Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Yep.....and here is an exclusive pic of his secret lover..... :girlF:

Not quite that easy, Melfy.

Our recruitment policy is very specific.....we do not accept Lusers and Liars.

So in your case, Melfy, don't bother even applying for such an esteemed position as a "zetatalk debunker" because you failed big time in the honesty stakes a long long time ago.

Just sayin.



Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 03/24/2010 04:45 PM

Thread: 'Ladies and gentlemen, on your left you will see an erupting volcano': The stunning sight Caribbean holidaymakers saw from plane

Thread: Iceland Volcano Erupting this second. Live web cam

Nancy, I believe is probably her worst own enemy. I mean after all these years of failure the woman carries on as if she was never ever wrong in her predictions. Most folk are not as stupid and gullible as her few followers here and at places like the Poleshit Ningy. Even originating on the internet has a shelf life and zetatalk's use by date expired in 2003.

Ms LIEDer just keeps putting a new "date" label every year on a stale and rotting product.

So you are claiming that Nancy was correct in predicting eruptions in Montserrat and Iceland? Two volcanically active regions? This is astounding predictive ability to you?

Are you serious?

OMG!

Next, Nancy is going to predict a golf game AT PEBBLE BEACH!

Amazing! Stunning! YAWN!

Cover job? What are you talking about? I guess you don't need a cover job because we all already know you're paid to be here so there's really no sense.

You're a stupid DEFLUNKER? I guess you might as well be...you spend enough time here.

And still pushing your auto-biography I see. Did Nancy write the foreward?

No, it is true. Nothing the "Zetas" have said has come to pass - EVER.

Volcanic eruptions in the Caribbean and Iceland are nothing new. Show us how these eruptions are different than previous ones. Present evidence that "Planet X" is responsible for them. If you can't then:



Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 03/24/2010 07:45 PM

Well. it is a little odd is it not? Nancy predicts volcanic eruptions exactly where there are active volcanoes. Who didn't?

Now wait for it. Little zetacultie, the Melfster, will be along soon to add his pathetic spin to the rather obvious.....Nancy has never ever CORRECTLY predicted anything UNIQUE. for example Ms LIEDer's "list" of "weather and natural events" related predictions from the past are nothing more than generalizations of what occurs naturally and frequently on our planet. The assertion that her fantasy rogue planet is the cause of any type of "weather or naturally occurring" related event on our planet is quickly debunked. When one goes back over history and details previous decades and decades of such "weather and natural occurring" events then one can only conclude that Ms LIEDer's rogue planet has ALWAYS been parked besides our sun since at least recorded history. Such is sadly the pathetic "logic" of one, Nancy LIEDer.

Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 03/24/2010 10:37 PM

How does a halted planet nearby affect our weather, anyway?

"1) That Nancy was "Right" about anything."

Correct! Nancy bats at 0%! 100% wrong!

One of the most destructive volcanic eruptions in the history of Iceland began in the early morning of January 23, 1973, near the Nation's premier fishing port, the town of Vestmannaeyjar, on Heimaey, the only inhabited isle in the Vestmannaeyjar volcanic archipelago. This 28-page booklet discusses the impact of the 1973 volcanic eruption of Eldfell on the island of Heimaey. Before the eruption was over, approximately one-third of the town of Vestmannaeyjer had been obliterated, but, more importantly, the potential damage probably was reduced by the spraying of seawater onto the advancing lava f!ows, causing them to be slowed, stopped, or diverted from the undamaged portion of the town. -- Williams and Moore

The wise "observer" will consider the ENTIRE BODY of work, rather than bits and pieces.





Last Edited by ***ZetaMaX*** on 03/25/2010 07:39 AM

Too bad your "whoop ass" backfired on you. Instead of kicking "debunker" ass, your ass is the one being kicked. But, not because of "debunkers"....but because of Nancy's own failed record.




Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 03/25/2010 08:13 AM

It's *NOT* 2012 yet!

:hot_dog:

And when 2012 rolls around, MaxiMelf, what excuse will you use to keep being Nancy's lapdog?

Will you say:

"I meant 2015"
"Nancy was using an old calendar and the real date is 2021"
"The Zetas used their Massively Overclocked Cosmic Computer to roll back time, and it's 1987 again, pardon me while I put on these parachute pants"
"Planet X came and wreaked havoc on the Earth and you are all dead ha ha ha ha ha."

By the way, your Volar persona has turned into a nasty little bitch. I suggest you retire it. It's doing far more harm than good for your 'cause.'

I am not Volar.

Volar writes:

"I am not Volar."

Man, that is a tough existential conundrum you've got there, Volar!

So.. Zetamax.. have you already been convinced of a couple of so called debunker facts (which, pay attention, are ALWAYS based on reality!)

Do you, Zetamax, believe that you are both Volar and Zetamax?

Do you believe that you are both Zetamax and Kurt, Nancy's son?

Do you believe that you are both Zetamax and Nancy herself? Or maybe all of them?

Remember that the so called debunkers only use logic, reason and facts, based on irrefutable evidence. Convinced yet?

Then why aren't you considering Nancy's '100 percent accuracy' claim?

Why aren't you considering the innumerable times Nancy's/Zeta predictions have been wrong?

Why aren't you considering experimental verification that the claims made by Nancy/Zeta do not reflect reality?

Doesn't sound like you are considering the entire body of work, to me...

Indeed - the "debunker facts" (LOL) include

I - ***ZetaMaX*** - am Nancy's son KURT
I - ***ZetaMaX*** - am NANCY

Pure debunker "logic" at it's best!!

Last Edited by ***ZetaMaX*** on 03/25/2010 03:15 PM

You have to consider the "spirit" rather than the "letter" of the work.

"You have to consider the "spirit" rather than the "letter" of the work."

No, actually, I don't 'have' to consider either.

But the spirit of the work, in this case, is every bit as fucked up as the letter. Together, they form that rare gestalt in which bullshit heaped on bullshit transcends mere bullshit to become...uber-bullshit.

Which makes it hilarious fun to read, but a rather poor basis on which to create a belief system.

Not any worse than your logic.

We - "debunkers" - are paid to be here.
We - "debunkers" - are wrong while Nancy and the "Zetas" are right.
I - Circuit Breaker - am working at HP as part of some cover job.

Pure flunker "logic" at it's best.

We all did, and it's still a crock of crap!

Here are some common sense thoughts on what to do if you live in an earthquake prone area.


WHAT RESCUERS AND EXPERTS *DO NOT* RECOMMEND YOU DO DURING AN EARTHQUAKE
Based on years of research about how people are injured or killed during earthquakes, and the experiences of U.S. and international search and rescue teams, these three actions are not recommended to protect yourself during earthquakes:
DO NOT run outside or to other rooms during shaking: The area near the exterior walls of a building is the most dangerous place to be. Windows, facades and architectural details are often the first parts of the building to collapse. To stay away from this danger zone, stay inside if you are inside and outside if you are outside. Also, shaking can be so strong that you will not be able to move far without falling down, and objects may fall or be thrown at you that you do not expect. Injuries can be avoided if you drop to the ground before the earthquake drops you.
DO NOT stand in a doorway: An enduring earthquake image of California is a collapsed adobe home with the door frame as the only standing part. From this came our belief that a doorway is the safest place to be during an earthquake. True- if you live in an old, unreinforced adobe house or some older woodframe houses. In modern houses, doorways are no stronger than any other part of the house, and the doorway does not protect you from the most likely source of injury- falling or flying objects. You also may not be able to brace yourself in the door during strong shaking. You are safer under a table.
Please help! If you have received an email about the "triangle of life" please respond to its sender by directing them to this page:

www.earthquakecountry.info/dropcoverholdon/

Ask them to send this link to everyone they sent the "triangle" email, and to the person who sent it to them. Thank you!
DO NOT get in the "triangle of life": In recent years, an e-mail has been circulating which describes an alternative to the long-established "Drop, Cover, and Hold On" advice. The so-called "triangle of life" and some of the other actions recommended in the e-mail are potentially life threatening, and the credibility of the source of these recommendations has been broadly questioned (see links at left).
The "triangle of life" advice (always get next to a table rather than underneath it) is based on several wrong assumptions:
. buildings always collapse in earthquakes (wrong- especially in developed nations, and flat "pancake" collapse is rare anywhere);
. when buildings collapse they always crush all furniture inside (wrong- people DO survive under furniture or other shelters);
. people can always anticipate how their building might collapse and anticipate the location of survivable void spaces (wrong- the direction of shaking and unique structural aspects of the building make this nearly impossible) ; and
. during strong shaking people can move to a desired location (wrong- strong shaking can make moving very difficult and dangerous).
Some other recommendations in the "triangle of life" e-mail are also based on wrong assumptions and very hazardous. For example, the recommendation to get out of your car during an earthquake and lay down next to it assumes that there is always an elevated freeway above you that will fall and crush your car. Of course there are very few elevated freeways, and laying next to your car is very dangerous because the car can move and crush you, and other drivers may not see you on the ground! A compilation of rebuttals from many organizations to these alternative recommendations, as well as news articles about the controversy, is listed at left.

PRACTICE THE RIGHT THING TO DO. IT COULD SAVE YOUR LIFE
You will be more likely to react quickly when shaking begins if you have actually practiced how to protect yourself on a regular basis. A great time to practice Drop, Cover, and Hold On is by participating in the Great California ShakeOut this October (and soon in other areas).
More information about what to do during an earthquake can be found at www.earthquakecountry.info/roots/step5.html.

Created in the SCEC system
Last modified: March 08 2010 18:39
© 2010 www.scec.org Southern California Earthquake Center @ www.usc.edu

>> We - "debunkers" - are paid to be here.
>> We - "debunkers" - are wrong while Nancy and the "Zetas" are right.
>> I - Circuit Breaker - am working at HP as part of some cover job.

Don't you feel better telling the TRUTH, rather than what you are PAID to say?



Last Edited by ***ZetaMaX*** on 03/25/2010 08:52 PM