love how flat earth was a thing and now its a trickle...

Actually, looks like a large portion of your red comes from people calling you out for being a stupid fuck.

I said the proof is out there you just don't want to see it.

That's what i hear from space believers.

Herp derp i dun seen round circles in the sky that means I live on a ball herp

No.

There is a movement to silence flat earth across the internet.

Here it is deleted, supporters of it banned and riduculed, which is why you dont' see much of it here anymore.

On other conspiracy sites it's much of the same.

On youtube the meme is for popular youtubers to make at least one video making fun of flat earth and some youtubers dedicate their whole channel to trying to debunk it.

I say trying by the way because they aren't debunking the whole idea of a flat earth, they are simply targeting specific flat earth supporters and their videos and just focusing on those, which is hardly debunking of the whole idea.


Furthermore the "earth changes" you refer to are happening to tie in with the fake alien war coming soon and the aliens will have people convinced that the earth is dying and we have to leave.

Therefore the need for getting on the ships.

Pro tips being dropped here guys.

Last Edited by JamesDean420 on 08/17/2018 01:25 PM

Awww, does the poor wittle Flat Erfer's pussy hurt?

Green!!! whats that supposed to prove, let me clarify the Galileo test for you since you didnt listen in 3rd grade.

you take two water wells at the same exact time of day in two different locations miles away.
when you look down the well with the sun directly overhead, the sun light travels straight down the shaft creating zero shadow.
then at the same exact time look down the other well miles away you notice the shadow is slightly off and and to the side.
you then take a measurement and calculate the distances and angles of the shadow you get the measurement for the "WHOLE Circumference" of the earth "AS A BALL" explain just this, maybe you can use some of that green to help you science.

or how about visiting the youtoob link I posted and answer any one of those questions, bet you cant.

and no in no way shape or form am I going to the bible, heck no, just used it to point to how your beliefs are based off of a book that has been proven to be a compilation of older books from a much older culture so to use it as a basis that proves a theory cant be used.

You are so sure the earth is flat, but you cant in any way shape or form tell us "WHY?" it is flat, I mean if it is flat then your side is leaving out the implication that it had to of been created, and artificially created for some ulterior purpose, well if its flat, whats the purpose? who cleans the cage per say, why keeps the lights running?

you cant even explain why it was created, and by who? you claim to be baited into a religious discussion, but your whole theory sits on a religious foundation. see even your own arguments doesnt hold water, how can an argument be won or a theory be proven if you leave out more than half of the information and important data, a theory gets proven when ALL the facts prove the theory.

Love love love how your side always tries and avoids these parts of the theory just yelling out "the earth is flat!!"" then when others ask you to prove it all your side does is call names, talk in circles, provides no testable evidence or proof, then you try and convoluted the topic with all these turns, twists, & quips and still you have not provided any proof at all, what so ever, only saying "its out there, look it up" how does that prove your point?.

why should we look it up when you are the one who jumped in here with all these claims, hey like the other poster said, we dont have to provide proof to things that have already been proven by science, its your side who needs to provide proof to your claims that the science is wrong, prove it!

but nooo, please take my reply apart and try and point at aspects of each sentence that you can twist, but yeah don't provide some proof or evidence to back your claims, neigh saying is always a scientific method to prove a theory.

Im sure just my ability to stand up to ignorance and flat earth trolls will get my green up, just watch, all of those who agree with me will green me up all kinds just on principle, then I will be a scientist like you, do you put "I have green on resumes?" lol.

Ok wait, you look down 2 water holes miles apart (impossible because you are only one person and cannot be at two places at once)

so these water holes have a shadow (like Plato's cave and everything else that the sun shines on when producing shadows)

Now you pretend to do some maths, and this is the really cute part. You measure the shadows, and you suddenly find the shadow with an equation that you cannot explain for that particular shadow of those water holes (anywhere on the earth it doesn't matter just some shadows (this is almost as good as the magical gravity theory) and then magically you come out with what, a ball?

Dude you sound freaking insane. Galileo was propaganda. Its absurd.

If that has to be 3rd grade, then it's stupid. I wasn't taught that experiment in 3rd grade. But we did drop a medicine ball from a high building to observe the magical gravity.



Marilyn Monroe held up a map of flat earth in one of her modeling shoots. She was a recent person so does that count? Just because the theory is old doesn't mean it has to be wrong. I'm saying that the heliocentric model is wrong. Doesn't matter who thinks it is or not. Stick to the facts of why you assume it's a globe scientifically.



By this logic because the human form is so well designed, then you have to explain to me how you exist also.



You are the one tap dancing like crazy around the plain obvious glaring fact that the horizon is a straight line. You can't get more obvious that your math is wrong.

I do not know the shape, size, dimensions of this place we call Earth. You'd be wiser to admitting the same thing. I do, however, know how water behaves - it always displays a flat surface despite what is underneath it, it can't bend, it can't display convexity of a shape on the surface. This is the experience of every single person alive or indeed everyone whom has ever lived. This common knowledge of how water behaves denies a globular earth. Of course you are freely open to challenge but you must display evidence of said claim. The claim of a globe Earth deny this practical reality.

Surely if we are to try and engage in a reasonable discourse then we must agree to first principles.

Idealism over realism? Fuck that.

Definitive yes.
trickle-down talking point tactic to avert eyes from actual Earth changes happening.

Over-saturation to dazzle & confuse.

Only ones behind are malicious and dumb sheep.

Not constant.
Also unrelated to flat-earth and a scarecrow to imply that a scientific idea widely thought of now is definite or unchanging.

That is the beauty of science and method.
Actualization and the ability to update itself when presented with new concepts.

The speed of light is definitively not constant, but holds the key to understanding the universe as vibration and frequencies, entanglement and even space/time travel.

Yes, that is an important subject, but again, unrelated to FE-tarding.
Mixing both also takes away credence to discussing it seriously.

Good point from Hydra I have to say.

Sure Hider won't need you to fight made up battles. This was regarding intellectual honesty and although you can't see it it has a massive amount to do with the earths shape. The question(s) have been avoidedfor six weeks......
you just continue denying reality you fool

project all you want.

"you can't see it it has a massive amount to do with the earths shape."
non. ad hominem. and not even you can digress about what you accuse me of.

"The question(s) have been avoidedfor six weeks"
Just saw it, told you about it, even the question was not for me. You even keep attacking me, regardless of how much I agreed with you on how massive the "speed of light" thing is.

"you just continue denying reality you fool"
Your laking tools for reason, comprehension, research and logic make a fool not of me.

Are you ignoring common sense and direct reality on purpose or are you unaware of the cult you are born into??

What a clown you are. Fuck hijacking others conversation can you explain how water can conform to the exterior of a shape???

1. You actually will not find someone more outside of the mass cult than me.

2. Centripetal force, first thing I mentioned. Your lack of comprehension for it regards scale of size and velocity.

keep projecting, you just trololo

I never have been a flat-earther and anybody that is probably just like the map earther than science being high on the list. A 10 minute vid by Neal Adam's on the Expanding Earth is the reason for the 'distraction'. You might want to explore that theory for it's validity. I'm impressed and I understand mechanics pretty good. It would not do the current version much good as the public would be looking for a refund, a big one.

Navigation software would make for an accurate model of the sky so the measurements you get should be valid without question. With that in mind some observation of the shadow on the moon might be able to determine if the shadow is even possible without a round earth.
A map and an accurate timeline of a variety of yacht races should give you host of time/speed/wind from around the world and especially the southern seas

Navigation software comes with star charts and a smart phone can determine your location close enough that errors are going to show up. If current photos were 'processed' that might also be fed into the program and if the data comes from a telescope its location is accurately known.
The wobble would be a different size in the north and south in a flat earth. I'm not sure how that is shown considering the time it takes for 1 revolution. shots of the same object from different locations might help show a ball rather than a table.

Oil companies use gravity as a way to determine what is below, some of that data might be available. A ball would have the center of the core as the direction gravity would take and they are more than a little careful to get their location right.

I'll add some more once I have some, lol.

Oh, the British I-don't-know-how-the-flat-earth-looks-and-I-have-no-flat-eart​h-model-but-but-but-I-know-that-Earth-is-flaaaaaaat-tard is on the thread.

Yup, the "Ignore" feature of the forum is a nice and useful feature.



.

Charlatan

1) There were two persons
2) The magic word is "meridian transit"

And again the flattards show that they are the people who have the least knowledge about the topic they are babbling about. But thanks for the laughs.

.

Are you beinf strupid for stupids sake?

yeah the two well experiment is simple you just stupided right over it and that you dont know it m=just shows how much your intellect covers, and proves my point "TROLL"

no man, you have someone else look down the well, and because your too dense to get the concept, the sun light shines straight down the well shaft, where the opening doesnt make any kind of shadow on the wall. and that the same time "SOMEONE ELSE" at the other well looks down that one, and the shadow is off slightly "DUE TO THE EARTHS CURVATURE!!" then the angle of the shadow, the measurement of how far off it is byy degrees, then extrapolate and you get the measurement for the curvature of the Earth and then extrapolate even further and you get the whole measurement for the distance of the earth and its 360 degree measurement, and that you dont know this and cant understand tells me all I need to know about how smart you are, and how much we should put into stock the extent of your intellect.

and any further explanation will be lost on you due to your lack of understanding of simple math.

and that you actually claim Galileo is propaganda further tells me your nothing but a troll and no matter how much math we provide or how much proof gets shoved in your face, you will deny it for the sake of denying it, which pretty much tells me that you would of fit right in during the inquisition and all the fear mongering and falsehoods surrounding the ignorant fear of witchcraft, and no matter how much we prove it to you, you will still look at us with that stupid look on your face.

we get it your ignorant and just like an autistic spectrumy slant sloped forehead you will always go full retard at the slightest sign of actual math, physics, & science.

I know when you cant fix stupid, and that time is now.

I now get it, you dont actually care about actual facts you only care about appearing retarded and frustrating those of us who want to have an actual fact based conversation.....A TROLL

Flat earthers make the rest of the conspiracy/GLP crowd look like retards.

I can't even think of a more ridiculous theory, except maybe the "lunar bukkake" theory that someone came up with to describe how the supposed flood happened...

Now that you called something you've NOT investigated stupid, prove scientifically curvature (and not a boat going over the horizon!) and axial rotation and you'll have some credibilityor STFU!

Now that you called something you've NOT investigated stupid, prove scientifically curvature (and not a boat going over the horizon!) and axial rotation and you'll have some credibility or STFU!

For me, it's photographing stuff that should be totally obscured by the "curvature" (according to GLOBE-Earthers, not Flattists.)

Globesters desperately scream "Refraction!" every time.

It's almost like "Gravity" being an excuse for everything.

LOL!

How can we even see "Stars" allegedly "Light-Years" from us when there is the well-known principle of the Inverse Square Law applying to all electromagnetic radiation?

No doubt the NASA boyz and their socks will be on this, stat!

Gotta be GRAV-O-TEE, right?

"5. The Experimental Demonstration of the Curvature of the Earth's Surface.

By H. Yule Oldham, M.A.

In 1870 Dr. A. R. Wallace performed his well-known Bedford Level experiment. In the summers of 1900 and 1901 a series of similar experiments was made with the special object of obtaining photographic records of the same. The Bedford Level is a portion of the Fens north of Ely, through which in the seventeenth century two great canals were made, shortening the course of the Ouse. Of these, one, the New Bedford river, is tidal ; the other, the old Bedford river, has locks at each end, and presents long, straight stretches of water without current or tide. The six-mile stretch of the old Bedford river between Welney and Denver was selected, as it is perfectly straig-ht, has a bridge at each end, but none in between. The height of the parapet of Welney bridge above the water level was measured, a mark was set up on Denver bridge at the same height above the water-level, and midway — three miles from each end — a mark was set up on a pole at the same height above the water-level. A telescope was then directed from the parapet of Welney bridge to the mark on Denver bridge, and the middle mark was seen to stand up about six feet above the line of sight, agreeing with the effect calculated to be produced by the curvature of the earth's surface."
[link to archive.org (secure)]

Was repeated numerous times since then and was a standard experiment for British school kids until the late 20th century.

And I would like to know why you won't accept a boat going over the horizon. Because it proves you wrong?

The shape of Earth and Earth rotation are two different things. Thus lets first establish the shape of Earth before we go to the rotation.

.

--

Last Edited by syncro on 08/18/2018 08:59 AM

Can't help it can you?
Lies. Blatant fucking lies. No curvature has been detected or measured EVER. The drawings of what someone seen through a telescope is not very scientific is it? Regardless of what little book you find it in......religious spastic.