Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Anyways Circuit Fool, you never wanted rational discuss. You get what you give!

Yes, I have...but it is you that isn't capable of it. End of story. Here's a list of examples:

Challenges "User # 78/68" Continues To Run Away From
(also known as The Number Of Ways "User # 78/68" Continues To Embarrass Himself)

1) When asked for proof that "Planet X" exists, he simply spews insults and runs away.
2) When someone wanted to bet him money (something that's very important to him) on Nancy's accuracy, he disappeared. And each time it is brought up, he ignores it.
3) I provided photographic proof that the sun was NOT rising 20 minutes early. When I asked him to dispute this, he ran away.
4) I provided a diagram proving that constellations behind the sun cannot be made visible by simply tilting the Earth or lowering it in the ecliptic. Instead of providing charts of his own to show it would be possible, he simply threw out insults and ran away.
4) When I personally invited him to Tampa to prove that I am exactly who I say I am, he initially showed interest and then ran away.
5) Hap, ID 88145, invited "User" to call him at work or e-mail him, instead of doing so he threw out more insults and ran away.
6) When asked why GOTO telescopes continue to accurately track the moon if it were moving unpredictably (i.e. too far north, too far south), he spewed more insults and ran away.
7) Hap invited anyone who believes in "Planet X" to come view the skies with him to search for this elusive "rogue planet" that "believers" all claim is so easy to see at sunrise. Instead of taking up that invitation, "User" threw out more insults and ran away.
8) ID 74444 suggested that Nancy is NOT the most popular poster on GLP and explained how he came to this conclusion. Instead of providing any evidence to prove otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
9) When asked if he believed that Earth was halted in orbit, or if he believed that "Planet X" would cause a "pole shift" and wipe out 90% of Earth's population (both of which are claims made by Nancy) - "User" called them trick questions, refused to answer and ran away.
10) "User" claims that "debunkers" lie. When asked for examples of these lies, he spews insults and runs away.
11) He claims that "debunkers" are government agents. When asked for proof of this, he spews insults and runs away.
12) Since "User" refuses to take Hap up on his offer to search for "Planet X," it was suggested "User" contact a local astronomy club and view with them. "User" spewed insults and ran away.
13) "User" claims earthquake activity is increasing. But instead of providing data to support this claim, he spewed insults and ran away.
14) Nancy claimed that Adam Air Flight 574 crashed in an inland lake. "Debunkers" have provided several links showing that Nancy is wrong. Instead of providing evidence showing otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
15) "User" contends that "Debunkers" are always wrong. When asked for examples of when "Debunkers" have been wrong, he spewed insults and ran away.
16) When asked for examples of when Nancy was right, especially when pertaining to astronomical claims and predictions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
17) "User" has seen this list several times and has yet to dispute anything on it. Instead, he spewed insults and ran away.
18) "User" doesn't believe that vaporized water contaminated with arsenic was responsible for the illness in Peru after a meteor strike. When asked what HE thought caused it, he spewed insults and ran away.
19) Nancy claims that the Minneapolis bridge collapse was caused by some "stretch zone." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran way.
20) "User" claims that I lied about amateur radio operators using their equipment and the moon for EME communications. When asked for evidence to support his claim that I lied, he spewed insults and ran away.
21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing the moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away.
22) "User" claimed that Menow lied when he said the sun is not setting further north each day during the fall months. When asked for supporting evidence, he spewed insults and ran away. (Prof-Rabbit supplied a link showing the sun does not move north during the fall months in the north hemisphere.)
23) "User" demands that "debunkers" provide evidence or, in his words, "to put up or shut up." When "User" is asked to do the same, he spews insults and runs away.
24) Hap sent some photos to Nancy. He never stated what they were or what he believed them to be, instead he asked her what she thought they were. Nancy, and Nancy alone, stated they were photos of "Planet X." When asked which photos are "Planet X" and which ones are just lens flare, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
25) "User" continues to say I've exposed my lies. He has been asked what lies those are and to provide supporting evidence. Instead, he spews insults and runs away.
26) "User" tasked Nighthawk to demonstrate some contradictions from "ZetaTalk." Nighthawk came up with four. "User" made a weak attempt to explain them away, then spewed insults and ran away.
27) Hap provided a link to a website with photos of his equipment. "User" claimed it was all fake, spewed insults and ran away.
28) Hap's contact information is provided on the website, but instead of using it to verify Hap is who he claims, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
29) Several weeks ago, Hap again extended his invitation for anyone to come look for "Planet X" using his observatory. "User" again spewed insults and ran away.
30) "User" claimed that Nancy predicted the current economic recession...when in reality, Nancy said the recession would happen in 2003 and that the DOW would be worth a quarter of its value. When this was pointed out, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 31) "User" implied that Hap shouldn't be taken seriously because he doesn't have any credentials in astronomy...even though none are needed to be an amateur astronomer. When asked what credentials Nancy had that makes her more believable, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
32) "User" claimed that the Zetas never said they were preventing asteroid strikes. When shown exactly what the Zetas said, proving they did say it, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
33) "User" claimed that "The Commentator" outed himself as a NASA shill. When asked to explain exactly how this was done, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
34) "User" once again claimed that "The Commentator" is a NASA shill. When asked to provide evidence to support this claim, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
35) "User" stated that "debunkers" spend thousands of hours on Nancy's threads. When asked for supporting evidence, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
36) "User" claimed that only NASA would hire "debunkers." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
37) "User" once again claimed that "debunkers" lie. When asked for evidence of this or examples of such lies, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
38) "User" claimed I was squirming. When asked for specific examples of how I was squirming, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
39) "User" presented an article describing how GPS satellites might fail within a year. He claimed that Nancy and the "Zetas" predicted this. However, "User" failed to post the whole article which stated the reason for the potential failure is due to neglect and failure to replace key satellites...not because of some "rogue planet" as Nancy claimed. When this was pointed out to him, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
40) "User" claimed that Hap was afraid to answer his questions. Hap said he would answer any question "User" had. Instead of asking any questions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.

There was a truce between us and I even defended you once. But it was YOU that went back to spewing insults. Proving once and for all, that attacks and insults is all you know. Let's see how long it takes to add a few more to this list.

CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.

Anyways Circuit Fool, you never wanted rational discuss. You get what you give!

Yes, I have...but it is you that isn't capable of it. End of story. Here's a list of examples:

Challenges "User # 78/68" Continues To Run Away From
(also known as The Number Of Ways "User # 78/68" Continues To Embarrass Himself)

1) When asked for proof that "Planet X" exists, he simply spews insults and runs away.
2) When someone wanted to bet him money (something that's very important to him) on Nancy's accuracy, he disappeared. And each time it is brought up, he ignores it.
3) I provided photographic proof that the sun was NOT rising 20 minutes early. When I asked him to dispute this, he ran away.
4) I provided a diagram proving that constellations behind the sun cannot be made visible by simply tilting the Earth or lowering it in the ecliptic. Instead of providing charts of his own to show it would be possible, he simply threw out insults and ran away.
4) When I personally invited him to Tampa to prove that I am exactly who I say I am, he initially showed interest and then ran away.
5) Hap, ID 88145, invited "User" to call him at work or e-mail him, instead of doing so he threw out more insults and ran away.
6) When asked why GOTO telescopes continue to accurately track the moon if it were moving unpredictably (i.e. too far north, too far south), he spewed more insults and ran away.
7) Hap invited anyone who believes in "Planet X" to come view the skies with him to search for this elusive "rogue planet" that "believers" all claim is so easy to see at sunrise. Instead of taking up that invitation, "User" threw out more insults and ran away.
8) ID 74444 suggested that Nancy is NOT the most popular poster on GLP and explained how he came to this conclusion. Instead of providing any evidence to prove otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
9) When asked if he believed that Earth was halted in orbit, or if he believed that "Planet X" would cause a "pole shift" and wipe out 90% of Earth's population (both of which are claims made by Nancy) - "User" called them trick questions, refused to answer and ran away.
10) "User" claims that "debunkers" lie. When asked for examples of these lies, he spews insults and runs away.
11) He claims that "debunkers" are government agents. When asked for proof of this, he spews insults and runs away.
12) Since "User" refuses to take Hap up on his offer to search for "Planet X," it was suggested "User" contact a local astronomy club and view with them. "User" spewed insults and ran away.
13) "User" claims earthquake activity is increasing. But instead of providing data to support this claim, he spewed insults and ran away.
14) Nancy claimed that Adam Air Flight 574 crashed in an inland lake. "Debunkers" have provided several links showing that Nancy is wrong. Instead of providing evidence showing otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
15) "User" contends that "Debunkers" are always wrong. When asked for examples of when "Debunkers" have been wrong, he spewed insults and ran away.
16) When asked for examples of when Nancy was right, especially when pertaining to astronomical claims and predictions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
17) "User" has seen this list several times and has yet to dispute anything on it. Instead, he spewed insults and ran away.
18) "User" doesn't believe that vaporized water contaminated with arsenic was responsible for the illness in Peru after a meteor strike. When asked what HE thought caused it, he spewed insults and ran away.
19) Nancy claims that the Minneapolis bridge collapse was caused by some "stretch zone." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran way.
20) "User" claims that I lied about amateur radio operators using their equipment and the moon for EME communications. When asked for evidence to support his claim that I lied, he spewed insults and ran away.
21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing the moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away.
22) "User" claimed that Menow lied when he said the sun is not setting further north each day during the fall months. When asked for supporting evidence, he spewed insults and ran away. (Prof-Rabbit supplied a link showing the sun does not move north during the fall months in the north hemisphere.)
23) "User" demands that "debunkers" provide evidence or, in his words, "to put up or shut up." When "User" is asked to do the same, he spews insults and runs away.
24) Hap sent some photos to Nancy. He never stated what they were or what he believed them to be, instead he asked her what she thought they were. Nancy, and Nancy alone, stated they were photos of "Planet X." When asked which photos are "Planet X" and which ones are just lens flare, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
25) "User" continues to say I've exposed my lies. He has been asked what lies those are and to provide supporting evidence. Instead, he spews insults and runs away.
26) "User" tasked Nighthawk to demonstrate some contradictions from "ZetaTalk." Nighthawk came up with four. "User" made a weak attempt to explain them away, then spewed insults and ran away.
27) Hap provided a link to a website with photos of his equipment. "User" claimed it was all fake, spewed insults and ran away.
28) Hap's contact information is provided on the website, but instead of using it to verify Hap is who he claims, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
29) Several weeks ago, Hap again extended his invitation for anyone to come look for "Planet X" using his observatory. "User" again spewed insults and ran away.
30) "User" claimed that Nancy predicted the current economic recession...when in reality, Nancy said the recession would happen in 2003 and that the DOW would be worth a quarter of its value. When this was pointed out, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 31) "User" implied that Hap shouldn't be taken seriously because he doesn't have any credentials in astronomy...even though none are needed to be an amateur astronomer. When asked what credentials Nancy had that makes her more believable, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
32) "User" claimed that the Zetas never said they were preventing asteroid strikes. When shown exactly what the Zetas said, proving they did say it, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
33) "User" claimed that "The Commentator" outed himself as a NASA shill. When asked to explain exactly how this was done, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
34) "User" once again claimed that "The Commentator" is a NASA shill. When asked to provide evidence to support this claim, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
35) "User" stated that "debunkers" spend thousands of hours on Nancy's threads. When asked for supporting evidence, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
36) "User" claimed that only NASA would hire "debunkers." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
37) "User" once again claimed that "debunkers" lie. When asked for evidence of this or examples of such lies, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
38) "User" claimed I was squirming. When asked for specific examples of how I was squirming, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
39) "User" presented an article describing how GPS satellites might fail within a year. He claimed that Nancy and the "Zetas" predicted this. However, "User" failed to post the whole article which stated the reason for the potential failure is due to neglect and failure to replace key satellites...not because of some "rogue planet" as Nancy claimed. When this was pointed out to him, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
40) "User" claimed that Hap was afraid to answer his questions. Hap said he would answer any question "User" had. Instead of asking any questions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.

There was a truce between us and I even defended you once. But it was YOU that went back to spewing insults. Proving once and for all, that attacks and insults is all you know. Let's see how long it takes to add a few more to this list.


CB can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.

Fom Melfy:
CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
----------

ZetaMax can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" posts at every opportunity. He continues to claim he's a "fence shitter" when it's obvious to all he's a Nancy believer, through and through.

This is a "debunker" thread. If you don't like what is posted here, don't come in here and start griping.

Fom Melfy:
CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
----------

ZetaMax can't resist ming with his "shameful" posts at every opportunity. He continues to claim he's a "fence shitter" when it's obvious to all he's a Nancy believer, through and through.

This is a "debunker" thread. If you don't like what is posted here, don't come in here and start griping.

screw that to your head, dripster.

Fom Melfy:
CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
----------

ZetaMax can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" posts at every opportunity. He continues to claim he's a "fence shitter" when it's obvious to all he's a Nancy believer, through and through.

This is a "debunker" thread. If you don't like what is posted here, don't come in here and start griping.

screw that to your head, dripster.

Lies are WRONG - even in a "Lier's" home - filled with Liers.

Fom Melfy:
CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
----------

ZetaMax can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" posts at every opportunity. He continues to claim he's a "fence shitter" when it's obvious to all he's a Nancy believer, through and through.

This is a "debunker" thread. If you don't like what is posted here, don't come in here and start griping.

screw that to your head, dripster.

Lies are WRONG - even in a "Lier's" home - filled with Liers.

Lies are WRONG - even in a "Lier's" home - filled with Liers.

Lies are WRONG - even in a "Lier's" home - filled with Liers.

Then perhaps you should stop lying. Then you wouldn't have to worry about being liar. Funny how a supposed "lawyer" doesn't even know how to spell the word. I'll assume it was a typo...even though it was twice.

Fom Melfy:
CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
----------

ZetaMax can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" posts at every opportunity. He continues to claim he's a "fence shitter" when it's obvious to all he's a Nancy believer, through and through.

This is a "debunker" thread. If you don't like what is posted here, don't come in here and start griping.

screw that to your head, dripster.

Looks like this thread is proving a lot more popular than any of Nancy's.

:5:

Fom Melfy:
CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
----------

ZetaMax can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" posts at every opportunity. He continues to claim he's a "fence shitter" when it's obvious to all he's a Nancy believer, through and through.

This is a "debunker" thread. If you don't like what is posted here, don't come in here and start griping.

screw that to your head, dripster.


You guys are starting to sound just like zetacultists sounded before boycott. I'm pretty sure you don't see it yourselves, CB and 17230, and you may just get angry with me from pointing that out for you (that's what cultists and liars do, btw), but the truth is you're repeating the exact ways that you're supposed to be debunking in Nancy's threads/Zetatalk/cult. Just saying.

...... What happened to reason, logic, well made arguments and looking for truth - they were lost in the battle just like they always are.

So, when either side is "winning", what's the prize? What do you get? You give out nothing but repetitions already made by the opposite side, you parrot their worst ways and call it "right" just because you have an enemy and you think you're winning something.

You lose. That method is a way to lose. You'll see, someday.

...... What happened to reason, logic, well made arguments and looking for truth - they were lost in the battle just like they always are.

hu? reading, understanding, reality and sound arguments are not you strong sides, obviously.



So, when either side is "winning", what's the prize? What do you get? You give out nothing but repetitions already made by the opposite side, you parrot their worst ways and call it "right" just because you have an enemy and you think you're winning something.

My donation to humanity is to give Nancy the washing she deserves.


You lose. That method is a way to lose. You'll see, someday.

That MAY happen, perhaps, in a far future. Chances are very small for that - next to nothing. Get caught by a lightning, being president of the united states or Nancy getting back to reality is much more probable.

UNTIL that i am right - as long as i stand corrected from FACTS.

Which you neither can present nor understand.

...... What happened to reason, logic, well made arguments and looking for truth - they were lost in the battle just like they always are.

hu? reading, understanding, reality and sound arguments are not you strong sides, obviously.



So, when either side is "winning", what's the prize? What do you get? You give out nothing but repetitions already made by the opposite side, you parrot their worst ways and call it "right" just because you have an enemy and you think you're winning something.

My donation to humanity is to give Nancy the washing she deserves.


You lose. That method is a way to lose. You'll see, someday.

That MAY happen, perhaps, in a far future. Chances are very small for that - next to nothing. Get caught by a lightning, being president of the united states or Nancy getting back to reality is much more probable.

UNTIL that i am right - as long as i stand corrected from FACTS.

Which you neither can present nor understand.

...... What happened to reason, logic, well made arguments and looking for truth - they were lost in the battle just like they always are.

hu? reading, understanding, reality and sound arguments are not you strong sides, obviously.



So, when either side is "winning", what's the prize? What do you get? You give out nothing but repetitions already made by the opposite side, you parrot their worst ways and call it "right" just because you have an enemy and you think you're winning something.

My donation to humanity is to give Nancy the washing she deserves.


You lose. That method is a way to lose. You'll see, someday.

That MAY happen, perhaps, in a far future. Chances are very small for that - next to nothing. Get caught by a lightning, being president of the united states or Nancy getting back to reality is much more probable.

UNTIL that i am right - as long as i stand corrected from FACTS.

Which you neither can present nor understand.


Really? In my country there is a saying "se koira älähtää johon kalikka kalahtaa" (loose translation: that dog cries who gets hit by a wooden stick) meaning: he who sees himself in an argument yells out loud. I was talking to both sides of this oppositional situation (bunkers vs. debunkers) but you, 17230, were the one who reacted first, and reacted in a very stupid manner in addition, btw.

You, 17230, have made a statement (of your truth) that I, writing here as AC679804, am Nancy Lieder herself or a zetacult follower. I asked you to provide proof for your assertion but all you could come up with was that "I smell like Nancy" and other feelings completely made by your ego. There is nothing true in what you believe, 17230. The ego thinks that it knows the truth, and it's pretty ruthless in telling everyone that "truth" which is actually a LIE, like your LIE that I'm Nancy or her follower.

You simply didn't bother to look for yourself, you simply didn't bother to do any research (that would have been very easy to do at that time, btw, just by using the GLP search engine and reading, and paying attention). You were too lazy for any of that. Or too stupid. Or: you just wanted to hold on to your groundless beliefs that you call facts - but your facts are just your blind faith in your beliefs or whatever shit your ego spouts at you. Your ego is no different than what you so much despise in Nancy, her cult or in her followers. Your hatred towards those people - who are mislead or misguided somewhat, I agree - is your ego hating everything it cannot understand or control. Your hatred, 17230, is the most blatant expression in your posts at GLP all in all. I have no idea why there is so much hatred in you, dear fellow person, but what we need to do is to get rid of that ego activity.

You, 17230, are always so quick to call zetafollowers stupid and ignorant but you don't see those same characteristics in your own behavior and your belief system (which, btw, is just as bullshit as theirs :))

But, the good news is, that You, in reality, are not your ego. Someday you'll realize that you indeed were wrong while going with your ego. You can start changing that situation right now! I give you an easy task to do, or actually you have given it to yourself. Just look at my posts at GLP. Do the research. Pay attention. Notice. Discern real from fantasy or misguidande.

...... What happened to reason, logic, well made arguments and looking for truth - they were lost in the battle just like they always are.

hu? reading, understanding, reality and sound arguments are not you strong sides, obviously.



So, when either side is "winning", what's the prize? What do you get? You give out nothing but repetitions already made by the opposite side, you parrot their worst ways and call it "right" just because you have an enemy and you think you're winning something.

My donation to humanity is to give Nancy the washing she deserves.


You lose. That method is a way to lose. You'll see, someday.

That MAY happen, perhaps, in a far future. Chances are very small for that - next to nothing. Get caught by a lightning, being president of the united states or Nancy getting back to reality is much more probable.

UNTIL that i am right - as long as i stand corrected from FACTS.

Which you neither can present nor understand.


Really? In my country there is a saying "se koira älähtää johon kalikka kalahtaa" (loose translation: that dog cries who gets hit by a wooden stick) meaning: he who sees himself in an argument yells out loud. I was talking to both sides of this oppositional situation (bunkers vs. debunkers) but you, 17230, were the one who reacted first, and reacted in a very stupid manner in addition, btw.

You, 17230, have made a statement (of your truth) that I, writing here as AC679804, am Nancy Lieder herself or a zetacult follower. I asked you to provide proof for your assertion but all you could come up with was that "I smell like Nancy" and other feelings completely made by your ego. There is nothing true in what you believe, 17230. The ego thinks that it knows the truth, and it's pretty ruthless in telling everyone that "truth" which is actually a LIE, like your LIE that I'm Nancy or her follower.

You simply didn't bother to look for yourself, you simply didn't bother to do any research (that would have been very easy to do at that time, btw, just by using the GLP search engine and reading, and paying attention). You were too lazy for any of that. Or too stupid. Or: you just wanted to hold on to your groundless beliefs that you call facts - but your facts are just your blind faith in your beliefs or whatever shit your ego spouts at you. Your ego is no different than what you so much despise in Nancy, her cult or in her followers. Your hatred towards those people - who are mislead or misguided somewhat, I agree - is your ego hating everything it cannot understand or control. Your hatred, 17230, is the most blatant expression in your posts at GLP all in all. I have no idea why there is so much hatred in you, dear fellow person, but what we need to do is to get rid of that ego activity.

You, 17230, are always so quick to call zetafollowers stupid and ignorant but you don't see those same characteristics in your own behavior and your belief system (which, btw, is just as bullshit as theirs :))

But, the good news is, that You, in reality, are not your ego. Someday you'll realize that you indeed were wrong while going with your ego. You can start changing that situation right now! I give you an easy task to do, or actually you have given it to yourself. Just look at my posts at GLP. Do the research. Pay attention. Notice. Discern real from fantasy or misguidande.

So you, 17230, decided not to pay any attention in the future. That's very sad. I hope your Real Self gets a better hold on you later..

I have a question about your riddle (I'm a fanatic puzzle solver myself): Are you absolutely certain that your riddle is easy for anyone to solve?

Does your riddle require knowledge in English language or not?

I'm asking this because I've been trying to solve your riddle but I've been having difficulties because English is not my first language, and e.g. word "render" can be translated in sooooo many ways into my own language (I, btw, am a professional translator working at home doing translations). So, if you didn't already catch my question, I'll rephrase it: Can your riddle be solved only in English language OR Is it possible to translate to any other language? Do answer this, please.

Is the idea in your riddle to provide a synonym to a word, to place the word with another expression, to enter into another phrase that actually makes some sense? If so, then your riddle is not about intelligence or capacities, but it is very much based on cultural background which is not shared by all of humanity.

So you, 17230, decided not to pay any attention in the future. That's very sad. I hope your Real Self gets a better hold on you later..

how much do YOU know about what i do pay attention for the future?

Anyways Circuit Fool, you never wanted rational discuss. You get what you give!

Yes, I have...but it is you that isn't capable of it. End of story. Here's a list of examples:

Challenges "User # 78/68" Continues To Run Away From
(also known as The Number Of Ways "User # 78/68" Continues To Embarrass Himself)

1) When asked for proof that "Planet X" exists, he simply spews insults and runs away.
2) When someone wanted to bet him money (something that's very important to him) on Nancy's accuracy, he disappeared. And each time it is brought up, he ignores it.
3) I provided photographic proof that the sun was NOT rising 20 minutes early. When I asked him to dispute this, he ran away.
4) I provided a diagram proving that constellations behind the sun cannot be made visible by simply tilting the Earth or lowering it in the ecliptic. Instead of providing charts of his own to show it would be possible, he simply threw out insults and ran away.
4) When I personally invited him to Tampa to prove that I am exactly who I say I am, he initially showed interest and then ran away.
5) Hap, ID 88145, invited "User" to call him at work or e-mail him, instead of doing so he threw out more insults and ran away.
6) When asked why GOTO telescopes continue to accurately track the moon if it were moving unpredictably (i.e. too far north, too far south), he spewed more insults and ran away.
7) Hap invited anyone who believes in "Planet X" to come view the skies with him to search for this elusive "rogue planet" that "believers" all claim is so easy to see at sunrise. Instead of taking up that invitation, "User" threw out more insults and ran away.
8) ID 74444 suggested that Nancy is NOT the most popular poster on GLP and explained how he came to this conclusion. Instead of providing any evidence to prove otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
9) When asked if he believed that Earth was halted in orbit, or if he believed that "Planet X" would cause a "pole shift" and wipe out 90% of Earth's population (both of which are claims made by Nancy) - "User" called them trick questions, refused to answer and ran away.
10) "User" claims that "debunkers" lie. When asked for examples of these lies, he spews insults and runs away.
11) He claims that "debunkers" are government agents. When asked for proof of this, he spews insults and runs away.
12) Since "User" refuses to take Hap up on his offer to search for "Planet X," it was suggested "User" contact a local astronomy club and view with them. "User" spewed insults and ran away.
13) "User" claims earthquake activity is increasing. But instead of providing data to support this claim, he spewed insults and ran away.
14) Nancy claimed that Adam Air Flight 574 crashed in an inland lake. "Debunkers" have provided several links showing that Nancy is wrong. Instead of providing evidence showing otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
15) "User" contends that "Debunkers" are always wrong. When asked for examples of when "Debunkers" have been wrong, he spewed insults and ran away.
16) When asked for examples of when Nancy was right, especially when pertaining to astronomical claims and predictions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
17) "User" has seen this list several times and has yet to dispute anything on it. Instead, he spewed insults and ran away.
18) "User" doesn't believe that vaporized water contaminated with arsenic was responsible for the illness in Peru after a meteor strike. When asked what HE thought caused it, he spewed insults and ran away.
19) Nancy claims that the Minneapolis bridge collapse was caused by some "stretch zone." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran way.
20) "User" claims that I lied about amateur radio operators using their equipment and the moon for EME communications. When asked for evidence to support his claim that I lied, he spewed insults and ran away.
21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing the moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away.
22) "User" claimed that Menow lied when he said the sun is not setting further north each day during the fall months. When asked for supporting evidence, he spewed insults and ran away. (Prof-Rabbit supplied a link showing the sun does not move north during the fall months in the north hemisphere.)
23) "User" demands that "debunkers" provide evidence or, in his words, "to put up or shut up." When "User" is asked to do the same, he spews insults and runs away.
24) Hap sent some photos to Nancy. He never stated what they were or what he believed them to be, instead he asked her what she thought they were. Nancy, and Nancy alone, stated they were photos of "Planet X." When asked which photos are "Planet X" and which ones are just lens flare, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
25) "User" continues to say I've exposed my lies. He has been asked what lies those are and to provide supporting evidence. Instead, he spews insults and runs away.
26) "User" tasked Nighthawk to demonstrate some contradictions from "ZetaTalk." Nighthawk came up with four. "User" made a weak attempt to explain them away, then spewed insults and ran away.
27) Hap provided a link to a website with photos of his equipment. "User" claimed it was all fake, spewed insults and ran away.
28) Hap's contact information is provided on the website, but instead of using it to verify Hap is who he claims, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
29) Several weeks ago, Hap again extended his invitation for anyone to come look for "Planet X" using his observatory. "User" again spewed insults and ran away.
30) "User" claimed that Nancy predicted the current economic recession...when in reality, Nancy said the recession would happen in 2003 and that the DOW would be worth a quarter of its value. When this was pointed out, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 31) "User" implied that Hap shouldn't be taken seriously because he doesn't have any credentials in astronomy...even though none are needed to be an amateur astronomer. When asked what credentials Nancy had that makes her more believable, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
32) "User" claimed that the Zetas never said they were preventing asteroid strikes. When shown exactly what the Zetas said, proving they did say it, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
33) "User" claimed that "The Commentator" outed himself as a NASA shill. When asked to explain exactly how this was done, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
34) "User" once again claimed that "The Commentator" is a NASA shill. When asked to provide evidence to support this claim, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
35) "User" stated that "debunkers" spend thousands of hours on Nancy's threads. When asked for supporting evidence, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
36) "User" claimed that only NASA would hire "debunkers." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
37) "User" once again claimed that "debunkers" lie. When asked for evidence of this or examples of such lies, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
38) "User" claimed I was squirming. When asked for specific examples of how I was squirming, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
39) "User" presented an article describing how GPS satellites might fail within a year. He claimed that Nancy and the "Zetas" predicted this. However, "User" failed to post the whole article which stated the reason for the potential failure is due to neglect and failure to replace key satellites...not because of some "rogue planet" as Nancy claimed. When this was pointed out to him, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
40) "User" claimed that Hap was afraid to answer his questions. Hap said he would answer any question "User" had. Instead of asking any questions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.

There was a truce between us and I even defended you once. But it was YOU that went back to spewing insults. Proving once and for all, that attacks and insults is all you know. Let's see how long it takes to add a few more to this list.


CB can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.

So you, 17230, decided not to pay any attention in the future. That's very sad. I hope your Real Self gets a better hold on you later..

how much do YOU know about what i do pay attention for the future?


I don't know nor do I claim to know anything about your future, which I can only hope is for the better, but regarding communication at GLP I do pay attention and I do notice who posts what, when and where, and I do know after you've posted where you stand.

Thank you very much for your answers conserning your riddle. I've been having a real hard time with it, disparaging myself for not being able to get real sense into it. I will take your comments and advice into heart and ponder.. I'm sure I'll be able to solve it.. no problemo..

So you, 17230, decided not to pay any attention in the future. That's very sad. I hope your Real Self gets a better hold on you later..

how much do YOU know about what i do pay attention for the future?


I don't know nor do I claim to know anything about your future, which I can only hope is for the better, but regarding communication at GLP I do pay attention and I do notice who posts what, when and where, and I do know after you've posted where you stand.

Thank you very much for your answers conserning your riddle. I've been having a real hard time with it, disparaging myself for not being able to get real sense into it. I will take your comments and advice into heart and ponder.. I'm sure I'll be able to solve it.. no problemo..

"sometimes" ?? (chuckle)

seriously, for even trying it you get a big + from me.

Yeah. And so? Nancy's zetathreads used to be very popular and that argument was used by the cultists as proof that they were right. Now the same model or form is used in the Debunkers thread. What changed? Nothing. You guys seem to be fighting just of power positions. What happened to reason, logic, well made arguments and looking for truth - they were lost in the battle just like they always are.

So, when either side is "winning", what's the prize? What do you get? You give out nothing but repetitions already made by the opposite side, you parrot their worst ways and call it "right" just because you have an enemy and you think you're winning something.

You lose. That method is a way to lose. You'll see, someday.

I've got most of my disaster preps done already for any disaster, that is. And that gives a certain sense of peace.