Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!! | |
walt User ID: 1193878 Zambia 12/13/2010 09:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Menow User ID: 1119283 United States 12/13/2010 10:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and Nancy did not 'reschedule' the start of 7 of 10: Quoting: andrewemphasising once again the end of 2010... Ning quote: ******************* [link to poleshift.ning.com] "Zetas said at last chat: One of the events that was presented in the holographic presentation that Nancy attended last November will surely occur "(this year). Does it means we will go to 7 this year? Yes." 5/15/2010 "The 7 of 10, which we said would occur by the end of 2010, will include one or more of the disasters that Nancy was presented with during her November, 2009 holographic presentation." 6/19/2010 "We were only allowed to state that one or more of the plate movements described would happen by the end of 2010, when a 7 of 10 would have arrived, and that a 7 of 10 would shock the world.” ********************* So... there it is... Going to a "7" will mean an event which will "SHOCK THE WORLD". Just so we're clear, Andrew... has such an event already happened this year or not? I don't want you backpedalling later to claim something previous to now. although there were few instances that could be termed "precursor" events, surely "nothing up to now qualifies", yes. (for the record) Except that I think Nancy is claiming that the Indoesian plate has already "sunk" in talking about flooding there. I think she is going to claim that as a "hit" on her prediction for 7 of 10 in 2010. |
Menow User ID: 1119283 United States 12/13/2010 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Typical morons. So, where does this crap of "nine planets" come from? I thought we were supposed to be dealing with one "rogue planet"....not a "rogue solar system." Or are they saying that "Planet X" is bringing nine planets and several moons with it? I mean, this story gets better and better as it goes. I wonder what they'll all be saying by the end of next year when the "monster" fails to show up. I would love to know how they came up with this 19 degree tilt and how they determined that all celestial objects are in the wrong place. Naturally, if you were to ask them and point out that sunrise/sunset times match those of 2000 or even earlier, which wouldn't be possible if the Earth's tilt had changed, or point out that GOTO telescopes can still accurately track objects...they'll go in to denial mode and claim you're a government agent, ban you and delete your post. Quoting: Circuit BreakerI have no idea where that passage originated. I tried to google the first line or so and got no hits. |
andrew User ID: 1193711 Ukraine 12/13/2010 10:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and Nancy did not 'reschedule' the start of 7 of 10: Quoting: Menow 1119283emphasising once again the end of 2010... Ning quote: ******************* [link to poleshift.ning.com] "Zetas said at last chat: One of the events that was presented in the holographic presentation that Nancy attended last November will surely occur "(this year). Does it means we will go to 7 this year? Yes." 5/15/2010 "The 7 of 10, which we said would occur by the end of 2010, will include one or more of the disasters that Nancy was presented with during her November, 2009 holographic presentation." 6/19/2010 "We were only allowed to state that one or more of the plate movements described would happen by the end of 2010, when a 7 of 10 would have arrived, and that a 7 of 10 would shock the world.” ********************* So... there it is... Going to a "7" will mean an event which will "SHOCK THE WORLD". Just so we're clear, Andrew... has such an event already happened this year or not? I don't want you backpedalling later to claim something previous to now. although there were few instances that could be termed "precursor" events, surely "nothing up to now qualifies", yes. (for the record) Except that I think Nancy is claiming that the Indoesian plate has already "sunk" in talking about flooding there. I think she is going to claim that as a "hit" on her prediction for 7 of 10 in 2010. but, hey, this could be easily verified - there are 'guidelines' - sinking is supposed to be 80 feet at the southern tip of indonesian microplate and something around 30-40 feet in the middle. that's no small thing and if THAT happens it would certainly "shock the world" - many cities and islands virtually disappearing under waters. |
Menow User ID: 1119283 United States 12/13/2010 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nancy has certainly led people to belive that something BIG will happen by the end of this year. Ning quote: "Leon the counting many members are doing..has to do with the 7/10 prediction. The Zetas predicted that we will be at a 7/10 by year end.. and that it will be something that will shock the world. Please read the FAQ , to find out what the 7/10 is." On the other hand, I believe Nancy is already trying to weasel out of that firm prediction. I think she is going to say something which qualifies has already happened. |
Menow User ID: 1119283 United States 12/13/2010 11:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and Nancy did not 'reschedule' the start of 7 of 10: Quoting: andrewemphasising once again the end of 2010... Ning quote: ******************* [link to poleshift.ning.com] "Zetas said at last chat: One of the events that was presented in the holographic presentation that Nancy attended last November will surely occur "(this year). Does it means we will go to 7 this year? Yes." 5/15/2010 "The 7 of 10, which we said would occur by the end of 2010, will include one or more of the disasters that Nancy was presented with during her November, 2009 holographic presentation." 6/19/2010 "We were only allowed to state that one or more of the plate movements described would happen by the end of 2010, when a 7 of 10 would have arrived, and that a 7 of 10 would shock the world.” ********************* So... there it is... Going to a "7" will mean an event which will "SHOCK THE WORLD". Just so we're clear, Andrew... has such an event already happened this year or not? I don't want you backpedalling later to claim something previous to now. although there were few instances that could be termed "precursor" events, surely "nothing up to now qualifies", yes. (for the record) Except that I think Nancy is claiming that the Indoesian plate has already "sunk" in talking about flooding there. I think she is going to claim that as a "hit" on her prediction for 7 of 10 in 2010. but, hey, this could be easily verified - there are 'guidelines' - sinking is supposed to be 80 feet at the southern tip of indonesian microplate and something around 30-40 feet in the middle. that's no small thing and if THAT happens it would certainly "shock the world" - many cities and islands virtually disappearing under waters. Nancy "verifies" things in whatever why she chooses. You don't get a say in it. Remember the airliner in an "inland lake" even though there were no such lakes withing reach? Nancy pronounces her own "hits" and modifies reality to suit. Any who question her on that will be banished. |
andrew User ID: 1193711 Ukraine 12/13/2010 11:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | unless something like this happens - ie permanent sinking into seawater by 30 to 80 feet of [coastal and low] parts of Indonesia - it couldnt be called a "hit". and Nancy also said that this will not be likely accompanied by big earthquakes, - slow and silent slip of that microplate |
Marquis User ID: 1192788 United Kingdom 12/13/2010 11:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | unless something like this happens - ie permanent sinking into seawater by 30 to 80 feet of [coastal and low] parts of Indonesia - it couldnt be called a "hit". Quoting: andrewand Nancy also said that this will not be likely accompanied by big earthquakes, - slow and silent slip of that microplate What will it mean to you if the 7 doesn't happen by the end of the year? |
andrew User ID: 1193711 Ukraine 12/13/2010 11:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | unless something like this happens - ie permanent sinking into seawater by 30 to 80 feet of [coastal and low] parts of Indonesia - it couldnt be called a "hit". Quoting: Marquisand Nancy also said that this will not be likely accompanied by big earthquakes, - slow and silent slip of that microplate What will it mean to you if the 7 doesn't happen by the end of the year? well, this wouldnt mean that EVERYTHING she/they said is wrong. they couldnt have been more specific re 7 by the end of 2010, about timing and events and reiterating again and again when asked that it will happen in 2010. If that fails to happen it would mean big trouble for ZT and our members will be disappointed. however, i wouldnt exclude this "7" happening later, if this doesnt happen in 2010. relying on ANY dates is tricky, it could even have been Nancy's misinterpretation, who knows? important thing is to watch the actual developments, monitor eq's and weather/climate etc. if it is to happen, - it will happen in due time |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74444 United States 12/13/2010 11:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | unless something like this happens - ie permanent sinking into seawater by 30 to 80 feet of [coastal and low] parts of Indonesia - it couldnt be called a "hit". Quoting: andrewand Nancy also said that this will not be likely accompanied by big earthquakes, - slow and silent slip of that microplate What will it mean to you if the 7 doesn't happen by the end of the year? well, this wouldnt mean that EVERYTHING she/they said is wrong. they couldnt have been more specific re 7 by the end of 2010, about timing and events and reiterating again and again when asked that it will happen in 2010. If that fails to happen it would mean big trouble for ZT and our members will be disappointed. however, i wouldnt exclude this "7" happening later, if this doesnt happen in 2010. relying on ANY dates is tricky, it could even have been Nancy's misinterpretation, who knows? important thing is to watch the actual developments, monitor eq's and weather/climate etc. if it is to happen, - it will happen in due time So, if that is not enough to shake your faith in Nancy, what is? What event has to occur for you to change your mind, and conclude that Nancy/ZT is simply a lot of hooey? |
Setheory User ID: 869850 United States 12/13/2010 11:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | unless something like this happens - ie permanent sinking into seawater by 30 to 80 feet of [coastal and low] parts of Indonesia - it couldnt be called a "hit". Quoting: andrewand Nancy also said that this will not be likely accompanied by big earthquakes, - slow and silent slip of that microplate What will it mean to you if the 7 doesn't happen by the end of the year? well, this wouldnt mean that EVERYTHING she/they said is wrong. they couldnt have been more specific re 7 by the end of 2010, about timing and events and reiterating again and again when asked that it will happen in 2010. If that fails to happen it would mean big trouble for ZT and our members will be disappointed. however, i wouldnt exclude this "7" happening later, if this doesnt happen in 2010. relying on ANY dates is tricky, it could even have been Nancy's misinterpretation, who knows? important thing is to watch the actual developments, monitor eq's and weather/climate etc. if it is to happen, - it will happen in due time Andrew...lets be brutally honest. This "7 of 10" event will not happen by the end of the year and you will continue to buy into this crap despite of it being another epic fail. This is cult dynamics...this is how they operate. We have watched this happen year after year without fail. It is clear that you are unwilling to let go of your delusion. |
andrew User ID: 1193711 Ukraine 12/13/2010 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | well, this wouldnt mean that EVERYTHING she/they said is wrong. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444they couldnt have been more specific re 7 by the end of 2010, about timing and events and reiterating again and again when asked that it will happen in 2010. If that fails to happen it would mean big trouble for ZT and our members will be disappointed. however, i wouldnt exclude this "7" happening later, if this doesnt happen in 2010. relying on ANY dates is tricky, it could even have been Nancy's misinterpretation, who knows? important thing is to watch the actual developments, monitor eq's and weather/climate etc. if it is to happen, - it will happen in due time So, if that is not enough to shake your faith in Nancy, what is? What event has to occur for you to change your mind, and conclude that Nancy/ZT is simply a lot of hooey? climate,and other Earth changes have to stop, for good, so that it is a thing of the past. |
Setheory User ID: 869850 United States 12/13/2010 11:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, if that is not enough to shake your faith in Nancy, what is? Quoting: andrewWhat event has to occur for you to change your mind, and conclude that Nancy/ZT is simply a lot of hooey? climate,and other Earth changes have to stop, for good, so that it is a thing of the past. They haven't ceased for 4 billion years. Why would you expect change to stop now? |
KeepingItReal User ID: 1038225 Canada 12/13/2010 11:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why does it occur to me that this 7 of 10 by years end is destined to become another Christmas Hammer debacle for Nancy? It's been two years since that failed prediction. I remember she tried so desperately to find something to fit her prediction and ended up stretching the window to the spring. Nancy should learn to not give dates or add a pray it away clause to her doom cult to prevent the need for more white lies. The few followers she has left won't believe the white lies and failed predictions forever. Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
andrew User ID: 1193711 Ukraine 12/13/2010 11:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Andrew...lets be brutally honest. Quoting: Setheory 869850This "7 of 10" event will not happen by the end of the year and you will continue to buy into this crap despite of it being another epic fail. This is cult dynamics...this is how they operate. We have watched this happen year after year without fail. It is clear that you are unwilling to let go of your delusion. you may want to call it this way.. of course, i will not erupt with indignation and deny what i stood up for before. what would be the point? it is a theory worth considering, at least, and i will not abandon it. i will continue to be with ZetaTalk and Nancy. |
andrew User ID: 1193711 Ukraine 12/13/2010 11:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why does it occur to me that this 7 of 10 by years end is destined to become another Christmas Hammer debacle for Nancy? It's been two years since that failed prediction. I remember she tried so desperately to find something to fit her prediction and ended up stretching the window to the spring. Nancy should learn to not give dates or add a pray it away clause to her doom cult to prevent the need for more white lies. The few followers she has left won't believe the white lies and failed predictions forever. Quoting: KeepingItReal7 of 10 IS about the Christmas Hammer! that article from 2007 was about what is anticipated now - "7" of 10! |
andrew User ID: 1193711 Ukraine 12/13/2010 11:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, if that is not enough to shake your faith in Nancy, what is? Quoting: Setheory 869850What event has to occur for you to change your mind, and conclude that Nancy/ZT is simply a lot of hooey? climate,and other Earth changes have to stop, for good, so that it is a thing of the past. They haven't ceased for 4 billion years. Why would you expect change to stop now? on a smaller scale change as compared with 50 years ago, even 30-40 years ago. since that time things have changed alot, no more precisely, they started to change back then. they were pretty consistent then and started to rapidly and INCREASINGLY change some 30-40 years ago. |
Marquis User ID: 1192788 United Kingdom 12/13/2010 11:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you may want to call it this way.. Quoting: andrewof course, i will not erupt with indignation and deny what i stood up for before. what would be the point? it is a theory worth considering, at least, and i will not abandon it. i will continue to be with ZetaTalk and Nancy. That's an interesting way of phrasing it... "I will not abandon it... I will continue to be with ZetaTalk and Nancy." It sounds like the sort of thing you'd say about a spouse dying from cancer, not someone who channels aliens over the internet. |
Setheory User ID: 869850 United States 12/13/2010 12:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Andrew...lets be brutally honest. Quoting: andrewThis "7 of 10" event will not happen by the end of the year and you will continue to buy into this crap despite of it being another epic fail. This is cult dynamics...this is how they operate. We have watched this happen year after year without fail. It is clear that you are unwilling to let go of your delusion. you may want to call it this way.. of course, i will not erupt with indignation and deny what i stood up for before. what would be the point? it is a theory worth considering, at least, and i will not abandon it.i will continue to be with ZetaTalk and Nancy. This is the whole point of the matter. When a theory or concept is continually proven to fail or is prone to inaccuracies, it should be abandoned. Your unwillingness to alter the beliefs you hold in spite of the overwhelming evidence that they are flawed is proof of your affliction. |
andrew User ID: 1193711 Ukraine 12/13/2010 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | it is a theory worth considering, at least, and i will not abandon it.i will continue to be with ZetaTalk and Nancy. Quoting: Setheory 869850This is the whole point of the matter. When a theory or concept is continually proven to fail or is prone to inaccuracies, it should be abandoned. Your unwillingness to alter the beliefs you hold in spite of the overwhelming evidence that they are flawed is proof of your affliction. not enough "proof", if that what you refer to could be even called proof |
Menow User ID: 1119283 United States 12/13/2010 12:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | well, this wouldnt mean that EVERYTHING she/they said is wrong. Quoting: andrewthey couldnt have been more specific re 7 by the end of 2010, about timing and events and reiterating again and again when asked that it will happen in 2010. If that fails to happen it would mean big trouble for ZT and our members will be disappointed. however, i wouldnt exclude this "7" happening later, if this doesnt happen in 2010. relying on ANY dates is tricky, it could even have been Nancy's misinterpretation, who knows? important thing is to watch the actual developments, monitor eq's and weather/climate etc. if it is to happen, - it will happen in due time So, if that is not enough to shake your faith in Nancy, what is? What event has to occur for you to change your mind, and conclude that Nancy/ZT is simply a lot of hooey? climate,and other Earth changes have to stop, for good, so that it is a thing of the past. You fail to understand that Nancy takes NORMAL events and says that they are abnormal. Example: The "moon tilt" nonsense. Go ahead and explain how the Moon is not supposed to appear to 'tilt' as it crosses the sky. |
Setheory User ID: 869850 United States 12/13/2010 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | it is a theory worth considering, at least, and i will not abandon it.i will continue to be with ZetaTalk and Nancy. Quoting: andrewThis is the whole point of the matter. When a theory or concept is continually proven to fail or is prone to inaccuracies, it should be abandoned. Your unwillingness to alter the beliefs you hold in spite of the overwhelming evidence that they are flawed is proof of your affliction. not enough "proof", if that what you refer to could be even called proof A long and well documented record of failed doomsday predictions…a list of irrational claims that can easily be disproven such as “the earth being halted in its orbit”…delusional calls to do the needless and inhumane such as killing your pets…Good God!...what more do you need? |
Marquis User ID: 1192788 United Kingdom 12/13/2010 12:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What event has to occur for you to change your mind, and conclude that Nancy/ZT is simply a lot of hooey? Quoting: andrewclimate,and other Earth changes have to stop, for good, so that it is a thing of the past. Btw, this is like saying "I'll stop believing in phlogiston when things stop burning." |
KeepingItReal User ID: 1038225 Canada 12/13/2010 12:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why does it occur to me that this 7 of 10 by years end is destined to become another Christmas Hammer debacle for Nancy? It's been two years since that failed prediction. I remember she tried so desperately to find something to fit her prediction and ended up stretching the window to the spring. Nancy should learn to not give dates or add a pray it away clause to her doom cult to prevent the need for more white lies. The few followers she has left won't believe the white lies and failed predictions forever. Quoting: andrew7 of 10 IS about the Christmas Hammer! that article from 2007 was about what is anticipated now - "7" of 10! No it wasn't Andrew. Prior to the Christmas in question, Nancy claimed that the Christmas Hammer would make that years Christmas memorable and that it would be our last. We were supposed to get hammered right at Christmas, not this year, but the 2007 or 2008, whichever it was. We are still waiting. The Christmas hammer has nothing to do with the 2010 7 out of 10. Another example of how the ning tards gyrate and spin to try and save face. But it's all here in the archives, andyboy, and it only makes you look more foolish when you make these false statements. Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
andrew User ID: 1193711 Ukraine 12/13/2010 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why does it occur to me that this 7 of 10 by years end is destined to become another Christmas Hammer debacle for Nancy? It's been two years since that failed prediction. I remember she tried so desperately to find something to fit her prediction and ended up stretching the window to the spring. Nancy should learn to not give dates or add a pray it away clause to her doom cult to prevent the need for more white lies. The few followers she has left won't believe the white lies and failed predictions forever. Quoting: KeepingItReal7 of 10 IS about the Christmas Hammer! that article from 2007 was about what is anticipated now - "7" of 10! No it wasn't Andrew. Prior to the Christmas in question, Nancy claimed that the Christmas Hammer would make that years Christmas memorable and that it would be our last. We were supposed to get hammered right at Christmas, not this year, but the 2007 or 2008, whichever it was. We are still waiting. The Christmas hammer has nothing to do with the 2010 7 out of 10. Another example of how the ning tards gyrate and spin to try and save face. But it's all here in the archives, andyboy, and it only makes you look more foolish when you make these false statements. would it count for you if it happened THIS year now? |
Menow User ID: 1119283 United States 12/13/2010 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
KeepingItReal User ID: 1038225 Canada 12/13/2010 01:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why does it occur to me that this 7 of 10 by years end is destined to become another Christmas Hammer debacle for Nancy? It's been two years since that failed prediction. I remember she tried so desperately to find something to fit her prediction and ended up stretching the window to the spring. Nancy should learn to not give dates or add a pray it away clause to her doom cult to prevent the need for more white lies. The few followers she has left won't believe the white lies and failed predictions forever. Quoting: andrew7 of 10 IS about the Christmas Hammer! that article from 2007 was about what is anticipated now - "7" of 10! No it wasn't Andrew. Prior to the Christmas in question, Nancy claimed that the Christmas Hammer would make that years Christmas memorable and that it would be our last. We were supposed to get hammered right at Christmas, not this year, but the 2007 or 2008, whichever it was. We are still waiting. The Christmas hammer has nothing to do with the 2010 7 out of 10. Another example of how the ning tards gyrate and spin to try and save face. But it's all here in the archives, andyboy, and it only makes you look more foolish when you make these false statements. would it count for you if it happened THIS year now? Not since it was supposed to have happened two or three years ago. You are grasping at straws. But then again, you are one of the few that still believe her after the 2003 pole shift failed to happen. That's seven years wrong, going on eight years. It's like predicting the big California quake on a specific date, and when it doesn't happen you wait for the next big one 10 years later and claim a hit. Nancy got herself into this. She gave dates and timelines. They failed. There is no getting around that. She was wrong and she will be wrong about this one. We have just a few weeks to see her fail again. Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
Menow User ID: 1119283 United States 12/13/2010 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why does it occur to me that this 7 of 10 by years end is destined to become another Christmas Hammer debacle for Nancy? It's been two years since that failed prediction. I remember she tried so desperately to find something to fit her prediction and ended up stretching the window to the spring. Nancy should learn to not give dates or add a pray it away clause to her doom cult to prevent the need for more white lies. The few followers she has left won't believe the white lies and failed predictions forever. Quoting: andrew7 of 10 IS about the Christmas Hammer! that article from 2007 was about what is anticipated now - "7" of 10! No it wasn't Andrew. Prior to the Christmas in question, Nancy claimed that the Christmas Hammer would make that years Christmas memorable and that it would be our last. We were supposed to get hammered right at Christmas, not this year, but the 2007 or 2008, whichever it was. We are still waiting. The Christmas hammer has nothing to do with the 2010 7 out of 10. Another example of how the ning tards gyrate and spin to try and save face. But it's all here in the archives, andyboy, and it only makes you look more foolish when you make these false statements. would it count for you if it happened THIS year now? Would it count for you if it DIDN'T happen? No, it wouldn't. You would ignore it and accept an excuse just like all the other times. |
Menow User ID: 1119283 United States 12/13/2010 03:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | well, this wouldnt mean that EVERYTHING she/they said is wrong. Quoting: Menow 1119283they couldnt have been more specific re 7 by the end of 2010, about timing and events and reiterating again and again when asked that it will happen in 2010. If that fails to happen it would mean big trouble for ZT and our members will be disappointed. however, i wouldnt exclude this "7" happening later, if this doesnt happen in 2010. relying on ANY dates is tricky, it could even have been Nancy's misinterpretation, who knows? important thing is to watch the actual developments, monitor eq's and weather/climate etc. if it is to happen, - it will happen in due time So, if that is not enough to shake your faith in Nancy, what is? What event has to occur for you to change your mind, and conclude that Nancy/ZT is simply a lot of hooey? climate,and other Earth changes have to stop, for good, so that it is a thing of the past. Quoting: andrew You fail to understand that Nancy takes NORMAL events and says that they are abnormal. Example: The "moon tilt" nonsense. Go ahead and explain how the Moon is not supposed to appear to 'tilt' as it crosses the sky. Come on, Andrew... explain how Nancy's 'moon-tilt' claims are factual. Then you can move on to explaining how the Sun and Moon are not where they belong in the sky and only people on the internet know about it. All the world's astronomers have missed it or are covering it up, right? Those are central to Nancy's "Earth changes" claims, but are utterly bogus. It's all lies, Andrew. Zetatalk is a steaming pile of BS. Unless, of course, you care to explain how the Moon is really not supposed to 'tilt' as we observe it in the sky. Go ahead, Andrew. You have the floor. |
Marquis User ID: 1192788 United Kingdom 12/13/2010 07:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So something's been bugging me today. The Zetas are required to maintain an element of doubt among humans about their existence and the existence of Planet X. This is because if people found out about the existence of aliens all at once they'd burn contactees at the stake, apparently? Supposedly it's better to let people slowly subconsciously realize it. Okay, fine, whatever. Now let's say someone at NASA has a sudden crisis of conscience and decides to blow the lid off the conspiracy. "I've had enough," says our whistleblower. "I'm not going to go along with this evil plot to suppress knowledge of Planet X. I'm going to go public with the facts: Earth is stopped in its orbit, and things only look kind of normal because aliens are wobbling the planet around." Wouldn't the Zetas be compelled to stop the whistleblower, because he'd be eliminating the element of doubt? Maybe they brainwash him, maybe they kill him and blame it on NASA, maybe they just talk him out of it. I don't know. But in any case they'd be directly complicit in the conspiracy. The PTBs and the Zetas would be working to the same ends. Is it a stretch to think they'd be working together directly as well? One more thing to think about. Nancy says that NASA discovered Planet X in 1983 using IRAS and the coverup only began after an initial accidental press conference. Wouldn't announcing the presence of Planet X eliminate the element of doubt as well? The Zetas couldn't let that happen; it'd be against their vaunted STO moral code... now where do you suppose NASA could find the resources to pay off every space agency, university, and amateur astronomer in the world? |