Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Watch this...

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

Let's see how quickly she brings out the banhammer.


What, specifically, was the bannable offense? Or has it been removed already?


Banned already. Basically, I stated that none of what Nancy was claiming had actually happened and that her statement about the Eurasian, North American and Pacific plates was silly since they didn't join anywhere and provided the map shown earlier today.

So, Max, what do you think about her claim that the North American, Eurasian and Pacific plates join?


Just add that one to the long list of things she either doesn't know how to do and know about.

She can't read a map.

She also knows nothing about tides, seismology, geology, plate tectonics, astronomy, aviation...ad infinitum.

So, Max, what do you think about her claim that the North American, Eurasian and Pacific plates join?


Just add that one to the long list of things she either doesn't know how to do and know about.

She can't read a map.

She also knows nothing about tides, seismology, geology, plate tectonics, astronomy, aviation...ad infinitum.


for someone supposedly transmitting messages from a higher more intelligent beings.She channels the most illogical things then tells us we humans dont have a clue.

She definitely knows nothing about tides. She continues to claim that the tsunami buoys (SAIC STB) show the ocean floor undulating in height.

Dare I say the woman has probably never lived by the ocean and watched the tide come in and out?

I get to see tidal action twice a day while driving to and from work - I have to drive over one of the tidal inlets on the outskirts of town.

She definitely knows nothing about tides. She continues to claim that the tsunami buoys (SAIC STB) show the ocean floor undulating in height.

Dare I say the woman has probably never lived by the ocean and watched the tide come in and out?

I get to see tidal action twice a day while driving to and from work - I have to drive over one of the tidal inlets on the outskirts of town.

Yeah, it gets pretty ridiculous. It's like she's totally blocked out the fact that the Y axis on those graphs is "water column height" and not "sea floor position." I mean, she posts stuff like this:

The sea floor had risen, then fallen, and these past couple weeks was positively undulating. So a "drop" in the sea floor (which has been at this for awhile in the Coral Sea) must be taken in the context of when a reading starts. It would just be dropping back to normal!
[link to poleshift.ning.com]

Huh, I wonder what could cause a sort of cyclical rising and falling in the height of the water column. Must be tectonic plates bouncing up and down, there's just no other explanation!

Someone should post a graph from like 10 years ago on the other side of the world with some of the text changed. I'm sure she'd see it as proof that the sea floor is doing something SHOCKING.

Ah, and there is ZM on cue, cheering for the banning of words he doesn't agree with, yet at the same time cowering that his own words might be banned.

Hypocritical, much?

Here's another person who can't understand orbital mechanics:

Thread: How do GEO-satellites (stationary) remain in orbit if they are NOT constantly falling around the earth? -- I'M CALLING YOU OUT!

A couple of people have explained it to him but he claims the information is all a lie. He claims to have a great intellect but offers no explanation of his own as to how satellites in geo-synchronous orbits stay up. He's definitely a candidate for Nancy's club.

Well the Australian floods have started to recede. My prediction: Nancy will find a story in the next week about flooded areas in Indonesia recovering and say "Aha! The sinking is complete and is now reversing. I never said anything about it being permanent..."

Watch this...

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

Let's see how quickly she brings out the banhammer.


What, specifically, was the bannable offense? Or has it been removed already?


Banned already. Basically, I stated that none of what Nancy was claiming had actually happened and that her statement about the Eurasian, North American and Pacific plates was silly since they didn't join anywhere and provided the map shown earlier today.

they DO join - near Japan, Bonin islands

[link to s707.photobucket.com]

How do you know it's him? I saw others call him that and he didn't deny it so I guess it must be.

Well the Australian floods have started to recede. My prediction: Nancy will find a story in the next week about flooded areas in Indonesia recovering and say "Aha! The sinking is complete and is now reversing. I never said anything about it being permanent..."


and she NEVER did! to the contrary, she said it WILL recede

Q.: Are parts of Australia along the Queensland coast to be permanently flooded due to elevation loss now? There is a quote in the link below that references "this hanging on for 12 months" [link to www.smh.com.au]

ZT: The establishment is desperate to prevent awareness of the presence of Planet X in the inner solar system, and has agreed among themselves that blaming rain and storm surge for the sinking of land in Indonesia would be the first volley against the ZetaTalk message. Thus, in Asia, any type of flooding, whether there has been rain or not, is blamed on rain in the media. Unexpected was the flooding in Queensland, as this had not been mentioned by ourselves. Australia was not included in the news blackout issued to cover our 7 of 10 predictions, and thus news of this flooding hit the world. We have explained that the water wash backing up rivers along the eastern coast of Queensland is due to the tilting of the Indo-Australian Plate, but as this phenomena had not been expected, the establishment was taken by surprise.

What does this mean? Is this a permanent state of affairs? That would hardly be the case, as water finds its level and the water heaped around the eastern edge of the Indo-Australian Plate is flowing in many directions to this end. The rivers will soon be flowing to the sea, unimpeded, and the flood waters draining as rapidly as they arrived.
EOZT

[link to www.zetatalk.com]

Good point. If Indonesia supposedly sank 80 ft...what's going to cause the flooding to recede? It should stay under water indefinitely. Care to explain that one Landrew?

Good point. If Indonesia supposedly sank 80 ft...what's going to cause the flooding to recede? It should stay under water indefinitely. Care to explain that one Landrew?