NASA ...Show Me The Lunar Rover Tracks !!! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 725590 Spain 07/19/2009 07:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Everybody who says yes to any of these questions must be part of the Bielefeld Conspiracy!!! Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCDWho gives a fuck about Bielefeld except if a huge amount of money from the citizens goes to them to fake space missions. I can't find anything brainwashing from Bielefeld, but with Nasa I can see brain damaged shills everything truth is posted. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 725590 Spain 07/19/2009 07:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sleepless (OP) User ID: 729313 United Kingdom 07/19/2009 07:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725590 haha yupp .... yesterday that was footprints btw :) I had to remove my Signature As it seems to have confused some people....It Don't take much for that round here .. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 725590 Spain 07/19/2009 07:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | check out the rotation on the vid from 0:19 to 0:22. It comes to an ubrupt stop. No slowing down nothing. The laws of physics are overwhelmed once again. NASA is amazing.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 697653And compare with a real rendezvous of shuttle and ISS. The rendezvous I posted is Apollo 11 and it looks like Kubricks movie. In fact Kubrick was probably the one at charge (they after created that documentary of him doing it with his wife and all these rummsfeld, etc). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 729276 Australia 07/19/2009 07:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny thing about footage from the moon. With the low gravity there wasn't any dust swirling about the astronauts feet or while the lunar rover was being driven. What gives... The whole thing was staged and they know it. Quoting: Floyd007Proving it was an airless environment, as dust falls very quickly in a vacuum. You can see it in the movies of the rovers - watch the PERFECT dust parabolas off the wheels. Impossible to fake on earth. Thanks for providing one of the often overlooked proofs of the mission. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 721980 Australia 07/19/2009 07:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 439828 New Zealand 07/19/2009 08:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For you. (Yes I know you are not going to see nothing wrong, so consider it for your subconscient and in some years perhaps your conscience can start to wonder) Quoting: The GuyI'm guessing you don't think the LEM's movements looked natural? That NASA video of what is meant to be Apollo 11 docking with the Command Module is some crazy shit. There is a lot of places in the video where there is constant movement, then a sudden stop, no slowing down at all. It shows that these were small models used, and that they were fixed on an external object. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 704903 United Kingdom 07/19/2009 08:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny thing about footage from the moon. With the low gravity there wasn't any dust swirling about the astronauts feet or while the lunar rover was being driven. What gives... The whole thing was staged and they know it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 729276Proving it was an airless environment, as dust falls very quickly in a vacuum. You can see it in the movies of the rovers - watch the PERFECT dust parabolas off the wheels. Impossible to fake on earth. Thanks for providing one of the often overlooked proofs of the mission. its a good example of why the controversy will remain. The moon deniers simply are too dumb to analyse any "proof" put before them. Their inbuilt predjudice wil lead them to the wrong conclusion everytime. BTW the lack of swirling dust really does prove it was filmed in a vacuum. I suppose that doesnt 100% prove it was filmed on the moon ( as they could have had a massive vacuum chamber), but then that directly conflicts with the other "proof" the deniers have (such as a waving flag etc). They want it both ways. |
The Guy User ID: 683039 United States 07/19/2009 08:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That NASA video of what is meant to be Apollo 11 docking with the Command Module is some crazy shit. There is a lot of places in the video where there is constant movement, then a sudden stop, no slowing down at all. It shows that these were small models used, and that they were fixed on an external object. Gee, just like a bunch of physicists to miss something like that, huh? Seriously, the LEM (minus the legs, of course) only weighed about five tons (mass of 4,600kg), and was radially symmetrical. It wouldn't take much to spin it, or to stop it from spinning, very quickly. It's good to be open-minded, just don't let your brain fall out. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 435072 United States 07/19/2009 08:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Petty dam good simulation here. [link to www.youtube.com] Now I wonder, why this test site or stage, looks so much like the so called real video of these missions. Don't get me wrong, I think we went to the moon alright, just not like they showed us all. |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 434868 Netherlands 07/19/2009 10:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Petty dam good simulation here. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 435072[link to www.youtube.com] Now I wonder, why this test site or stage, looks so much like the so called real video of these missions. Don't get me wrong, I think we went to the moon alright, just not like they showed us all. They had photos taken by robot landers to work from. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Skeptic the First User ID: 725789 United States 07/19/2009 10:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Guy User ID: 683039 United States 07/19/2009 10:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 718901 United Kingdom 07/19/2009 11:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
FreeFlow User ID: 456207 Austria 07/19/2009 11:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 526155 Canada 07/19/2009 11:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NASA is making the extraordinary claim; NASA must supply the corresponding extraordinary proof. Quoting: The GuyThey took pictures, and brought back rocks. A machine could have brought back the rocks. The pics could be faked easily. Thread: Who can explain the science behind the ASTRONAUT'S SPACE SUITS? [link to www.mt.net] |
The Guy User ID: 683039 United States 07/19/2009 12:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pictures and rocks are "extraordinary proof"? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 718901LOL. I guess having a piece of cheese in my fridge is proof that I, too, have been to the moon. If you claim they're bogus, then you'd need to present evidence for that. It's good to be open-minded, just don't let your brain fall out. |
Skeptic the First User ID: 725789 United States 07/19/2009 05:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They took pictures, and brought back rocks. Quoting: The GuyThe pictures look fake, and the rocks are all too much like earth rocks--so similar, in fact, that NASA and the geological community have been arguing for decades as to what is or is not a moon rock: [link to en.wikipedia.org] --- From the 1950s through the 1990s, NASA aerodynamicist Dean R. Chapman and others advanced the "lunar origin" theory of tektites. ... O'Keefe [of NASA] suggested explosive, hydrogen-driven lunar volcanoes as the original source of tektites. ... Regardless, O'Keefe said that "If 14425 was found in Antarctica instead of Fra Mauro (on the Moon), it would probably have been accepted as a tektite." --- In other words, "moon rocks" look a lot like the product of hydrogen bomb explosions. Of course, only the military-industrial-intelligence complex has access to hydrogen bomb explosions, so the geological community has no way to compare the products of such explosions against the "moon rocks." |
Skeptic the First User ID: 725789 United States 07/19/2009 05:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you claim they're bogus, then you'd need to present evidence for that. Quoting: The GuySorry, re-take Science 101. Anyone can say, "I flew to the moon 6 times, and here are the photos and rocks to 'prove' it." Science requires independent reproducibility; history requires independent confirmation; and the legal system requires sworn testimony as to provenance. If you can persuade Neil Armstrong to testify under oath and cross-examination of his alleged moon rock collection, let us know. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 439828 New Zealand 07/19/2009 05:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That NASA video of what is meant to be Apollo 11 docking with the Command Module is some crazy shit. There is a lot of places in the video where there is constant movement, then a sudden stop, no slowing down at all. It shows that these were small models used, and that they were fixed on an external object. Gee, just like a bunch of physicists to miss something like that, huh? Seriously, the LEM (minus the legs, of course) only weighed about five tons (mass of 4,600kg), and was radially symmetrical. It wouldn't take much to spin it, or to stop it from spinning, very quickly. But a sudden full stop, with no slowing down, how does that happen in the deep vacuum of space? |
The Guy User ID: 683039 United States 07/19/2009 05:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you claim they're bogus, then you'd need to present evidence for that. Quoting: Skeptic the First 725789Sorry, re-take Science 101. Anyone can say, "I flew to the moon 6 times, and here are the photos and rocks to 'prove' it." Science requires independent reproducibility; history requires independent confirmation; and the legal system requires sworn testimony as to provenance. If you can persuade Neil Armstrong to testify under oath and cross-examination of his alleged moon rock collection, let us know. Well, the moon landings are part of history. Independent confirmation, huh? How about tracking from multiple international tracking stations? Oh, wait, they were all "in on it," right? It's good to be open-minded, just don't let your brain fall out. |
The Guy User ID: 683039 United States 07/19/2009 05:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But a sudden full stop, with no slowing down, how does that happen in the deep vacuum of space? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 439828With a relatively light, radially symmetrical mass and a quick RCS burn. It's good to be open-minded, just don't let your brain fall out. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 725590 Spain 07/19/2009 06:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | its a good example of why the controversy will remain. The moon deniers simply are too dumb to analyse any "proof" put before them. Their inbuilt predjudice wil lead them to the wrong conclusion everytime. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 704903BTW the lack of swirling dust really does prove it was filmed in a vacuum. I suppose that doesnt 100% prove it was filmed on the moon Show me a video where the lack of dust demonstrates that is the Moon and I will post some competition videos of motos running in ground throwing ground but without dust (perhaps the competition is in the fucking Moon?). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 725590 Spain 07/19/2009 06:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Seriously, the LEM (minus the legs, of course) only weighed about five tons (mass of 4,600kg), and was radially symmetrical. It wouldn't take much to spin it, or to stop it from spinning, very quickly. Quoting: The GuyIt is MANNED mission. There is not a computer calculating the exact miliseconds a rocket must be firing to stop in such a way. Now look to the videos where Armstrongs flies here in Earth a "lunar module lander" and search for such stop motions. Also MUST I POST LINKS TO VIDEOS WHERE YOU SEE THE RENDEZVOUS BETWEEN SHUTTLE AND ISS ??? What you want, an official communicate of Nasa saying that rendezvous is the worst thing ever they made in the entire HOAX??????? |
The Guy User ID: 683039 United States 07/19/2009 06:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Show me a video where the lack of dust demonstrates that is the Moon and I will post some competition videos of motos running in ground throwing ground but without dust (perhaps the competition is in the fucking Moon?). Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725590Dude, the dirt in motorcross racing is wet down before the race. It's good to be open-minded, just don't let your brain fall out. |
The Guy User ID: 683039 United States 07/19/2009 06:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is MANNED mission. There is not a computer calculating the exact miliseconds a rocket must be firing to stop in such a way. Now look to the videos where Armstrongs flies here in Earth a "lunar module lander" and search for such stop motions. Also MUST I POST LINKS TO VIDEOS WHERE YOU SEE THE RENDEZVOUS BETWEEN SHUTTLE AND ISS ??? What you want, an official communicate of Nasa saying that rendezvous is the worst thing ever they made in the entire HOAX??????? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725590Well, lets compare masses, shall we? LM ascent stage: 4,670kg Space shuttle: 78,000kg empty, usually closer to 100,000kg Can you see how the shuttle might have just a bit more momentum? It's good to be open-minded, just don't let your brain fall out. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 725590 Spain 07/19/2009 06:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NASA is making the extraordinary claim; NASA must supply the corresponding extraordinary proof. Quoting: The GuyThey took pictures, and brought back rocks. I have a documentary where they say how every rock they found can be found in Earth and you can see Armstrong and Aldrin collecting these rocks to after be able to recognize them in the Moon. The difference between the rocks collected in the Moon and the ones of Earth are the micrometeorites. And that as I am tired of telling here in GLP is where your linear accelerator or circular accelerator or who knows what they did is used to create the microimpacts. And of course probably in only some pieces not in the entire kilos, just one to show in some publication and it is all. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 725590 Spain 07/19/2009 06:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 725590 Spain 07/19/2009 06:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pictures and rocks are "extraordinary proof"? Quoting: The GuyLOL. I guess having a piece of cheese in my fridge is proof that I, too, have been to the moon. If you claim they're bogus, then you'd need to present evidence for that. I have some rock from Mars, some of Venus and some of Mars. I can sell you to a low price. What you need as proof of autenticity? How you know a rock is from Mars or Venus? Microimpacts? Do you believe NASA is unable to create microimpacts? |
FreeFlow User ID: 456207 Austria 07/19/2009 06:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NASA = never a sincere answer Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725590Never a Straight Answer. ST in BG is the one that created this phrase. I hope greys are not the bad guys but I don't think they are our friends. Interesting future we will have to live indeed. I saw it long before TG in BS said this lol, I just altered it a little cause they lie lie lie ... I agree, our future will bring surprises ... I am here to challenge your indoctrinated false belief that flaming queens don't use shovels ... |