*** Fukushima *** and other nuclear-----updates and links | |
Citizenperth User ID: 42453258 Australia 06/29/2013 04:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Former head doctor of National Cancer Center,”Thyroids of Fukushima children look like honeycomb from too much cysts” Quoting: Waterbug [link to fukushima-diary.com] 30% :( It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42465201 Japan 06/29/2013 06:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Former head doctor of National Cancer Center,”Thyroids of Fukushima children look like honeycomb from too much cysts” Quoting: Waterbug [link to fukushima-diary.com] In my Opinion this is normal? Let us have a look: [link to www.google.co.jp (secure)] Not so different, imo! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42465201 Japan 06/29/2013 06:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | POINT OF VIEW/ Hirohito Ono: We cannot allow return to nuclear power without proper debate The run-up to July's Upper House election will likely focus on the economy and foreign policy issues, but one topic that must be discussed is the Abe administration's nuclear energy policy. In its platform for the December Lower House election, the Liberal Democratic Party said it "would seek the establishment of an economic and social structure that did not have to depend on nuclear power." Although that was not a position seeking to move away from nuclear energy, it did imply efforts to think about nuclear energy in relative terms. However, even that stance has become much more ambiguous. The Abe administration is leaning toward the resumption of operations at nuclear reactors. And it still insists on pushing through with the troubled nuclear fuel recycling program. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has visited India, Turkey and central Europe with a sales pitch for Japan's nuclear power technology. Source: [link to ajw.asahi.com] The Asahi Shimbun became a really great Newspaper since 03/11, they become important! |
Citizenperth User ID: 42453258 Australia 06/29/2013 07:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Awesome book put out by there military about radiation and safety.. puts a dent in the current logic... [snip] Radiation doses that exceed a minimum (threshold) level can cause undesirable effects such as depression of the blood cell-forming process (threshold dose = 500 mSv, 50 rem) or cataracts (threshold dose = 5,000 mSv, 500 rem). The scope and severity of these effects increases as the dose increases above the corresponding threshold. Radiation also can cause an increase in the incidence, but not the severity, of malignant disease (e.g., cancer). For this type of effect, it is the probability of occurrence that increases with dose rather than the severity. For radiation protection purposes it is assumed that any dose above zero can increase the risk of radiation-induced cancer (i.e., that there is no threshold). Epidemiologic studies have found that the estimated lifetime risk of dying from cancer is greater by about 0.004% per mSv (0.04% per rem) of radiation dose to the whole body (NRC, 1990). Radioactive sources can expose the body from outside (external doses, e.g., when a diagnostic x ray is taken), or from inside (internal doses, e.g., when radioactive materials are inhaled, ingested, or enter through wounds). Gamma and x-ray radiations (and, to a lesser extent, beta radiation) are the primary contributors to external doses. Alpha and beta radiations are much more important contributors to internal doses. Control measures to reduce or limit exposure to radiation must consider the circumstances and environment of the exposure. In discussing the influence of scenario on radiation controls, we use the ICRP (1991a, 1993) nomenclature—''intervention'' and "practice." A practice is an intentional activity in which the practitioner is routinely at risk of radiation exposure (e.g., the duties of x-ray technicians in hospitals and nuclear power plant workers). An intervention, by contrast, is an action taken to reduce radiation exposure, often by responding to an accident (e.g., the actions of firefighters who responded to the Chernobyl accident). A practice is characterized by well-defined radiation sources and work procedures; an intervention, by great uncertainty in both. The Army has previously published guidance for control of doses from routine occupational exposures to radiation and from those associated with nuclear war. The ACE Directive is an encouraging step in developing control measures for other situations. We realize that the Directive was meant for a specific mission (Bosnia) and that the Army recognizes its limitations. The improvements recommended by the committee should be viewed as constructive and in no way diminish the significant progress that the Army has made toward the control of the complete spectrum of radiation hazards on the battlefield and in nonwartime situations. While the ACE Directive is useful as a basis for establishing guidelines to protect soldiers from the adverse effects of radiation, the committee recommends that it be revised to assure completeness and clarity. [end sip] [link to www.nap.edu] Last Edited by CitizenPerth™ on 06/29/2013 07:06 AM It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Citizenperth User ID: 42453258 Australia 06/29/2013 07:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Awesome book put out by there military about radiation and safety.. puts a dent in the current logic... Quoting: Citizenperth [snip] Radiation doses that exceed a minimum (threshold) level can cause undesirable effects such as depression of the blood cell-forming process (threshold dose = 500 mSv, 50 rem) or cataracts (threshold dose = 5,000 mSv, 500 rem). The scope and severity of these effects increases as the dose increases above the corresponding threshold. Radiation also can cause an increase in the incidence, but not the severity, of malignant disease (e.g., cancer). For this type of effect, it is the probability of occurrence that increases with dose rather than the severity. For radiation protection purposes it is assumed that any dose above zero can increase the risk of radiation-induced cancer (i.e., that there is no threshold). Epidemiologic studies have found that the estimated lifetime risk of dying from cancer is greater by about 0.004% per mSv (0.04% per rem) of radiation dose to the whole body (NRC, 1990). Radioactive sources can expose the body from outside (external doses, e.g., when a diagnostic x ray is taken), or from inside (internal doses, e.g., when radioactive materials are inhaled, ingested, or enter through wounds). Gamma and x-ray radiations (and, to a lesser extent, beta radiation) are the primary contributors to external doses. Alpha and beta radiations are much more important contributors to internal doses. Control measures to reduce or limit exposure to radiation must consider the circumstances and environment of the exposure. In discussing the influence of scenario on radiation controls, we use the ICRP (1991a, 1993) nomenclature—''intervention'' and "practice." A practice is an intentional activity in which the practitioner is routinely at risk of radiation exposure (e.g., the duties of x-ray technicians in hospitals and nuclear power plant workers). An intervention, by contrast, is an action taken to reduce radiation exposure, often by responding to an accident (e.g., the actions of firefighters who responded to the Chernobyl accident). A practice is characterized by well-defined radiation sources and work procedures; an intervention, by great uncertainty in both. The Army has previously published guidance for control of doses from routine occupational exposures to radiation and from those associated with nuclear war. The ACE Directive is an encouraging step in developing control measures for other situations. We realize that the Directive was meant for a specific mission (Bosnia) and that the Army recognizes its limitations. The improvements recommended by the committee should be viewed as constructive and in no way diminish the significant progress that the Army has made toward the control of the complete spectrum of radiation hazards on the battlefield and in nonwartime situations. While the ACE Directive is useful as a basis for establishing guidelines to protect soldiers from the adverse effects of radiation, the committee recommends that it be revised to assure completeness and clarity. [end sip] [in Civilian control situations] The first of these, the practice, is an intentional activity in which the practitioner is routinely at risk of exposure. Workers who are exposed to radiation during the course of their duties include, for example, x-ray technicians in hospitals, nuclear power plant workers, and researchers who use radioactive materials. The practices in which they engage include taking x rays of patients, running a nuclear reactor, or making measurements using radioactive sources. These occupationally exposed individuals are trained to appreciate the hazards of radiation, acknowledge those risks as a condition of employment, and follow safety precautions in order to minimize their exposure. Any practice may have exposures that do not routinely occur (such as accidents). If these have not yet happened, they are called potential exposures. Both the probability of such events happening and the magnitude of expected radiation doses can be calculated in planning responses. These also should be considered in the introduction and management of new practices. If an accident actually happens, interventions are taken to reduce exposure. An intervention is an action that one takes to reduce a radiation exposure (often to other individuals or groups) from specific radiation sources by (ICRP, 1993): reducing or removing the existing sources, improving the reliability of the existing sources, modifying pathways,7 or reducing the number of exposed individuals. An example of an intervention would be the response of the firefighters who fought to control the fire in the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident. Often an intervention is associated with an emergency action. [end snip] [link to www.nap.edu] It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42465201 Japan 06/29/2013 08:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | After failing to reach its radiation decontamination target, the government proposed that evacuees from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster return to their homes and take responsibility for their own safety. The residents called for continued clean-up efforts, but government officials offered them dosimeters instead. The proposal was made on June 23 in a meeting between central government officials and evacuees from the Miyakoji district of Tamura, Fukushima Prefecture. Source: [link to ajw.asahi.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42465201 Japan 06/29/2013 09:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And our glorious and hard-working Friends of Tepco are starting with the Fundament for the big Garbage burning Facility . [link to photo.tepco.co.jp] |
Citizenperth User ID: 42453258 Australia 06/29/2013 09:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And our glorious and hard-working Friends of Tepco Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42465201 are starting with the Fundament for the big Garbage burning Facility . [link to photo.tepco.co.jp] i'm really hoping the 'friends' part is sarcasm..... and BAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAH... all the stuff is 'simulated'... so are their radiological releases....... Last Edited by CitizenPerth™ on 06/29/2013 09:08 AM It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42465201 Japan 06/29/2013 09:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And our glorious and hard-working Friends of Tepco Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42465201 are starting with the Fundament for the big Garbage burning Facility . [link to photo.tepco.co.jp] i'm really hoping the 'friends' part is sarcasm..... and BAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAH... all the stuff is 'simulated'... so are their radiological releases....... :hentaidoom: You are a Simulation too, a unnecessary one. The Plant is real and F'Shima is real too: [link to www.tepco.co.jp] |
Citizenperth User ID: 42453258 Australia 06/29/2013 09:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And our glorious and hard-working Friends of Tepco Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42465201 are starting with the Fundament for the big Garbage burning Facility . [link to photo.tepco.co.jp] i'm really hoping the 'friends' part is sarcasm..... and BAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAH... all the stuff is 'simulated'... so are their radiological releases....... You are a Simulation too, a unnecessary one. The Plant is real and F'Shima is real too: [link to www.tepco.co.jp] agreed, but the data is all a lie on both counts...... if they're your 'friends', i'd find new ones, the sooner the better..... Last Edited by CitizenPerth™ on 06/29/2013 09:29 AM It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42465201 Japan 06/29/2013 09:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Citizenperth User ID: 42453258 Australia 06/29/2013 09:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | @Cploerp, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42465201 i don't mind what you think because you are absolute clueless about F'Shima! show me your chronology, rather than rants on a page at me?.... It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Citizenperth User ID: 42453258 Australia 06/29/2013 09:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | @Cploerp, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42465201 i don't mind what you think because you are absolute clueless about F'Shima! show me your chronology, rather than rants on a page at me?.... you add nothing more then tepco vitriol, and BS honestly, have somewhat of an opinion rather than just random attacks or running away... oh, wait.... you did..... and you're not japanese so shut the fuck up final note.. you're banned here.... so .. you know.. go away or some shit .. no-one believes you Atom-Tepco_boy...... It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42465201 Japan 06/29/2013 09:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Citizenperth User ID: 42453258 Australia 06/29/2013 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cploerp, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42465201 People have Eyes and just need to watch this page to see the Reality! Now go on and cry for help, you childish Dumba.. you have not even the Balls to fight like a Human because you are a Wimp! i don't do anything... you're flagged here... idiotoso..... It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42465201 Japan 06/29/2013 09:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Citizenperth User ID: 42453258 Australia 06/29/2013 09:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | if you stopped offering to bend over with your shaved brown apple, in a school skirt, i wouldn't want to... wait!?.. does that glow in the dark?????..... Last Edited by CitizenPerth™ on 06/29/2013 09:53 AM It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42465201 Japan 06/29/2013 09:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Citizenperth User ID: 42453258 Australia 06/29/2013 09:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | if you stopped offering to bend over with your shaved brown apple, in a school skirt, i wouldn't want to... wait!?.. does that glow in the dark?????..... SEE YA TOMORROW TEPCO PAID APOLOGIST!!!! It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38176253 Sweden 06/29/2013 11:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funds from disaster relief budget given to nuclear operators TOKYO — Funds set aside to help earthquake, tsunami and nuclear victims have been allocated to power companies, officials in Japan said Friday, a move that could fuel fury among people who lost their homes. About 10 billion yen of the 25 trillion yen pledged for disaster recovery over several years has been reserved to offset costs for utility companies that were ordered to shut nuclear power plants in the aftermath of the Fukushima disaster. The news comes after it was revealed public cash had been used in areas seemingly unaffected by the natural catastrophe, including on beefing up security for Japan’s controversial whale hunt and on paying people to count turtles. Officials said Friday that around 2 billion yen had already been given to Chubu Electric Power to help it make interest payments on bank loans taken out to fund the spiraling cost of fossil fuels. [link to www.japantoday.com] . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38176253 Sweden 06/29/2013 11:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Japan and the United States have begun joint research on the development of technologies that can measure the amount of uranium and plutonium contained in melted fuel at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant, Japanese and U.S. officials involved in the project said Saturday. Under Japan's safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency, Japan is obliged to report to the IAEA the quantity of nuclear substances in the nuclear fuel at power plants to show that none of it is converted for use in arms. Japan aims to begin monitoring of the substances from the early 2020s in line with the government timetable for scrapping reactors, said the officials from Japan Atomic Energy Agency and U.S. Department of Energy that are chiefly responsible for the project. [link to english.kyodonews.jp] . |
Citizenperth User ID: 42453258 Australia 06/29/2013 11:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funds from disaster relief budget given to nuclear operators Quoting: Anonymous Coward 38176253 TOKYO — Funds set aside to help earthquake, tsunami and nuclear victims have been allocated to power companies, officials in Japan said Friday, a move that could fuel fury among people who lost their homes. About 10 billion yen of the 25 trillion yen pledged for disaster recovery over several years has been reserved to offset costs for utility companies that were ordered to shut nuclear power plants in the aftermath of the Fukushima disaster. The news comes after it was revealed public cash had been used in areas seemingly unaffected by the natural catastrophe, including on beefing up security for Japan’s controversial whale hunt and on paying people to count turtles. Officials said Friday that around 2 billion yen had already been given to Chubu Electric Power to help it make interest payments on bank loans taken out to fund the spiraling cost of fossil fuels. [link to www.japantoday.com] . that is just super friendly news..... It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Waterbug (OP) User ID: 34388912 United States 06/29/2013 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funds from disaster relief budget given to nuclear operators Quoting: Anonymous Coward 38176253 TOKYO — Funds set aside to help earthquake, tsunami and nuclear victims have been allocated to power companies, officials in Japan said Friday, a move that could fuel fury among people who lost their homes. About 10 billion yen of the 25 trillion yen pledged for disaster recovery over several years has been reserved to offset costs for utility companies that were ordered to shut nuclear power plants in the aftermath of the Fukushima disaster. The news comes after it was revealed public cash had been used in areas seemingly unaffected by the natural catastrophe, including on beefing up security for Japan’s controversial whale hunt and on paying people to count turtles. Officials said Friday that around 2 billion yen had already been given to Chubu Electric Power to help it make interest payments on bank loans taken out to fund the spiraling cost of fossil fuels. [link to www.japantoday.com] . that is just super friendly news..... Ridiculous. Guess we know where the victims rate, don't we..? |
Waterbug (OP) User ID: 34388912 United States 06/29/2013 08:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [Tritium overflow] Tritium detected from 11 locations in the sea, average 340,000 Bq/m3 [link to fukushima-diary.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42570124 Japan 06/30/2013 05:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Japan made secret promise with U.S. to restart pluthermal nuclear program A Japanese prime ministerial envoy secretly promised to the United States that Japan would resume its controversial "pluthermal" program, using light-water reactors to burn plutonium, according to documents obtained by the Mainichi. The secret promise was made by Hiroshi Ogushi, then parliamentary secretary of the Cabinet Office, to Daniel Poneman, deputy secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy, during Ogushi's visit to the United States on behalf of then Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda in September last year. The revelation comes as Japan's pluthermal project remains suspended in the wake of the Fukushima No. 1 Nuclear Power Plant disaster due to safety concerns. The fact that a Japanese official promised to the U.S. to implement such a controversial project without a prior explanation to the Japanese public is expected to stir up controversy. According to the official documents obtained by the Mainichi, upon being pressed to reduce the amount of plutonium in Japan that could be diverted to military use, Ogushi told Poneman that Japan would burn plutonium in plutonium-thermal (pluthermal) reactors. The then ruling Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) was in the final stages of formulating its nuclear energy policy at the time. Source and more: [link to mainichi.jp] Fugggin Governmental Americanos! |
Citizenperth User ID: 42555664 Australia 06/30/2013 06:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Chernobyl children critique [link to fukushimaemergencywhatcanwedo.blogspot.com.au] It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42570124 Japan 06/30/2013 07:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Waterbug (OP) User ID: 34388912 United States 06/30/2013 08:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Japan made secret promise with U.S. to restart pluthermal nuclear program Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42570124 A Japanese prime ministerial envoy secretly promised to the United States that Japan would resume its controversial "pluthermal" program, using light-water reactors to burn plutonium, according to documents obtained by the Mainichi. The secret promise was made by Hiroshi Ogushi, then parliamentary secretary of the Cabinet Office, to Daniel Poneman, deputy secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy, during Ogushi's visit to the United States on behalf of then Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda in September last year. The revelation comes as Japan's pluthermal project remains suspended in the wake of the Fukushima No. 1 Nuclear Power Plant disaster due to safety concerns. The fact that a Japanese official promised to the U.S. to implement such a controversial project without a prior explanation to the Japanese public is expected to stir up controversy. According to the official documents obtained by the Mainichi, upon being pressed to reduce the amount of plutonium in Japan that could be diverted to military use, Ogushi told Poneman that Japan would burn plutonium in plutonium-thermal (pluthermal) reactors. The then ruling Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) was in the final stages of formulating its nuclear energy policy at the time. Source and more: [link to mainichi.jp] Fugggin Governmental Americanos! The Japanese parliamentary secretary made the promise without informing the people first. Business as usual. Why are you surprised..? |
Citizenperth User ID: 42555664 Australia 06/30/2013 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Japan made secret promise with U.S. to restart pluthermal nuclear program Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42570124 A Japanese prime ministerial envoy secretly promised to the United States that Japan would resume its controversial "pluthermal" program, using light-water reactors to burn plutonium, according to documents obtained by the Mainichi. The secret promise was made by Hiroshi Ogushi, then parliamentary secretary of the Cabinet Office, to Daniel Poneman, deputy secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy, during Ogushi's visit to the United States on behalf of then Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda in September last year. The revelation comes as Japan's pluthermal project remains suspended in the wake of the Fukushima No. 1 Nuclear Power Plant disaster due to safety concerns. The fact that a Japanese official promised to the U.S. to implement such a controversial project without a prior explanation to the Japanese public is expected to stir up controversy. According to the official documents obtained by the Mainichi, upon being pressed to reduce the amount of plutonium in Japan that could be diverted to military use, Ogushi told Poneman that Japan would burn plutonium in plutonium-thermal (pluthermal) reactors. The then ruling Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) was in the final stages of formulating its nuclear energy policy at the time. Source and more: [link to mainichi.jp] Fugggin Governmental Americanos! The Japanese parliamentary secretary made the promise without informing the people first. Business as usual. Why are you surprised..? because your not paid for disinformation, and being apologetic about the worlds worst nuclear disaster bug..... It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
Waterbug (OP) User ID: 34388912 United States 06/30/2013 09:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Japan made secret promise with U.S. to restart pluthermal nuclear program Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42570124 A Japanese prime ministerial envoy secretly promised to the United States that Japan would resume its controversial "pluthermal" program, using light-water reactors to burn plutonium, according to documents obtained by the Mainichi. The secret promise was made by Hiroshi Ogushi, then parliamentary secretary of the Cabinet Office, to Daniel Poneman, deputy secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy, during Ogushi's visit to the United States on behalf of then Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda in September last year. The revelation comes as Japan's pluthermal project remains suspended in the wake of the Fukushima No. 1 Nuclear Power Plant disaster due to safety concerns. The fact that a Japanese official promised to the U.S. to implement such a controversial project without a prior explanation to the Japanese public is expected to stir up controversy. According to the official documents obtained by the Mainichi, upon being pressed to reduce the amount of plutonium in Japan that could be diverted to military use, Ogushi told Poneman that Japan would burn plutonium in plutonium-thermal (pluthermal) reactors. The then ruling Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) was in the final stages of formulating its nuclear energy policy at the time. Source and more: [link to mainichi.jp] Fugggin Governmental Americanos! The Japanese parliamentary secretary made the promise without informing the people first. Business as usual. Why are you surprised..? because your not paid for disinformation, and being apologetic about the worlds worst nuclear disaster bug..... That's how they got nukes in the first place, ain't it..? The people had to be duped into it. |