If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?

Seriously, you're arguing now that the reason it couldn't have happened is we didn't have remote controlled Cameras?

Would not the Soviets have tracked each mission? Did they ever come out and say it didn't happen? I mean they were on the losing side of the space race.

Please indicate location of TV camera arm please.
[link to lightsinthedark.files.wordpress.com]

the rooskies didn't know their ass back in 1969.
anything they had they stole, and didn't have a clue
about how it worked once they had it.

and, now, they've got that douche-bag Putin trying to do it all over again.

They tracked each and every mission precisely with telescopes and directional radar and radio transmissions. They had no doubt it was real.

Look at the entrance of the module. With space suits on they cannot fit thru opening. Rip off!

stupid bots

quite unbelievable how many here believe the most bizarre things and at the same time doubt this.

in October 1957 they put a small vacuum-tube transmitter,
that went beep-beep-beep, into orbit, and the world went
nuts.

You don't even know the first thing about the subject.

EXACTLY!

If there was even a hint it wasn't real, they would have screamed blue murder.

Their silent acceptance speaks volumes.



.

If you can't be bothered to explore the laws of physics on your own, I'm certainly not going to waste my time forcing them down your throat. Gravity, escape velocity, and acceleration are all good starting points. Enjoy.

i know that in 1969 the only computers they had were
a couple-a-hundred single transistors silk-screened
onto a 4x4 inch fiberglass board, that didn't even work.

I see a lot of ignorance about the Apollo program here. Please watch this documentary.


Moon Machines - Saturn V (part 1 of 3)



Moon Machines - Saturn V (part 2 of 3)



Moon Machines - Saturn V (part 3 of 3)





Moon machines - Command Module (part 1 of 3)



Moon machines - Command Module (part 2 of 3)



Moon machines - Command Module (part 3 of 3)





Moon Machines - Navigation (part 1 of 3)



Moon Machines - Navigation (part 2 of 3)



Moon Machines - Navigation (part 3 of 3)

Actually - on 21st July 1969 - While Neil and Buzz were actually ON the Moon, the Russians put a probe (Luna 15) on the Moon.
OK, so it crashed (it was intended as a sample return) - but that's where the human element came into it's own.

continued....



Moon Machines - Lunar Module (part 1 of 3)



Moon Machines - Lunar Module (part 2 of 3)



Moon Machines - Lunar Module (part 3 of 3)




Moon Machines - Spacesuits (part 1 of 3)



Moon Machines - Spacesuits (part 2 of 3)



Moon Machines - Spacesuits (part 3 of 3)




Moon Machines - Lunar Rover (part 1 of 3)



Moon Machines - Lunar Rover (part 2 of 3)



Moon Machines - Lunar Rover (part 3 of 3)

Fake just like everything else!!!!

Computers?
Don't need no stinking computers!

Those slide-rule whizzes really didn't need Microshaft to get to the moon and back. The physics were thoroughly understood.

to my mind, the greatest technological achievement of
the 20th century was the launching in Telestar on July 10, 1962, and everything that proceeded therefrom...

The moon does not have an atmosphere. Aerodynamic pressure and drag require a lot of fuel. Its not only gravity that has to be overcome.

The CPU's sent up with Curiosity are loosely the equivalent of stuff you were using in '96. In space, the latest and greatest isn't always the best suited for the job.

It isn't the size of your processor, it's how you use it.

Another interesting question, who was filming when they left the moon?
The static camera on the ground is MOVING.

rockets and stuff....

There are these amazing things known as GEARS and WHEELS.....

It's not moving
It pans upwards - REMOTELY

Answered in this very thread. Amazing what you can learn when you actually make an attempt at it.

two great American technological fiascos:

1. the bozos that ground the mirror for the Hubble Space Telescope ground it to the wrong specs and didn't bother
to test it, and the mirror was no good when they launched it. (any highschool physics kid knows how to grind a telescope mirror)

2. the great "Patriot anti-missile defense system" that
we gave to Israel in 1990 couldn't shoot down any of
Sadam's Scud missiles because the bozos who made the
internal clock for the computer system screwed it up
and the clock was off by 1 microsecond (which was equivalent
to an 800 meter inaccuracy at target).

[link to science.nasa.gov]

Apparently we didn't have the actual technology to have humans survive on the moon.

That link and the fact that we're still developing the technology to return is my proof of this.

Now, that's interesting.

Joining up with an orbiting body (what was orbiting velocity and trajectory?), with no navigational equipment worth mentioning? That's quite a feat on this side of possible, but deep within the zone of improbable.

Those "lunar modules" were, more or less, just sealed cans of packed human meat, far from interplanetary spaceships that people usually imagine them to be.

How about this conspiracy theory then? They did go to the Moon, but they never landed there. It was all a show for the Soviets.