills met with staunch opposition from Democrats. The so-called “sheriffs first” bill says federal agents must get a sheriff’s permission before making arrests or serving warrants – or risk local kidnapping or trespassing charges. If the bill clears the Republican-controlled House and Senate, it would go directly to voters in 2014. The direct referendum would avoid the potential veto pen of Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat. Supporters said it is a necessary check on the power of federal law enforcement agencies, The measure was opposed earlier in the week at a hearing by local law enforcement agencies, and critics have said such a measure most certainly would face a legal challenge. Opponents, led by Democrats, warned it would threaten the effectiveness of cooperative task forces tracking violent crime and drugs. [link to missoulian.com] Was not very long ago in Texas our children brought their guns to school in their vehicles. We could bring guns to Church.... I never remember a problem in my community, over 36 years... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 219210 United States02/16/2013 09:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 34403843 United States02/16/2013 09:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HELENA – Montana moved a step closer Friday to declaring that local sheriffs are the supreme law of the land and trying to nullify any federal crackdown on assault rifles. Quoting: TheTruthNeverLies The measures were among a slate of gun rights bills that cleared the Legislature’s House Judiciary Committee and now head to the House floor. Other measures that advanced would let college students bring guns on campus, allow high school students to leave guns locked in their cars, and clear the way for nearly anyone to carry concealed weapons without a permit. Several of the bills met with staunch opposition from Democrats. The so-called “sheriffs first” bill says federal agents must get a sheriff’s permission before making arrests or serving warrants – or risk local kidnapping or trespassing charges. If the bill clears the Republican-controlled House and Senate, it would go directly to voters in 2014. The direct referendum would avoid the potential veto pen of Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat. Supporters said it is a necessary check on the power of federal law enforcement agencies, The measure was opposed earlier in the week at a hearing by local law enforcement agencies, and critics have said such a measure most certainly would face a legal challenge. Opponents, led by Democrats, warned it would threaten the effectiveness of cooperative task forces tracking violent crime and drugs. [link to missoulian.com] Vote by 2014? By that time anyone who would vote for it will be either A: Disarmed already B: Arrested already or C: Dead already. I am not saying it is a good thing...because it is but for this to have any value it should have been passed 10 years ago. As of now...stick a fork in it...were done. Sad but true. Yur done! Step aside old old man..... This Is A Job For Mama!!  |
| PIR User ID: 33479868 United States02/16/2013 09:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HELENA – Montana moved a step closer Friday to declaring that local sheriffs are the supreme law of the land and trying to nullify any federal crackdown on assault rifles. Quoting: TheTruthNeverLies The measures were among a slate of gun rights bills that cleared the Legislature’s House Judiciary Committee and now head to the House floor. Other measures that advanced would let college students bring guns on campus, allow high school students to leave guns locked in their cars, and clear the way for nearly anyone to carry concealed weapons without a permit. Several of the bills met with staunch opposition from Democrats. The so-called “sheriffs first” bill says federal agents must get a sheriff’s permission before making arrests or serving warrants – or risk local kidnapping or trespassing charges. If the bill clears the Republican-controlled House and Senate, it would go directly to voters in 2014. The direct referendum would avoid the potential veto pen of Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat. Supporters said it is a necessary check on the power of federal law enforcement agencies, The measure was opposed earlier in the week at a hearing by local law enforcement agencies, and critics have said such a measure most certainly would face a legal challenge. Opponents, led by Democrats, warned it would threaten the effectiveness of cooperative task forces tracking violent crime and drugs. [link to missoulian.com] Vote by 2014? By that time anyone who would vote for it will be either A: Disarmed already B: Arrested already or C: Dead already. I am not saying it is a good thing...because it is but for this to have any value it should have been passed 10 years ago. As of now...stick a fork in it...were done. Sad but true. Yur done! Step aside old old man..... This Is A Job For Mama!! Tell "mama" good luck in 2014! Long before this ever would see a vote there will be martial law and a full enactment of the NDAA and martial law executive orders. The Feds beat the states to the punch. Snooze ya lose. Game over. Sad but true |
| TheTruthNeverLies (OP) User ID: 28381736 United States02/16/2013 09:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HELENA – Montana moved a step closer Friday to declaring that local sheriffs are the supreme law of the land and trying to nullify any federal crackdown on assault rifles. Quoting: TheTruthNeverLies The measures were among a slate of gun rights bills that cleared the Legislature’s House Judiciary Committee and now head to the House floor. Other measures that advanced would let college students bring guns on campus, allow high school students to leave guns locked in their cars, and clear the way for nearly anyone to carry concealed weapons without a permit. Several of the bills met with staunch opposition from Democrats. The so-called “sheriffs first” bill says federal agents must get a sheriff’s permission before making arrests or serving warrants – or risk local kidnapping or trespassing charges. If the bill clears the Republican-controlled House and Senate, it would go directly to voters in 2014. The direct referendum would avoid the potential veto pen of Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat. Supporters said it is a necessary check on the power of federal law enforcement agencies, The measure was opposed earlier in the week at a hearing by local law enforcement agencies, and critics have said such a measure most certainly would face a legal challenge. Opponents, led by Democrats, warned it would threaten the effectiveness of cooperative task forces tracking violent crime and drugs. [link to missoulian.com] Vote by 2014? By that time anyone who would vote for it will be either A: Disarmed already B: Arrested already or C: Dead already. I am not saying it is a good thing...because it is but for this to have any value it should have been passed 10 years ago. As of now...stick a fork in it...were done. Sad but true. Yur done! Step aside old old man..... This Is A Job For Mama!! Tell "mama" good luck in 2014! Long before this ever would see a vote there will be martial law and a full enactment of the NDAA and martial law executive orders. The Feds beat the states to the punch. Snooze ya lose. Game over. Sad but true the only reason i agree with you is because i feel like they will stage a HUGE event to blame gun owners or to force us in martial law and gun confiscation this year "Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth." "Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." "Religion and morality are the essential pillars of civil society." -George Washington, Father of our country & 1st President |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 419649 United States02/16/2013 09:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 14579509 United States02/16/2013 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Do some research into the origin of the word "Sheriff". The "Shire Reeves" were the law enforcers and tax collectors in the counties for the "king" of England in the 1600's. "The word "sheriff" is a contraction of the term "shire reeve". The term, from the Old English scīrgerefa, designated a royal official responsible for keeping the peace (a "reeve") throughout a shire or county on behalf of the king".( [link to en.wikipedia.org] Wasn't a revolutionary war fought by patriots to escape the rule of the "king of England"? Whats up wit dat? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1070863 United States02/16/2013 09:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Sundara User ID: 29286215 United States02/16/2013 09:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HELENA – Montana moved a step closer Friday to declaring that local sheriffs are the supreme law of the land and trying to nullify any federal crackdown on assault rifles. Quoting: TheTruthNeverLies The measures were among a slate of gun rights bills that cleared the Legislature’s House Judiciary Committee and now head to the House floor. Other measures that advanced would let college students bring guns on campus, allow high school students to leave guns locked in their cars, and clear the way for nearly anyone to carry concealed weapons without a permit. Several of the bills met with staunch opposition from Democrats. The so-called “sheriffs first” bill says federal agents must get a sheriff’s permission before making arrests or serving warrants – or risk local kidnapping or trespassing charges. If the bill clears the Republican-controlled House and Senate, it would go directly to voters in 2014. The direct referendum would avoid the potential veto pen of Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat. Supporters said it is a necessary check on the power of federal law enforcement agencies, The measure was opposed earlier in the week at a hearing by local law enforcement agencies, and critics have said such a measure most certainly would face a legal challenge. Opponents, led by Democrats, warned it would threaten the effectiveness of cooperative task forces tracking violent crime and drugs. [link to missoulian.com] lol, guns everywhere with that state... LOL smart...shakes his head* i love you:) |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 34532152 United States02/16/2013 09:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| PresidentCamacho User ID: 25454873 United States02/16/2013 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: PIR Vote by 2014? By that time anyone who would vote for it will be either A: Disarmed already B: Arrested already or C: Dead already. I am not saying it is a good thing...because it is but for this to have any value it should have been passed 10 years ago. As of now...stick a fork in it...were done. Sad but true. Yur done! Step aside old old man..... This Is A Job For Mama!! Tell "mama" good luck in 2014! Long before this ever would see a vote there will be martial law and a full enactment of the NDAA and martial law executive orders. The Feds beat the states to the punch. Snooze ya lose. Game over. Sad but true the only reason i agree with you is because i feel like they will stage a HUGE event to blame gun owners or to force us in martial law and gun confiscation this year Yes, they can easily pull it off. It is still amazing to me that after all these shootings that the general public does not question or suspect any underlying agenda going on. Then again when videos like the 5 thousand versions of the "Harlem Shake" are getting millions of views, I shouldn't be so surprised. The years passed, mankind became stupider at a frightening rate. Some had high hopes the genetic engineering would correct this trend in evolution, but sadly the greatest minds and resources where focused on conquering hair loss and prolonging erections. ~ Narrator (Idiocracy) |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 590644 United States02/16/2013 09:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Do some research into the origin of the word "Sheriff". The "Shire Reeves" were the law enforcers and tax collectors in the counties for the "king" of England in the 1600's. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14579509 "The word "sheriff" is a contraction of the term "shire reeve". The term, from the Old English scīrgerefa, designated a royal official responsible for keeping the peace (a "reeve") throughout a shire or county on behalf of the king".( [link to en.wikipedia.org] Wasn't a revolutionary war fought by patriots to escape the rule of the "king of England"? Whats up wit dat? One huge difference; the sheriff is elected in the US. GARY MARBUT FOR PRESIDENT! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28870983 United States02/16/2013 10:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HELENA – Montana moved a step closer Friday to declaring that local sheriffs are the supreme law of the land and trying to nullify any federal crackdown on assault rifles. Quoting: TheTruthNeverLies The measures were among a slate of gun rights bills that cleared the Legislature’s House Judiciary Committee and now head to the House floor. Other measures that advanced would let college students bring guns on campus, allow high school students to leave guns locked in their cars, and clear the way for nearly anyone to carry concealed weapons without a permit. Several of the bills met with staunch opposition from Democrats. The so-called “sheriffs first” bill says federal agents must get a sheriff’s permission before making arrests or serving warrants – or risk local kidnapping or trespassing charges. If the bill clears the Republican-controlled House and Senate, it would go directly to voters in 2014. The direct referendum would avoid the potential veto pen of Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat. Supporters said it is a necessary check on the power of federal law enforcement agencies, The measure was opposed earlier in the week at a hearing by local law enforcement agencies, and critics have said such a measure most certainly would face a legal challenge. Opponents, led by Democrats, warned it would threaten the effectiveness of cooperative task forces tracking violent crime and drugs. [link to missoulian.com] Vote by 2014? By that time anyone who would vote for it will be either A: Disarmed already B: Arrested already or C: Dead already. I am not saying it is a good thing...because it is but for this to have any value it should have been passed 10 years ago. As of now...stick a fork in it...were done. Sad but true. Fineswines bill is all but dead in the water. It's up to the individual states now. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 34520550 United States02/16/2013 10:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28870983 United States02/16/2013 10:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1362283 United States02/16/2013 10:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28870983 United States02/16/2013 10:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Opponents, led by Democrats, warned it would threaten the effectiveness of cooperative task forces tracking violent crime and drugs." Quoting: Professor Xavier I swear by God, it is high time to start rounding Democrats up and putting them in prison camps. They are an existential threat to America, and the world in general. yep, Democraps are the problem. They introduced an AWB here in Ohio but it won't go anywhere. We have to many pro gun politicians. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1362283 United States02/16/2013 10:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1259776 United States02/16/2013 10:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the best way to "track"/even find dangerous drug-usage is to stop criminalizing them and the users. Let the people handle it. Obviously corrupt-government's idiotic "tracking", and criminalization of drugs hasnot worked,  or has no one noticed that glaring fact?- -so try something different for a while.- -and why hasnot that been done already, after of these years and generations of failure? Because ithas been a tax-free profit-boon for our Mafia-owned, hapless servants, deceitfully masquerading as our government. [our servants are in our kitchen stealing our silverware, while their overseer is in default due to perpetual vacation and treason] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 34536881 United States02/16/2013 10:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HELENA – Montana moved a step closer Friday to declaring that local sheriffs are the supreme law of the land and trying to nullify any federal crackdown on assault rifles. Quoting: TheTruthNeverLies The measures were among a slate of gun rights bills that cleared the Legislature’s House Judiciary Committee and now head to the House floor. Other measures that advanced would let college students bring guns on campus, allow high school students to leave guns locked in their cars, and clear the way for nearly anyone to carry concealed weapons without a permit. Several of the bills met with staunch opposition from Democrats. The so-called “sheriffs first” bill says federal agents must get a sheriff’s permission before making arrests or serving warrants – or risk local kidnapping or trespassing charges. If the bill clears the Republican-controlled House and Senate, it would go directly to voters in 2014. The direct referendum would avoid the potential veto pen of Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat. Supporters said it is a necessary check on the power of federal law enforcement agencies, The measure was opposed earlier in the week at a hearing by local law enforcement agencies, and critics have said such a measure most certainly would face a legal challenge. Opponents, led by Democrats, warned it would threaten the effectiveness of cooperative task forces tracking violent crime and drugs. [link to missoulian.com] Was not very long ago in Texas our children brought their guns to school in their vehicles. We could bring guns to Church.... I never remember a problem in my community, over 36 years... i remebr that too |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1259776 United States02/16/2013 10:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the best way to "track"/even find dangerous drug-usage is to stop criminalizing them and the users. Let the people handle it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1259776 Obviously corrupt-government's idiotic "tracking", and criminalization of drugs hasnot worked, or has no one noticed that glaring fact?- -so try something different for a while.- -and why hasnot that been done already, after of these years and generations of failure? Because ithas been a tax-free profit-boon for our Mafia-owned, hapless servants, deceitfully masquerading as our government. [our servants are in our kitchen stealing our silverware, while their overseer is in default due to perpetual vacation and treason] RED ALERT!! OBAMA TO FEDERALIZE LOCAL POLICE DEPARTMENTS: [link to www.youtube.com] |
| Citizenperth User ID: 34143816  Australia02/16/2013 10:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation |  It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
| JasmineinNM User ID: 15256858 United States02/16/2013 10:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Liberalism truly is a FREAKING MENTAL DISORDER and it infects every state in the union. Time for some serious chemotherapy to purge the cancer. You have to recall though that with any good cancer treatment....the odds of killing the patient before you kill the cancer is very high. I still think we should do a good strong bone marrow change on those poor deluded sorry ass bastards. On the other hand though........their disease/disorder is most likely terminal anyway. They are so infected that given a little more time (minus treatment) they are going to die anyway.... just let the cancer eat them up. Too late most likely to save the patient. The condition is inoperable and terminal. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 12882975  South Korea02/16/2013 10:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Montana should allocate resources and prepare for an All OUT Assault by Malignant Psychopaths. Sedition, subversion, false-flags, propaganda and every other form of Psy-Op, and Mind-Control the Malignants can draw from their bag of tricks? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 32405669 United States02/16/2013 10:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HELENA – Montana moved a step closer Friday to declaring that local sheriffs are the supreme law of the land and trying to nullify any federal crackdown on assault rifles. Quoting: TheTruthNeverLies The measures were among a slate of gun rights bills that cleared the Legislature’s House Judiciary Committee and now head to the House floor. Other measures that advanced would let college students bring guns on campus, allow high school students to leave guns locked in their cars, and clear the way for nearly anyone to carry concealed weapons without a permit. Several of the bills met with staunch opposition from Democrats. The so-called “sheriffs first” bill says federal agents must get a sheriff’s permission before making arrests or serving warrants – or risk local kidnapping or trespassing charges. If the bill clears the Republican-controlled House and Senate, it would go directly to voters in 2014. The direct referendum would avoid the potential veto pen of Gov. Steve Bullock, a Democrat. Supporters said it is a necessary check on the power of federal law enforcement agencies, The measure was opposed earlier in the week at a hearing by local law enforcement agencies, and critics have said such a measure most certainly would face a legal challenge. Opponents, led by Democrats, warned it would threaten the effectiveness of cooperative task forces tracking violent crime and drugs. [link to missoulian.com] Was not very long ago in Texas our children brought their guns to school in their vehicles. We could bring guns to Church.... I never remember a problem in my community, over 36 years... We had Gun Club in our high school, and the principal was the staff member who was the club leader. He felt very strongly about kids being able to responsibly use guns. He was a very respected, well liked educator, principle for decades. This was the high school in a university town, and the professors' kids were right in there with the tradesmen's kids. Can you imagine that now? No problem there either, except from the university student from the cities. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28232375 United States02/16/2013 11:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Obviously banning an instrument is not an effective way to prevent violence, which existed before any particular weapon. Violence will be committed with whatever is available, especially if someone is crazy - whether with an assault rifle or a kitchen knife or acid in the face. Quoting: Horus of the Two Horizons 34531932 Banning weapons is most effective at protecting THEM (who still get to enjoy protection from any "banned" weapons) from US. Bans on weapons are being passed (with the willing help of libtards) by tyrants afraid of the people they so miserably fail to represent. They want people disarmed before the masses realize just how much damage TPTB have caused. It is a necessary step to improve their odds of staying in power after collapse. Collapse is coming. This well-researched book is worth reading: [link to www.amazon.com] Precisely. Well stated. |
