Women have a right to infanticide | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 658956 United States 04/13/2010 12:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 955507 Canada 04/28/2010 07:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 955670 United States 04/28/2010 07:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Any child under three (some say under five) for which women cannot take care of is eligible for infanticide. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 783644From a progressive point of view, legalizing it would be the best way to achieve efficient population control. It was common in the Greek classical age, when liberated advanced women could freely dispose of their children. It's time to return tho Thids Godlen Age of female freedom. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 957637 Canada 05/02/2010 01:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
peaceandgoodwill User ID: 925043 United States 05/02/2010 01:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Etheric Ray User ID: 739576 Canada 05/02/2010 01:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 947453 United States 05/02/2010 01:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Infanticide is only done in times of necessity. It is not something that is talked about. Its a horrific evil that is only done when it has to be done. However the exception should also exist for infants borne with serious defects. It is only ethical that accidents be dealt in this matter. Animals do this naturally so why is it so difficult for people to understand this? Sometimes it is the most humane decision despite the emotional cost. |
Etheric Ray User ID: 739576 Canada 05/02/2010 01:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 957637 Canada 05/02/2010 01:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 887925 United States 05/02/2010 01:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think you are a prime candidate for that of which you speak, and I volunteer to do it you stupid sick &^%$> Any child under three (some say under five) for which women cannot take care of is eligible for infanticide. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 783644From a progressive point of view, legalizing it would be the best way to achieve efficient population control. It was common in the Greek classical age, when liberated advanced women could freely dispose of their children. It's time to return tho Thids Godlen Age of female freedom. |
Yycroman User ID: 956699 United States 05/02/2010 01:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Lover of YHVH and Yahushua User ID: 954680 United States 05/02/2010 02:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Any child under three (some say under five) for which women cannot take care of is eligible for infanticide. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 783644From a progressive point of view, legalizing it would be the best way to achieve efficient population control. It was common in the Greek classical age, when liberated advanced women could freely dispose of their children. It's time to return tho Thids Godlen Age of female freedom. YOU NEED TO SEE A PSYCHOLOGIST, QUICKLY. IF you are a woman, you should be ashamed of yourself. NO...sorry...IF YOU ARE A HUMAN YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF. WHAT YOU ARE ADVOCATING IS MURDER, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 925007 United States 05/02/2010 03:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 949908 United States 05/02/2010 03:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am in no way in favor of this. However it's been done. Is still being done. In the Western world, we're spoiled, and used to not having to make hard choices. But imagine you're a woman who already has five or six children and all of them are hungry and you are too, and you're pregnant again (no birth control). You try to abort, not because you don't want the baby but because you've got two children still on the breast and three others under the age of five. It fails, and you give birth to yet another child; so now you've got three who need the breast, and you're starving yourself already so you can feed the ones you've got. The children you've already named, who you are attached to, are starving too. It's very likely that one (or maybe more) will die of hunger. You've got to choose. They can't all live. What are you going to do? Let the children you already know and have named die, or put the newborn out on the rocks or into the river? Nature is rough, but it has its reasons. We've overshot the balance and gotten used to having most of our children grow up. It was not this way for most of human history. Women would have six, eight, twelve children, and count themselves lucky (assuming they lived through the births) to see two or three grow to adulthood. It's time we came to grasp this brutal reality. If we do not correct ourselves, nature will do it for us. It always has and always will, and the longer we put it off, the uglier it will be. That's why everyone should have access to free birth control and abortion on demand. The alternative IS infanticide and/or starvation. Sorry. It's cruel, but true. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 957637 Canada 05/03/2010 12:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 814465 United States 05/03/2010 01:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Any child under three (some say under five) for which women cannot take care of is eligible for infanticide. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 783644From a progressive point of view, legalizing it would be the best way to achieve efficient population control. It was common in the Greek classical age, when liberated advanced women could freely dispose of their children. It's time to return tho Thids Godlen Age of female freedom. Sounds like you should have been infanticided. I have encountered some sick fucks but you win some kind of prize. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 957637 Canada 05/05/2010 04:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jenkins User ID: 979373 Canada 05/24/2010 09:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sandi_T User ID: 873093 United States 05/24/2010 09:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Women, what do you think ? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 797383Any woman who would kill her own child is insane. She must be protected from her insanity, and so must her child. I am generally anti-adoption (especially the way it's handled now), but this is a case in which adoption should be strongly considered. However, adoption even in these cases should be handled the way that Australia handles it, NOT the way that the USA does. No more requests in the "Strangest things" thread please. :hf: Past Lives requests thread: Thread: That Which Once Was: Past Lives |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 980082 China 05/24/2010 09:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Any child under three (some say under five) for which women cannot take care of is eligible for infanticide. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 783644From a progressive point of view, legalizing it would be the best way to achieve efficient population control. It was common in the Greek classical age, when liberated advanced women could freely dispose of their children. It's time to return tho Thids Godlen Age of female freedom. Even female animals shall not do that. Funny, are we human being ? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 960117 United States 05/24/2010 09:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jenkins User ID: 979373 Canada 05/24/2010 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jenkins User ID: 1000282 Canada 06/18/2010 07:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1022608 United States 07/14/2010 09:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
~*~sang-froid~*~ User ID: 1033548 Canada 07/14/2010 09:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | your spelling is horrible.... Quoting: 7491And thats not the only thing. Abortion is a very serious matter from a biblical point of view. WHO MURDERED CLARICE?... [link to www.chick.com] Well then. I am amazed. How in the fuck can this poster be the opposite of 1947? Fuck! Same links/pics/etc... Interesting! :gsfhibiscus: ...Where there's a Will... "...go back to sleep you yellow bellied freaks, afraid of God AND Modern Science..." ~ Wintersleep ~ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 945477 United States 07/14/2010 09:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Total sarcasm here.. crazy Americans.. it makes me sad to know that my brothers and sisters have been fooled into believing in Illuminati style science...such as Eugenics |
Jolly User ID: 1036550 China 07/14/2010 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1044382 Canada 07/23/2010 12:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1044382 Canada 07/23/2010 12:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | that's Murder~~ Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1044382No it isn't. Ooops, here is the link. Thread: An infanticide is NOT a murder |
LinuxChick User ID: 910135 United States 07/23/2010 12:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Women, what do you think ? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 797383I'm a woman, and in general I really detest children- but are you out of your effing mind? I believe in the right to choose an abortion in the first trimester or two, but to kill a child? Sick, sick, sick. A child that is born is a full human being with the right to exist. If a mother can't care for a child she should have thought of that before she got pregnant in the first place. If she has a child she can't care for, why not just leave it at a church or hospital. Infanticide is a horror that does not belong in the 21st century, and take this FWIW from someone who can't stand kids. You need help... |