Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,540 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 782,816
Pageviews Today: 966,487Threads Today: 160Posts Today: 3,410
07:52 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax

 
Space between the ears
User ID: 14197539
United States
04/15/2012 05:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Listen you circus side show killer clown freaks, no apollo something or other ever landed a human on that moon you see once in a while up there in the sky.

To prove it never happened they had to make a law to keep anyone who just so happens to have a rocket with a camera from looking down on the designated apollo make believe landing locations, off limits by law.

Thats right you low level thinkers, they made a law last year to keep everybody away from all those areas they claim have a landing mark by apollo. You will see nothing so they had a law to keep everybody away from seeing nothing. That keeps the charade alive and well with more obscure pimpin the landing stories as real.
nomuse (not logged in)
User ID: 2380183
United States
04/15/2012 05:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Listen you circus side show killer clown freaks, no apollo something or other ever landed a human on that moon you see once in a while up there in the sky.

To prove it never happened they had to make a law to keep anyone who just so happens to have a rocket with a camera from looking down on the designated apollo make believe landing locations, off limits by law.

Thats right you low level thinkers, they made a law last year to keep everybody away from all those areas they claim have a landing mark by apollo. You will see nothing so they had a law to keep everybody away from seeing nothing. That keeps the charade alive and well with more obscure pimpin the landing stories as real.
 Quoting: Space between the ears 14197539


Citation, please.
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
Contrarian's Contrarian

User ID: 11757475
Netherlands
04/16/2012 08:16 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Every single time you post, you end it with a magical and vague reference to SCIENCE or EVIDENCE
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

If you think it's wrong then show evidence it's wrong.
All you ever do is clown around and whine "Ain't so!"

The evidence and science that supports the historicity of Apollo is hardly vague or hidden away.

You being to lazy to go look for it and at it tells us all we need to know, you are not a truth seeker.


What a joke your posts are.
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

Said the clown...

What's your stage name? Bombastico the Windbag?


To prove it never happened they had to make a law to keep anyone who just so happens to have a rocket with a camera from looking down on the designated apollo make believe landing locations, off limits by law.
 Quoting: Space between the ears 14197539

Why do you lie?

Why do hoaxies lie so much?

Can't find any evidence to support your claims so you just invent some?
book
Hatred is a cancer upon the world.
It rots the mind and blackens the heart.


Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8597527
United States
04/16/2012 11:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax

Every single time you post, you end it with a magical and vague reference to SCIENCE or EVIDENCE
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

If you think it's wrong then show evidence it's wrong.


prove what wrong? you never say anything! your just a little lap dog that runs around yapping 'science!' 'science!'

what was that gem of yours earlier? "every professional in the world believes in the apollo moon landings" ? something like that?

what a little clown you are

cruise
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1015670
United States
04/16/2012 03:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax

Every single time you post, you end it with a magical and vague reference to SCIENCE or EVIDENCE
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

If you think it's wrong then show evidence it's wrong.


prove what wrong? you never say anything! your just a little lap dog that runs around yapping 'science!' 'science!'

what was that gem of yours earlier? "every professional in the world believes in the apollo moon landings" ? something like that?

what a little clown you are

cruise
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


His clowning appears to be worth a lot more than your handwaving.
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
Contrarian's Contrarian

User ID: 11757475
Netherlands
04/16/2012 03:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Every single time you post, you end it with a magical and vague reference to SCIENCE or EVIDENCE
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

If you think it's wrong then show evidence it's wrong.
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD

prove what wrong? you never say anything!
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

You are the one who claims all the evidence was faked, yet you do not even know what the evidence actually is.

THAT tells us all we need to know about the value of your sorry excuse for an opinion.

Each time you decline the burden to proof your claim, and you've done so dozens of time, you reveal yourself for the ignorant internet blowhard you are.
You don't know shit.
You don't have an effing clue.

what was that gem of yours earlier? "every professional in the world believes in the apollo moon landings" ? something like that?
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

Pretty much every expert in relevant domains.
And I challenged you to disproof it.

But of course you didn't even try.
Why do some honest investigative work when pontificating away into a vacuum is so much easier?

what a little clown you are
cruise
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

I'm not the one who seems only capable of producing large volumes of hot air.
What page now?
Still not a single piece of evidence for your claim.
You're an embarrassment to conspiracy researchers the world over.
book
Hatred is a cancer upon the world.
It rots the mind and blackens the heart.


Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5040935
United States
05/04/2012 10:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
bump for the super moon.
Raphael

User ID: 16757951
Canada
05/27/2012 07:07 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax


End of story.
book
For once come with a fresh argument, you guys are getting boring.
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD

s226

kiss my aura dora

OK here is the fresh argument, what is more important >> please choose A or B.

A/ landing or pretending to land a bunch of chimps on the MOON

or...

B/ using the MOON to help control the weather down here on EARTH?

BTW here is a fact of life lost on the NASA NAZI supporters.

>> Weather, mother nature, the wrathful YHVH is our nemesis from genesis, and the battle rages on.

DUH

Science wankers filled to the brim with Apollo stats are twats who are metaphysically challenged.

Hey NASA Nazis WTF is Apollo the Sun God and Zeus' 'the Eagle has landed' doing on the MOON?

namaste

Last Edited by Raphael on 06/12/2012 08:26 AM
The swastika is an inherent part of Intelligent Design.

[link to at37.wordpress.com]

“A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…”
-Einstein
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22346980
08/21/2012 07:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
from 0:38

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22346980
08/21/2012 07:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax

Every single time you post, you end it with a magical and vague reference to SCIENCE or EVIDENCE
 Quoting: Anonymous OP 8597527

If you think it's wrong then show evidence it's wrong.


prove what wrong? you never say anything! your just a little lap dog that runs around yapping 'science!' 'science!'

what was that gem of yours earlier? "every professional in the world believes in the apollo moon landings" ? something like that?

what a little clown you are

cruise
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD


I agree, but Halcyon Dayz, FCD is a 'BIG ONE' shill, not little.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17922170
United States
08/23/2012 08:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
This blows every other moon-hoax documentary out of the water.

Man went 230,000+ miles (460,000+ miles round trip!) into space in the 1960's. Since then, no country in the world has "had the budget" to go more than 400 miles into space. Are you effing kidding me??!!

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8597527


BUMP
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22573215
United States
08/25/2012 11:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
This blows every other moon-hoax documentary out of the water.

Man went 230,000+ miles (460,000+ miles round trip!) into space in the 1960's. Since then, no country in the world has "had the budget" to go more than 400 miles into space. Are you effing kidding me??!!

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8597527


BUMP
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17922170


OK, lets see what's involved in going to the Moon...

You need to design a spacecraft...well, a couple of spacecraft...but before you do that you have to design the mission.

To design the spacecraft, you also need to design the tools and machines to create the parts and assemble the ships. Then you need to design and build the buildings for creating and building the spaceship. Now you need to do the same for the rocket that will launch the thing. But to do that, you need to determine what "mode" you will use for the mission...EOR? LOR? Direct? This decision determines what sort of craft you will need, fuel/engine requirements etc. Then you need to go back and redetermine the facility to build the various parts, the tooling/jigs etc. Any mission changes will ripple through all of this..

Oh, you also need to assemble and launch the thing.We have LC39, originally created for Apollo, modified for Shuttle, and now being re-worked for Constellation. It's expensive, and any changes in the rocket hardware also affects the launch complex.

Finally, you need public support...no, you need public enthusiasm. Folks gotta be excited about this stuff, cause it's gonna be expensive as Hell. It will dig into folk's pet programs for funding, so you better be sure you have full dedication of the people.

Today, it seems ignorance and crude demeanor is celebrated over education and decorum. Society is too busy worrying about their "stuff" and their interests to think for any time about bigger things beyond themselves. There's no "reason" for such endeavors as going to the Moon again. Sure, we have Constellation slowly plodding along, but it will need a major boost in funding if it will get off the ground in a timely manner.

Meanwhile, Apollo brough back Moonrocks...and they helped in determining the origin of the Moon. We went there 9 times including the non-landing missions. The documentation (far, far more than the hoax community is aware of) provides thorough proof of the missions.

So for the hoaxers, you can bleat and demean, cuss and belittle all you like, but it doesn't change the facts, and it doesn't make you any better a person. You cannot argue what you refuse to understand, and you look feeble when you try...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22713807
Australia
08/27/2012 07:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
...


Not really. Those pics are terrible and out of focus. I've seen much better done with much less.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1386821


Out of focus my ass. You really can't read. My best photos look more like this:
[link to www.flickr.com]
You also don't seem to care that upgrades are still being made. It's amazing how irrational my haters are.
 Quoting: Astromut


That's blurry as hell. I think YOU need an upgrade to learn how to take better pictures.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1386821

Blurry my ass, you need glasses, or maybe a personality adjustment to get you to get you to quit trolling.
 Quoting: Astromut


...


Im not the only one who can see no tracks.. but seriously if you can circle the tyre tracks and upload the pic with the circle on it, i will believe you.. i conceded before when you gave me the explanation.. what makes you think that I will not again if shown the tracks in that photo??
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11802684

[link to i319.photobucket.com]
 Quoting: Astromut


Astro.. really? .. im so disappointed in you.. that isnt even the photo we are discussing.. this is

[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11802684

Incidentally, in that photo and the one immediately after it, you can see how the entire ground around the LEM has been completely disrupted by the astronauts compared to smoother ground farther away:
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]
Tracks are visible in the distance, but not once you get into the disrupted region. Since this was at the start of an EVA, it was after closeout on the previous EVA. The astronauts do a LOT of unloading from the rover after an EVA. They're constantly going back and forth between the rover and the LEM, and there's a ton of activity all around the rover. There's no way the tracks would survive that kind of activity. The rover doesn't seem to be producing clearly visible tire tracks in the photo I posted either, probably because the entire ground's already been churned up so the tracks won't provide the nice clean contrast you see when it drives on flat undisturbed regolith.
 Quoting: Astromut


Are you fucking delusional
sheepcrazyjak
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22689420
United States
08/27/2012 09:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
...


Out of focus my ass. You really can't read. My best photos look more like this:
[link to www.flickr.com]
You also don't seem to care that upgrades are still being made. It's amazing how irrational my haters are.
 Quoting: Astromut


That's blurry as hell. I think YOU need an upgrade to learn how to take better pictures.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1386821

Blurry my ass, you need glasses, or maybe a personality adjustment to get you to get you to quit trolling.
 Quoting: Astromut


 Quoting: Astromut


Astro.. really? .. im so disappointed in you.. that isnt even the photo we are discussing.. this is

[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11802684

Incidentally, in that photo and the one immediately after it, you can see how the entire ground around the LEM has been completely disrupted by the astronauts compared to smoother ground farther away:
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]
Tracks are visible in the distance, but not once you get into the disrupted region. Since this was at the start of an EVA, it was after closeout on the previous EVA. The astronauts do a LOT of unloading from the rover after an EVA. They're constantly going back and forth between the rover and the LEM, and there's a ton of activity all around the rover. There's no way the tracks would survive that kind of activity. The rover doesn't seem to be producing clearly visible tire tracks in the photo I posted either, probably because the entire ground's already been churned up so the tracks won't provide the nice clean contrast you see when it drives on flat undisturbed regolith.
 Quoting: Astromut


Are you fucking delusional
sheepcrazyjak
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22713807


Delusional? How about "informed"?

See, you hoaxers just parrot the same hoax stories, without taking a second to try to understand your opponents' evidence. Apollo, like any space endeavor, is based on science, engineering, orbital mechanics, math...you know, stuff that requires some effort to learn.

But saying "this looks odd, so it must be fake." "The LM looks like it was decorated by a 3 year old"...and somehow this just becomes accepted fact in your community.

Meanwhile, those with some education know full well that the Apollo landings were entirely real. The tracking and telemetry, the engineering, the design of the rockets and spacecraft, the life support systems, the trans lunar trajectory (which rapidly skirted the edges of the Van Allen belts due to the inclination of the originating Earth orbit)...lots of details that you haven't bothered to find.
Because you're to busy trying to tear others down, while you could be learning something you never knew. There is not one person with credentials that sees anything "fake" about Apollo. the Kaysings, Rene's and Whites of the world don't know what they talk about, they have never looked at a book or paper about thermodynamics, radiation or spacecraft guidance.

And neither have you...and it makes you look really foolish. Study some science, look at the subjects you so casually call "fake"...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22682349
United Kingdom
08/29/2012 06:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11303960

Now, That is a real cracker! Thanks!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23871119
United States
09/28/2012 01:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
I can't believe all of you are talking about ONE flag, when there were so many moon landings and flags posted every single time. Which moon landing are you talking about? What was THAT flag made of? Are you talking about one of several other moon landings? What was THAT flag made of? Do you really think they bought a whole bunch of flags from one place for all future moon landings? Do any of you stop for a moment to realize that the answer depends on which moon landing is being referenced?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24553925
United States
09/28/2012 02:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Ok I actually wanted to give it a chance but then i stopped watching then they said that no rockets would work in the vacuum of space lol
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24596731
United States
09/30/2012 12:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Ok I actually wanted to give it a chance but then i stopped watching then they said that no rockets would work in the vacuum of space lol
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24553925


Yeah, that's about the level of science education we're dealing with here...lots of willful, and proud, ignorance.
RelentlesslyClever

User ID: 24731078
United States
10/01/2012 12:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
I am new here and so not familiar with the system's logistics. I posted this as a "new thread" under General Conspiracies. Forgive me for posting the same thing twice, but I figure if anyone is interested in the post, here is where it should be;

THE APOLLO SCAM IN A NUTSHELL

In Apollo astronaut Michael Collins' "classic" telling of the American moon landing effort, "CARRYING THE FIRE"(my paperback edition, Ballantine, 1975), Collins makes the claim that Frank Borman's Apollo 8 cislunar illness was "Space Adaptation Syndrome" based. As a matter of fact, Borman is alleged by Collins to have been the first American astronaut to have experienced symptoms related to this malady of THE ORDER OF THE ZERO G, and said problem accounted for Borman's nausea and vomiting during his rather famous cislunar illness.

Collins' spin on the tale is ever so interesting, and more to the point, REVEALING AND INCRIMINATING. As the story originally appeared in the real time of the space flight, and as reported over and over and over again in the newspapers of the day, Borman had DIARRHEA in addition to his nausea and vomiting, BAD DIARRHEA. Why is it that Collins leaves out the diarrhea in his recounting of the Apollo 8 saga? Well, the diarrhea, were it to have been real, would have been potentially infectious. In addition, the foul liquid stool could have gummed up the ship's electronic works, just as was "feared" might be the case with the water leak in the staged Apollo 15 mission.

Stories like the Borman diarrhea in space yarn were told/scripted to add realism to the staged missions. In some cases, as this one, they realized in retrospect, the script as originally delivered was incriminating, and as such, they changed the story after the fact. Our CATCHING THEM RETELL THESE MANY STORIES IN LESS INCRIMINATING TERMS, OUR CATCHING THEM IN THESE LIES, IS AN APPROACH MY COLLEAGUES AND I REFER TO AS "NARRATIVE ANALYSIS" AND IT IS THE BEST/SUREST/MOST POTENT METHOD FOR DEMONSTRATING THE FRAUDULENCE OF THE APOLLO MISSIONS. As both stories cannot be true, as Borman cannot both have had and not have had diarrhea, we know both stories to be bogaus and therefore know all of Apollo to be fraudulent, every mission, every silly phony quindar "BEEP BEEP LINE".

Indeed, in the case under discussion, the case dealing with the Baloney based Borman cislunar diarrhea episode, Borman himself changed the story in his own retelling upon his return to earth. In an article Borman penned himself which appeared in LIFE MAGAZINE January 17, 1969, Borman wrote of his cislunar space illness and left out the bit about the diarrhea, just as Collins did, knowing the story did not add up, and now that the diarrhea was out of the bag, the fraud perpetrators had to do something to clean it up. The first approach was to pretend they never told the bogus tale about Borman having the runs to begin with. A nice video by 2 of my colleagues addresses this whole silly smelly business quite well;

[link to www.youtube.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]
Joe Montana is God
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24725326
Australia
10/01/2012 01:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
I am new here and so not familiar with the system's logistics. I posted this as a "new thread" under General Conspiracies. Forgive me for posting the same thing twice, but I figure if anyone is interested in the post, here is where it should be;

THE APOLLO SCAM IN A NUTSHELL

In Apollo astronaut Michael Collins' "classic" telling of the American moon landing effort, "CARRYING THE FIRE"(my paperback edition, Ballantine, 1975), Collins makes the claim that Frank Borman's Apollo 8 cislunar illness was "Space Adaptation Syndrome" based. As a matter of fact, Borman is alleged by Collins to have been the first American astronaut to have experienced symptoms related to this malady of THE ORDER OF THE ZERO G, and said problem accounted for Borman's nausea and vomiting during his rather famous cislunar illness.

Collins' spin on the tale is ever so interesting, and more to the point, REVEALING AND INCRIMINATING. As the story originally appeared in the real time of the space flight, and as reported over and over and over again in the newspapers of the day, Borman had DIARRHEA in addition to his nausea and vomiting, BAD DIARRHEA. Why is it that Collins leaves out the diarrhea in his recounting of the Apollo 8 saga? Well, the diarrhea, were it to have been real, would have been potentially infectious. In addition, the foul liquid stool could have gummed up the ship's electronic works, just as was "feared" might be the case with the water leak in the staged Apollo 15 mission.

Stories like the Borman diarrhea in space yarn were told/scripted to add realism to the staged missions. In some cases, as this one, they realized in retrospect, the script as originally delivered was incriminating, and as such, they changed the story after the fact. Our CATCHING THEM RETELL THESE MANY STORIES IN LESS INCRIMINATING TERMS, OUR CATCHING THEM IN THESE LIES, IS AN APPROACH MY COLLEAGUES AND I REFER TO AS "NARRATIVE ANALYSIS" AND IT IS THE BEST/SUREST/MOST POTENT METHOD FOR DEMONSTRATING THE FRAUDULENCE OF THE APOLLO MISSIONS. As both stories cannot be true, as Borman cannot both have had and not have had diarrhea, we know both stories to be bogaus and therefore know all of Apollo to be fraudulent, every mission, every silly phony quindar "BEEP BEEP LINE".

Indeed, in the case under discussion, the case dealing with the Baloney based Borman cislunar diarrhea episode, Borman himself changed the story in his own retelling upon his return to earth. In an article Borman penned himself which appeared in LIFE MAGAZINE January 17, 1969, Borman wrote of his cislunar space illness and left out the bit about the diarrhea, just as Collins did, knowing the story did not add up, and now that the diarrhea was out of the bag, the fraud perpetrators had to do something to clean it up. The first approach was to pretend they never told the bogus tale about Borman having the runs to begin with. A nice video by 2 of my colleagues addresses this whole silly smelly business quite well;

[link to www.youtube.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: RelentlesslyClever


hey hi again fattydash/ dr patrick
Thor's Hamster

User ID: 1248699
United States
10/01/2012 01:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
This blows every other moon-hoax documentary out of the water.

Man went 230,000+ miles (460,000+ miles round trip!) into space in the 1960's. Since then, no country in the world has "had the budget" to go more than 400 miles into space. Are you effing kidding me??!!

Apollo Zero


Did you ApolloTards realize that lasers can be reflected off the natural lunar surface?

Where is your proof that the lasers are actually hitting retro-reflectors and not just bouncing off the surface?


PIN THIS
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8597527


Absolutely correct and good insight. ^5!!! 5*s.
clappa
Apollo astronauts couldn't have passed through Van Allen's Belt. Van Allen wore suspenders.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24725326
Australia
10/01/2012 01:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
This blows every other moon-hoax documentary out of the water.

Man went 230,000+ miles (460,000+ miles round trip!) into space in the 1960's. Since then, no country in the world has "had the budget" to go more than 400 miles into space. Are you effing kidding me??!!

Apollo Zero


Did you ApolloTards realize that lasers can be reflected off the natural lunar surface?

Where is your proof that the lasers are actually hitting retro-reflectors and not just bouncing off the surface?


PIN THIS
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8597527


Absolutely correct and good insight. ^5!!! 5*s.
clappa
 Quoting: Thor's Hamster


we `apollotards' are well aware of this and have been for years
Are you aware that the reflectors return a much high number of photons than the lunar surface, and it can then be determined if you hit the reflector or missed???
nomuse (not logged in)
User ID: 2380183
United States
10/01/2012 02:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
"New here," right.

Is there anywhere left on the web that Doctor Socks is actually new to?

Perhaps he meant he got a new crate of socks.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24725326
Australia
10/01/2012 02:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
his choice of such `shitty' subject matter always gives him away- he seems to have a real poo fetish...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24737592
United States
10/01/2012 02:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Three words. Again.

Van. Allen. Belt.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14435734


Wrong. One word.

Radiation.

BEYOND. Van. Allen. Belt.

DEAD. LY.

Van Allen changed his story. It is documented that he now contradicts himself.

Let's not forget "the astronauts were SO lucky that there were no solar flare activity during their missions", propaganda which was spewed for years. Even "scientists" have been documented making this claim.

Which has been proven false. There were solar flares during EVERY Apollo moon mission.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24737592
United States
10/01/2012 02:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
"we `apollotards' are well aware of this and have been for years"

Really? Didn't see many, or should I say ANY, of you pointing out how misleading that mythbusters episode was.

In fact, it was high-fives all around for the Apollogists. Take that hoaxers. Yeah, git sum mythbusters. Reflectors bitches. Man on da moon.

BUT, then it was pointed out that lasers had been reflected off the moon BEFORE Apollo. Uh-oh. Quick, what do we do? Do what we always do. Move the goal-posts.

LOL.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24725326
Australia
10/01/2012 02:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Three words. Again.

Van. Allen. Belt.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14435734


Wrong. One word.

Radiation.

BEYOND. Van. Allen. Belt.

DEAD. LY.

Van Allen changed his story. It is documented that he now contradicts himself.

Let's not forget "the astronauts were SO lucky that there were no solar flare activity during their missions", propaganda which was spewed for years. Even "scientists" have been documented making this claim.

Which has been proven false. There were solar flares during EVERY Apollo moon mission.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24737592


one word

wrong

radiation from nasa
[link to lsda.jsc.nasa.gov]

and we all know nasa lies (say unlike dr fattydash PMSL)

radiation from the USSR
[link to cdsweb.cern.ch]

Van Allen changed his story. It is documented that he now contradicts himself.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24737592


care to show that documentation, because I have seen documentation from him denying this and that the hoaxers stories are a pack of `bs'

Jays letter to the actual Dr Van Allen and his reply are well known after the nonsense fox tv show that popularized that whole business in the first place
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24725326
Australia
10/01/2012 02:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
"we `apollotards' are well aware of this and have been for years"

Really? Didn't see many, or should I say ANY, of you pointing out how misleading that mythbusters episode was.

In fact, it was high-fives all around for the Apollogists. Take that hoaxers. Yeah, git sum mythbusters. Reflectors bitches. Man on da moon.

BUT, then it was pointed out that lasers had been reflected off the moon BEFORE Apollo. Uh-oh. Quick, what do we do? Do what we always do. Move the goal-posts.

LOL.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24737592


I would like to see these `Appologists all high fiving it posts' myself, as when that episode first aired, most of the forums debunking moon landing denialists ripped it to shreds with all the bad science it used
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
Contrarian's Contrarian

User ID: 19507663
Netherlands
10/01/2012 07:06 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
Are you aware that the reflectors return a much high number of photons than the lunar surface, and it can then be determined if you hit the reflector or missed???
 Quoting: Aussie Coward 24725326

'Hoaxie' and 'aware of scientific facts' don't go in the same sentence unless it is linked with 'aren't'.
Being scientifically literate and being a hoaxie are mutually exclusive.

There were solar flares during EVERY Apollo moon mission.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24737592

Case in point: a hoaxie who for some reason thinks solar flares are omnidirectional.
book
Hatred is a cancer upon the world.
It rots the mind and blackens the heart.


Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 21705985
United States
10/01/2012 07:13 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Game Over for NASA Moon-Landing Hoax
No, the surface of the moon can't be used as a reflector
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10952430


Earth-Moon-Earth, also known as moon bounce, is a radio communications technique which relies on the propagation of radio waves from an Earth-based transmitter directed via reflection from the surface of the Moon back to an Earth-based receiver.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8597527


But that's not the same thing as bouncing lasers off it.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.

News