Another Sandy Hook Inconsistency - Caught on local talk radio

[link to www.nypost.com]

Mr. Rosen is now saying that the the mother of the child who visited his house at noon is Jesse Lewis' mother.

Though don't like to quote NY Post, they do have what is purportedly the class picture, minus, apparently, the Parker girl:

[link to www.nypost.com]

He is the one who said he held six children, who were little by little retrieved by the parents. Will attempt to make a compendium of all the variant stories on this issue.

Can anyone explain how to quote others and also how to post directly under a comment?

The interview of Mr. Rosen relative to the Lewis boy and his mother is here:

[link to www.insideedition.com]

At the top right of the post you want to quote, click the left-most icon.

Hello Mom, this is your son, Mark Bingham. You believe me, don't you mom?

Good grief, what a load of bs about the whole story.
It seems entirely made up.

The award for crap pusher might be Kaitlin Roig who claims she, an aide and 15 students huddled in a 3x3 foot bathroom,
with a sink and toilet.
You believe me, don't you, Ms.Roig asks.

'''
A group of little first-graders was so terrified when crazed gunman Adam Lanza burst into their classroom that they ran from their safe hiding place only to be promptly gunned down, one of the children’s fathers recounted yesterday.
'''
So, Now this "Crazed Gunman" is bursting into a room with kids screaming, and running in every direction, hits each kid multiple times?

Apparantly without breaking any windows?

Now I'm having a time frame/target aquisition that will not work?

Targets randomly scrambeling every which way, he allegedly hits each target multiple times, he apparently doesn't miss, survivor statistics well below normal, and in the time frame represented by the Scanner Recording?

?

Regarding the Chris Rodia this article was just published: Mr. Rodia has been wrongly associated with this due to an honest mistake in the listening to the cross-interactions of police transmissions. One of the original posters, willymon, seems to have confirmed this.

[link to www.newstimes.com]

However,the important issue is yet another discrepancy, that the car doesn't belong to Mrs. Lanza but to a "relative:" Have asked someone to run the plate: if he can do so, will post it, here.


The quote from the article: "While the school shooting is still an active case, State Police spokesman Lt. J. Paul Vance said there was only one shooter: Adam Lanza, 20, who took his own life at the scene.

"We aren't looking for anybody else -- for any other person," Vance said Wednesday, adding he has never heard of Rodia.
The car confiscated at the scene, the black Honda with that license plate, belongs to a relative of Lanza's and not to Rodia, he said

Two discrepancies: an active case but "not lookig for anybody else" and the most important one, it is NOT Nancy Lanza's car.

Read more: [link to www.ctpost.com]

This would seemingly be a tall-tale. Dramatization. Hollywood.

The plethora of witnesses said the shooter never said a word.

The statement by one student, "Let me in, Let me in": not any eyewitness, he was in a closet. That could have just as easily been Lanza pleading for help.

Thus, the Soto heroics; "they're in the gym" must be a DC-based psy-ops and should be disregarded ad the very least as hearsay.

It is reasonable to presume that all statements about known heroics in that room are questionable.

The caller could have easily have been a plant, especially if he is calling for profiling. The nut-cases are the people who orchestrated this, not the relatively "normal kid" Lanza.

I've been reading the glp threads on Sandy Hook, as well as local mainstream media reports. The whole thing is mind boggling. It becomes very difficult to ascertain the truth when so many theories abound, including the "official" theory put forth by law enforcement and mainstream media.

Some threads are taking the "macro" approach. What's the agenda? Who did it? Why? I'm trying to take the "micro" approach. Instead of saying, "here's what I think happened," or "this is what it's all about," I'm trying to identify the specific discrepancies in the official story as pronounced by law enforcement and parroted by MSM.

Things like why did they first say Ryan Lanza? Why was Nancy Lanza reported to be a teacher? Why the confusion about the guns, where found and how many? Why couldn't venerable publications like the Hartford Courant get basic facts straight about what happened in Ms. Soto's room, days and even weeks after the event? Why did law enforcement say they found "very good" evidence at the Lanza home, then later reveal that little of value had been discovered, and that hard drives were smashed? Why no photos of shooter's point of entry, or of 600 students evacuating? Gene Rosen's far-fetched story. Who was the mysterious man Rosen referred to in his interviews, the one who seems to have corralled the kids and was "talking harshly?" What has become of Natalie Hammond, the wounded teacher? Did any of the witnesses actually see Adam Lanza's face, or did he wear a mask? Did they perform forensic test on Adam to see if he'd fired a weapon?

These are just some of the questions. I am certain I am leaving out many important ones. Nowhere in this post have I postulated what I think happened, who I think did it, or what I think it's all about. First things first. We need facts, which have been scarce thus far in this case. We who actually care should start by demanding answers from those that have them

found the dr. oz episode but couldnt find the part where the kid talks about a drill. They did find the one kid who couldn't get a complete sentence out of his mouth.

Doctor Oz:"thats fine, perfect."

[link to www.doctoroz.com]

Thanks for the link.

The kid mentions "drill" about a minute in.

Holy crap just watched again. Thanks for the time.

Dr. Oz: "thanks we have free flu shots backstage"

LMAO and some aspartame soft drinks on ice!

I swear this just keeps getting crazier.

Here's an article from Jan. 5 Connecticut Post:

Exerpt:
"
Like Jesse's father, Neil Heslin, Lewis raced to Sandy Hook School from her job in Orange the moment she heard the news. A text message from a friend started the worst and longest day of her life.

"I got there from work right about the time all the kids came out to their parents," Lewis said. "I'm running around searching and somebody said, `Oh, I think they took Jesse to the house next door with six other kids.' So I ran to the house next door, but he wasn't there."

[link to www.ctpost.com]

That just doesn't sound right. "They" took him to the neighbors??? I thought the kids ran there. Or did the bus driver take them there? or the mysterious guy who had the kids sitting in orderly fashion and "talking harshly" when Gene Rosen showed up...

This news report really freaks me out with the local reporter saying that she ran across the school nurse who has been there for 15 years and She knew Adams mom and she was a great lady and kindergarten teacher.

[link to www.usatoday.com]

Just another one of the many things that doesn't add up.

Just curious....did a single bonafide parent personally identify the body of their child in person after the event?

I've heard that question asked but I don't know the answer.

This article states that one little boy had an open casket funeral?

[link to www.washingtonpost.com]

This whole thing is super confusing.I don't know what the hell is going on, i think thats the point.

I didn't see where it said open casket. They mentioned he wore a footbal jersey, but didn't specifically say open casket.

I think this might be splitting hairs a little bit. I'm not fully comfortable saying "nothing happened" and "it's all a fake." I steered clear of making that assertion throughout my threads. I've been pointing out the discrepancies in the reporting of what happened, trying to put it back on the sources of these discrepancies to explain them.

it's unreal reading these accounts of fictitious psy op entities as if they are real people. put down the cracked pipe and have a cup of shit under military rule instead

About half way down the article.

There were two funerals and a wake for victims Monday, each service commemorating a tragedy of its own. The first was for Jack Pinto, and it unfolded to an unbearable soundtrack of grief that will continue at Honan Funeral Home for most of the coming week. A soprano sang hymns at the altar. A mother sobbed at the side of an open casket. A black hearse idled out back, waiting to transport the coffin to a cemetery up the street.

I don't know, s.j. I'm a little wary of people who think they have the whole thing figured out from soup to nuts (including state officials).

Okay thanks for pointing that out.

Your welcome! Great thread and good questions here! 5* and karma
Keep asking the hard questions!

The Washington Post.


It's not TV....true.....but is not that viewed as MSM?


Sorry to nit pick.

you're right i do think i have this - and transcending the attendant contrivances to a speedy exposure of the perps in all their shall we not say glory is preeminent in my mind. i do applaud yours and others research which will eventually taken to its logical conclusion bear out my confidence and make clear all the evidence around us every day of shall we say olive drab influence on america but stay wary my friend but not of me

Not quite sure I get your point. I definitely consider Wash Post to be mainstream. Never said believable.

Fair enough. Peace be with you.