Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

And that will be when again? Careful now...your queen has already been wrong numerous times.


And your proof of that is what?


WRONG! Why would the government believe anything the "Zetas" or Nancy had to say when NONE of the precursor signs occurred? "Planet X" was not undeniable in the sky as the "Zetas" said it would be and there was absolutely no sign of rotation stoppage. All you have is weak circumstantial evidence. It's more likely that they named as they did because they heard of Nancy but certainly didn't believe anything she proclaimed. If they did, they wouldn't have committed all their resources in to securing Iraq. How would they implement Martial Law here in the U.S. when all the equipment and personnel are on the other side of the planet? Unless you have something better to support your claim, all you have is that - a claim. Nothing more.


Present your evidence that the election was rigged. I'll admit that it was messed up, but rigged. No. And if power was what they wanted so bad, why didn't the Bush Administration do something to hold on to that power in the last election...you know, when Bush's term was up and Obama won the election after the "Zetas" said he wouldn't even get the nomination?


Wrong again. Remember, the "Zetas" said that the U.S. and Indonesian governments would not succeed with their plans. Again, why would the governments do any of this if they really believed what Nancy had to say when none of the precursor events happened? These are nothing more than coincidences. Unless you can prove that "Planet X" actually exists...that's all they are and that's all they will remain.


One big problem there Andrew:

The date of May 15th has often been referred to as an early date, to some degree. This is early to some degree, the number of days or weeks not specified. Anyone who has severed their life elsewhere and is in a safe place by May 15th will not find this distressing, or have any regrets.
ZetaTalk: Hour of the Shift, Nov 2001

Thus, you have Planet X in the news, under every subject but the inbound planet that will pass on May 15, 2003 or shortly thereafter.
ZetaTalk: Solar Flares, Jun 2002

We have stated that Planet X will be visible in the daytime sky, 7 weeks before passage. Given that we have stated that passage is shortly after May 15, 2003, as at this time those wanting to survive should be at their safe locations, this is putting the visibility into the last week of March at the earliest.
ZetaTalk: April 2003, Jan 2003

The most damaging statement is this:

As explained on Gentile last evening, but repeated here as many will not be able to hear this streaming audio, we have given the dates out because the US and Indonesian governments can no longer succeed with their plans. We had held the date close, to put these governments in the same position the common man they planned to murder are in, so that rotation stoppage would happen suddenly and prevent a smooth blockading of the city dwellers. As Nancy has been able to be interviewed in the US, the message of these plans replayed around the world, cooperation by the military or locale police in such blockades are unlikely to happen. Given such orders, they would object, refuse, allow escape, as they know the true agenda. Thus, the number of people injured by withholding the date outnumbered the number that would be murdered, the balance scale tipped.
ZetaTalk: Dates, Why Now?
Note: relayed during the May 16 Lou Genitle show, and addressed during the May 17 IRC as well.

Care to try again?

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 10/10/2010 10:02 PM

"Bill S" is going to get himself banned for stating the obvious: they sure move around a lot in two hours. Which suggests they aren't moons at all.

We already know about Nancy's predictions. You failed, however, to show that those "predictions" are even correct or happened. You also failed to show that Nancy and the "Zetas" actually predicted it...instead of post-dicting it.

You obviously appreciate that fact that it's nothing more than an excuse to explain away your master's failures. Lest you forget the one comment that the "Zetas" made that makes everything else about the elite utter bullshit:



Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 10/10/2010 10:14 PM

What are you a child that need all your food chewed for you.. There is enough information there to cast doubt in either direction.
Or did you just want to post a smilie.

What do you care since this thread wasn't started by you and is meant to be a discussion place to debunk Nancy. All the information proves Nancy is wrong. You criticize me for posting a smilie, one which is quite symbolic, and yet you post one yourself. Is it because your hypocrisy knows no bounds?

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 10/10/2010 10:28 PM

"meant to be a discussion place to debunk Nancy."
All I see is name calling and bullying.

"You criticize me for posting a smilie, one which is quite symbolic, and yet you post one yourself."
Where you unable to see the symbolism of frog shit?

Ad hom.



No, there isn't. There is nothing there that can verify two simple Zeta claims: 100 percent accuracy and Earth is halted in its orbit. The Earth is demonstrably NOT halted in its orbit, therefore Zetatalk is wrong, therefore it is NOT 100 percent accurate.

At that point, you really can chuck the rest.

So the "Zetas" are 'right' over and over again, only they aren't allowed to be 'right' that much, so they're not, but then again they're still right all the time? Is that about right, so to speak?

Lets' try it this way... The "Zetas" are always right, except when they are wrong, but in that case it's because they meant to be wrong... right?

Yes, and I've tried in the past to get others to stop. But, I have no control over that and just accept it.


What symbolism?

Sad post.

Ohh... GOODY! Someone who thinks there are valid predictions and claims on that list. Why don't you pick one and try to defend its veracity?

I haven't seen any of yours really ranking up there either. If you don't like the posts, you don't have to be here.

Hmmm, how many years have "debunkers" been asking for someone to do that? Since at least 2003. How many have actually attempted it? None

If the Zetas had accurately predicted one of the surprise discoveries our space probes made I'd be interested.

But somehow the Zetas never seem to know anything more then a little under-educated lady from the Mid-West.

Misconceptions included.

So I am sure you can provide a source with time and date stamp prior to 1995 where Nancy said this, and you can also provide the source quoted in June 12, 2000. Without those two pieces of information, it is an empty claim. Hopefully Looky will be the first to take on the challenge and prove a prediction right. You have the floor, Looky.

If you read the statement in bold then conclude that I find either side to contain valid information, I am only able to conclude that your reading comprehension skills are below that necessary for adult discussion.

Do you all need a lesson in reading comprehension?
Apparently Nancy predicted Neanderthals.

I will break down my response for easy reading ..

NO... she did not predict Neanderthals .. she claims to have stated why they where selected for termination.

But all we have is her word. I was hoping you would tackle the prediction and provide proof that it is in fact a successful prediction, but I can see you are like all the zeta supporters that have gone before you.

Indeed: in that regard of Nancy's there is, in fact, no gray.

She's wrong. Truly, simple as that.

frogass, you are free to leave if you find the level of discourse too difficult for you.

Since you have failed utterly to defend any of the claims made by the senile, delusional, hate filled LIEDer I can only conclude you are incapable of defending them.

Yep zetaculties really ONLY relate back to ONE common SOURCE in the end......and basically it is this need to claim veracity in the words of Nancy LIEDer, as in SOZT....EOZT that is always their ultimate failure.



Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 10/11/2010 02:57 AM

Yes, precisely correct, 74444.

And the truly AMAZING aspect of this whole Nancy LIEDer saga has been the woman's inability to be even CORRECT once on any of her PREDICTIONS; especially the astronomical ones.

And NO zetaculties; the subject of so called "earth changes" is not a topic of PROPHETIC PREDICTION. Historically it is rather obvious that our planet has been consistently ever changing in it's natural evolution over the course of it's existence. Yes it is a NORMAL course for our planet and there is NOTHING that you zidiots can claim in regards to Nancy LIEDer or zetatalk that can change this REALITY!!

Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 10/11/2010 03:18 AM

im talking not about technology and that science that is behind it, obviously. and you know it

You know NOTHING about real science. You are incapable of rational thought and you belief in childish bullshit.

i think it is highly possible that they could not accurately calculate its orbit and track it, BECAUSE its orbit is so beyond anything human science preaches.

exactly:
Why would the government believe anything the "Zetas" or Nancy had to say?

oh look who says that!

bwahahahaha!

joker you, little you!

yes, dumbf*ck, our planet has been consistently ever changing OVER THE COURSE OF ITS EXISTENCE, not over [last] 50 years!

if what argument you are trying to push were true, Earth would have been totally unstable , at all times.

does geological record show this? No!
it shows Earth that had periods of relative stability of its climate patterns, interrupted with sudden, violent and distorting events that reformed the [old] balance into a new one!