There REALLY IS something strange in western sky around sunset...!!!

Now THIS is what I've been waiting for. You see, in one of my PROFESSIONS (meaning I get PAID to do it), we have an industry saying, "The tape don't lie" (we work and operate off of high quality videos, but for our conversation we will use... "The picture don't lie").

1) You magnified the picture to a pixel blur--Why?

Couple of zooms showed me CLEARLY solid black line all the way though.

"I cannot stand lying pricks like you"...Coming from the biggest shill in the history of GLP is just classic. You sell your soul as good as anyone alive. You are a proffesional liar on behalf of the government and it does not get more pathetic than that, nothing does.

No, and don't understand what you are talking about. I am posting random pictures of the sky in Atlanta on different days, from different locations, at different times of day/night...Whatever you see, is what you see and you and everyone else sees. You will have to reconcile that with whatever you want. I can't do that for you. Got those Lens Flare Planet pics, yet? $300 cash waiting for you.

No, I am not. Show where I lied.

What did you not understand? Use the "quote" system and I will clarify. For the record, lots of people are watching this thread, you are the ONLY one who has said they can't understand. Nice job.

Now THIS is what I've been waiting for. You see, in one of my PROFESSIONS (meaning I get PAID to do it), we have an industry saying, "The tape don't lie" (we work and operate off of high quality videos, but for our conversation we will use... "The picture don't lie").

1) You magnified the picture to a pixel blur--Why? This picture was pretty close to the power line. No need to magnify at all. Couple of zooms showed me CLEARLY solid black line all the way though. And oh by the way, I still had Sun, horizon, "object", "moon" @ 10/11 o'clock from the object (sorry I don't have coordinates, and cosmic measurements, that's your "specialty"). Your picture has NONE OF THAT...nice job in maintaining "control" and "test" integrity.

2) The fact that you used your picture and "clearly see" anything is the single greatest indictment of your: eyes, motive or BOTH.

Here are both pics, so the WORLD can see or at least the GLP community that you all try to compare to the WORLD's population when providing Shill Math lessons.

Now Let's Go!!!

[link to imageshack.us]

[link to imageshack.us]

You need some new "weapons", Telescopic pics of power lines are laughable or embarrassing. You may want your handlers to ASSign you to a different thread. Like, for real, dude.

How do you know a shill is lying...? He is typing!!

You contradicted yourself with your prior statement as well as in the very sentence that contained your denial. As others have pointed out, you are becoming increasingly incoherent. If you knew what you were talking about, you would have gone to the primary source material after finding the problem with Google sky. You didn't.

I posted the picture of the "missing region" as well as the site from which you can download the raw data for yourself.

No he doesn't. You are such a lying prick.
"7. Can you explain the fact that the area at (5h 53m 27s, -6 10’ 58”) has been blackened out in Google Sky and Microsoft Telescope? People suggest that these have been blackened out because those are the co-ordinates where Nibiru is located at present.

Several people have asked me about this blank rectangle in Orion in Google Sky, or another similar blank in Virgo [link to www.2012hoax.org] Google Sky and other Internet maps are compilations of astronomical photos of the sky. Many of them are photos taken more than 50 years ago in the Palomar Sky Survey; others are more recent from the Sloan Digital Survey. The problem is that many people think Google sky is a live view of the sky today. They write to me about searching Google Sky for Nibiru or other rogue objects, but even if these were real they would not be visible in these old data. The entire premise that Google Sky can be used to find images of Nibiru, or that blanks indicate that the authorities are hiding important images of Nibiru, is wrong. "
[link to web.archive.org]

He doesn't go into the level of detail I do and actually retrieve the "missing section" from the Palomar Sky Survey (really it was UKSTU data, but collectively the two are usually referred to simply as POSSII since UKSTU is a sister telescope to the Oschin Schmidt). Nevertheless, he's saying the same thing, it's old data from pre-existing sky surveys.

Well then they did not reproduce what I did. I simply went to the original source data and downloaded the film plates to make the color image myself, without simply pasting over the hole in their all-sky mosaic.

Look above for my question about the image of the "winged planet" I provided. You didn't answer me. The "infrared feature" is simply data from a different sky survey, generally Google and Microsoft use IRAS data for that "layer." What is it you claim to be seeing in the IRAS data and where?

Thank you for posting the pictures.

They are asking that, because with the low resolution pictures that we are saving, we don't see the cable crossing it. You are going to get a lot of criticism because if they enlarge your images as I have done, they will see a very poor resolution image and you will not be able to get your point across.

I cropped and enhanced it. Look... [link to i.imgur.com]

I am now completely confused by the enhanced photos. Before I continue, I admit that I am 99% stupid about astronomy and photography, but I don't understand why the black line is not clearly visible in the enhancement -- at least not to me (or am I blind?) -- in the enhanced photo. Also, how much did you enhance it because it looks pretty awesome?!!

And, to put my two cents in, PLEASE stop with the childish back-and-forth. It is apparent that neither Dr. Astro nor 3rdEyeE is stupid, and I don't think either one is lying, even though one is obviously -- and I think honestly -- mistaken about what the mystery object is or isn't. Why can't you just leave it at that and show each other some respect? (And please don't come back with "He started it" or "I will after he does." Talk about childish!!

Damn, bro...can you tell us what you are talking about? I asked a couple of questions about the "diversion" YOU and only YOU tried, and then you ask me to "search"? Is the word "search" in my thread to you? No it is not. You were ASSigned to throw out the bullshit, and when asked to explain/defend your bullshit, you opted not to. Of course you know what that does to your credibility on one of the greatest threads in GLP history? Do you know?

I am now completely confused by the enhanced photos. Before I continue, I admit that I am 99% stupid about astronomy and photography, but I don't understand why the black line is not clearly visible in the enhancement -- at least not to me (or am I blind?) -- in the enhanced photo. Also, how much did you enhance it because it looks pretty awesome?!!

Now THIS is what I've been waiting for. You see, in one of my PROFESSIONS (meaning I get PAID to do it), we have an industry saying, "The tape don't lie" (we work and operate off of high quality videos, but for our conversation we will use... "The picture don't lie").

1) You magnified the picture to a pixel blur--Why? This picture was pretty close to the power line. No need to magnify at all. Couple of zooms showed me CLEARLY solid black line all the way though. And oh by the way, I still had Sun, horizon, "object", "moon" @ 10/11 o'clock from the object (sorry I don't have coordinates, and cosmic measurements, that's your "specialty"). Your picture has NONE OF THAT...nice job in maintaining "control" and "test" integrity.

2) The fact that you used your picture and "clearly see" anything is the single greatest indictment of your: eyes, motive or BOTH.

Here are both pics, so the WORLD can see or at least the GLP community that you all try to compare to the WORLD's population when providing Shill Math lessons.

Now Let's Go!!!

[link to imageshack.us]

[link to imageshack.us]

You need some new "weapons", Telescopic pics of power lines are laughable or embarrassing. You may want your handlers to ASSign you to a different thread. Like, for real, dude.

Me too, 99% stupid that is. What I think Erik is saying is the image that Astromut showed was SO enhanced that the brightness of the object overshadowed the power line, thus making it appear to be in front of the line. Just two clicks, I presume means, two degrees less enhancement would show the line in front of the object.

Are you this stupid? You can clearly see it in from of the site. You just lost all credibility.

You do realize that your language skills and Freudian slips are being recorded like the Sumerian texts, right? You just said "in from" (that's not even a type-o) and then you said "of the site" (like webSITE). OCD + stress causes these brain failures. NOTICE neither was a typeO or spelling mistake. Whose credibility? Little lens flare got you spooked?

I am willing to bet many of the people who were contributing to this thread find themselves cringing from each new post. I also think there are a few who are now guessing that “they” sent you to this thread to derail it and make them look crazy by association. Hence their silence.

Sorry my IPhone does stupid auto corrects. Blaming me for spelling errors? Stupid.

Now THIS is what I've been waiting for. You see, in one of my PROFESSIONS (meaning I get PAID to do it), we have an industry saying, "The tape don't lie" (we work and operate off of high quality videos, but for our conversation we will use... "The picture don't lie").

1) You magnified the picture to a pixel blur--Why? This picture was pretty close to the power line. No need to magnify at all. Couple of zooms showed me CLEARLY solid black line all the way though. And oh by the way, I still had Sun, horizon, "object", "moon" @ 10/11 o'clock from the object (sorry I don't have coordinates, and cosmic measurements, that's your "specialty"). Your picture has NONE OF THAT...nice job in maintaining "control" and "test" integrity.

2) The fact that you used your picture and "clearly see" anything is the single greatest indictment of your: eyes, motive or BOTH.

Here are both pics, so the WORLD can see or at least the GLP community that you all try to compare to the WORLD's population when providing Shill Math lessons.

Now Let's Go!!!

[link to imageshack.us]

[link to imageshack.us]

You need some new "weapons", Telescopic pics of power lines are laughable or embarrassing. You may want your handlers to ASSign you to a different thread. Like, for real, dude.

And it is the wire that makes #4 "appear to be a flare", right? So when the wire is gone and EVERYTHING else is there...Then what is it?

Now Let's GO!!!

Confession Time:

I have not been participating fairly as my buddies don't know who they are PROFESSIONALLY dealing with...and that isn't fair. With that, here's what I can share:

1)I have worked in the neuroscience/brain-training field for 9+ years

2)I attended one of the "Best Public Universities" in the United States of America

3) I have officiated Men's Basketball at some of the highest levels in the world (NCAA Men's Division I and National Basketball Association) since 1999. This is only relevant because eyesight, discernment, ability to adjudicate, VIDEO an Photo review are critical in this field.

Just wanted to level the playing field b/c I know one of my "buddies" likes fishin, one worked at Wolfs or Kinkos or comparable photo/video shop, one likes to sit on telsecopes and blow up pictures/dolls.

Now back to the pics. #5 She's not on the wire anymore.

Me too, 99% stupid that is. What I think Erik is saying is the image that Astromut showed was SO enhanced that the brightness of the object overshadowed the power line, thus making it appear to be in front of the line. Just two clicks, I presume means, two degrees less enhancement would show the line in front of the object.

To be clear, the wire does not produce or contribute to the flare, it only makes it easier to identify as a flare.

You would have seen a lens flare in that photo with or without power lines.

Speaking of Johns Creek...One of the most affluent suburbs in America and now the banks have ARMED guards at the door. Anybody else seen this in their area? A guard at a bank THAT has never been robbed and never had guards before not even during 9/11 or the tech fallout or the mortgage fallout.

Confession Time:

I have not been participating fairly as my buddies don't know who they are PROFESSIONALLY dealing with...and that isn't fair. With that, here's what I can share:

1)I have worked in the neuroscience/brain-training field for 9+ years

2)I attended one of the "Best Public Universities" in the United States of America

3) I have officiated Men's Basketball at some of the highest levels in the world (NCAA Men's Division I and National Basketball Association) since 1999. This is only relevant because eyesight, discernment, ability to adjudicate, VIDEO an Photo review are critical in this field.