Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Yeah, I loved the part where the Zetans are rocking the planet to simulate the seasons...thats a good one.

Thread: Clouds on the Moon? (Page 3)

I just couldn't help quoting a few more posts from Mr FrEaKy's moon thread that was pinned earlier today.

The Old Timer is good value for a laugh now and then. And even though annoying at times, and mind you Mr FrEaKy has been acting like this from when he first came to GLP, I do feel a little compassion at the dude's obviously lack of "brain" power.

Exactly, VP. And when that "zeta simulation of the seasons" first came out from Ms LIEDer I thought geez surely these bizarre and totally bogus claims will cause many of zetatalk's loyal and staunch believers to finally get a clue.

Every year that I watch the four seasons unfold here in New Zealand is yet another year that I get to have some great entertainment by mocking these zetaculties.

lol I know. I feel pity for them sometimes, misled by a dog murdering, batshit crazy old lady. I feel more pity for the Zeta believers than I do for Amber/MommyOF2/Ambernon lol

Having myself interacted with Amber I would have to agree with you. Especially with Amber's arrogance in so many ways.
Even though it is only an assertion on my part I do believe that Amber is affected by some type of real mental illness. I mean her very bizarre behaviour alone, apart from her pathetic pushing of her silly earthquake prediction theory, went beyond the normal ramblings of a typical woowoo on GLP, Imo.

Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 03/19/2010 07:10 PM

I dont know about mental health, lack of intelligence though clearly yes :)

Her last prediction was originally for the 18th...well since its now the 19th (nearly the 20th) its a clear fail on her part, sadly when reminded of that she said she had "Extended" her prediction to cover the extra day...remind you of anyone?? Reminded me of Nancy and her "Soon" predictions lol.

Amber doesnt like it when you question her and present real FACT, I suppose that goes for anyone who is claiming to be able to predict natural disasters, but her objections go much further than normal, the way she keeps saying she wont respond to critics but continues to do so screams of attention whore. Ill be fair to her here though, ive been pretty mean spirited towards her and not exactly pleasant either.

LOL!!

Similar to Amber's "Extended" stay on GLP after saying, I think MO said it was like 5 times or something, that she was going to leave GLP and find a place where people accepted her earthquake prediction theory with no questions asked. Lol!! Amber whinged and bitched about GLPers being so mean to her etc when it was Amber herself who started all the shit and then proceeded to make several threads attacking others.

Anyway I consider it a GLP P R I C E L E S S !! scenario the way Amber has done a "180" and decided to "Extend" her stay here despite everything she had said previously when attacking GLP .

Uhh, **SIMULATED** seasons would indeed look, act and FEEL like the REAL THING!!!

No they wouldn't.

Obviously, you can't visualize the obvious effects tilting the Earth to simulate seasons would have on the night sky.

To simulate spring in the northern hemisphere where Nancy says the Earth is halted in the August/September position would require tilting the earth 46 degrees on it's axis.

And your point is???

That you are wrong in your belief, plain flat out wrong.

It is not possible to tilt the earth 46 degrees to simulate seasons, while simultaneously keeping the constellations correct in the sky.

Nor is it any of ours.

You and your master are wrong.

Not if you consider the possibility of SCREEN MEMORIES.

Ah, that would be because the seasons ARE the REAL THING

Do you think we are at the Oscars or something!!

But, if you do that, you may as well go all the way to solipsism. You are naught but a brain in a jar, you are the ONLY real thing in your whole reality, and everything else is just holographic data fed to you.

Since this assertion is neither provable, nor disprovable, we should (in science, anyway) discard it. It is a hypothesis that is untestable, and adds nothing to our understanding reality.

Likewise, your idea regarding 'screen memories' is similarly untestable. If we can trust nothing of our senses, then what's the point of seeking answers to anything? By what tools are answers even seekable?

Thus, unless you have a falsifiable way of TESTING your idea of 'screen memories,' it would seem an unnecessary complication to what is actually observed, and the idea itself, explains nothing.

Therefore, I would suggest that a far more likely scenario is simply that Nancy is utterly wrong about how the heavens move, and that fact largely invalidates the rest of her claims regarding the Zetas, including their very existence.

So many good points, one of the better assertions towards common sense and reality as we perceive it. Anything else is only speculation.

It certainly is interesting how perception plays a big part of a belief system. There truly is no end to what a crazy mind can do; especially when it come to a religion such as zetacult.

The belief might seem good and cool and all that to some, but the reality is not supporting the failed cult. Simple really.

It's like,,, a train wreak that happened back in 2003 and the people still on that POS train, can't seem to get off.

Sucks to be a zetacultie.

Of course you would, anyone who could swallow Nancy's delusional ravings would swallow anything.

As for the fence, well you can't very well get off something that is up your ass.

LIEDer is no Montana Wildhack! ;-)

I want to know more about gang stalking.

I'm just not mentally prepared yet :) I'm still recuperating from finding out about Mind Control.

And if I make the mistake of mentioning one more thing I've read on this crazy site to my wife I'm going to be sleeping in the yard.

Why should I consider that possibility? It's highly unlikely and there isn't any evidence to suggest that such a thing is taking place...or that the "Zetas" even exist in the first place.

Weak, Max...very weak.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 03/20/2010 07:47 AM

Just tell her it's entertaining reading just how delusional people can be, especially when there is an audience, you only have to visit the "ning" to see how they feed off one another.

But for "FENCE SITTER" - weak is GOOD ENOUGH!

I think once maybe long ago you were a fence sitter, but you fell off it into Nancy's garden and have been living there ever since.

Perhaps...IF you were really a "fence sitter."

If I am not a "fence sitter", then I must be a liar ... Are you "good" with that?

Well, I could say you are on some issues...such as your many claims about Alaska. Mostly because you never came back and presented the evidence you said you were going to. There are only a few reasons why that might be. 1) You heard those claims from someone else (i.e. Nancy Lieder), repeated them but then couldn't find anything to support them. 2) You read it somewhere, repeated it here but then found, on closer examination, that what you claimed and what you read weren't exactly the same thing or it didn't quite support what you said. In either case, that wouldn't make you a liar per se...only the perpetrator of a lie. Unless you knew it was a lie when you repeated it.

I decided it would be too RISKY to share the information. It is highly sensitive.

How did you get the information in the first place? You claimed it was all out there in books. My conclusion is you're now lying.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 03/20/2010 11:38 AM