| Users Online Now: 2,077 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,358,449 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,861,108 | Threads Today: 473 | Posts Today: 7,994 |
| 02:44 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,077 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,358,449 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,861,108 | Threads Today: 473 | Posts Today: 7,994 |
| 02:44 PM | ||
If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon? | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 6231580  United States08/26/2012 11:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19725671 United States08/26/2012 11:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22631821 United States08/26/2012 11:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22629621  Thailand08/26/2012 11:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was only the 3 astronauts, right? No rocket scientists. No reconstructed apparatus. And what about the operations of firing a rocket WITH 3 MEN AND FUEL, CAMERA'S etc FROM THE MOON? How the hell could any scientist speculate that 3 astronauts would be able to take off by themseves? From point zero, the amount of fuel needed? What about the times; we needed to send disinfo to the Soviet Union... 1+1 = 2. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6231580 It was fake. Recondition your mind: Aint NO ONE been on the moon. Ummm...there were two men in the LEM when it lifted off from the moon, not three. The third was in the orbiting command module. It did it with sixteen Reaction Control System (RCS) thrusters, 5.17 pounds (2.35 kg) each) mounted in four quads |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19058378 United States08/26/2012 11:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 12257174 United States08/26/2012 11:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 6231580 United States08/26/2012 11:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was only the 3 astronauts, right? No rocket scientists. No reconstructed apparatus. And what about the operations of firing a rocket WITH 3 MEN AND FUEL, CAMERA'S etc FROM THE MOON? How the hell could any scientist speculate that 3 astronauts would be able to take off by themseves? From point zero, the amount of fuel needed? What about the times; we needed to send disinfo to the Soviet Union... 1+1 = 2. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6231580 It was fake. Recondition your mind: Aint NO ONE been on the moon. Ummm...there were two men in the LEM when it lifted off from the moon, not three. The third was in the orbiting command module. It did it with sixteen Reaction Control System (RCS) thrusters, 5.17 pounds (2.35 kg) each) mounted in four quads ok.... 2 men. not much difference though; what about the technology of the time? the fuel required would have been hundreds of lbs, no? to take off from point zero. And where is the rocketry apparatus? who built it? |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 6231580 United States08/26/2012 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just because you're not smart enough to wrap your tiny brain around it doesn't mean it couldn't be done. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22631821 No one said it was easy but it was quite doable, all the problems were solved, and we got it done. Yes, im no rocket scientist. But it took hundreds of men with 1000's of lb's of fuel to get off the earth... and centuries of trial and error... yet we send up 3 men with NO REAL firsthand knowledge of lunar aerodynamics? just theory? doesnt hold water. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21186169 United States08/26/2012 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1517542 United States08/26/2012 11:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was only the 3 astronauts, right? No rocket scientists. No reconstructed apparatus. And what about the operations of firing a rocket WITH 3 MEN AND FUEL, CAMERA'S etc FROM THE MOON? How the hell could any scientist speculate that 3 astronauts would be able to take off by themseves? From point zero, the amount of fuel needed? What about the times; we needed to send disinfo to the Soviet Union... 1+1 = 2. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6231580 It was fake. Recondition your mind: Aint NO ONE been on the moon. Ummm...there were two men in the LEM when it lifted off from the moon, not three. The third was in the orbiting command module. It did it with sixteen Reaction Control System (RCS) thrusters, 5.17 pounds (2.35 kg) each) mounted in four quads ok.... 2 men. not much difference though; what about the technology of the time? the fuel required would have been hundreds of lbs, no? to take off from point zero. And where is the rocketry apparatus? who built it? please stop. the stupid is bothering me right now. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19058378 United States08/26/2012 11:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21186169 United States08/26/2012 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21186169 United States08/26/2012 11:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 6231580 United States08/26/2012 11:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was only the 3 astronauts, right? No rocket scientists. No reconstructed apparatus. And what about the operations of firing a rocket WITH 3 MEN AND FUEL, CAMERA'S etc FROM THE MOON? How the hell could any scientist speculate that 3 astronauts would be able to take off by themseves? From point zero, the amount of fuel needed? What about the times; we needed to send disinfo to the Soviet Union... 1+1 = 2. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6231580 It was fake. Recondition your mind: Aint NO ONE been on the moon. Ummm...there were two men in the LEM when it lifted off from the moon, not three. The third was in the orbiting command module. It did it with sixteen Reaction Control System (RCS) thrusters, 5.17 pounds (2.35 kg) each) mounted in four quads ok.... 2 men. not much difference though; what about the technology of the time? the fuel required would have been hundreds of lbs, no? to take off from point zero. And where is the rocketry apparatus? who built it? please stop. the stupid is bothering me right now. its bothering you: thats called DOUBT. all this because the elitist dictatorship is failing; and has lost all credibility to dictate facts to us...ANYMORE. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 12562320 United States08/26/2012 11:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We are sending robots to mars and people still don't think we could have sent people to the moon? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378 Robots don't get irradiated by the Van Allen Belt. People do. Men cannot grow beards in space. [link to vimeo.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22632779  United Kingdom08/26/2012 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 6231580 United States08/26/2012 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We are sending robots to mars and people still don't think we could have sent people to the moon? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378 WHY HAVENT WE gone back then? its over 40 years old technology, the costs in the times would/should be MICROCOSM of what it was... hell, we should have cities up there.... i call bullshit on the moon landing. We would have gone back; yet most modern space operations have been ORBITING, and shuttes... the rea tech. 'man on the moon' is a soviet directed gov psy op. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 2011675 United States08/26/2012 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Top Hat Top Hat  User ID: 22633369 United States08/26/2012 11:39 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was only the 3 astronauts, right? No rocket scientists. No reconstructed apparatus. And what about the operations of firing a rocket WITH 3 MEN AND FUEL, CAMERA'S etc FROM THE MOON? How the hell could any scientist speculate that 3 astronauts would be able to take off by themseves? From point zero, the amount of fuel needed? What about the times; we needed to send disinfo to the Soviet Union... 1+1 = 2. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6231580 It was fake. Recondition your mind: Aint NO ONE been on the moon. Um, 1 man on the LEM and 2 men on the lunar module. 3 - 1 = 2 men on the Moon dummy. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 6231580 United States08/26/2012 11:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 6231580 United States08/26/2012 11:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was only the 3 astronauts, right? No rocket scientists. No reconstructed apparatus. And what about the operations of firing a rocket WITH 3 MEN AND FUEL, CAMERA'S etc FROM THE MOON? How the hell could any scientist speculate that 3 astronauts would be able to take off by themseves? From point zero, the amount of fuel needed? What about the times; we needed to send disinfo to the Soviet Union... 1+1 = 2. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6231580 It was fake. Recondition your mind: Aint NO ONE been on the moon. Um, 1 man on the LEM and 2 men on the lunar module. 3 - 1 = 2 men on the Moon dummy. already addressed, its now a straw man |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1517542 United States08/26/2012 11:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22629621 Ummm...there were two men in the LEM when it lifted off from the moon, not three. The third was in the orbiting command module. It did it with sixteen Reaction Control System (RCS) thrusters, 5.17 pounds (2.35 kg) each) mounted in four quads ok.... 2 men. not much difference though; what about the technology of the time? the fuel required would have been hundreds of lbs, no? to take off from point zero. And where is the rocketry apparatus? who built it? please stop. the stupid is bothering me right now. its bothering you: thats called DOUBT. all this because the elitist dictatorship is failing; and has lost all credibility to dictate facts to us...ANYMORE. nope, no doubt. just your stupid is hurting my head at the moment. It will pass when I completely forget about you and your post in the next few minutes. the time I have wasted on you hurts my head |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22633279 United States08/26/2012 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 6231580 United States08/26/2012 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1472892  Israel08/26/2012 11:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 6231580 United States08/26/2012 11:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just because you're not smart enough to wrap your tiny brain around it doesn't mean it couldn't be done. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22631821 First sign of a poster being a parroting drone doing as his controllers tell him to: attempt to belittle the OP. You lose. exactly, its how the 9/11 gov shills deall with questions... "dismissive ridicule".. and it IS FAIL. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22481746 United Kingdom08/26/2012 11:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 6231580 United States08/26/2012 11:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6231580 ok.... 2 men. not much difference though; what about the technology of the time? the fuel required would have been hundreds of lbs, no? to take off from point zero. And where is the rocketry apparatus? who built it? please stop. the stupid is bothering me right now. its bothering you: thats called DOUBT. all this because the elitist dictatorship is failing; and has lost all credibility to dictate facts to us...ANYMORE. nope, no doubt. just your stupid is hurting my head at the moment. It will pass when I completely forget about you and your post in the next few minutes. the time I have wasted on you hurts my head NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF DENIAL... go take a tylenol. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22631821 United States08/26/2012 11:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They've made enemies on BOTH sides. All because of the eitist agenda and policy capture that is all about destroying america, imprisoning americans.. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6231580 Fuck it. and fuck them; their exploitation is coming to an end. Who is "them"? Are you another paranoid Jeww hater? You're blaming Teh Jewws for faking the moon landing?? |
| Raido User ID: 22246636 United Kingdom08/26/2012 11:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was only the 3 astronauts, right? No rocket scientists. No reconstructed apparatus. And what about the operations of firing a rocket WITH 3 MEN AND FUEL, CAMERA'S etc FROM THE MOON? How the hell could any scientist speculate that 3 astronauts would be able to take off by themseves? From point zero, the amount of fuel needed? What about the times; we needed to send disinfo to the Soviet Union... 1+1 = 2. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6231580 It was fake. Recondition your mind: Aint NO ONE been on the moon. While im not saying the moon landing is real or fake taking off from the moons surface is easy due to the low gravity. and im sure they did it with small explosives on the base of the lander that shot the passenger but up in to orbit very slowly. INSANELY LOW GRAV = LITTLE FORCE REQUIRED |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22633247 United States08/26/2012 11:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was only the 3 astronauts, right? No rocket scientists. No reconstructed apparatus. And what about the operations of firing a rocket WITH 3 MEN AND FUEL, CAMERA'S etc FROM THE MOON? How the hell could any scientist speculate that 3 astronauts would be able to take off by themseves? From point zero, the amount of fuel needed? What about the times; we needed to send disinfo to the Soviet Union... 1+1 = 2. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6231580 It was fake. Recondition your mind: Aint NO ONE been on the moon. it took the Saturn 5 rocket to escape Earth's gravity. the Moon is 20% of Earth's gravity. so, it would take 20% of a Saturn 5 to escape Moon's gravity! yer right: it's all a FAKE! |
