Moon Hoax Proof: There is NOT a Single Photo of the First Step on the Moon. | |
Weasel_Turbine User ID: 14143765 United States 12/13/2012 11:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How sad what? there are lot of bullshit infos online, SO let me see the stuff on nasa site if that's so easy to find. Otherwise also for you -----> - SO, still yet, no one got a clue where to find that claim on nasa site? ..interesting. ANYONE that can use google can find it. Sadly you aren't capable of doing anything for yourself. If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
DUCM900 User ID: 29784956 Italy 12/13/2012 11:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1516308 Netherlands 12/13/2012 11:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DUCM900 User ID: 29784956 Italy 12/13/2012 11:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nomuse (not logged in) User ID: 2380183 United States 12/13/2012 02:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | SO, still yet, no one got a clue where to find that claim on nasa site? Quoting: DUCM900 ..interesting. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] Took one click to find. |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 25358447 Netherlands 12/13/2012 03:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BTW, technically no Apollo mission left the Earth's orbit. Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD Their target, the Moon, is after all in orbit around the Earth. ..about what I wrote, I mean the imaginary line track out of the Earth's Atmosphere (in other words out of the Thermosphere). It's called "an orbit". The spacecraft in LEO alters its orbit into one that that intersects with the Moon's. Astronautics: you don't know it. That is a radiotelescope, darling. Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD Those are indeed good enough to tell if a signal is coming from a stationary point on the surface of the Moon, or from an object in orbit around the Moon. So what? they could not track anything? what are you talking about. They could track it, and THEY DID. That they didn't is yet an other one of the hoax-peddlers' lies that the gullible hoaxies believe without any critical thought. Remarkable bunch of creduloids those hoaxies. The evidence: you don't know it. And another "Why X?" with X being a non-fact. Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD [link to en.wikipedia.org] Don't you get tired of being so wrong all the time? Just as well, because you're so good at it. "Shill" is just GLP-speak for "person who has shown me wrong". The camera was attached to the rover and remotely controlled by a guy named Ed Fendell in mission control. Quoting: Weasel_Turbine Are there any reference about this on NASA site? Apollo history: you don't know it. The ability to do your own research: you don't have it. ... Quoting: DUCM900 Okay, Im normally one to support this type of opinion in regaurds to the moon, however, that picture just made me laugh... literally. They are take at different angles, hence reflections in one, and not in the other. Notice the pic on the right has more "space" to the lefT? Different capture angles. I know that, BUT where those "reflections" comes from? The construction of the spacecraft: you don't know it. (The triangular window isn't at a 90 degrees angle with the surface.) Is there anything about Apollo that you do know? Why are all hoaxies such complete ignorami? What part of "why should I do your work for you" do you not understand? Especially when you try to insult everyone you disagree with? It is far more fun watching you avoid doing a simple google search anyway. Really exposes you for the troll you are. Quoting: Weasel_Turbine so DO IT Shill, F*** DO IT! EXPOSE ME. You obviously need no help with that. You expose your ignorance, and sheer unwillingness to learn anything, with every word you post. It is something you have in common with all hoaxies. His argument seems to be "I would have..." AKA the "If I ran the zoo" argument. Some people seem to be incapable of understanding that OTHER people might have different priorities. Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 12/13/2012 03:49 PM Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29774557 Croatia 12/13/2012 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10372663 United States 12/13/2012 03:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | not having a photo of the first step on the moon wouldnt prove the entire thing to be a hoax Interesting, so the men made a historical mission like that, took lots of stupid photos and NOT the first step on the moon? Are u freaking kidding me? How exactly were they supposed to do that? Are YOU freakin kidding me?!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29774557 Croatia 12/13/2012 03:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mars distance Mar. 03, 2012 – 100.7 million km (62.6 million miles) Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29774557 but no problem to get brilliant detailed photos The average distance from Earth to Moon is 384,403 km (238,857 miles). but all we get is this crap [link to cumbriansky.files.wordpress.com] OK, but I heard there are 12 monkeys ready to fly there and bring us some more rocks |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 25358447 Netherlands 12/13/2012 03:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mars distance Mar. 03, 2012 – 100.7 million km (62.6 million miles) Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29774557 but no problem to get brilliant detailed photos The average distance from Earth to Moon is 384,403 km (238,857 miles). but all we get is this crap [link to cumbriansky.files.wordpress.com] Do you know what the word "resolution" (in optics) means? Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
DUCM900 User ID: 29784956 Italy 12/13/2012 04:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | SO, still yet, no one got a clue where to find that claim on nasa site? Quoting: DUCM900 ..interesting. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] Took one click to find. Thanks but I know that page link, so what? did you find any reference on remote camera? |
nomuse (not logged in) User ID: 2380183 United States 12/13/2012 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Baby steps. First get him to show the smallest object photographed on Mars (not by a lander, rover, or orbiter). He apparently has no idea what the scale of the features he may have seen is. (seen..have..scale...is...? okay, grammar gives up and goes home for the day.) |
nomuse (not logged in) User ID: 2380183 United States 12/13/2012 05:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | SO, still yet, no one got a clue where to find that claim on nasa site? Quoting: DUCM900 ..interesting. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] Took one click to find. Thanks but I know that page link, so what? did you find any reference on remote camera? The phrase "Ground Controlled Television Assembly" didn't leap out at you? In addition to being mentioned in about half the references linked by that page, there are several reports specifically on the control and a complete operations and check-out manual. |
DUCM900 User ID: 29784956 Italy 12/13/2012 05:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | SO, still yet, no one got a clue where to find that claim on nasa site? Quoting: DUCM900 ..interesting. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] Took one click to find. Thanks but I know that page link, so what? did you find any reference on remote camera? The phrase "Ground Controlled Television Assembly" didn't leap out at you? In addition to being mentioned in about half the references linked by that page, there are several reports specifically on the control and a complete operations and check-out manual. You mean that? --> [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] - Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/13/2012 05:08 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29345426 Australia 12/13/2012 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DUCM900 User ID: 29811317 Italy 12/13/2012 06:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | SO not any type of exhaust plume. Why? Also No sand in the ground moving away from the LEM's bottom area when lifting off. Why? - Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/13/2012 06:25 PM |
Weasel_Turbine User ID: 14143765 United States 12/13/2012 06:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the fuel used does not produce a visible plume in a vacuum. Also Quoting: DUCM900 No sand in the ground moving away from the LEM's bottom area when lifting off. Why? - All the thrust was concentrated on the descent stage (the part that was left behind). Why would the thrust then affect the ground? If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
DUCM900 User ID: 29815321 Italy 12/13/2012 06:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | WHY? which are the chemical elements as the result of the reaction stuff? All the thrust was concentrated on the descent stage (the part that was left behind). Why would the thrust then affect the ground? Quoting: Weasel_Turbine Simply because there would be too much power released. - Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/15/2012 07:29 AM |
Weasel_Turbine User ID: 14143765 United States 12/13/2012 07:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Translation: google doesn't work for me so I have to ask others to do my work. Because I'm feeling generous [link to www.google.com] The fuel used Aerozine 50 with nitrogen tetroxide as an oxidizer. there are other rockets that use the same fuel and those ALSO don't have a visible plume in a vacuum. Explained in depth here [link to www.clavius.org] All the thrust was concentrated on the descent stage (the part that was left behind). Why would the thrust then affect the ground? Quoting: Weasel_Turbine Simply because there was too much power released. ? It still doesn't make sense for the thrust to affect the ground. It was directed at the descent stage and deflected outward and upward. NONE of it towards the ground. Have you actually LOOKED at the liftoff? Last Edited by LHP598 on 12/13/2012 07:23 PM If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12790821 United States 12/13/2012 07:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Stupid moon-hoaxtards. You're stupid. You're just stupid people who want to be contrary about something. If the moon landing was a hoax, don't you think THE SOVIETS would have come out and said so in 1969 if they had even the SLIGHTEST SHRED OF EVIDENCE? They didn't. In fact, they accused the US of running a conspiracy to build a missile base on the moon to attack the USSR. Don't you think it would have been a much better tactic to try and get the world to believe the American capitalist pigs were lying about landing on the moon? |
DUCM900 User ID: 29815321 Italy 12/13/2012 07:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Translation: google doesn't work for me so I have to ask others to do my work. Quoting: Weasel_Turbine Because I'm feeling generous [link to www.google.com] The fuel used Aerozine 50 with nitrogen tetroxide as an oxidizer. there are other rockets that use the same fuel and those ALSO don't have a visible plume in a vacuum. Explained in depth here [link to www.clavius.org] I asked for the chemical elements as the result of the reaction, NOT the primary elements. Anyway you did not link NASA, you've just use google as a noob and then you picked up the crap that fit nice to you. Are you freaking kidding me? - Last Edited by IWASTHERE on 12/13/2012 07:54 PM |
DUCM900 User ID: 29815321 Italy 12/13/2012 07:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Weasel_Turbine User ID: 14143765 United States 12/13/2012 08:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I asked for the chemical elements as the result of the reaction, NOT the primary elements. Quoting: DUCM900 Anyway you did not link NASA, you've just use google as a noob and then you picked up the crap that fit nice to you. Are you freaking kidding me? - Translation: I'm too lazy to do the work myself so I'll complain about what you gave me. I provided information about the fuel used and showed evidence that other rockets using the same fuel do not have visible plumes. If I had given the resultant chemical compounds I doubt you'd know what to do with it anyway (the products by the way are water vapor, nitrogen gas, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen gas and hydroxide). [link to www.dtic.mil] I gave you the answer you needed, not the answer you wanted. You'd realize that if you weren't too busy trolling. If the information is correct, (it is but I'm betting you didn't even read it) then why does it matter what the source is? Last Edited by LHP598 on 12/13/2012 08:10 PM If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
Critical Thinker User ID: 29832692 United States 12/13/2012 11:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The camera was already outside the LM on a platform called the "MESA" (Modularized Equipment Stowage Assembly). Before Armstrong climbed down the ladder, he pulled a ring that deployed the MESA and allowed the TV pictures to start. (From the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal. Times are "Ground Elapsed Time"--GET is basically the mission time) 109:21:07 Aldrin: Did you get the MESA out? 109:21:09 Armstrong: I'm going to pull it now. (Pause) [Neil is pulling the D-ring which releases the MESA, attached to the side of the LM under Buzz's station, and lets it swing down into an accessible position. Once down on the surface, he can adjust the MESA height if necessary.] 109:21:18 Armstrong: Houston, the MESA came down all right. Also see [link to www.myspacemuseum.com] |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 25358447 Netherlands 12/14/2012 06:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | those 2 raving ginger queers? lol. well that just proves the fake moon landing was real. Classic ad hom. [link to yourlogicalfallacyis.com] And the usual abominable logic. For over 40 years hoaxies have produced vast amounts of hot air but not a single verifiable fact that indicates that their accusations are even remotely correct. That doesn't proof them wrong, but it certainly proofs them irrelevant. What is a rocket plume, and what makes it visible? Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
DUCM900 User ID: 29845290 Italy 12/14/2012 06:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29212529 United States 12/14/2012 08:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey duc Your shill stuff is getting old, and it is becoming apparent taht you have no argument aside from crying "shill". Just because someone knows more (a LOT more) than you do about Apollo. You don't "know" anything about Apollo, or spaceflight in general. You just spout the hoax line, without knowing anything about the subject you "argue". It makes you look silly...go play with your bike or something (just don't ride it, there are too many idiot bikers out there...) Oh, I alos ride... |
DUCM900 User ID: 29950418 Italy 12/15/2012 07:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey duc Quoting: Anonymous Coward 29212529 Your shill stuff is getting old, and it is becoming apparent taht you have no argument aside from crying "shill". Just because someone knows more (a LOT more) than you do about Apollo. You don't "know" anything about Apollo, or spaceflight in general. You just spout the hoax line, without knowing anything about the subject you "argue". |
DUCM900 User ID: 30904298 Italy 12/26/2012 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DUCM900 User ID: 30941792 Italy 12/27/2012 06:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |