Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!! | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 04/15/2012 05:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to poleshift.ning.com] Quoting: Menow 14092435 Notice that there are three shots showing the alleged "object". The image marked "10:00pm" shows the full view from the cam. The other 2, including the one marked "5:00pm"(it's actually 6:40 from the timestamp, and the bottom one is at 6:30), have the images CROPPED so as to not show that the moon is actually in the full frame. Nancy is hiding the fact that the moon is NOT behind the camera, as she has claimed, and is in fact causing that lens flare. Nancy is caught skewing data AGAIN! Well, Nancy has never been known for being genuine or honest. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Menow User ID: 14092435 United States 04/15/2012 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13806508 United States 04/15/2012 10:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re an earlier post: I think Nancy and ZetaTalk have many of the elements of a cult. However, this is ameliorated by the members not being in one geographic location. The majority of these believers probably have people in their lives who are not believers who would be a stabilizing presence were something extremely self-destructing be demanded. |
aussie 763624 User ID: 763624 Singapore 04/16/2012 04:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re an earlier post: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13806508 I think Nancy and ZetaTalk have many of the elements of a cult. However, this is ameliorated by the members not being in one geographic location. The majority of these believers probably have people in their lives who are not believers who would be a stabilizing presence were something extremely self-destructing be demanded. I dont know about that, there were at least two I saw on the ning a while back that were packing up/leaving their jobs and houses (one willing to accept less than half market value!!) to move to `safe locations' when the 7 of 10 was ramping up (supposedly) I know of one IRL (who was the major reason I started debunking nancy in the first place) that lost their job, family and house because of the 2003 `white lie', and who is probably dead by now- last seen living in drains and under bridges in my home town then he just disappeared one day and hasnt been seen since... I suspect that many family breakups occur rather than being `dragged back to reality' they would rather leave `disbelievers'- its often been said that their families would `come to their senses' when the signs become `inescapable' IMHO it certainly classifies as a cult- even if their members are geographically spread they certainly meet all the other criteria and watching the more `rabid believers' at the ning, they certainly use each other as a support system same as any other cult- maybe an online cult??? |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 04/16/2012 08:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And then there's Free Store....who moved his family, built a bunker and prepared for the end. Then - nothing happened. But instead of realizing the error of his ways, he continued to cling to his belief that "Planet X" was coming. His wife, on the other hand, did come back to reality. She tried to get Free Store to give up on "Planet X" but he wouldn't - so she left. Free Store is so dedicated to Nancy and "Planet X" that, in August 2007, he declared he would commit suicide in September if it didn't show up. Fortunately, he didn't...but only because he claimed "Planet X" did show up. When "debunkers" tried to discuss the situation with him, he claimed to have called the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and filed a report with them that if anything should happen to him they should investigate the "debunkers" on this thread. What a laugh. Not ONE "debunker" ever threatened him...if anything, the RCMP would find that the only one who threatened him harm was himself. Now, here we are several years later...and instead of admitting the errors of his ways, he has simply disappeared. Pretty much like we predicted he would. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Menow User ID: 14092435 United States 04/16/2012 12:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | *********************** [link to poleshift.ning.com] "Comment by astrogal50 28 minutes ago @Martin GD: Whatever the Canadian Establishment may be claiming about geology and earthquakes, it is important to remember that the cover up of Planet X and the pending pole shift is massive and widespread. No one is going to admit the truth about the real cause of the increase in frequency and magnitude of quakes, including in unusual locations. ANY explanation is better, including the Establishment Lie going around now that somehow melting glaciers are causing earthquakes. ZetaTalk on science always trumps human science, every time, and that includes Establishment Lies and debunking in the mainstream media. Thanks." |
prof-rabbit nli User ID: 14522853 Australia 04/16/2012 12:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
prof-rabbit nli User ID: 14522853 Australia 04/16/2012 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
walt User ID: 14525614 Zambia 04/16/2012 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This new entry by Astrogal is priceless: Quoting: Menow 14092435 *********************** [link to poleshift.ning.com] "Comment by astrogal50 28 minutes ago @Martin GD: Whatever the Canadian Establishment may be claiming about geology and earthquakes, it is important to remember that the cover up of Planet X and the pending pole shift is massive and widespread. No one is going to admit the truth about the real cause of the increase in frequency and magnitude of quakes, including in unusual locations. ANY explanation is better, including the Establishment Lie going around now that somehow melting glaciers are causing earthquakes. In fact, it's so good (the cover-up) that not a single person has seen it...LOL! |
Menow User ID: 14092435 United States 04/16/2012 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then I was right and Nancy has it backward. Everything Nancy and "Zetas" say about the location of the "Dark Twin" from that image is just right out the window. Now I wonder... will anybody there read this and tell her? Quoting: Menow 14092435 No. Because if they did, she'd delete their post and ban them...even if they were a die harder supporter simply trying to point out a mistake. Interesting little observation. On both the 04/09/2012 and 04/13/2012 images that show the supposed dark twin, the Moon was at an azimuth of roughly 90°. Therefore, I have come to the conclusion that what we have is a classic lens flare caused by an off-side image (i.e., the Moon). Of course, Nancy spins this into light bending and other bullshit she doesn't understand. I'm surprised that the ning moderators haven't deleted the post saying it's a lens flare. Of course, as before, I've done a PDF capture of that thread on the nigh to preserve things for posterity. So, Bob, will you post that capture? I think it will show that Nancy altered the Zetatalk on that page the next morning to hide her error. |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 14541857 New Zealand 04/16/2012 06:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So... the ningers have found a moment in a vid from Neumayer where the "object" is seen overlapping the building, proving that it's a flare. I'm not sure how Nancy is going to spin that. Quoting: Menow 14092435 OMG. Nancy has CHANGED the "Zetatalk" since last night to reflect what I/we pointed out here- that the camera is FACING THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. In other words, she has reversed her previous statement that the came was FACING NORTH and just added some incomprehensible gobbldygook to RE-"explain" things. Did anyone get a capture from last night of that page? "....and just added some incomprehensible gobbldygook to RE-"explain" things.... Something that Ms LIEDer has truly mastered over the years to fool the gullible. Lol, it's ALL she's got!! Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 14541857 New Zealand 04/16/2012 06:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi everybody, Quoting: prof-rabbit nli 14522853 Just dropped in to wish everyone a happy April 17th, did Hap get his steak dinner ? Keep up the good work Melfey ! Hi there, Prof-rabbit. Yes; Hap did indeed receive his "steak dinner"......well eventually. Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7468171 United States 04/16/2012 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then I was right and Nancy has it backward. Everything Nancy and "Zetas" say about the location of the "Dark Twin" from that image is just right out the window. Now I wonder... will anybody there read this and tell her? Quoting: Menow 14092435 No. Because if they did, she'd delete their post and ban them...even if they were a die harder supporter simply trying to point out a mistake. Interesting little observation. On both the 04/09/2012 and 04/13/2012 images that show the supposed dark twin, the Moon was at an azimuth of roughly 90°. Therefore, I have come to the conclusion that what we have is a classic lens flare caused by an off-side image (i.e., the Moon). Of course, Nancy spins this into light bending and other bullshit she doesn't understand. I'm surprised that the ning moderators haven't deleted the post saying it's a lens flare. Of course, as before, I've done a PDF capture of that thread on the nigh to preserve things for posterity. So, Bob, will you post that capture? I think it will show that Nancy altered the Zetatalk on that page the next morning to hide her error. To my amusement, that post is still on the ning! Tom |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7468171 United States 04/16/2012 07:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, Bob, will you post that capture? I think it will show that Nancy altered the Zetatalk on that page the next morning to hide her error. Quoting: Menow 14092435 Here's the original text from the capture I did on 4/13: "The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on the left) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a north view, in fact, but would require a solid west view." Here's what is posted now: "The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on the right) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a South view, in fact, but would require the cam to be looking in the other direction." Second paragraph (original): "The cam shot that matches the capture states "View from the communications radome to the north side of the base." At midnight GMT the station is positioned such that the cam is looking out into space behind the dark side of the Earth. DT is behind the Earth in its orbit and also falling outside the orbit to be a bit behind the Earth. Thus someone (cam) looking north from the station would see it on their left, which is what the photo showed." ...and what is posted now: "The cam shot that matches the capture states "View from the communications radome to the north side of the base." At midnight GMT the station is positioned such that the cam is looking out into space from the dark side of the Earth. Dark Twin is now rising in the cam from the west, seen more distinctly as the cam turns with the rotation of the Earth to look toward the West. Almost behind the Earth in its orbit and also falling outside the orbit to be a bit behind the Earth. Thus someone (cam) looking South from the station at about Latitude 60 would see it passing from right to left, which is what other photos show. As for her image from skymap, she is obviously unable to use it properly. She's probably got it set for Wisconsin and is incapable of figuring out how to change it to the coordinates for the Neumayer Station and set the correct time zone (Neumayer has no offset for GMT). |
Menow User ID: 14092435 United States 04/17/2012 12:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, Bob, will you post that capture? I think it will show that Nancy altered the Zetatalk on that page the next morning to hide her error. Quoting: Menow 14092435 Here's the original text from the capture I did on 4/13: "The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on the left) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a north view, in fact, but would require a solid west view." Here's what is posted now: "The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on the right) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a South view, in fact, but would require the cam to be looking in the other direction." Second paragraph (original): "The cam shot that matches the capture states "View from the communications radome to the north side of the base." At midnight GMT the station is positioned such that the cam is looking out into space behind the dark side of the Earth. DT is behind the Earth in its orbit and also falling outside the orbit to be a bit behind the Earth. Thus someone (cam) looking north from the station would see it on their left, which is what the photo showed." ...and what is posted now: "The cam shot that matches the capture states "View from the communications radome to the north side of the base." At midnight GMT the station is positioned such that the cam is looking out into space from the dark side of the Earth. Dark Twin is now rising in the cam from the west, seen more distinctly as the cam turns with the rotation of the Earth to look toward the West. Almost behind the Earth in its orbit and also falling outside the orbit to be a bit behind the Earth. Thus someone (cam) looking South from the station at about Latitude 60 would see it passing from right to left, which is what other photos show. As for her image from skymap, she is obviously unable to use it properly. She's probably got it set for Wisconsin and is incapable of figuring out how to change it to the coordinates for the Neumayer Station and set the correct time zone (Neumayer has no offset for GMT). Yes. What about the actual "Zetatalk" below that? The crucial issue is that she has altered the bit between the official "SOZT" and "EOZT" markers. Can all this be made to appear as a screenshot on that Zetasquawk site or somewhere? |
Menow User ID: 14092435 United States 04/17/2012 12:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Circuit Breaker No. Because if they did, she'd delete their post and ban them...even if they were a die harder supporter simply trying to point out a mistake. Interesting little observation. On both the 04/09/2012 and 04/13/2012 images that show the supposed dark twin, the Moon was at an azimuth of roughly 90°. Therefore, I have come to the conclusion that what we have is a classic lens flare caused by an off-side image (i.e., the Moon). Of course, Nancy spins this into light bending and other bullshit she doesn't understand. I'm surprised that the ning moderators haven't deleted the post saying it's a lens flare. Of course, as before, I've done a PDF capture of that thread on the nigh to preserve things for posterity. So, Bob, will you post that capture? I think it will show that Nancy altered the Zetatalk on that page the next morning to hide her error. To my amusement, that post is still on the ning! Tom Right, it is. Nancy just used it as an example for the flock as to what will happen if you question anything the almighty "Zetas" proclaim. Heh. |
Menow User ID: 14092435 United States 04/17/2012 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's the original text from the capture I did on 4/13: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7468171 "The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on the left) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a north view, in fact, but would require a solid west view." Here's what is posted now: "The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on the right) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a South view, in fact, but would require the cam to be looking in the other direction." I think Nancy actually had one bit right the first time, but then reversed it to being wrong the second time. It's in red. She clearly has no idea what she is talking about. |
Menow User ID: 14092435 United States 04/17/2012 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's the original text from the capture I did on 4/13: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7468171 "The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on the left) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a north view, in fact, but would require a solid west view." Here's what is posted now: "The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on the right) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a South view, in fact, but would require the cam to be looking in the other direction." I think Nancy actually had one bit right the first time, but then reversed it to being wrong the second time. It's in red. She clearly has no idea what she is talking about. Wait... now *I'm* concused- I think what I just posted is wrong... at least I will ADMIT it! |
Menow User ID: 14092435 United States 04/17/2012 03:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 04/17/2012 04:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2457378 Canada 04/17/2012 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And then there's Free Store....who moved his family, built a bunker and prepared for the end. Then - nothing happened. But instead of realizing the error of his ways, he continued to cling to his belief that "Planet X" was coming. His wife, on the other hand, did come back to reality. She tried to get Free Store to give up on "Planet X" but he wouldn't - so she left. Quoting: Circuit Breaker :free: Free Store is so dedicated to Nancy and "Planet X" that, in August 2007, he declared he would commit suicide in September if it didn't show up. Fortunately, he didn't...but only because he claimed "Planet X" did show up. When "debunkers" tried to discuss the situation with him, he claimed to have called the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and filed a report with them that if anything should happen to him they should investigate the "debunkers" on this thread. What a laugh. Not ONE "debunker" ever threatened him...if anything, the RCMP would find that the only one who threatened him harm was himself. Now, here we are several years later...and instead of admitting the errors of his ways, he has simply disappeared. Pretty much like we predicted he would. |
Free Store User ID: 2457378 Canada 04/17/2012 05:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And then there's Free Store....who moved his family, built a bunker and prepared for the end. Then - nothing happened. But instead of realizing the error of his ways, he continued to cling to his belief that "Planet X" was coming. His wife, on the other hand, did come back to reality. She tried to get Free Store to give up on "Planet X" but he wouldn't - so she left. Quoting: Circuit Breaker :free: Free Store is so dedicated to Nancy and "Planet X" that, in August 2007, he declared he would commit suicide in September if it didn't show up. Fortunately, he didn't...but only because he claimed "Planet X" did show up. When "debunkers" tried to discuss the situation with him, he claimed to have called the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and filed a report with them that if anything should happen to him they should investigate the "debunkers" on this thread. What a laugh. Not ONE "debunker" ever threatened him...if anything, the RCMP would find that the only one who threatened him harm was himself. Now, here we are several years later...and instead of admitting the errors of his ways, he has simply disappeared. Pretty much like we predicted he would. Thanks for all them years of laughs, turkey. Never married but maybe after the Pole Shift..... |
bob_909 User ID: 7468171 United States 04/17/2012 06:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes. What about the actual "Zetatalk" below that? The crucial issue is that she has altered the bit between the official "SOZT" and "EOZT" markers. Quoting: Menow 14092435 Can all this be made to appear as a screenshot on that Zetasquawk site or somewhere? Original from 04/13/2012 9:14pm SOZT 4/13/12 Clearly not the Moon (which was nearly Full and in any case behind the cam) nor the Sun (as the object appears in the middle of the night just before and after midnight), this is a capture of the Dark Twin. The cam is on the S Pole, looking North, and as such the cam, or a human viewer, would be looking at midnight directly out into space on the dark side of Earth. Looking to the left is looking West, which is where the Dark Twin rides. We had warned that the twin would tend to move BEHIND the Earth as these planets are squeezed in the cup, and thence escape by moving back into space behind the Earth. There are also other possibilities, one of which is to have the twin pass the Earth and attempt to escape by moving forward in their shared orbit. At present, the twin is caught slightly behind the Earth in their shared orbit, and moving outside of their orbit back into space. EOZT Current: "SOZT 4/13/12 Clearly not the Moon (which was nearly Full and in any case behind the cam) nor the Sun (as the object appears in the middle of the night just before and after midnight), this is a capture of the Dark Twin. The cam is near the S Pole, looking at the North facing side of the structure, and as such the cam, or a human viewer, would be hanging upside down looking directly out into space on the dark side of Earth. Where the Dark Twin should be riding to the West, behind the Earth in their shared orbit, it appears to be almost overhead, directly behind and somewhat to the South of the Earth. We had warned that the twin would tend to move BEHIND the Earth as these planets are squeezed in the cup, and thence escape by moving back into space behind the Earth, passing the Earth in their shared orbit. We mentioned these possibilities, that the Dark Twin would pass the Earth and attempt to escape by moving forward in their shared orbit. At present, the twin is caught behind the Earth in their shared orbit, and moving along outside of their orbit behind the Earth out in space. It is trying to evade conflict with the Earth by dropping below the Ecliptic somewhat, as it attempt to slide past the Earth. EOZT Significant changes between the original and what is currently posted. I should note, however, that I have not highlighted all the differences between the two versions of the post. As for the pdf capture that I copied the original post from, it has not been altered in any way except to extract the one page from the original nine page document. capture: [link to www.zetasquawk.com] I should also note that she has a big problem with directions. The camera is not facing WEST, it is facing EAST. I will be providing an image capture from the camera that shows the Moon in the sky with a comparison image from Cartes du Ciel for the same position, date and time. Last Edited by bob_909 on 04/17/2012 08:00 PM “Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14481685 United States 04/17/2012 06:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 14608467 New Zealand 04/17/2012 08:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thanks for all them years of laughs, turkey. Never married but maybe after the Pole Shift..... Quoting: Free Store 2457378 Yes it was quite obvious that you had a longtime burning desire to "bed" and eventually "marry" your doomsday "wetdream", aka Ms Nancy LIEDer, before the geographical poleshift that never was. fortunately for Ms LIEDer her sole "handmaiden" desires were towards her glorious Overlords, The Zetas, thus preventing her from ever having to address your pathetic attempts, Mr FrEaKy, to persuade Nancy to move in with you in your secluded "doomsday" bunker way out there in the dense woods of Canada. Now crawl back from whence you came you freaken loon Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 14608467 New Zealand 04/17/2012 08:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think Nancy actually had one bit right the first time, but then reversed it to being wrong the second time. It's in red. She clearly has no idea what she is talking about. Quoting: Menow 14092435 Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
bob_909 User ID: 7468171 United States 04/17/2012 08:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's the rather quickly put together page showing which way the Neumayer Station III camera is facing. [link to www.zetasquawk.com] “Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 04/17/2012 09:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thanks for all them years of laughs, turkey. Never married but maybe after the Pole Shift..... Quoting: Free Store 2457378 This is proof positive that either Nancy or her minions monitor what goes on here. Free Store hasn't been around here in a long time. Someone must have told him. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 04/17/2012 09:32 PM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4832919 United States 04/17/2012 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thanks for all them years of laughs, turkey. Never married but maybe after the Pole Shift..... Quoting: Free Store 2457378 This is proof positive that either Nancy or her minions monitor what goes on here. Free Store hasn't been around here in a long time. Someone must have told him. Freaky probably never left, and even one as rock hard stupid as he is must get tired of his manifest shortcomings being pointed out at such great length. |
Menow User ID: 14092435 United States 04/17/2012 10:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's the rather quickly put together page showing which way the Neumayer Station III camera is facing. Quoting: bob_909 [link to www.zetasquawk.com] I think Nancy NOW says the cam faces south, but also says that as Earth rotates the cam looks west. As usual, what she says is pretty confusing- intentionally so, I suspect. |