Is our Solar System a Binary Star System? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 438726 United States 12/30/2009 03:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 12/30/2009 04:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 438726 Thanks for the reference... Will scope it out and post excerpts here if they fit.. Much appreciated! |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 12/30/2009 11:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 12/30/2009 09:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Vedic Medic User ID: 853357 United States 12/30/2009 09:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Vedic Medic User ID: 853357 United States 12/30/2009 09:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 12/30/2009 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/01/2010 03:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 803157 United States 01/01/2010 03:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If our sun does have a companion star it has to be pretty far out there. First off a brown dwarf will be 10 to 75 times the mass of Jupiter. Jupiter is a very bright object. So for an object 10 to 75 times more massive not to be seen and not to have a obvious impact on the sun and planets gravitationally, it has to be atleast a lightyear or more away. Still it is plausible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 842606[link to news.discovery.com] The companion in the binary system gets no closer than 30 AU from the Sun. [link to www.google.com] |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/01/2010 07:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If our sun does have a companion star it has to be pretty far out there. First off a brown dwarf will be 10 to 75 times the mass of Jupiter. Jupiter is a very bright object. So for an object 10 to 75 times more massive not to be seen and not to have a obvious impact on the sun and planets gravitationally, it has to be atleast a lightyear or more away. Still it is plausible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 803157[link to news.discovery.com] The companion in the binary system gets no closer than 30 AU from the Sun. [link to www.google.com] Assuming the tremendous body of detailed research on this blog is accurate, and there's no reason NOT to, your 30AU distance concept may be accurate when the companion body is not in it's perihelion maneuver. During this transition, there's nothing to prohibit the object from getting MUCH closer than that. Also, the research here bears out that brown dwarf sub-stars may be as small as 3-7 Jupiter masses.... Our magnetosphere is being HIGHLY disrupted, and the rest of the planets in our system are heating up probably due to the approaching magnetic node rings surrounding the dwarf as it executes the perihelion maneuver... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 852549 United States 01/01/2010 07:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If our sun does have a companion star it has to be pretty far out there. First off a brown dwarf will be 10 to 75 times the mass of Jupiter. Jupiter is a very bright object. So for an object 10 to 75 times more massive not to be seen and not to have a obvious impact on the sun and planets gravitationally, it has to be atleast a lightyear or more away. Still it is plausible. Quoting: Dream Killer[link to news.discovery.com] The companion in the binary system gets no closer than 30 AU from the Sun. [link to www.google.com] Assuming the tremendous body of detailed research on this blog is accurate, and there's no reason NOT to, your 30AU distance concept may be accurate when the companion body is not in it's perihelion maneuver. During this transition, there's nothing to prohibit the object from getting MUCH closer than that. Also, the research here bears out that brown dwarf sub-stars may be as small as 3-7 Jupiter masses.... Our magnetosphere is being HIGHLY disrupted, and the rest of the planets in our system are heating up probably due to the approaching magnetic node rings surrounding the dwarf as it executes the perihelion maneuver... Seems to me the magnetosphere has been pretty stable and hasn't been getting many 'hits' at all. I see the increased fireball/comet activity as being good indiciators of this theory, but the magnetosphere is activity has been minimul lately. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 846541 United States 01/02/2010 03:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please refer to the following technical research detailing the disruptions I'm referring to with regard to the magnetosphere of our planet: [link to www.astro.auth.gr] Enjoy! |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/02/2010 03:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please refer to the following technical research detailing the disruptions I'm referring to with regard to the magnetosphere of our planet: [link to www.astro.auth.gr] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 846392 United States 01/02/2010 03:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If our sun does have a companion star it has to be pretty far out there. First off a brown dwarf will be 10 to 75 times the mass of Jupiter. Jupiter is a very bright object. So for an object 10 to 75 times more massive not to be seen and not to have a obvious impact on the sun and planets gravitationally, it has to be atleast a lightyear or more away. Still it is plausible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 803157[link to news.discovery.com] The companion in the binary system gets no closer than 30 AU from the Sun. [link to www.google.com] didn't you read my initial post in the first page? I'm not GLP's foremost intellect for nothing! Sirius is our companion star, the sun is a wormhole and conduit for inter-dimensional light |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/02/2010 04:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also consider this secondary reference... The magnetosphere of our planet IS DEFINITELY weakening and is being distrupted by SOMETHING.... The approach of a brown dwarf into our locality celestially would certainly explain this as the magnetic node rings of the object impact our planet as it draws nearer.. This is an object, BTW, that can NOT be seen by telescopes under many scenarios detailed earlier in this blog... [link to www.brighthub.com] |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/02/2010 04:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to video.google.com] Please take some time and review this material... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 855184 Canada 01/02/2010 04:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also consider this secondary reference... The magnetosphere of our planet IS DEFINITELY weakening and is being distrupted by SOMETHING.... Quoting: Dream KillerThe approach of a brown dwarf into our locality celestially would certainly explain this as the magnetic node rings of the object impact our planet as it draws nearer.. This is an object, BTW, that can NOT be seen by telescopes under many scenarios detailed earlier in this blog... [link to www.brighthub.com] its the second sun great info thanks... |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/02/2010 04:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If our sun does have a companion star it has to be pretty far out there. First off a brown dwarf will be 10 to 75 times the mass of Jupiter. Jupiter is a very bright object. So for an object 10 to 75 times more massive not to be seen and not to have a obvious impact on the sun and planets gravitationally, it has to be atleast a lightyear or more away. Still it is plausible. Quoting: Dream Killer[link to news.discovery.com] The companion in the binary system gets no closer than 30 AU from the Sun. [link to www.google.com] Assuming the tremendous body of detailed research on this blog is accurate, and there's no reason NOT to, your 30AU distance concept may be accurate when the companion body is not in it's perihelion maneuver. During this transition, there's nothing to prohibit the object from getting MUCH closer than that. Also, the research here bears out that brown dwarf sub-stars may be as small as 3-7 Jupiter masses.... Our magnetosphere is being HIGHLY disrupted, and the rest of the planets in our system are heating up probably due to the approaching magnetic node rings surrounding the dwarf as it executes the perihelion maneuver... I think I already answered this... While Sirius may represent a "triad" system we're in, and they ARE proven to exist, in this forum, I'm talking about a different object that doesn't fit the description you detailed. While "generally" accurate, theories are proven by their exceptions. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 855184 Canada 01/02/2010 04:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 564424 United States 01/02/2010 04:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd like to open a venue for the placement of information regarding our solar system actually being a BINARY system, with a Brown Dwarf as the companion star... Quoting: Dream Killer 843139I have a good amount of information and links I'll be posting to this thread, and am interested in hearing from anyone with information, opinion, or curiosity regarding this possibility. YES, it IS a "shooting gallery" out there.... And we are in it! Your links and proof are bullshit. Any two-bit math major can prove it. Planets would experience a period of slow orbit while closest to the binary twin, they would all do this, and they would all do it in the same relative area of orbit. None of them do. |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/02/2010 04:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ps. the reoccurring theme of this years crop circles was based on earths magnetisphere.. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 855184You raise an EXCELLENT sidebar issue... Not only have the crop circles represented changes in the magnetosphere, but also, they have been eerily tied to Mayan geometry and diagrams.... Here's a recent one of the MANY that have occurred this year.. [link to angularmomentum.eu] Please also look at this video relating your magnetosphere/crop circle connection: [link to www.youtube.com] Thanks for the post! Last Edited by Dream Killer on 01/02/2010 05:01 AM |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/02/2010 04:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'd like to open a venue for the placement of information regarding our solar system actually being a BINARY system, with a Brown Dwarf as the companion star... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 564424I have a good amount of information and links I'll be posting to this thread, and am interested in hearing from anyone with information, opinion, or curiosity regarding this possibility. YES, it IS a "shooting gallery" out there.... And we are in it! Your links and proof are bullshit. Any two-bit math major can prove it. Planets would experience a period of slow orbit while closest to the binary twin, they would all do this, and they would all do it in the same relative area of orbit. None of them do. By all means... Please enlighten us! The orbits of the outer planets have LONG been exhibiting perturbations over many years, these have STILL remained unexplained. I would LOVE to see your mathematical proof of YOUR solution to this celestial dynamic anomaly! Probably would get you a Nobel! Last Edited by Dream Killer on 01/02/2010 04:23 AM |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/02/2010 04:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh and BTW Anonymous Coward 564424.... The elliptical orbits of ALL the planets demonstrate by the very nature of BEING an ellipse that there are TWO foci in the dynamic... Again, I'm waiting on the edge of my chair for your mathematical proof... Assuming, of course, that you are BEYOND some "two-bit" math major... (or at LEAST on the same "par" as one...) Well? Last Edited by Dream Killer on 01/02/2010 04:43 AM |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/02/2010 04:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Back to the magnetosphere for a follow-up... Here is probably one of the best singular resources CONFIRMING the distortion/disruptions in our magnetosphere.. [link to www2.nict.go.jp] REAL TIME CURRENT GRAPH: [link to www2.nict.go.jp] Last Edited by Dream Killer on 01/02/2010 04:48 AM |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/02/2010 06:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/02/2010 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nomuse (NLI) User ID: 834029 United States 01/02/2010 08:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh and BTW Anonymous Coward 564424.... Quoting: Dream KillerThe elliptical orbits of ALL the planets demonstrate by the very nature of BEING an ellipse that there are TWO foci in the dynamic... Again, I'm waiting on the edge of my chair for your mathematical proof... Assuming, of course, that you are BEYOND some "two-bit" math major... (or at LEAST on the same "par" as one...) Well? What, you re-writing Newton and Kepler now? No. You don't need two foci to make an elliptical orbit. I'd be interested in these supposed unexplained peturbations of yours...yes, I know there are still some...but it was by examining those that we discovered Pluto...which is forty AU out, a fraction of the mass of the Moon, has an apparent magnitude of only 15 but was predicted and located in 1930! Seems to me a body several times the mass of Jupiter, brilliant in infrared, getting to within 30 AU, and actively interfering with the solar magnetic field, would have been spotted well before Pluto was. It certainly wouldn't hide even from amateurs until 2010. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 855770 Canada 01/02/2010 08:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/03/2010 09:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh and BTW Anonymous Coward 564424.... Quoting: nomuse (NLI) 834029The elliptical orbits of ALL the planets demonstrate by the very nature of BEING an ellipse that there are TWO foci in the dynamic... Again, I'm waiting on the edge of my chair for your mathematical proof... Assuming, of course, that you are BEYOND some "two-bit" math major... (or at LEAST on the same "par" as one...) Well? What, you re-writing Newton and Kepler now? No. You don't need two foci to make an elliptical orbit. I'd be interested in these supposed unexplained peturbations of yours...yes, I know there are still some...but it was by examining those that we discovered Pluto...which is forty AU out, a fraction of the mass of the Moon, has an apparent magnitude of only 15 but was predicted and located in 1930! Seems to me a body several times the mass of Jupiter, brilliant in infrared, getting to within 30 AU, and actively interfering with the solar magnetic field, would have been spotted well before Pluto was. It certainly wouldn't hide even from amateurs until 2010. All of the research links regarding your questions are already posted on this blog in earlier pages... BTW: If you go back and check the research links out thoroughly, the explanation WHY the object isn't visible even in the infrared, is that it may be a very COLD object. The GP-8 project, which can find objects just above absolute zero DID locate such an object. Not once, but TWO times! Before a third measurement could be made to triangulate the positions, and calculate orbit ellipse, the project was supposedly shut down. Amateurs do NOT have access to this kind of technology, it is FAR to expensive. The reason they "said" the GP probe was shut down was because it ran out of supercooled helium, which allowed it to measure such cold objects. ALL of this research is available on earlier pages... Thanks for the cogent conversation! Last Edited by Dream Killer on 01/03/2010 09:25 PM |
Dream Killer User ID: 846541 United States 01/03/2010 09:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh and BTW Anonymous Coward 564424.... Quoting: nomuse (NLI) 834029The elliptical orbits of ALL the planets demonstrate by the very nature of BEING an ellipse that there are TWO foci in the dynamic... Again, I'm waiting on the edge of my chair for your mathematical proof... Assuming, of course, that you are BEYOND some "two-bit" math major... (or at LEAST on the same "par" as one...) Well? What, you re-writing Newton and Kepler now? No. You don't need two foci to make an elliptical orbit. I'd be interested in these supposed unexplained peturbations of yours...yes, I know there are still some...but it was by examining those that we discovered Pluto...which is forty AU out, a fraction of the mass of the Moon, has an apparent magnitude of only 15 but was predicted and located in 1930! Seems to me a body several times the mass of Jupiter, brilliant in infrared, getting to within 30 AU, and actively interfering with the solar magnetic field, would have been spotted well before Pluto was. It certainly wouldn't hide even from amateurs until 2010. OH BTW: Here's the PROOF of ellipses requiring TWO foci.. Sure YOU aren't trying to rewrite Newton and/or Kepler? [link to en.wikipedia.org] You'll note for an ellipse to occur in a planetary body, both F1 and F2 are required, at least that's what the physicists say, check the above link for yourself. Last Edited by Dream Killer on 01/03/2010 09:30 PM |