Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

`SNAP'

(shame I wasnt on a government paid program full of hackers with money to blow...)

I'd hack into maxipads account and use the `other end' of Gazmik's picture for maxipads account

LOL

Shit - 900 pages!

Clif right again? When was he ever right before? Unless you can show us where he specifically predicted this earthquake - you lose as usual. Simply saying there will be earthquakes is the same as saying there will be rain, tornadoes or hurricanes. These things happen on Earth.

And another thing....this doesn't look good for Nancy and her followers who claim that the USGS is downplaying earthquakes and trying to hide them:

From MSNBC:

"The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) upgraded the strength of the first quake to a magnitude 8.9"

I thought she said the USGS was lowering magnitudes?

Nancy and the Zetas WRONG AGAIN!

[link to fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com]



Don't say I never do anything for ya maxipad- look I even found a nice new avatar for you to use!!

(and from such a `fitting' website to boot....)

NOW I wish I was a `paid government debunker...
because if I was...

maxipads account would be SOOOO hacked right about now!!!!

(LOL- if I actually am a government paid debunker- maybe it will happen LOL- wouldn't that be a blast to see maxipad posting with a horses ass as his avatar...)

Preliminary report was 7.9 M (I've got the email alert).

"2011-03-11 05:46:23 (M 7.9) NEAR EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN 38.3 142.4 (43b63" from the email header

Nancy and her pathetic Zitas just CANNOT get ANYTHING right!!

Nancy....The "LOSING" LIEDer...and her numbnut Zitas.... yet again!!!!

Melfy has a PROVEN record of supporting doom prediction LOSERS!!

The Melfster is soooooo intelligent....NOT!!!

Hey guys. Had to bug out because of the tsunami. Everyone is fine here, no one hurt in the state that I know of, but there is going to be cleaning up for awhile.

Strangely, my very modest preparations (which Nancy and believers would say are FAR too little, but FEMA would say I'm doing a bit more than what they recommend) were more than enough to weather the tsunami. My property didn't even get wet, thankfully.

So, is Nancy claiming this is all caused by the gravity of her invisible inbound planet? Then why do I weigh the same if its gravitational force are so powerful?

Except that you spelled moron wrong. It has two o's and no a.

Hello CB!

I hope all is well! Ive just been doing my thing, as we all are...

Peace

Hello Earth.

I figured you were around somewhere. I haven't been spending as much time as I used to on GLP.

ooooops. Another fail for the bunkers who have stated on this very thread that earthquakes are always downgraded from the initial reported magnitude. Here we have a clear cut example of a reported earthquake being upgraded from a 7.9 to an 8.9. Will any be humble and honest enough to admit they were wrong? Hmmm.

Not likely. Honesty is not in their vocabulary. Nor is integrity...Max is proof of that.

Well "science" has failed us again. What's happening in Japan now is no "accident" but rather GROSS - even criminal - NEGLIGENCE. As you silly debunkers point out nauseatingly repeatedly "Japan has earthquakes". Yet they build nuclear power plants to the nines.

Yea - I "trust" human "science" ...

NOT

Clif has been saying diaspora Diaspora DIASPORA for a couple years now. Well NOW it looks like it's going to HAPPEN. Good thing I got a rather large house - I may soon have ALL of my west coast relatives here. All 8 of them.

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 03/12/2011 04:34 AM

As per usual Melfy you FAILED to address the ACTUAL issue regarding the accusations from your FAILED LIEDer that major earthquakes were having their magnitudes manipulated by the USGS as a way to coverup the presence of your zetacult's no show rogue planet. The UPGRADING of the 8.9 mag earthquake in Japan, from the original lower magnitude reported by the USGS, makes you zetaculties look once again stupid!!

Well done!!

And what has science got to do with Japan building nuclear power plants? Uh - NOTHING. Science didn't tell them to build a plant there. Human decision did.

Knowing you, if the same thing happened but the "Zetas" had told the Japanese to build there, you'd be okay with it.

What's to address? Isn't is "possible" that THIS time the USGS did it in order to discredit Nancy observations about past behavior??? (Note I said "possible", not "probable")

Since when was "science" and "human decision" distinguishable????

Dumbass, when did anyone here every say that building nuclear plants in highly seismic areas was a good idea? If those plants are there, it isn't the fault of science, but of governments. Big difference. I fail to see how this has anything to do with your previous assertions that the USGS always downgrades quakes. Not man enough to just admit you were wrong, right BridgetMax? I actually saw a clip yesterday where a USGS scientist said that this quake was extraordinary.

ROFLMAO. The USGS has probably never even heard of Nancy. I would bet they have better things to occupy them than a failed scam artist wannabe cult leader with no understanding of simple plate tectonics. What a fool you are, Max.

It was extraordinary - just as Clif predicted. No thoughts on his "diaspora" assertions? If we get three or four plants melting down (looks like we have at "least" one going that way for sure), will ANYONE want to be west of the Rocky Mountains? (or anywhere under the jet stream?)

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 03/12/2011 08:45 AM

So, if I decide to see a particular movie or have dinner at a certain restaurant, I'm using science to decide?

Wow, ever would have have thought. Here I thought maybe I was making my decision on what I liked and didn't like.

Show us, specifically, where Clif predicted this earthquake would happen. Can you? I thought not.

Here are some of my prediction:

There will be a powerful earthquake in CA.
Sometime between now and September, there will be several strong tornadoes in the mid-west.
Between August and October, a strong hurricane will form in the Atlantic ocean.

Now, you watch. When it happens, I expect you to come back and post "Circuit Breaker right again!"

Oh, and yes, I'd be willing to live west of the Rocky Mountains. Just because the core melts down doesn't mean absolute doom for the planet. For some reason, you think that a meltdown equates to several nuclear warheads going off and that isn't the case at all. You really need to read up on these things.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 03/12/2011 09:01 AM

Thread: Fallout from Japan meltdown could force evacuation of Western USA and destroy the midwest bread basket of the world

The problem in Japan is a lack of natural resources. So, they have to choose between nuclear power or importing fuels to generate electricity.

Perhaps - but ANYONE with the slightest knowledge of how nuclear plants work KNOW that ***RUNNING WATER*** is ***CRITICAL*** to prevent rod meltdowns. In a region such as this, plants should be sitting next to manmade LAKES and they should have five or six ways to pump the water to the rods - from diesal pumps to HAND ONES.

One of these:

[link to www.cleanairgardening.com]

pumps 40 - 90 gallons a minute. You get 100 people manning 20 of these with 2 inch hoses and you've got enough running water to avoid catastrophe.

INEXCUSABLE.

Hmmm, didn't see anything there that showed Clif predicted this earthquake. Nor did I see anything there that showed the west coast would be uninhabitable.

Here's some information for you...not that you'll believe it because it wasn't provided by the "Zetas" or Clif:

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

"A meltdown occurs when a severe failure of a nuclear power plant system prevents proper cooling of the reactor core, to the extent that the nuclear fuel assemblies overheat and melt. A meltdown is considered very serious because of the potential that radioactive materials could be released into the environment. A core meltdown will also render the reactor unusable until and unless it is repaired. The scrapping and disposal of the reactor core will incur substantial costs for the operator."

And:

The effects of a nuclear meltdown depend on the safety features designed into a reactor. A modern reactor is designed both to make a meltdown unlikely, and to contain one should it occur.

In a modern reactor, a nuclear meltdown, whether partial or total, should be contained inside the reactor's containment structure. Thus (assuming that no other major disasters occur) while the meltdown will severely damage the reactor itself, possibly contaminating the whole structure with highly radioactive material, a meltdown alone should not lead to significant radiation release or danger to the public.

Let's not forget, also, that Three Mile Island was a partial core meltdown and the amount of radiation released was small.

So, just because the core melts down doesn't mean total disaster. It will largely depend on the structural integrity of the reactor.