REALTIVITY FINALLY DISQUALIFIED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE! BREAKING NEWS!

And the "we" of the second quote in this case is everyone BUT you can experimentally prove the effects because you are both ignorant of how and incapable of understanding why

sorry if you ansered this already, just read your light theory.

so one electron comes in to take the place of the other getting expeled?

Don't you all realize you can't possibly be posting to this thread because IDW knows it is 'selectively visible?'

Please stop doing the impossible. Thank you.

It would seem my posts are being marked somehow by omitting the letter h. This is odd, since it happens no matter what computer or device I use to post here and it does not occur when I post anonymously. I know for certain it is being done after I post, since I am using auto correction in most cases

i think most people would rather stick a gun in their mouths than have to deal with you

It would seem my posts are being marked somehow by omitting the letter h. This is odd, since it happens no matter what computer or device I use to post here and it does not occur when I post anonymously. I know for certain it is being done after I post, since I am using auto correction in most cases

You are not AA/IDW!

AA/IDW posted some time ago that he was chased by government agents.
After that post AA/IDW didn't post again - they got him.

Now suddenly someone is posting with a IDW signature, but since a long time AA had only posted under the name "Anonymous Astrophysicist"

You are a fucking government agent, posting as IDW, to conceal the real fate of the real AA/IDW!

You are unmasked - tell us what happened to the real AA/IDW


.

You are not AA/IDW!

AA/IDW posted some time ago that he was chased by government agents.
After that post AA/IDW didn't post again - they got him.

Now suddenly someone is posting with a IDW signature, but since a long time AA had only posted under the name "Anonymous Astrophysicist"

You are a fucking government agent, posting as IDW, to conceal the real fate of the real AA/IDW!

You are unmasked - tell us what happened to the real AA/IDW


.

Can someone please apply some roach spray to this thread?

thanks, one question about gravity.

Its hard for me to think that the neutron gets attracted to both the electron and the proton. I thought the electron/proton would cancel each other out in terms of charge.

but I see your point and this is amazing.

There doesn't have to be an opposite charge for an electrostatic attraction to occur, only a difference in charge

There doesn't have to be an opposite charge for an electrostatic attraction to occur, only a difference in charge

U mean like a positive charge to GROUND!!!!!....JUust a difference in potential

U mean like a positive charge to GROUND!!!!!....JUust a difference in potential

Don't know if this was already posted: [link to math.ucr.edu]

If I read through the list .... (especially the second half) .... LOL

.

That has already been debunked as nonsense earlier in the thread. While atomic structures that do not contain neutrons are attracted by the force of gravity, they do not exert a gravitational force themselves on other atoms of their own kind.

The evidence of this is that the most abundant matter in the universe is hydrogen plasma, and if hydrogen had any force of attraction to other atoms of hydrogen , after many billion years it is unlikely interstellar and intergalactic space would be filled with dispersed plasma.

Obvious nonsense. As virtually any star demonstrates. The gas that coalesces is almost entirely neutron free hydrogen. And it coalesces under gravity, something that would be starkly impossible if neutron free hydrogen exerted no gravitational pull on neutron free hydrogen.

The entire premise of your argument is disproven by the single most abundant substance in the universe: neutron free hydrogen.




Again, nonsense. Gravity's influence is overwhelmingly localized. What is 'likely' are localized collections of neutron free hydrogen that coalesce into generally sphere shaped balls. Which is what we see throughout the galaxy, with most of the visible matter form into stars.

Something that your theory insists should never happen. Something that anyone who looks up during day light hours can affirm does happen.

You make a tremendous amount of unintelligent conclusions in your synapses. For instance, you conclude without real proof and in contradiction to logic that stars are composed entirely of hydrogen upon their formation and that all elements are formed within stars after their formation. While this is a theory, it is most certainly not a fact. Experiments will show that hydrogen has no tendency to be attracted to other atoms of hydrogen.Instead, they tend to disperse into a rarified plasma. If you release hydrogen gas into space what is the result in a vacuum? Simple question. Does it remain in a gas state or does it form a much less dense plasma?

Given our own stars magnetic field, it is without a doubt evidence that iron exists at it's core. Iron has neutrons.

It is far more likely given the fact that 99.9% of the hydrogen in the universe is plasma after many billions of years that hydrogen is not held together by gravity by itself.

You make a tremendous amount of unintelligent conclusions in your synapses. For instance, you conclude without real proof and in contradiction to logic that stars are composed entirely of hydrogen upon their formation and that all elements are formed within stars after their formation. While this is a theory, it is most certainly not a fact. Experiments will show that hydrogen has no tendency to be attracted to other atoms of hydrogen.Instead, they tend to disperse into a rarified plasma. If you release hydrogen gas into space what is the result in a vacuum? Simple question. Does it remain in a gas state or does it form a much less dense plasma?

Given our own stars magnetic field, it is without a doubt evidence that iron exists at it's core. Iron has neutrons.

It is far more likely given the fact that 99.9% of the hydrogen in the universe is plasma after many billions of years that hydrogen is not held together by gravity by itself.

Main streamers admit Relativity is hopelessly flawed


The reason is simple, because in order to prevent any KE calculation resulting in mass in excess of light speed, the proved formula was inexplicably altered wit 'resting mass energy" in the 'relativistic' formula so that no input of energy could ever possibly result in >C velocities!
Now I will present my theory, which is falsifiable by a nearly infinite number of experiments or observations.GOOD LUCK

GRAVITY EXPLAINED: what it REALLY is


Now, let me explain in very simple terms what the weak force gravity REALLY is.

In all matter there are electrons and protons. These particles both have an electrical or electrostatic charge.

Neutrons have no charge and they are the answer to the question of gravity, as I will explain.

In objects or masses which exert a force of gravity on other objects, there must be [and always are] neutrons present.

: This is because gravity is actually simply the electrostatic attraction between particles with a difference in charge potential, the neutrally charged neutron and the negatively charged electron exert a force inversely proportional to the distance they are from each other upon each other.

The simultaneous repelling and attracting forces of protons and electrons in two masses cancel, and this simply explains why gravity is weaker of the forces when compared to electromagnetism.
All matter with neutrons possesses a force of gravity.

ThIS IS AN INTELLIGENTLY DESIGNED ELECTRIC UNIVERSE!

There is no mystery to electrostatic attraction, it is a well known and accepted reality!

The confusing part to most is that BOTh electrons and protons have a difference in potential with neutrons, and BOTh are attracted to neutrons through this weaker of the forces, electrostatics, which IS gravity!

The simpler of minds would think that if protons attract neutrons {as in the nucleus of the atom which is an undisputed fact}, then neutrons must repel electrons and cancel the force of attraction.

Why? They OBVIOUSLY don't!

Particles with differences in electrical potential always attract electrostaticly even if one is neutral, it is only when they have the same charge do they repel. Since the neutron has no charge of it's own, it has a difference in potential with both electrons and protons and is attracted to both electrostaticly, as proved by the empirical evidence in countless experiments and apparatus dependent on this fact.

Isn't that a lot simpler than making up a bunch of crap about mass warping 'space time' and creating a 'dimple' in space that objects roll down into ?. if this were true why are objects always pulled toward the center of mass no matter what direction it is in relation to orientation of the space/ time crap?? why do objects fall in a straight line towards it when they start out being stationary in relation to the other mass instead of a "curve" along this so called curvature of space time or gravity well?

Anyway, believe me or not watch the video, Einstein is debunked and admitted to be fatally flawed by the mainest of stream science, that jap dude 'yall all think is the second cumming

Your OP makes no sense, at least the part about existing theory. There is nothing necessarily wrong with "rest mass" that increases as velocity approaches the speed of light.

That is not the problem that is discussed in the video, the video has nothing to do with that. The video is about how neither existing gravitational theory nor existing quantum theory explains well what happens at the boundary or inside a black hole.

Main streamers admit Relativity is hopelessly flawed


The reason is simple, because in order to prevent any KE calculation resulting in mass in excess of light speed, the proved formula was inexplicably altered wit 'resting mass energy" in the 'relativistic' formula so that no input of energy could ever possibly result in >C velocities!
Now I will present my theory, which is falsifiable by a nearly infinite number of experiments or observations.GOOD LUCK

GRAVITY EXPLAINED: what it REALLY is


Now, let me explain in very simple terms what the weak force gravity REALLY is.

In all matter there are electrons and protons. These particles both have an electrical or electrostatic charge.

Neutrons have no charge and they are the answer to the question of gravity, as I will explain.

In objects or masses which exert a force of gravity on other objects, there must be [and always are] neutrons present.

: This is because gravity is actually simply the electrostatic attraction between particles with a difference in charge potential, the neutrally charged neutron and the negatively charged electron exert a force inversely proportional to the distance they are from each other upon each other.

The simultaneous repelling and attracting forces of protons and electrons in two masses cancel, and this simply explains why gravity is weaker of the forces when compared to electromagnetism.
All matter with neutrons possesses a force of gravity.

ThIS IS AN INTELLIGENTLY DESIGNED ELECTRIC UNIVERSE!

There is no mystery to electrostatic attraction, it is a well known and accepted reality!

The confusing part to most is that BOTh electrons and protons have a difference in potential with neutrons, and BOTh are attracted to neutrons through this weaker of the forces, electrostatics, which IS gravity!

The simpler of minds would think that if protons attract neutrons {as in the nucleus of the atom which is an undisputed fact}, then neutrons must repel electrons and cancel the force of attraction.

Why? They OBVIOUSLY don't!

Particles with differences in electrical potential always attract electrostaticly even if one is neutral, it is only when they have the same charge do they repel. Since the neutron has no charge of it's own, it has a difference in potential with both electrons and protons and is attracted to both electrostaticly, as proved by the empirical evidence in countless experiments and apparatus dependent on this fact.

Isn't that a lot simpler than making up a bunch of crap about mass warping 'space time' and creating a 'dimple' in space that objects roll down into ?. if this were true why are objects always pulled toward the center of mass no matter what direction it is in relation to orientation of the space/ time crap?? why do objects fall in a straight line towards it when they start out being stationary in relation to the other mass instead of a "curve" along this so called curvature of space time or gravity well?

Anyway, believe me or not watch the video, Einstein is debunked and admitted to be fatally flawed by the mainest of stream science, that jap dude 'yall all think is the second cumming