Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Every allowance should be accorded. This woman speaks the "truth".

Working on a response ... SOON!

Last Edited by ***ZetaMaX*** on 11/11/2010 06:29 AM

Well MILF or not I for one would not im-bed that one......

Delving into the future, "get your lotto numbers from us!"

science is quite a leap of faith too - you didnt verify all those experiments made for all those hundreds of years to know is it true for yourself, didnt you? and not many people did [:)]

we just take their word for it.
[who knows - maybe they are telling lies to us about many things?]

in any case, one ends up chosing whom to believe (give his ceredence to) - science types or Nancy or whomever.

its "faith", this way or other

ZT would have to produce results before they could even try to reproduce them...

The TIPPING POINT is now less than 48 hours away!!!!!

Last Edited by ***ZetaMaX*** on 11/11/2010 09:50 AM

Good question. It WAS a "question" - or did you not notice the question marks. I wasn't implying that I had any answer, much less the correct one!



That would depend on the individual, the circumstances, the surrounding environment - many factors. Nancy is not "doing drugs", she's disseminating information with the intent of stimulating people to PREPARE for catastrophic change to the status quo. The fact that she may be doing it "imperfectly" is not the important consideration. She's pushing people to consider other "possibilities" - and in that endeavor, I SUPPORT HER!!!



Only if the truth is truly RELEVANT. In this case, it is SO IMPORTANT that people prepare for catastrophic change, that she is entitled to a pass in terms of her methodology.



You all are VERY hard-pressed to show how anyone has "catastrophically" suffered. Some folks lost a little money, and some a little "pride" - which is nothing compared to what unprepared folks stand to lose in the VERY near future!!!

So you like to confirm things for yourself? Why are you afraid to say how you confirmed Earth's rotation?

Why are you such a disingenuous pud?

Her Youtube channel holds some real gems.

[link to www.youtube.com]

On the main one she talks about making a bunch of money from some sort of 'rental' system for vids. I never heard of it. She goes on to specify that she charges more for the one where her bare breasts are shown. What a hoot(er)!

She is trying to get people to 'loan' her large amounts of money at the end of that main one. She's quite a piece of work!

I admire the way she just "puts herself out there". Her unpretentious puerility is truly awe inspiring!

Apparently there used to be this one of her dancing topless and I'm trying to search for it. Hard to believe it existed and nobody grabbed it. Inquiring minds want to know!


"Colleen Thomas dances to Something in your Mouth"

[link to www.youtube.com]

This site may have that Colleen dancing topless vid. If you look at those blacked-out vids, one or two of them are the right one of the nickelback song. The one dated in october may still be there, but I'm afraid to try to download it. When you click on it, it says you have to fill out a survey of some sort. I is askeerd to do it! Anybody brave?

[link to actualeurope.info]

No way will I exchange cookies with that site, Menow!

She's not that hot.

But good find nonetheless!

No way will I exchange cookies with that site, Menow!

She's not that hot.

But good find nonetheless!

Dude, those are aftermarket hooters.

I am fascinated by the phenomenon of this woman's sudden 'fame'. This one is truly bizarre. She claims to be wearing a skimpy bathing suit for 'scientific reasons', but then shamelessly offers more of the vid for money.

[link to www.youtube.com]

I found the below linked post to be generally true. The searches I did on that supposed vid of her dancing topless took me to UFO 'disclosure' interview sites, and the like. They were using search terms related to her vid as tags.

*******************************

[link to www.disclose.tv]

Post subject: Re: Mystery missile launchPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 7:19 am


Conspirator


Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 1:31 am
Posts: 1340 I did a little search (cause I'm naughty) and a funny thing happened. Seems people cannot find any Colleen Thomas nudes like you say there are but alot of MUFON reports now use "Colleen Thomas Nude/Naked" as their tags. I wonder how much attention she is drawing to certain ideas and topics by saying there are nude pics of her that are "circulating".

Maybe there are, don't really care all that much but on a brief whim I see quite a bit of sites using this rumor to draw attention to what they got goin on. Smart plan on her part or just people taking advantage of the situation?

What is this woman smoking!!

Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 11/11/2010 03:17 PM

Here's one where she promises a 'post-invasion' party for 3 days from now, brags about making 12K on her nude photos, promises more and is begging for financial backing re: that.




[link to www.youtube.com]

She's using her ass ets for the greater good ...

Last Edited by ***ZetaMaX*** on 11/11/2010 10:21 PM

No, science is not a leap of faith. Do you know why? Because tests have been done, data has been collected and theories were made based upon that data. Then, others observed, tested and verified the results. If the results were the same, a conclusion was formed based upon all that data. I don't need to repeat the experiments made for hundreds of years because they were already done...by others and it was documented.

Welcome to fail Andrew.

And when the silly TIPPING POINT crap that you are spouting about Melfy FAILS to materialize in the next few days then we shall be using your ass ets for the greater good.......of a prolonged

Shite!

Finally some common ground, Brother!

The creationists make that exact same argument too. "I believe in God and you believe in science! They're both belief and belief is faith, so you can't say that one is better than the other."

Of course faith isn't simply belief, it's strong belief even in the absence of evidence. That's a majorly important difference.

Here's some "science" for you:

[link to www.zetatalk.com]





Last Edited by ***ZetaMaX*** on 11/12/2010 07:49 AM

Max, the word 'science' doesn't mean what you think it does.

On a completely different note, has anyone here ever heard of a phenomena called 'the number stations?'

And THAT- IMHO is the crux of the matter....

no matter WHAT the evidence says otherwise
no matter HOW many times their predictions are wrong
no matter WHO they back, to be proven they are backing the wrong horse...


nancy liars followers have `faith'

`its a strong belief even in the ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE...'

(note that statement..)

in fact the more the absence of evidence, the stronger the faith...

hence the strongest belief by the ningers and nancy liars followers..
because the more the absence of evidence the stronger their belief..

zero evidence = infinite belief...

we have all seen the various socks/nutters and kooks put forward `their cases'

`the defence rests...

used to be heard around 7 megs???

They were common back when I was a youngster
did lots of `six.......two... three....'
crap
they got busted years ago in cb action magazine
most were fakes but some high powered stations in the states ran for years

everyone who had a beam knew who and what they were
much like the woodpeckers-a certain country tried for years to blame it on another country- shame that the ametuer radio operators knew different

see most have directional antennas and can quite easily use a map ( in fact almost all of them know their magnetic deviation and many with bigger beams can track overseas stations down to within a few hundred kilometers or so

then there are the `foxhunts'

thats a game played by cbers, hams, and even schoolkids

fox hides and transmits
hunters find

bloody good fun ( even if back when I was a p plater we sometimes had to `carry' our (parents) car out after we got a bit too enthusiastic hiding (right DK??)

anyone who has actually done a `foxhunt' knows how much pure B.S. is spread around about `secret squirrel' radio stations and `hidden bases' transmitting messages...


who do you think found the `woodpecker' (a Russian radar transmitter that was on an odd harmonic on the amateur bands???)

it as talked about worldwide for about a year before the usa even knew what it was...


and it took a few years before they actually went `slaps forehead' DOH- those pesky radio hams- anyone would think they knew what they were listening to....


(from memory- about 12 years from the woodpeckers first appearance to `DOH" time for the cia/fbi/ insert idiots here)