NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation | |
Southgaia User ID: 37160815 Portugal 04/08/2013 01:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37649178 Germany 04/08/2013 01:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3715049 United States 04/08/2013 01:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 36482247 United States 04/08/2013 01:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation By saying that, Obama is basically encouraging Kim Jong Un to kill South Koreans... He's saying : do whatever North Korea... no big deal... I'll make sure South Korea doesn't do anything bad to you... |
Citizenperth User ID: 37578576 Australia 04/08/2013 01:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation If South Korea strikes first doesn't that give China the green light to kick arse and defend NK? Quoting: calx we just signed up to the chinese dollar.... Thread: Australia turns to direct currency exchange with China.. wondered what she was doing there.... Last Edited by CitizenPerth™ on 04/08/2013 01:07 AM It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
The Tauremini User ID: 36829606 United States 04/08/2013 01:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation [link to twitter.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36482247 NYT: Some of the public language from #ROK gov't suggests Seoul & Washington may not agree on how far any retaliation should go. NYT quotes unnamed senior U.S. official: "Overreaction by South Korea is a real risk — and we’re working on that problem.” Overreaction = striking back. I'm sure Obama only want new BS sanctions on North Korea or some other meaningless shit. SHUT THE FUCK UP OBAMA. South Korea is gonna retaliate the way the fuck they want. America fucking invaded 2 countries over 3000 dead... so shut the fuck up about ``overreacting``... North Korea lay siege to Seoul before there's any retaliation. I swear, they're too soft on NK. "Who Dares Wins" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9664906 United States 04/08/2013 01:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation [link to twitter.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36482247 NYT: Some of the public language from #ROK gov't suggests Seoul & Washington may not agree on how far any retaliation should go. NYT quotes unnamed senior U.S. official: "Overreaction by South Korea is a real risk — and we’re working on that problem.” Overreaction = striking back. I'm sure Obama only want new BS sanctions on North Korea or some other meaningless shit. SHUT THE FUCK UP OBAMA. South Korea is gonna retaliate the way the fuck they want. America fucking invaded 2 countries over 3000 dead... so shut the fuck up about ``overreacting``... Bullshit. The US has been doing more to provoke the North into doing something stupid than South Korea has. Only thing they said was "Overreaction by the South is a risk." Yeah, they don't want the South to accidentally shoot first, because then WE wouldn't be able to attack the North. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9664906 United States 04/08/2013 01:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Citizenperth User ID: 37578576 Australia 04/08/2013 01:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation If South Korea strikes first doesn't that give China the green light to kick arse and defend NK? Quoting: calx This is why so does the shooting down of their 'test' rocket..... webs we weave.... It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23638801 India 04/08/2013 01:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3715049 United States 04/08/2013 01:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation If South Korea strikes first doesn't that give China the green light to kick arse and defend NK? Quoting: calx we just signed up to the chinese dollar.... Thread: Australia turns to direct currency exchange with China.. wondered what she was doing there.... I read about that!! The days of the petrodollar as the reserve currency are numbered, man. Probably why a bunch of countries are hoarding gold. (Including China.) Sorry Germany, it'll take us 7 years by boat to deliver yours! |
MuslimAmerican User ID: 26542172 United States 04/08/2013 01:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation [link to twitter.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36482247 NYT: Some of the public language from #ROK gov't suggests Seoul & Washington may not agree on how far any retaliation should go. NYT quotes unnamed senior U.S. official: "Overreaction by South Korea is a real risk — and we’re working on that problem.” Overreaction = striking back. I'm sure Obama only want new BS sanctions on North Korea or some other meaningless shit. SHUT THE FUCK UP OBAMA. South Korea is gonna retaliate the way the fuck they want. America fucking invaded 2 countries over 3000 dead... so shut the fuck up about ``overreacting``... If he had any intelligence whatsoever he'd be urging SK to surrender any planned military action against NK. The sanctions should be lifted and the whole thing will be over with. No potentially worldwide conflict, no one gets nuked, everyone can move on. There's no logical reason for there to be conflict on the Korean peninsula(or anywhere else for that matter). People need to stop living in this dream land that somehow the "allies" will always come out on top. If history has taught us anything it's that Empires fall, HARD. Feed the hungry, visit the sick, free a captive if he be unjustly confined(kidnapped/enslaved by someone). Assist any person oppressed, whether they're of the Muslim or non-Muslim. - Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37609369 Greece 04/08/2013 01:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation Well looks like Kim certainly knew what he was doing when he piped up yelling and screaming he's going to nuke us all. He knew no one wants this one going off. He can shoot up ships, islands , and kidnap people. No one will bat an eye. The world powers involved. He has the perfect setting, and smart enough to know it. Plus god knows how many nukes he's got stockpiled by now and is willing to use them... Wonder what other leverage he's got? |
Citizenperth User ID: 37578576 Australia 04/08/2013 01:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation [link to twitter.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36482247 NYT: Some of the public language from #ROK gov't suggests Seoul & Washington may not agree on how far any retaliation should go. NYT quotes unnamed senior U.S. official: "Overreaction by South Korea is a real risk — and we’re working on that problem.” Overreaction = striking back. I'm sure Obama only want new BS sanctions on North Korea or some other meaningless shit. SHUT THE FUCK UP OBAMA. South Korea is gonna retaliate the way the fuck they want. America fucking invaded 2 countries over 3000 dead... so shut the fuck up about ``overreacting``... If he had any intelligence whatsoever he'd be urging SK to surrender any planned military action against NK. The sanctions should be lifted and the whole thing will be over with. No potentially worldwide conflict, no one gets nuked, everyone can move on. There's no logical reason for there to be conflict on the Korean peninsula(or anywhere else for that matter). People need to stop living in this dream land that somehow the "allies" will always come out on top. If history has taught us anything it's that Empires fall, HARD. why don't they just let them unite and leave them the fuck alone.... like stories of german families that met 30 years later and shit all because of a political cement wall...... think of the cheap reboks you'll get....... Last Edited by CitizenPerth™ on 04/08/2013 01:22 AM It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37609369 Greece 04/08/2013 01:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation [link to twitter.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36482247 NYT: Some of the public language from #ROK gov't suggests Seoul & Washington may not agree on how far any retaliation should go. NYT quotes unnamed senior U.S. official: "Overreaction by South Korea is a real risk — and we’re working on that problem.” Overreaction = striking back. I'm sure Obama only want new BS sanctions on North Korea or some other meaningless shit. SHUT THE FUCK UP OBAMA. South Korea is gonna retaliate the way the fuck they want. America fucking invaded 2 countries over 3000 dead... so shut the fuck up about ``overreacting``... If he had any intelligence whatsoever he'd be urging SK to surrender any planned military action against NK. The sanctions should be lifted and the whole thing will be over with. No potentially worldwide conflict, no one gets nuked, everyone can move on. There's no logical reason for there to be conflict on the Korean peninsula(or anywhere else for that matter). People need to stop living in this dream land that somehow the "allies" will always come out on top. If history has taught us anything it's that Empires fall, HARD. South Korea surrender to North Korea. Like they would ever do that. Would you relinquish your freedom and way of life that easily? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37609369 Greece 04/08/2013 01:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation [link to twitter.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36482247 NYT: Some of the public language from #ROK gov't suggests Seoul & Washington may not agree on how far any retaliation should go. NYT quotes unnamed senior U.S. official: "Overreaction by South Korea is a real risk — and we’re working on that problem.” Overreaction = striking back. I'm sure Obama only want new BS sanctions on North Korea or some other meaningless shit. SHUT THE FUCK UP OBAMA. South Korea is gonna retaliate the way the fuck they want. America fucking invaded 2 countries over 3000 dead... so shut the fuck up about ``overreacting``... If he had any intelligence whatsoever he'd be urging SK to surrender any planned military action against NK. The sanctions should be lifted and the whole thing will be over with. No potentially worldwide conflict, no one gets nuked, everyone can move on. There's no logical reason for there to be conflict on the Korean peninsula(or anywhere else for that matter). People need to stop living in this dream land that somehow the "allies" will always come out on top. If history has taught us anything it's that Empires fall, HARD. why don't they just let them unite and leave them the fuck alone.... like stories of german families that met 30 years later and shit all because of a political cement wall...... think of the cheap reboks you'll get....... Because South Korea doesn't want to reunite . Certainly not under North Korea's terms.The North Korean doesn't want to give up power and join South Korea they want to take over. |
grimmlord User ID: 33815406 United States 04/08/2013 01:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation OP , as a rule of thumb , always believe the opposite of what the nytimes reports : nytimes = pravda and besides , the truth here is that it is darth obama who is escalating against nk . nk is hysterically shitting in their pants because they've never seen this sort of behaviour from the usa because it is the prelude for the first strike aerial attack which no one in the region has wargamed because everyone has always assumed that nk would make the opening move . if you watched the nwo's sunday news shows , you should already be able to clock that they are preparing the american sheeple to accept the coming obama roll up of nk . BLACK SWAN register an account first and then chat with grimmlord on spam.com/spam tard |
Citizenperth User ID: 37578576 Australia 04/08/2013 01:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation [link to twitter.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36482247 NYT: Some of the public language from #ROK gov't suggests Seoul & Washington may not agree on how far any retaliation should go. NYT quotes unnamed senior U.S. official: "Overreaction by South Korea is a real risk — and we’re working on that problem.” Overreaction = striking back. I'm sure Obama only want new BS sanctions on North Korea or some other meaningless shit. SHUT THE FUCK UP OBAMA. South Korea is gonna retaliate the way the fuck they want. America fucking invaded 2 countries over 3000 dead... so shut the fuck up about ``overreacting``... If he had any intelligence whatsoever he'd be urging SK to surrender any planned military action against NK. The sanctions should be lifted and the whole thing will be over with. No potentially worldwide conflict, no one gets nuked, everyone can move on. There's no logical reason for there to be conflict on the Korean peninsula(or anywhere else for that matter). People need to stop living in this dream land that somehow the "allies" will always come out on top. If history has taught us anything it's that Empires fall, HARD. why don't they just let them unite and leave them the fuck alone.... like stories of german families that met 30 years later and shit all because of a political cement wall...... think of the cheap reboks you'll get....... Because South Korea doesn't want to reunite . Certainly not under North Korea's terms.The North Korean doesn't want to give up power and join South Korea they want to take over. yeah, i get that, but i wonder, or speculate, at the wide eyes of the NK civilians when they see what they don't got... or vice-verca, remember the re-unification of germany? It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37609369 Greece 04/08/2013 01:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation ... Quoting: MuslimAmerican If he had any intelligence whatsoever he'd be urging SK to surrender any planned military action against NK. The sanctions should be lifted and the whole thing will be over with. No potentially worldwide conflict, no one gets nuked, everyone can move on. There's no logical reason for there to be conflict on the Korean peninsula(or anywhere else for that matter). People need to stop living in this dream land that somehow the "allies" will always come out on top. If history has taught us anything it's that Empires fall, HARD. why don't they just let them unite and leave them the fuck alone.... like stories of german families that met 30 years later and shit all because of a political cement wall...... think of the cheap reboks you'll get....... Because South Korea doesn't want to reunite . Certainly not under North Korea's terms.The North Korean doesn't want to give up power and join South Korea they want to take over. yeah, i get that, but i wonder, or speculate, at the wide eyes of the NK civilians when they see what they don't got... or vice-verca, remember the re-unification of germany? They've studied the re-unification of Germany and have said they are different people and cultures and that they would not want that type of re- unification. To them the idea of being absorbed by South Korea is abhorrent. They think very differently than us. What the North Korean regime wants is to reunite and rule South Korea in the same manner it rules North Korea. |
Citizenperth User ID: 37578576 Australia 04/08/2013 01:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation ... Quoting: Citizenperth why don't they just let them unite and leave them the fuck alone.... like stories of german families that met 30 years later and shit all because of a political cement wall...... think of the cheap reboks you'll get....... Because South Korea doesn't want to reunite . Certainly not under North Korea's terms.The North Korean doesn't want to give up power and join South Korea they want to take over. yeah, i get that, but i wonder, or speculate, at the wide eyes of the NK civilians when they see what they don't got... or vice-verca, remember the re-unification of germany? They've studied the re-unification of Germany and have said they are different people and cultures and that they would not want that type of re- unification. To them the idea of being absorbed by South Korea is abhorrent. They think very differently than us. What the North Korean regime wants is to reunite and rule South Korea in the same manner it rules North Korea. thanks for the insight greece :) It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37609369 Greece 04/08/2013 01:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37609369 Because South Korea doesn't want to reunite . Certainly not under North Korea's terms.The North Korean doesn't want to give up power and join South Korea they want to take over. yeah, i get that, but i wonder, or speculate, at the wide eyes of the NK civilians when they see what they don't got... or vice-verca, remember the re-unification of germany? They've studied the re-unification of Germany and have said they are different people and cultures and that they would not want that type of re- unification. To them the idea of being absorbed by South Korea is abhorrent. They think very differently than us. What the North Korean regime wants is to reunite and rule South Korea in the same manner it rules North Korea. thanks for the insight greece :) Your welcome. :) I can't fathom it but that's their way of thinking... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3715049 United States 04/08/2013 01:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation ... Quoting: Citizenperth why don't they just let them unite and leave them the fuck alone.... like stories of german families that met 30 years later and shit all because of a political cement wall...... think of the cheap reboks you'll get....... Because South Korea doesn't want to reunite . Certainly not under North Korea's terms.The North Korean doesn't want to give up power and join South Korea they want to take over. yeah, i get that, but i wonder, or speculate, at the wide eyes of the NK civilians when they see what they don't got... or vice-verca, remember the re-unification of germany? They've studied the re-unification of Germany and have said they are different people and cultures and that they would not want that type of re- unification. To them the idea of being absorbed by South Korea is abhorrent. They think very differently than us. What the North Korean regime wants is to reunite and rule South Korea in the same manner it rules North Korea. That's so odd! Aren't they aware that Germany is much stronger today (relatively speaking in comparison to other EU countries) because they united? Or are they brainwashed so much that they know nothing of compromise? Well, that was probably a dumb question. :) |
Citizenperth User ID: 37578576 Australia 04/08/2013 01:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37609369 Because South Korea doesn't want to reunite . Certainly not under North Korea's terms.The North Korean doesn't want to give up power and join South Korea they want to take over. yeah, i get that, but i wonder, or speculate, at the wide eyes of the NK civilians when they see what they don't got... or vice-verca, remember the re-unification of germany? They've studied the re-unification of Germany and have said they are different people and cultures and that they would not want that type of re- unification. To them the idea of being absorbed by South Korea is abhorrent. They think very differently than us. What the North Korean regime wants is to reunite and rule South Korea in the same manner it rules North Korea. That's so odd! Aren't they aware that Germany is much stronger today (relatively speaking in comparison to other EU countries) because they united? Or are they brainwashed so much that they know nothing of compromise? Well, that was probably a dumb question. :) hey calx ;) ! drill through that NK footage thread..... somewhere in there is some Canadian dudes that filmm clipped their way through NK... awesome stuff... from nice living and empty restaurants.. to flag bearing dudes at the border, and empty streets... was awesome.... It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3715049 United States 04/08/2013 01:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation ... Quoting: Citizenperth yeah, i get that, but i wonder, or speculate, at the wide eyes of the NK civilians when they see what they don't got... or vice-verca, remember the re-unification of germany? They've studied the re-unification of Germany and have said they are different people and cultures and that they would not want that type of re- unification. To them the idea of being absorbed by South Korea is abhorrent. They think very differently than us. What the North Korean regime wants is to reunite and rule South Korea in the same manner it rules North Korea. That's so odd! Aren't they aware that Germany is much stronger today (relatively speaking in comparison to other EU countries) because they united? Or are they brainwashed so much that they know nothing of compromise? Well, that was probably a dumb question. :) hey calx ;) ! drill through that NK footage thread..... somewhere in there is some Canadian dudes that filmm clipped their way through NK... awesome stuff... from nice living and empty restaurants.. to flag bearing dudes at the border, and empty streets... was awesome.... Hay buddy. :) I've seen a bunch of vids about NK. It's quite unnerving and spooky. As if they're stuck in a time warp! It seems so... empty and hollow. |
Citizenperth User ID: 37578576 Australia 04/08/2013 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37609369 They've studied the re-unification of Germany and have said they are different people and cultures and that they would not want that type of re- unification. To them the idea of being absorbed by South Korea is abhorrent. They think very differently than us. What the North Korean regime wants is to reunite and rule South Korea in the same manner it rules North Korea. That's so odd! Aren't they aware that Germany is much stronger today (relatively speaking in comparison to other EU countries) because they united? Or are they brainwashed so much that they know nothing of compromise? Well, that was probably a dumb question. :) hey calx ;) ! drill through that NK footage thread..... somewhere in there is some Canadian dudes that filmm clipped their way through NK... awesome stuff... from nice living and empty restaurants.. to flag bearing dudes at the border, and empty streets... was awesome.... Hay buddy. :) I've seen a bunch of vids about NK. It's quite unnerving and spooky. As if they're stuck in a time warp! It seems so... empty and hollow. yeah man, i like their 50's retro look.. kinda like creapy.. walking into grandma's bedroom.. lol.... Last Edited by CitizenPerth™ on 04/08/2013 01:45 AM It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1444471 United States 04/08/2013 01:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rusty Shackelferd User ID: 25067480 United States 04/08/2013 01:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MuslimAmerican User ID: 26542172 United States 04/08/2013 01:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation [link to twitter.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36482247 NYT: Some of the public language from #ROK gov't suggests Seoul & Washington may not agree on how far any retaliation should go. NYT quotes unnamed senior U.S. official: "Overreaction by South Korea is a real risk — and we’re working on that problem.” Overreaction = striking back. I'm sure Obama only want new BS sanctions on North Korea or some other meaningless shit. SHUT THE FUCK UP OBAMA. South Korea is gonna retaliate the way the fuck they want. America fucking invaded 2 countries over 3000 dead... so shut the fuck up about ``overreacting``... If he had any intelligence whatsoever he'd be urging SK to surrender any planned military action against NK. The sanctions should be lifted and the whole thing will be over with. No potentially worldwide conflict, no one gets nuked, everyone can move on. There's no logical reason for there to be conflict on the Korean peninsula(or anywhere else for that matter). People need to stop living in this dream land that somehow the "allies" will always come out on top. If history has taught us anything it's that Empires fall, HARD. why don't they just let them unite and leave them the fuck alone.... like stories of german families that met 30 years later and shit all because of a political cement wall...... think of the cheap reboks you'll get....... That's a little absent minded don't ya think? Especially since this wouldn't even be an issue is the US wasn't steadily hurdling insults, threats and sanctions at NK that don't hurt the actual leaders but the people. If someone, another nation were causing American children to drop dead in the streets from starvation, wouldn't you be ready to fight? The only ones being oppressed here is NK. Always has been always will be, except of course to the bias r-tards that call themselves patriotic by wanting to invade, rape, murder and completely destroy an entire people simply because they didn't drop to their knees when the "nation of freedom" said so. What a crock of shit, I doubt even you believe this bullshit you claim. [link to twitter.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36482247 NYT: Some of the public language from #ROK gov't suggests Seoul & Washington may not agree on how far any retaliation should go. NYT quotes unnamed senior U.S. official: "Overreaction by South Korea is a real risk — and we’re working on that problem.” Overreaction = striking back. I'm sure Obama only want new BS sanctions on North Korea or some other meaningless shit. SHUT THE FUCK UP OBAMA. South Korea is gonna retaliate the way the fuck they want. America fucking invaded 2 countries over 3000 dead... so shut the fuck up about ``overreacting``... If he had any intelligence whatsoever he'd be urging SK to surrender any planned military action against NK. The sanctions should be lifted and the whole thing will be over with. No potentially worldwide conflict, no one gets nuked, everyone can move on. There's no logical reason for there to be conflict on the Korean peninsula(or anywhere else for that matter). People need to stop living in this dream land that somehow the "allies" will always come out on top. If history has taught us anything it's that Empires fall, HARD. South Korea surrender to North Korea. Like they would ever do that. Would you relinquish your freedom and way of life that easily? I didn't say surrender to NK, I said SURRENDER MILITARY ACTION, perhaps if you hadn't rushed to reply to what you assumed I said instead of what I actually reading; but that seems to be the problem with a lot of people like you. Anyway by not starting a nuclear war, I don't see how that can be relinquishing freedom. We wouldn't even be in this situation if the Us/UN could actually mind their own business and stay out of the affairs of smaller nations, but no somehow the US has this fetish they like to misrepresent and call "moral code"; which is a joke in and of itself considering US foreign policy is about as immoral as it can get. Feed the hungry, visit the sick, free a captive if he be unjustly confined(kidnapped/enslaved by someone). Assist any person oppressed, whether they're of the Muslim or non-Muslim. - Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37609369 Greece 04/08/2013 01:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37609369 Because South Korea doesn't want to reunite . Certainly not under North Korea's terms.The North Korean doesn't want to give up power and join South Korea they want to take over. yeah, i get that, but i wonder, or speculate, at the wide eyes of the NK civilians when they see what they don't got... or vice-verca, remember the re-unification of germany? They've studied the re-unification of Germany and have said they are different people and cultures and that they would not want that type of re- unification. To them the idea of being absorbed by South Korea is abhorrent. They think very differently than us. What the North Korean regime wants is to reunite and rule South Korea in the same manner it rules North Korea. That's so odd! Aren't they aware that Germany is much stronger today (relatively speaking in comparison to other EU countries) because they united? Or are they brainwashed so much that they know nothing of compromise? Well, that was probably a dumb question. :) Yes it is odd. Those cultural differences. Keep in mind the cult mindset that rules there that likens their rulers to Gods. That's pounded into them day and night. From the moment they're born. Their leaders are not just leaders but akin to living Gods. God/Celebrity/Leader/Father all rolled into one. They see their southern counterparts as traitors. Traitors to a belief system and a way of life and to Dear Leader of course. They want to reunite and bring them back to the faith so to speak, and save them. To them it must seem as if they live terribly sinful lives either led astray or are just wicked people.If a hostile invasion took place I would not want to be a South Korean. The South Koreans fear them for good reason. |
LOU512 User ID: 15499118 United States 04/08/2013 01:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation If South Korea strikes first doesn't that give China the green light to kick arse and defend NK? Quoting: calx yes n 1961, the two countries signed the Sino-North Korean Mutual Aid and Cooperation Friendship Treaty, whereby China pledged to immediately render military and other assistance by all means to its ally against any outside attack.[2] This treaty was prolonged twice, in 1981 and 2001, with a validity until 2021. The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. Sun Tzu |