COMET C2012/S1 ISON : COMA/TAIL OF OVER 64,400 KM [UPDATE]

Yeah, I'm still waiting a Ninja and you are not.
Next:
1) incorrect axiom #1 states that there is only gravity governing the cosmos AND MORE IMPORTANTLY that outer space is universally electrically neutral

2) incorrect axiom #2 states that the solar system began all at one time 4.5 billion years ago

3) incorrect axiom #3 states that comets were thought to be dirty snow balls that "melt" (sublimate) when near the sun

4) incorrect axiom #4 states that the cause of galactic red shifts is due to movement (they failed to realize there is another source of red shift ... the induced electric dipole red shift) and they incorrectly concluded that the universe must be expanding

Ah Mr Batshit crazy makes an appearance, when will your red karma friend join in.
The three stooges- Glauco, Da Fuq and dvcmcm, a comedy act if I've ever seen one.

Discuss how everything you believe in is dead wrong.

Or leave




Last Edited by Da fuq on 04/06/2013 07:26 AM

Hey Archimedes, answer that: Thread: WHY Pluto Was Downgraded To a Minor Planet?



.

Hehehehehe. I never see these guys before.
Why don't you discuss the topic rather then offending people?

Last Edited by glauco on 04/06/2013 07:29 AM

He is an Ad hominem like astro



Let me go into the bowels of this thread and find another example.




Ah yes the bitchass comedian.

Last Edited by Da fuq on 04/06/2013 07:31 AM

For starters you're ignorant of what the word axiom means.

Then somewhere astroboys only response to that was a link to some mainstream science shill wesbite where you have to be a member to even read the gay article.

Lol, see, you are funny. So as per your logic everything I believe is wrong and you and the other two stooges are right?

Later we discuss that, now let's discuss the axioms.

Later we discuss the axioms meaning, now let's discuss the axioms?

This is a clear indication of what I meant about your logic and not 'owning' anyone. You make no sense at all, are you scratching your own head reading that back?

Ah, so peer reviewed journals are "shill websites" now. Well as a real scientist with peer reviewed publications and having served as a peer reviewer I can officially say that is horse shit and that you are incredibly ignorant. You just admitted you will automatically ignore any and all research from scientists, so that makes you a bigot as well.

She wants to discuss the meaning of the word axiom, I want to discuss the axioms itself. If I'm presenting them, for sure I know what an axiom is. So to keep the focus, let's talk about the four axioms and later we discuss the meaning of the word. You guys move the focus all the time.

After one page nobody yet started discussing the four axioms, instead they are confusing the topic. Let's see how it started:



So I said:


And he said:


So I concluded:


Anybody ready to discuss the axioms?

What part of shill website shillin' for the mainstream did you not understand?

What part of bigoted ignoramus did you not understand?

You have no power here, astroboy.



Last Edited by Da fuq on 04/06/2013 08:10 AM

Halcyon is a woman?



It's all too evident now.

Alcyon and Hydra. But they are hard, I already tried an approach.

You ARE NOT a real Scientist, you dont deserve that rank you are an astronomer afficionado with a telescope in the backyard.

YOU ARE NOT AN ASTRONOMY DOCTOR.

you dont believe me? guys search his starting posts....

We have known this.

Last Edited by Da fuq on 04/06/2013 08:25 AM

If you don't know what an axiom is you can not claim they are axioms.


IOW you are right because you are right.
Circular.


First establish they are axioms.


Look who's talking. Like all woowoos you're in love with the Gish Gallop.


First proof they are axioms.

You are so full of shit.


The lecherous Latino Lothario shtick does nothing to for your credibility.
It just exposes your bigotry. Again.



What is your evidence for this accusation?


Yes?


Everybody knows that.
Everybody also knows his knowledge of astronomy is vastly superior to that of any woowoo.

Now you're done ad homming care to attack the EVIDENCE?

Why are woowoos so stupid?
Every single time they attack the messenger and not the message they demonstrate their inabilitty to deal with the facts.
Every single time they do so their credibitlity sinks even deeper in the negative numbers.
So why do they do it?

Yes, actually I am.

I'm not a professional astronomer, but I am a professional scientist. I'm also quite good at astronomy which is something I do for the enjoyment of it.

Hey, drop the wall of text and pick up the house.

It is almost as if you just went and pulled a scripture from the bible, then presented it as evidence to me.



So dense

Last Edited by Da fuq on 04/06/2013 08:50 AM

But, to you, ANY website that doesn't support YOUR beliefs is a shill website.

And you do?