Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!! | |
walt User ID: 1427986 Zambia 06/14/2011 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Menow User ID: 1425087 United States 06/14/2011 12:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's about what caused Earth to allegedly halt. It wasn't claimed to be done by aliens, but rather caused by PX. Quoting: Menow 1421273correct Here, for man, dazed in the disinformation as the only fare given to him, a way to determine for himself the truth of the matter. Earth has halted, and reversed, because her bully brother Planet X is coming at her! Quoting: zetababble[link to www.zetatalk.com] Comets orbit the Sun in the same counterclockwise motion that the planets assume in their orbits. Thus, the May perihelion dates assumed an Earth running ahead of the comets, the comets needing this time to catch up to the Earth in her orbit. Earth stopped, reversed, and the dates have arrived early! Quoting: zetababble[link to www.zetatalk.com] During a recent Interview we were asked about the June 8 transit of Venus, which did not occur, though by the planet jam-up in front of Planet X it has pushed alongside the Earth due to the crowding the Dark Twin coming up behind the Earth in their shared orbit has created Quoting: zetababble[link to www.zetatalk.com] So he is correct `in a way' that the zetas didn't do it, planet x did... but being rather disingenuous in the way he does it IMHO Thanks for the information. I always assumed that she claimed it was of the Zeta’s doing. It is ridiculous either way, but I think it is important to be precise when citing her claims. If not, it gives them wiggle room to avoid defending these statements just as Volar did in that thread. "Volar" was waaayyy to 'slick' with that statement about the halted Earth. He knew exactly what 'he' was doing in setting up that confusion. He knew what was being asked and he knew how to mislead with his answer. He was simply playing with the poster who asked about the halted Earth claim. "Volar" is definately a plant or a true 'shill' for Zetatalk. He only plays 'dumb' for the effect and reaction it brings. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 06/14/2011 01:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 96644 United States 06/14/2011 02:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: **ZetaMax** An excellent list of 100% FAILURES of zetatalk. Her followers often post this link, but NOT A SINGLE ONE has EVER been able to show accuracy on a SINGLE ONE of those topics. NOT ONE. 100 % pure and utter FAILURE. |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States 06/14/2011 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: **ZetaMax** An excellent list of 100% FAILURES of zetatalk. Her followers often post this link, but NOT A SINGLE ONE has EVER been able to show accuracy on a SINGLE ONE of those topics. NOT ONE. 100 % pure and utter FAILURE. The Shroud of Yurin: [link to www.zetatalk.com] |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States 06/14/2011 02:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 See - it's not just about "money". |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 06/14/2011 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: **ZetaMax** Yes. Because *tourism* was a concern of people in the 14th century. I'd give Nancy three out of five for that one. I do happen to notice that when her claims coincide with traditional science, that those claims tend to be more correct. When they clash with traditional science, they tend to be amazingly wrong. Funny, that. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 06/14/2011 02:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States 06/14/2011 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually, rereading it -- one of five. Nancy claims it was made in the 1950s. Apparently very wrong. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444Hilarious - how the only time the debunkers admit to being in error, is when they give Nancy "too much" credit!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 973304 United States 06/14/2011 03:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually, rereading it -- one of five. Nancy claims it was made in the 1950s. Apparently very wrong. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444Hilarious - how the only time the debunkers admit to being in error, is when they give Nancy "too much" credit!!! At least the debunkers can admit an error. Nancy, on the other hand, can't afford to allow a blemish on the "100% correct" froth from the Zetas. |
Setheory User ID: 869850 United States 06/14/2011 03:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually, rereading it -- one of five. Nancy claims it was made in the 1950s. Apparently very wrong. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444Wasn’t there a scientific analysis done in the 1970s that showed it to be 6-7 hundred years old? So the fact that it was a forgery was common knowledge in 1996. The only part she had to guess at was when and by whom. Her guess was an epic fail on both counts. I think your “1 of 5” is being rather generous. I can't believe she hasn't removed that fail from her site. |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 1428439 New Zealand 06/14/2011 06:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How can anyone be proud of "1000" pages - filled with juvenile nonsense like this??? Quoting: **ZetaMax**How can anyone be "proud" of following and supporting the "collection of pages" that make up zetatalk - filled with bizarre nonsense and failed predictions??? Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 1428439 New Zealand 06/14/2011 06:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually, rereading it -- one of five. Nancy claims it was made in the 1950s. Apparently very wrong. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444Hilarious - how the only time the debunkers admit to being in error, is when they give Nancy "too much" credit!!! Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
The Commentator User ID: 587619 United States 06/14/2011 11:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Max, it's your turn to start the campfire tonight, here at Camp Nancy-L! Quoting: Volar 1427325I'll set up my telescope. Andrew is very excited about Uranus. I'm glad he's got something besides sex on his mind tonight. Hurry on back to the campsite, Maxy-poo! How can anyone be proud of "1000" pages - filled with juvenile nonsense like this??? So remove yourself and your lying, bullshit filled posts and the level of juvenile nonsense will decline to non detectable levels. non sufficit Orbis Being a zetatard means never having to make sense. "Nancy pays me to post on Her threads" Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill NO max/bridget EVER!!!!! NO luser EVER!!! NO clunker EVER!!!!! |
The Commentator User ID: 587619 United States 06/14/2011 11:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: **ZetaBridget** An excellent list of 100% FAILURES of zetatalk. Her followers often post this link, but NOT A SINGLE ONE has EVER been able to show accuracy on a SINGLE ONE of those topics. NOT ONE. 100 % pure and utter FAILURE. The Shroud of Yurin: The Shroud of WHAT? Jesus H. Tapdancing Christ the Jew, you are a stupid fuck. non sufficit Orbis Being a zetatard means never having to make sense. "Nancy pays me to post on Her threads" Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill NO max/bridget EVER!!!!! NO luser EVER!!! NO clunker EVER!!!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 06/15/2011 01:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually, rereading it -- one of five. Nancy claims it was made in the 1950s. Apparently very wrong. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444Hilarious - how the only time the debunkers admit to being in error, is when they give Nancy "too much" credit!!! Actually, I have admitted to being wrong several times, over my posts. That I gave Nancy too much credit in error is ironic, I'll certainly grant. It's also ironic you picked a Nancy post she still has up on Zetatalk that is yet another patently false Nancy claim. You have a good eye, ZM. |
aussie 763624 User ID: 763624 Singapore 06/15/2011 03:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Those in the Service-to-Other have little use for lies and seldom employ them. Quoting: nancyTHE NING/forum/topics/zetatalk-chat-for-april-16?id=3863141%3ATopic%3A429470&page=5#comments Hoisted by her own petard... How many times has she been busted lying now??? (for dawgs sakes- it's how she got the nickname nancy LIEder!!!) But we all know the difference between what she describes as STO behaviour and what she displays as her own behaviour. |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 1332505 United States 06/15/2011 06:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: **ZetaBridget** An excellent list of 100% FAILURES of zetatalk. Her followers often post this link, but NOT A SINGLE ONE has EVER been able to show accuracy on a SINGLE ONE of those topics. NOT ONE. 100 % pure and utter FAILURE. The Shroud of Yurin: The Shroud of WHAT? Jesus H. Tapdancing Christ the Jew, you are a stupid fuck. It's what NANCY had as her link on this page: [link to www.zetatalk.com] I was just being accurate in citing her. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1428328 United States 06/15/2011 06:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Setheory User ID: 869850 United States 06/15/2011 10:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's what NANCY had as her link on this page: Quoting: **ZetaMax**[link to www.zetatalk.com] I was just being accurate in citing her. That's pretty funny. Thanks for the clarification. |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States 06/15/2011 11:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's what NANCY had as her link on this page: Quoting: **ZetaMax**[link to www.zetatalk.com] I was just being accurate in citing her. That's pretty funny. Thanks for the clarification. Of course I would expect the debunkers to be "amused" by a trivial inaccuracy on a page devoted to "accuracy". |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 06/15/2011 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's what NANCY had as her link on this page: Quoting: **ZetaMax**[link to www.zetatalk.com] I was just being accurate in citing her. That's pretty funny. Thanks for the clarification. Of course I would expect the debunkers to be "amused" by a trivial inaccuracy on a page devoted to "accuracy". I even more amused by GLARING inaccuracies in a failed belief system among who's cornerstones include supposed '100 percent accuracy'(except for the random wandering white lies). |
walt User ID: 1053029 Zambia 06/15/2011 04:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aussie 763624 User ID: 763624 Singapore 06/15/2011 05:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lunar Eclipse now on in South Africa. Guess it means that Nancy was wrong about the earth halted in it's orbit for a few years now... Quoting: waltNooo... get with the program! iIt means that the zetas (who can't move the Earth) but can move other planets, and even stars around to make everything seem `normal' apparently)- magiced their magnatrons, beebled their bobblers, leaned hard to larboard and turned 90 degrees R.A. and behold... The Solar system appears all normal! (apart from the bits that aren't- but they can't be seen by multi-million dollar telescopes or satellites, only with `special' 5 buck phone cameras...) laughs |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 06/16/2011 10:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 06/16/2011 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aussie 763624 User ID: 1258784 Australia 06/16/2011 11:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm amazed that ZM hasn't bumped this. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444So is Nancy even addressing the Lunar eclipse? Volar is debating that GOTOs can easily track skies even with a ten degree error on another thread right now... Another one of his `ingenious' style of quotes I suspect (got a link?) They will `track' no matter where you actually point them in the sky- as the tracking is done in the older models by a clockwork mechanism and the newer ones electric motors. However to actually get usable results ie pictures from them you would have to center them quite accurately (at least you mob in the northern hemisphere have the polar star to help, us lot south have to use compasses and figure out local deviation etc to get accurate results (which is why the `my compass is wrong' mob always make me laugh as well- it would show very quickly for the amateur astronomers in the southern hemisphere taking long exposure star shots) |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States 06/16/2011 11:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm amazed that ZM hasn't bumped this. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 06/16/2011 11:39 PM |
aussie 763624 User ID: 763624 Singapore 06/17/2011 08:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | :bumpgirl: Quoting: **ZetaMax**How can anyone be proud of "1000" pages - filled with juvenile nonsense like this??? INDEED, maxipad, INDEED How indeed could `anyone' be proud of 1000 pages of juvenile nonsense like this?? perhaps `anyone' could enlighten us why he felt it necessary to post such juvenile nonsense like this :bumpgirl: Anyone??? |
aussie 763624 User ID: 763624 Singapore 06/17/2011 08:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | :bumpgirl: Quoting: **ZetaMax**How can anyone be proud of "1000" pages - filled with juvenile nonsense like this??? faxing thuse pesky`misspullins again I c maxipud (I couldn't quite catch the misspelling you seem to have caught) in `How can anyone be proud of "1000" pages - filled with juvenile nonsense like this???' would you care to point it out?? |