| Users Online Now: 1,442 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 165,309 | |
| Pageviews Today: 222,818 | Threads Today: 94 | Posts Today: 922 |
| 01:51 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,442 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 165,309 | |
| Pageviews Today: 222,818 | Threads Today: 94 | Posts Today: 922 |
| 01:51 AM | ||
Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 82710290  Venezuela09/29/2022 04:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
QuoVadis  User ID: 84270067  Germany09/29/2022 04:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" people don't realize yet Thread: Russian Ambassador to Washington accused the United States of provoking a clash of nuclear powers The art of propaganda lies in understanding the emotional ideas of the great masses and finding, through a psychologically correct form, the way to the attention and thence to the heart of the broad masses. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75843986  United States09/29/2022 05:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 84241987  Australia09/29/2022 05:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77034040 09/29/2022 09:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78205049 United States09/29/2022 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73231483 United States09/29/2022 09:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78794998 United States09/29/2022 09:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| darth User ID: 50477462 United States09/29/2022 10:38 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" I cannot embed the video on this crappy tablet computer, but there was a GREAT video on utube last night. Canadian Prepper interviewed David Pyne who has quite the resume regarding war and nuclear weapons. Pyne is the first guy I have heard that understands that the Russians have far more nukes than we do. He estimates the Chicoms may have up to 4,000 warheads as well. He concludes that if there is a WWIII, the USA will lose decisively. Go to utube and search for Canadian Prepper. Look for the video titled “Buckle Up”. Our leaders in the West are leading us into a deadly conflict with two nuclear armed nations. Apparently, there is no effort in Congress or the Maladministration of Joseph the Usurper to build more nukes. Even if YOU personally believe that nuclear wars cannot be won, the Russians and CCP do not agree. Like Pyne said, “Of course you can win a nuclear war. We proved that in 1945”. It is past time to prep for what is coming. |
| Dogsbollocks User ID: 79380926  United Kingdom09/29/2022 10:47 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" Going to be an interesting day at UN tomorrow for sure. Top of the agenda the act of terrorism committed on Nord Stream 1/2. The Russians will be delivering a speech on what they know about it.And who they think is responsible. I think US will counter Russia accusations,By directly blaming Russia for the attack. Calling for Article 5 to be invoked. Not to be missed this one. Might be the last UN meeting. Dogsbollocks |
| Revbo™ User ID: 80902948 United States09/29/2022 10:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" I cannot embed the video on this crappy tablet computer, but there was a GREAT video on utube last night. Quoting: darth Canadian Prepper interviewed David Pyne who has quite the resume regarding war and nuclear weapons. Pyne is the first guy I have heard that understands that the Russians have far more nukes than we do. He estimates the Chicoms may have up to 4,000 warheads as well. He concludes that if there is a WWIII, the USA will lose decisively. Go to utube and search for Canadian Prepper. Look for the video titled “Buckle Up”. Our leaders in the West are leading us into a deadly conflict with two nuclear armed nations. Apparently, there is no effort in Congress or the Maladministration of Joseph the Usurper to build more nukes. Even if YOU personally believe that nuclear wars cannot be won, the Russians and CCP do not agree. Like Pyne said, “Of course you can win a nuclear war. We proved that in 1945”. It is past time to prep for what is coming. I agree with most of that, but 1945 was a special situation where the recipient of the bombs had no answer to them other than surrender, more comparable to Europeans having guns and Indians having bows and arrows than anything going on now. Guaranteed, if the Japanese had had nukes, Honolulu and San Francisco would have looked like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yeah, China and Russia have more combined nukes than we do, but we have plenty to get the job done. They would certainly destroy us in a nuclear war, but it would be the most pyrrhic victory (if it even would be a victory) in the history of the world. Last Edited by Revbo™ on 09/29/2022 10:50 AM John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. |
| Revbo™ User ID: 80902948 United States09/29/2022 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" Going to be an interesting day at UN tomorrow for sure. Quoting: Dogsbollocks Top of the agenda the act of terrorism committed on Nord Stream 1/2. The Russians will be delivering a speech on what they know about it.And who they think is responsible. I think US will counter Russia accusations,By directly blaming Russia for the attack. Calling for Article 5 to be invoked. Not to be missed this one. Might be the last UN meeting.  John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80949212 United States09/29/2022 11:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| darth User ID: 52029541 United States09/29/2022 11:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" I cannot embed the video on this crappy tablet computer, but there was a GREAT video on utube last night. Quoting: darth Canadian Prepper interviewed David Pyne who has quite the resume regarding war and nuclear weapons. Pyne is the first guy I have heard that understands that the Russians have far more nukes than we do. He estimates the Chicoms may have up to 4,000 warheads as well. He concludes that if there is a WWIII, the USA will lose decisively. Go to utube and search for Canadian Prepper. Look for the video titled “Buckle Up”. Our leaders in the West are leading us into a deadly conflict with two nuclear armed nations. Apparently, there is no effort in Congress or the Maladministration of Joseph the Usurper to build more nukes. Even if YOU personally believe that nuclear wars cannot be won, the Russians and CCP do not agree. Like Pyne said, “Of course you can win a nuclear war. We proved that in 1945”. It is past time to prep for what is coming. I agree with most of that, but 1945 was a special situation where the recipient of the bombs had no answer to them other than surrender, more comparable to Europeans having guns and Indians having bows and arrows than anything going on now. Guaranteed, if the Japanese had had nukes, Honolulu and San Francisco would have looked like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yeah, China and Russia have more combined nukes than we do, but we have plenty to get the job done. They would certainly destroy us in a nuclear war, but it would be the most pyrrhic victory (if it even would be a victory) in the history of the world. Revbo, with all due respect, I studied nuclear war strategy at the Hudson Trade School for Wayward Boys. Later, I was involved in nuclear strategy while working on Reagan’s Star Wars programs. Right now, I have the book “Soviet Strategy for Nuclear War” based on THEIR training documents. This is how the Russians would expect to win a nuclear war: 1. Multiple warheads on each silo to ensure destruction. 2. Destroy all aircraft on the ground and ships in port with SLBMs. 3. Destroy every carrier battle group and sub at sea using nuclear depth charges and torpedoes. 4. Destroy the comm facilities on land with SLBMs to prevent launch codes from being transmitted to subs on patrol that may have survived. 5. AVOID hitting cities. They are hostages. 6. Demand negotiation/surrender or the cities would be hit. The only counter is a President who will retaliate even if over 90% of our nukes are destroyed in the first strike. YES, the Russians and Chicoms would be taking a huge risk. However, in their calculation it might be the only move that they think they have. IMHO, the probability that Putin will use tactical nukes in Ukraine is over 75%. How do we prevent escalation? A more basic question: What is the US national interest in Ukraine that requires us to spend so much blood and treasure while risking annihilation? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 84287764 United States09/29/2022 11:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| darth User ID: 49317300 United States09/29/2022 11:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" So...everyone here thinks the most destructive weapons are Nukes? U guys are so armchair 1940's and have no idea what's in the classified cabinet. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84287764 I worked on a few weapons programs and invented one myself. However, nothing that I saw rivaled the power of thermonuclear weapons. I was not in the Black World; I lived next door. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81642511 United States09/29/2022 11:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" be careful with this warnews247.gr website. I've seen some trash there. Rather surprising "Dugin" doesn't know how many nuclear warheads Russia really has. 7 days ago Russian weapon systems include 4,477 deployed and reserve nuclear warheads, with about 1,900 of these being "non-strategic" warheads, otherwise known as tactical nuclear weapons, according to the... |
| darth User ID: 50464908 United States09/29/2022 12:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" be careful with this warnews247.gr website. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81642511 I've seen some trash there. Rather surprising "Dugin" doesn't know how many nuclear warheads Russia really has. 7 days ago Russian weapon systems include 4,477 deployed and reserve nuclear warheads, with about 1,900 of these being "non-strategic" warheads, otherwise known as tactical nuclear weapons, according to the... Russians LIE! I worked on a program over 20 years ago when I was an aerospace engineer. We were paying them billions to dismantle nukes. I know this will come as a total shock, but they CHEATED! I estimate they have over 20,000 warheads. In that program I learned that US inspectors were not allowed to witness the actual destruction of the nukes. The Russians said that would be “espionage”. They said we should rely on our Russian employees who all happened to be retired military officers. Our employees told us, “If we help you too much, we will be executed”. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 82565261 United States09/29/2022 12:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Revbo™ User ID: 80902948 United States09/29/2022 12:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" I cannot embed the video on this crappy tablet computer, but there was a GREAT video on utube last night. Quoting: darth Canadian Prepper interviewed David Pyne who has quite the resume regarding war and nuclear weapons. Pyne is the first guy I have heard that understands that the Russians have far more nukes than we do. He estimates the Chicoms may have up to 4,000 warheads as well. He concludes that if there is a WWIII, the USA will lose decisively. Go to utube and search for Canadian Prepper. Look for the video titled “Buckle Up”. Our leaders in the West are leading us into a deadly conflict with two nuclear armed nations. Apparently, there is no effort in Congress or the Maladministration of Joseph the Usurper to build more nukes. Even if YOU personally believe that nuclear wars cannot be won, the Russians and CCP do not agree. Like Pyne said, “Of course you can win a nuclear war. We proved that in 1945”. It is past time to prep for what is coming. I agree with most of that, but 1945 was a special situation where the recipient of the bombs had no answer to them other than surrender, more comparable to Europeans having guns and Indians having bows and arrows than anything going on now. Guaranteed, if the Japanese had had nukes, Honolulu and San Francisco would have looked like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yeah, China and Russia have more combined nukes than we do, but we have plenty to get the job done. They would certainly destroy us in a nuclear war, but it would be the most pyrrhic victory (if it even would be a victory) in the history of the world. Revbo, with all due respect, I studied nuclear war strategy at the Hudson Trade School for Wayward Boys. Later, I was involved in nuclear strategy while working on Reagan’s Star Wars programs. Right now, I have the book “Soviet Strategy for Nuclear War” based on THEIR training documents. This is how the Russians would expect to win a nuclear war: 1. Multiple warheads on each silo to ensure destruction. 2. Destroy all aircraft on the ground and ships in port with SLBMs. 3. Destroy every carrier battle group and sub at sea using nuclear depth charges and torpedoes. 4. Destroy the comm facilities on land with SLBMs to prevent launch codes from being transmitted to subs on patrol that may have survived. 5. AVOID hitting cities. They are hostages. 6. Demand negotiation/surrender or the cities would be hit. The only counter is a President who will retaliate even if over 90% of our nukes are destroyed in the first strike. YES, the Russians and Chicoms would be taking a huge risk. However, in their calculation it might be the only move that they think they have. IMHO, the probability that Putin will use tactical nukes in Ukraine is over 75%. How do we prevent escalation? A more basic question: What is the US national interest in Ukraine that requires us to spend so much blood and treasure while risking annihilation? Oh, don't get me wrong, brother. I knew about, and respect, your knowledge on the matter. I am certainly hoping for de-escalation, as well, although like you I don't see it happening, and I agree we have zero business (other than criminal business) in Ukraine. My only point was that the "winner" in a nuclear exchange is gonna suffer greatly in addition to the loser. Not that my point is a new point by any means, but to use Hiroshima and Nagasaki as an example of how a country can win a nuclear war, in my opinion, is sort of apples and oranges when his proposed winner in the next nuclear war has an enemy with comparable weapons where Japan did not. As to how do we prevent escalation, I think Trump's proposal is a good one. If anyone can get a deal done, it's him, but it will never happen. That leaves us with the odds being slim to none. John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80288506 United States09/29/2022 12:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" History will not be kind to these children who rock the boat with the intention to tip it over Regardless of the stories your Kremlin leaders and alt-news sites sell as truth |
| Lazy Monk User ID: 77910542  Sweden09/29/2022 01:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" I cannot embed the video on this crappy tablet computer, but there was a GREAT video on utube last night. Quoting: darth Canadian Prepper interviewed David Pyne who has quite the resume regarding war and nuclear weapons. Pyne is the first guy I have heard that understands that the Russians have far more nukes than we do. He estimates the Chicoms may have up to 4,000 warheads as well. He concludes that if there is a WWIII, the USA will lose decisively. Go to utube and search for Canadian Prepper. Look for the video titled “Buckle Up”. Our leaders in the West are leading us into a deadly conflict with two nuclear armed nations. Apparently, there is no effort in Congress or the Maladministration of Joseph the Usurper to build more nukes. Even if YOU personally believe that nuclear wars cannot be won, the Russians and CCP do not agree. Like Pyne said, “Of course you can win a nuclear war. We proved that in 1945”. It is past time to prep for what is coming. I agree with most of that, but 1945 was a special situation where the recipient of the bombs had no answer to them other than surrender, more comparable to Europeans having guns and Indians having bows and arrows than anything going on now. Guaranteed, if the Japanese had had nukes, Honolulu and San Francisco would have looked like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yeah, China and Russia have more combined nukes than we do, but we have plenty to get the job done. They would certainly destroy us in a nuclear war, but it would be the most pyrrhic victory (if it even would be a victory) in the history of the world. Revbo, with all due respect, I studied nuclear war strategy at the Hudson Trade School for Wayward Boys. Later, I was involved in nuclear strategy while working on Reagan’s Star Wars programs. Right now, I have the book “Soviet Strategy for Nuclear War” based on THEIR training documents. This is how the Russians would expect to win a nuclear war: 1. Multiple warheads on each silo to ensure destruction. 2. Destroy all aircraft on the ground and ships in port with SLBMs. 3. Destroy every carrier battle group and sub at sea using nuclear depth charges and torpedoes. 4. Destroy the comm facilities on land with SLBMs to prevent launch codes from being transmitted to subs on patrol that may have survived. 5. AVOID hitting cities. They are hostages. 6. Demand negotiation/surrender or the cities would be hit. The only counter is a President who will retaliate even if over 90% of our nukes are destroyed in the first strike. YES, the Russians and Chicoms would be taking a huge risk. However, in their calculation it might be the only move that they think they have. IMHO, the probability that Putin will use tactical nukes in Ukraine is over 75%. How do we prevent escalation? A more basic question: What is the US national interest in Ukraine that requires us to spend so much blood and treasure while risking annihilation? That last question is pretty easy to answer at least: The US is a dying empire. When empires die they don't go gently into the night, they lash out in a desperate attempt to delay the inevitable. The US is today a hollowed-out shell that only survives by printing dollars to buy what it needs from the rest of the world, which the rest of the world only accepts because they get bombed to smithereens if they don't. But now a certain rising power (China) has grown in strength to the point where it feels it can challenge the US. This emboldens other nations to attempt to escape their subservience to the US by aligning themselves with China instead. The dollar is being abandoned by a huge chunk of the world. Which will mean the end of US global dominance and parasitism if nothing is done about it. And so the US is lashing out. The war in Ukraine was orchestrated partly to break up the economic ties between Germany and Russia to keep a competing power from arising in Eurasia, and partly with the hope of fracturing Russia and plundering its resources. If successful, China will be next on the chopping block. TL/DR: It's all about the dollar. Lazy Monk |
| darth User ID: 49291947 United States09/29/2022 01:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" I cannot embed the video on this crappy tablet computer, but there was a GREAT video on utube last night. Quoting: darth Canadian Prepper interviewed David Pyne who has quite the resume regarding war and nuclear weapons. Pyne is the first guy I have heard that understands that the Russians have far more nukes than we do. He estimates the Chicoms may have up to 4,000 warheads as well. He concludes that if there is a WWIII, the USA will lose decisively. Go to utube and search for Canadian Prepper. Look for the video titled “Buckle Up”. Our leaders in the West are leading us into a deadly conflict with two nuclear armed nations. Apparently, there is no effort in Congress or the Maladministration of Joseph the Usurper to build more nukes. Even if YOU personally believe that nuclear wars cannot be won, the Russians and CCP do not agree. Like Pyne said, “Of course you can win a nuclear war. We proved that in 1945”. It is past time to prep for what is coming. I agree with most of that, but 1945 was a special situation where the recipient of the bombs had no answer to them other than surrender, more comparable to Europeans having guns and Indians having bows and arrows than anything going on now. Guaranteed, if the Japanese had had nukes, Honolulu and San Francisco would have looked like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yeah, China and Russia have more combined nukes than we do, but we have plenty to get the job done. They would certainly destroy us in a nuclear war, but it would be the most pyrrhic victory (if it even would be a victory) in the history of the world. Revbo, with all due respect, I studied nuclear war strategy at the Hudson Trade School for Wayward Boys. Later, I was involved in nuclear strategy while working on Reagan’s Star Wars programs. Right now, I have the book “Soviet Strategy for Nuclear War” based on THEIR training documents. This is how the Russians would expect to win a nuclear war: 1. Multiple warheads on each silo to ensure destruction. 2. Destroy all aircraft on the ground and ships in port with SLBMs. 3. Destroy every carrier battle group and sub at sea using nuclear depth charges and torpedoes. 4. Destroy the comm facilities on land with SLBMs to prevent launch codes from being transmitted to subs on patrol that may have survived. 5. AVOID hitting cities. They are hostages. 6. Demand negotiation/surrender or the cities would be hit. The only counter is a President who will retaliate even if over 90% of our nukes are destroyed in the first strike. YES, the Russians and Chicoms would be taking a huge risk. However, in their calculation it might be the only move that they think they have. IMHO, the probability that Putin will use tactical nukes in Ukraine is over 75%. How do we prevent escalation? A more basic question: What is the US national interest in Ukraine that requires us to spend so much blood and treasure while risking annihilation? Oh, don't get me wrong, brother. I knew about, and respect, your knowledge on the matter. I am certainly hoping for de-escalation, as well, although like you I don't see it happening, and I agree we have zero business (other than criminal business) in Ukraine. My only point was that the "winner" in a nuclear exchange is gonna suffer greatly in addition to the loser. Not that my point is a new point by any means, but to use Hiroshima and Nagasaki as an example of how a country can win a nuclear war, in my opinion, is sort of apples and oranges when his proposed winner in the next nuclear war has an enemy with comparable weapons where Japan did not. As to how do we prevent escalation, I think Trump's proposal is a good one. If anyone can get a deal done, it's him, but it will never happen. That leaves us with the odds being slim to none. Agreed! |
| darth User ID: 49252726 United States09/29/2022 01:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" I cannot embed the video on this crappy tablet computer, but there was a GREAT video on utube last night. Quoting: darth Canadian Prepper interviewed David Pyne who has quite the resume regarding war and nuclear weapons. Pyne is the first guy I have heard that understands that the Russians have far more nukes than we do. He estimates the Chicoms may have up to 4,000 warheads as well. He concludes that if there is a WWIII, the USA will lose decisively. Go to utube and search for Canadian Prepper. Look for the video titled “Buckle Up”. Our leaders in the West are leading us into a deadly conflict with two nuclear armed nations. Apparently, there is no effort in Congress or the Maladministration of Joseph the Usurper to build more nukes. Even if YOU personally believe that nuclear wars cannot be won, the Russians and CCP do not agree. Like Pyne said, “Of course you can win a nuclear war. We proved that in 1945”. It is past time to prep for what is coming. I agree with most of that, but 1945 was a special situation where the recipient of the bombs had no answer to them other than surrender, more comparable to Europeans having guns and Indians having bows and arrows than anything going on now. Guaranteed, if the Japanese had had nukes, Honolulu and San Francisco would have looked like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yeah, China and Russia have more combined nukes than we do, but we have plenty to get the job done. They would certainly destroy us in a nuclear war, but it would be the most pyrrhic victory (if it even would be a victory) in the history of the world. Revbo, with all due respect, I studied nuclear war strategy at the Hudson Trade School for Wayward Boys. Later, I was involved in nuclear strategy while working on Reagan’s Star Wars programs. Right now, I have the book “Soviet Strategy for Nuclear War” based on THEIR training documents. This is how the Russians would expect to win a nuclear war: 1. Multiple warheads on each silo to ensure destruction. 2. Destroy all aircraft on the ground and ships in port with SLBMs. 3. Destroy every carrier battle group and sub at sea using nuclear depth charges and torpedoes. 4. Destroy the comm facilities on land with SLBMs to prevent launch codes from being transmitted to subs on patrol that may have survived. 5. AVOID hitting cities. They are hostages. 6. Demand negotiation/surrender or the cities would be hit. The only counter is a President who will retaliate even if over 90% of our nukes are destroyed in the first strike. YES, the Russians and Chicoms would be taking a huge risk. However, in their calculation it might be the only move that they think they have. IMHO, the probability that Putin will use tactical nukes in Ukraine is over 75%. How do we prevent escalation? A more basic question: What is the US national interest in Ukraine that requires us to spend so much blood and treasure while risking annihilation? That last question is pretty easy to answer at least: The US is a dying empire. When empires die they don't go gently into the night, they lash out in a desperate attempt to delay the inevitable. The US is today a hollowed-out shell that only survives by printing dollars to buy what it needs from the rest of the world, which the rest of the world only accepts because they get bombed to smithereens if they don't. But now a certain rising power (China) has grown in strength to the point where it feels it can challenge the US. This emboldens other nations to attempt to escape their subservience to the US by aligning themselves with China instead. The dollar is being abandoned by a huge chunk of the world. Which will mean the end of US global dominance and parasitism if nothing is done about it. And so the US is lashing out. The war in Ukraine was orchestrated partly to break up the economic ties between Germany and Russia to keep a competing power from arising in Eurasia, and partly with the hope of fracturing Russia and plundering its resources. If successful, China will be next on the chopping block. TL/DR: It's all about the dollar. Lazy, I have a different opinion. Ukraine is important to politicians and bureaucrats because it is one of the most corrupt countries on Earth. I think it is all about the kickbacks. What percent of the money we send to the Ukies is being skimmed off by pols? Why did pols, e.g., Pelosi, go to a WAR ZONE to visit? IMHO, so that they could arrange their payoff and launder it without incriminating emails and phone calls. Ukraine is also a primary source for the slave trade in prostitutes. A beautiful child is worth more than a stack of gold. It is nauseating that our country has become so corrupt. Lastly, there are stupid pols in DC who think they will profit from WWIII by being able to attack political opponents as “Russian assets”. Just look at what they just did to Tulsi Gabbard. They also think that a war will absolve them of the blame for the coming inflationary collapse. They are risking destruction of modern civilization for profit. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79321299 United States09/29/2022 01:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" IIT a bunch of uneducated Russians postulate about 80 year old military tech as if it is still the dominant force on Earth. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80288506 History will not be kind to these children who rock the boat with the intention to tip it over Regardless of the stories your Kremlin leaders and alt-news sites sell as truth And why don't you tell us what the dominate power is? And prove it really exists. |
| Lazy Monk User ID: 77910542 Sweden09/29/2022 01:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" ... Quoting: Revbo™ I agree with most of that, but 1945 was a special situation where the recipient of the bombs had no answer to them other than surrender, more comparable to Europeans having guns and Indians having bows and arrows than anything going on now. Guaranteed, if the Japanese had had nukes, Honolulu and San Francisco would have looked like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yeah, China and Russia have more combined nukes than we do, but we have plenty to get the job done. They would certainly destroy us in a nuclear war, but it would be the most pyrrhic victory (if it even would be a victory) in the history of the world. Revbo, with all due respect, I studied nuclear war strategy at the Hudson Trade School for Wayward Boys. Later, I was involved in nuclear strategy while working on Reagan’s Star Wars programs. Right now, I have the book “Soviet Strategy for Nuclear War” based on THEIR training documents. This is how the Russians would expect to win a nuclear war: 1. Multiple warheads on each silo to ensure destruction. 2. Destroy all aircraft on the ground and ships in port with SLBMs. 3. Destroy every carrier battle group and sub at sea using nuclear depth charges and torpedoes. 4. Destroy the comm facilities on land with SLBMs to prevent launch codes from being transmitted to subs on patrol that may have survived. 5. AVOID hitting cities. They are hostages. 6. Demand negotiation/surrender or the cities would be hit. The only counter is a President who will retaliate even if over 90% of our nukes are destroyed in the first strike. YES, the Russians and Chicoms would be taking a huge risk. However, in their calculation it might be the only move that they think they have. IMHO, the probability that Putin will use tactical nukes in Ukraine is over 75%. How do we prevent escalation? A more basic question: What is the US national interest in Ukraine that requires us to spend so much blood and treasure while risking annihilation? That last question is pretty easy to answer at least: The US is a dying empire. When empires die they don't go gently into the night, they lash out in a desperate attempt to delay the inevitable. The US is today a hollowed-out shell that only survives by printing dollars to buy what it needs from the rest of the world, which the rest of the world only accepts because they get bombed to smithereens if they don't. But now a certain rising power (China) has grown in strength to the point where it feels it can challenge the US. This emboldens other nations to attempt to escape their subservience to the US by aligning themselves with China instead. The dollar is being abandoned by a huge chunk of the world. Which will mean the end of US global dominance and parasitism if nothing is done about it. And so the US is lashing out. The war in Ukraine was orchestrated partly to break up the economic ties between Germany and Russia to keep a competing power from arising in Eurasia, and partly with the hope of fracturing Russia and plundering its resources. If successful, China will be next on the chopping block. TL/DR: It's all about the dollar. Lazy, I have a different opinion. Ukraine is important to politicians and bureaucrats because it is one of the most corrupt countries on Earth. I think it is all about the kickbacks. What percent of the money we send to the Ukies is being skimmed off by pols? Why did pols, e.g., Pelosi, go to a WAR ZONE to visit? IMHO, so that they could arrange their payoff and launder it without incriminating emails and phone calls. Ukraine is also a primary source for the slave trade in prostitutes. A beautiful child is worth more than a stack of gold. It is nauseating that our country has become so corrupt. Lastly, there are stupid pols in DC who think they will profit from WWIII by being able to attack political opponents as “Russian assets”. Just look at what they just did to Tulsi Gabbard. They also think that a war will absolve them of the blame for the coming inflationary collapse. They are risking destruction of modern civilization for profit. All of that is also true. Human trafficking is sadly a thing on this godforsaken planet, and where do you get those really attractive blonde and blue-eyed women and children? Ukraine! Then there's also the fact a certain people wish to make Israel 2.0 out of Ukraine. The current occupants need to be dispersed first. On one level, the US is fighting to maintain world dominance, as I said. On one level it's just a bunch of crooks protecting their filthy criminal endeavors, as you said. And on yet another level it's all a sham, with the same secret elites pulling the strings of puppets on both sides, causing the war for depopulation and destruction, to prepare for whatever it is they wish to build on the ruins. Many agendas on many levels. Maybe there's even aliens/demons/AI at the root of it all. It almost seems like the evil we're witnessing is beyond human capacity at times... Lazy Monk |
| Chief Heyoka Glory Clown User ID: 84286487 United Kingdom09/29/2022 03:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Dugin, advisor to B. Putin: We are on the brink of World War III, nuclear Armageddon is approaching - Defeat in Kharkiv is of key importance" This planet is too small for Armageddon. And WWIII shall last 40 years which had been planned again in October 1989. For America started WWIII as they had started WWI and WWII with the fugitives of Israel. [smiles sweetly] And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings from the rising of the sun. I looked out of the dragon's mouth [both G H.W 'King Akhenaten, Nebuchadnezzar, Herod & Uzziah a.k.a Azazel' Bush and G W 'King Belshazzar, Bel & Antipas Herod' Bush] and the mouth of the beast [Bill 'King Philip Herod, Marc Antony & Beast' Clinton] and the mouth of the false prophet [Obama 'Tutankhamun CIA asset eugenics dog of war' Barack] out three unclean spirits [Joe 'King Joash, Jeroboam & Azaz a.k.a Semyaza' Biden, Hillary 'Queen Jezebel, Herodia & Rahab' Clinton and D J 'King Cyrus, Rehoboam, Henry VIII & Ahaz a.k.a Hananiah' Trump] in the manner of frogs [Boris 'Benjamin Franklin, Cardinal Wosely & Zaccheus' Johnson, Emmanuel 'Saul & Vlad Tepe' Macron and Pope 'Archer, Paul & Cephas a.k.a Peter the swarthy' Francis in the manner of French frogs over the pond]. They are the spirits of devils [ZWO Derp States fugitives of Israel], working miracles [fake news media], which go forth unto the kings of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty. I [Elijah the prophet] come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. He [Lord Jesus] gathered them together into a place called in Hebr@w, Armageddon. - Revelation 16:12-16 |
