The FLUFFY MAGNETIC RIBBON NEMESIS of the PLASMA UNIVERSE

thinking about it, changing the universe is probably the easiest way to change the focus of humankind

it`s not cheating , nor is it evil and it is not against humankinds freewill

haha

I agree! And its kinda fun to watch. I have a strong feeling you have been waiting for it also, but the world is finally accepting a new paradigm, a paradigm that has been talked about for a number of decades.

The acceptance of new ideas and changes is coming into its own, and I thought it would never come!

You say that "many natural/universal consequences may yet to be discovered, they have remained unseen and unknown because, nobody was looking/anticipating them"...

God, isn't so fucking nice to see this changing, not individually, but massively!

That new universe they are in is the new paradigm. All the corruption around the world is so out of sync now.

I cannot wait to see how everything falls into place. It is wonderful being someone that is awakened enough to see the change happening, is it not?!

BTW aether, I am not ignoring your posts. It seems I have a hundred things going on at once. Your posts and Xenus' posts are the ones that have kept me so interested in doing all this, and I honestly, really do appreciate it.

I found it! I found the fluffy nemesis of the Easter Bunny.. and just in time!


Fluffy bunny

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about the Wiccan terminology. For other uses, see Fluffy bunny (disambiguation).
Fluffy Bunny, or Fluffbunny, is a pejorative expression used since at least 2001 in Wicca, (and in Neopaganism generally), to refer to adherents of the religion who are thought to be superficial, fadish or wilfully ignorant. They are considered to dislike darker elements and emphasise goodness, light, eclecticism and elements taken from the New Age movement, or follow it as a fad.[1][2][3]

Catherine Noble-Beyer has defined Fluffy Bunnies in the following terms:

The primary definition of a Fluffy Bunny is one who refuses to learn, refuses to think, and refuses to consider the possibility that they could possibly ever be wrong. Generally, they find one book, author or website and follow it as if it were the holy word, frequently denouncing anything that disagrees with it as obviously false. Fluffy Bunnies rarely get past the defense of "Because [insert favorite author here] says so." Sometimes they don't even get that far, responding to any and all criticism with something like, "You're just trying to persecute me!"[3]

Contents [hide]
1 Related terms
2 Anti-Fluffy Bunny Movement
3 Bonewits' Fauna Pagans
4 Criticism
5 Use in Fiction
6 References

[edit] Related terms
Related terms used with similar meaning are "Insta-witches", "McWiccans", "One-Book Witches", "Wicclets",[3] "Playgans", "White light-ers", "Baby Pagans", and "Weekend Witches".[4] In the 1960's, Robert Cochrane used the term "old lady brigade", to describe others overly fixated with sweetness and light.[5]

[edit] Anti-Fluffy Bunny Movement
The term was first coined by the Why Wiccans Suck website (2001), which "unintentionally started a whole anti-fluffbunny movement in the Wicca subculture."[6][7] This movement gathered momentum with the appearance of sites such as Wicca for the rest of us (2002): With its tag line "Stop the fluff. Think for yourself. Fight the bunny.".[1][2][3]

[edit] Bonewits' Fauna Pagans
In a wry commentary on the terminology, Isaac Bonewits has extended the metaphor to encompass eight further groups of "fauna pagans": Namely; Stinking Badgers, Golden Geckos, Slippery Eels, Wise Owls, Sly Foxes, Fuzzy Sheep, Furry Coyotes, and Tenacious Turtles.[8] In this analysis, Fluffy Bunnys represent the excessively trusting extreme of a "value spectrum" which has at its opposing extremity, overly cynical Stinking Badgers. He also differentiates a further sub-group of "Dark Bunnys" which he characterises as being as superficial as Fluffy Bunnys, but fixated on the "dark side" of paganism.

[edit] Criticism
Bonewits' commentary above is partly critical of the concept of the Fluffy Bunny, seeing it largely in terms of irritation at newcomers, and remarking:

Certainly "one-book wonders" can be very annoying to the "ten-book wonders" who think they know all there is to know about Paganism.[8]

Jon Hanna's description of what 4 Non-Goths called the "anti-fluffybunny movement" is also partly critical, arguing:

...the concept of fluffiness, and the backlash against it, cannot be considered so much a stream of critical thought within witchcraft, as a fashion for the identity of "non-fluffy". A fashion that indeed reduces the degree of critical thought applied to the issues that provoked it, as surface artefacts become referenced with increasing frequency, most notably in often attacking a publishing house more vehemently than the works it publishes.[1]

And later concluding:

Indeed, the very concept of fluffiness can be a way of policing an identity. Since the rejection of any concept of initiatory lineage allows for no formal means of determining who is, or is not, considered Wiccan ..., those who are seen as claiming to be "us", but as not, or as "us", but of letting "us" down will be rejected by other means.[9]

[edit] Use in Fiction
The term has appeared in general fiction: In S.M. Stirling's Emberverse series, it is used by Judy Barstow to express disapproval of the incorporation of Laurel Wilson's Eugene group into the Wiccan Mackenzie clan.

"Oh, great. The septs of the Clan Mackenzie: Wolf, Bear, Coyote, Elk, Raven... and now the Fluffy Bunnies."[10]

so this is the updated updated thread. good stuff. ill keep checking it out because ive still yet to check out ALL the info.. but so far so good... really interested in the Sun lately too...

that`s fine sickscent, do not think about it, we all have our motives for what we do and i am no different, i have an agenda, motive

time for a song, if you don`t mind , which i will dedicate to a woman whom may or may not be aware of what she created

guess if your a guy , it`s always a woman

kekekekekekekeke

Weekend Witches

hahaha ac, that`s a funny post

weekend witches, huh, i believe i know a few of those

now i know their names

i like it

sickscent, read this science paper from 1931 stating the electrical nature of sunspots, especialy from page 2 onwards

it`s on a NASA site!!

it indicates how national security constraints have led humankind down the wrong path for so long

i believe we will get more of this "leaking"

[link to adsabs.harvard.edu]

Thats pretty damn interesting. The article states that sunspots could possibly form from 2 inner planets being on opposite sides of the sun. This makes me wonder if filaments could be born the same general way.

Also, if we are seeing increased electrical and magnetic phenoms on all the planets, I wonder if the outer planets are now playing a role in this also.

[link to www.everythingselectric.com]

If it is an Electric Universe and weather is electric there needs to be a circuit and flow of current

[link to everythingselectric.com]

recent e-mail indicating where main stream cosmology is at:

…"to answer your basic postulate, there is no doubt that cosmic magnetic fields are caused by electrical currents. That is a given, as required by Maxwell's Equations. Asking "where do these magnetic fields come from?" and "where do these electrical currents come from?" are the same question.

So to phrase the problem in terms of currents, the problem is that we don't know what keeps the currents flowing for billions of years. Why don't they fade away? Why do they flow in such an organised way? The simple response would be that interstellar gas is highly conducting, and so (like a superconductor), currents can just keep flowing forever. However, what has only recently becoming fully understood (and perhaps Perratt, being a plasma physicist, might not have been aware of this) is that interstellar gas is extremely turbulent. Energy and gas-flows thus cascade down to smaller scales and are dissipated as heat, and any current will fizzle out comparatively rapidly. This is likely quite a different situation from the solar system or the laboratory.

So the mystery remains. What keeps the current going for so long? The likely explanation is a dynamo, in which differential rotation and helical turbulence combine to amplify and organise currents (or magnetic fields, if you prefer) over long time scales. But a dynamo can only ever amplify an existing weak current or field. So the question remains: where did the first currents come from? We of course have ideas and theories about this, but we don't know which one of these ideas is correct. This is a question that I and my colleagues hope to address in the coming years."
Professor Bryan Gaensler

Bryan Malcolm Gaensler (born 4 July 1973) is an Australian astronomer and former Young Australian of the Year, currently based at the University of Sydney. He is best known for his work on magnetars, supernova remnants and magnetic fields.
[link to www.physics.usyd.edu.au]

Very cool read.

Aether, go to the other post and look at my new theory concerning conciousness with all that is coming.

interesting indeed.

Was it in this thread that a part of Nostradamus words were discussed?

Where was said that WHEN THE POPE LEFT ITS COUNTRY ?
(and something about the mastiff hauwling in the night)

>>> well maybe becoz of this :
Thread: BREAKING: MASSIVE UNDERSEA VOLCANO THREATENS TO DESTROY SOUTH ITALY

I said that a while ago. All planets affect each other during alignments, not just the sun.

Also, for the human connection to the cosmic forces in nature it's the hypothalamus....

no words to write

want to achnowledge

I posted this in another thread this morning that got lost so I'll post it here so you can understand where I'm coming from with this:

+++++++++++

Something else to think about....

How does the retina transmit information about light-dark exposure to the pineal gland? Light exposure to the retina is first relayed to the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus, an area of the brain well known to coordinate biological clock signals. Fibers from the hypothalamus descend to the spinal cord and ultimately project to the superior cervical ganglia, from which post-ganglionic neurons ascend back to the pineal gland. Thus, the pineal is similar to the adrenal medulla in the sense that it transduces signals from the sympathetic nervous system into a hormonal signal.


[link to www.vivo.colostate.edu]
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 923932



The hypothalamus 'master switchboard' resides in the brain stem upper end. It controls many body activities that affect homeostasis (maintenance of a stable internal environment in the body).

The hypothalamus is the main neural control center ....

[link to www.besthealth.com]


If you want to know your connection to the electric universe, start with the hypothalamus.

thanks FC

Your welcome ;-)

[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov] cme comin >_>

follow up 30th march 2010:


I agree that there is a qualitative difference between 'turbulence' in non-ionised gas flows and the many types of 'instabilities' which can occur in plasmas. I am not sure that Bryan has had time to read up on the track of books and papers from Birkeland to Falthammar and Alfven to Peratt and all the others who've contributed to the electrical view of the universe. It's a lot to absorb - I'm still trying, like most of us.

I think that electrically, despite local instabilities (which can be 'local' on a galactic scale, in my view) the conducting connective tissue is not very lossy,being plasma in state and therefore of low resistance. This results in efficient transmission of power which, when concentrated by EM forces at work, creates the stars and their organized groupings into galaxies, along with the smaller condensates from planets to dust. The power transmitted is very large, but the power density is low in the intergalactic scale, because the flows of charged particles are of such large diameter.

If EU conjecture is correct, all the stars in a galactic nexus are powered by their (electric) current environment, both the recirculating intra-galactic flows (see diagrams above from Alfven/Don Scott) and the large arriving/departing inter-galactic currents. Just looking at the radiated energy density from the billions of stars in a single galaxy, you can only imagine the wattage required to run this sucker. Currents light years in diameter are up to it, even though composed of a sparse soup of charges moving sedately along for millions and billions of years before arriving and getting pinched into much denser current flows which can and do light up in the glow and arc and occasionally the overstressed modes of action.

Dusty Dead Star
NASA 03.29.10

[link to www.nasa.gov]

I keep telling you guys that NASA itself says that "in common with most scientists, plasmas are simply referred to as gas" - or "hot gas", or "winds", or "ionized gas", or... ...anything but plasma or, especially, electric currents. It's code; guys. No one in the big tent wants to get into trouble and Get Marginalized by saying any of the electric model's words. That's all. Except maybe pragmatic solar scientists and radio astronomers, who are pretty good at understanding Maxwell's Laws and circuit theory and the like (dynamos notwithstanding). The leap to cosmic conclusions is a difficult one to scale up, though, for theorists.

My favorite part was the lame hope that "G54 supplies an important piece to the puzzle". Only if you understand what you are seeing there. Gravity by itself simply does not - can not - do things like that.

Amazing isn't it what they call mysteries and weirdness is all due to their misunderstandings and fragmented knowledge. I loathe the way they simply insert BS like dark matter, black holes, dark energy and now dark flow to fill the gaps of currently accepted theories in order to explain things the theories cannot.

Doing this research I have become amazed at this, especially regarding plasma.

It is like their 'code' words are merely for neat stories and do not really represent what the phenoms actually are.

Physicists Celebrate Big Day in the Cosmos
March 31, 2010

After more than 25 years — at least 10 in planning and 16 in construction — plus one failed attempt, the world’s most powerful particle accelerator hit pay dirt yesterday morning when two super-energized particle beams collided, releasing an extremely short-lived plasma that scientists believe approximates the origin of all matter.

[link to www.bu.edu]
:Smiley:

It's no coincidence that mankind's most expensive and largest experiment is related to plasma, too bad they are focused on something that may or may not exist.

your correct xenus but the termanology and sequence of words tells me a lot regarding the mind set of establishment thinking

real to me box

Bookmarked for when I have time to read through it all :)

for the thinkers


Time Reversal of Electromagnetic Waves
In a nondissipative medium, the wave equation is time-symmetric. Therefore, for every wave diverging from a pulsed source, there exists in theory a wave, the time-reversed wave, that precisely retraces all its original paths in a reverse order and converges in synchrony at the original source as if time were going backwards.


The Time-Reversed Laser to See the Light
March 29, 2010

Rather than emitting light, a time-reversed laser absorbs it. Perfectly.

[link to www.cbsnews.com]