Moon Landing hoax? Debunking the Debunkers?

Only one problem: he is right and you are wrong. The “moon hoax” story is completely false and debunked over and over with minimal research. We landed men on the moon. You can see their footprints from satellites.

I know you have a lot invested emotionally in the idea of the hoax, and I know you really want it to be true. It’s hard to admit you have been wrong all this time, but deep down you know you are wrong. Man up and let it go.

Death or resignation, no way to be certain of which.

HahahahHahHhHhHhahahaha!!!

It does not move significantly in position on the visor simply due to the optics of a curved surface reflecting something at the extreme border, however it does move.

It changes shape, because the stagehand is moving.

Here is a comparison, 1st frame of stagehand [left], next to last [middle], and last frame [right]. You will notice it changes shape noticeably.

[link to imgur.com (secure)]


{sarc}Smudge indeed, :-O {/sarc}

I figured you would choose to feed your delusions and shy away from the difficult task of admitting you have been deceived all these years. However for those who are interested in facts here is one link (there are many) which shows the actual footprints.

[link to www.forbes.com (secure)]

It’s difficult, I know. You have to ask yourself, could all these people be lying? Why would all these other countries who have incentive to verify America’s claims do so? We went to the moon. It happened. Let it go.

It does not move at all on the visor and it isn't changing shape. You're seeing it from a slightly different angle with different illumination from the sun as the helmet moves but it is the same shape in each pic.

Although I'm curious, where do you think this supposed stagehand is as the vehicle is moving and your "stagehand" appears off the ground in the last pic?

Last Edited by LHP598 on 12/01/2019 12:42 PM

It's entirely reasonable that if the incredibly expensive moon landings were faked, then a low budget, low resolution image would be faked as well.

Or is that just too preposterous a concept?

Why do you think we demand hi-resolution images, perhaps a lunar rover at the landing sight?


Seriously, are you that DERP?

As I stated before, your blindness is in no way compelling.

I sincerely hope you are really as stupid as you sound, otherwise, if you have sacrificed your integrity your entire life has been meaningless.

That would be a shame.

That you can't see in your own pics that the smudge is the same shape in each pic and appears off the ground in the last one is your problem, not mine.
thanks for the humor!

Last Edited by LHP598 on 12/01/2019 12:49 PM

We have a lot to accomplish with our space program and lunar missions. An extremely expensive lunar rover to a place we have already been, to prove something that HAS ALREADY BEEN PROVEN to conspiracy nuts isn’t a high priority. Sorry.

Got it.

According to imgur my IP is the only one that has actually viewed the image.

Ya know, you are not very good at your job.

Exactly. Other countries have incentive — financial incentive, in the way of economic assistance, trade deals, defense pacts, etc. — to “verify” America’s claim of having gone to the moon.

You answered your own question, although I don’t think you realize that your answer contradicts your initial supposition.

Of course we didn’t go to the moon with Apollo. For the reasons mentioned. And our government’s words & (non-) deeds since simply confirm this.

Imgur is wrong then. Or you're lying. I have viewed them multiple times and even showed my son.

but thanks for resorting to the shill gambit showing you really have nothing.

I am not now, nor ever have been, paid to post here or anywhere else.

thanks for the humor!

Fair enough. Maybe their page view counter is slow or something.

I actually have no problem with you believing the Apollo missions were real.

The one I want to convince is me, and that ain't happened yet!

The Poon Landing

Actually that was just a typo. I intended to say “Other countries have no incentive” which they don’t. But I think you know that’s what I intended to say and just wanted to jump on the opportunity to make your point, which you didn’t. No economic assistance, trade deals or military defense treaties are riding on other countries going along with “America’s moon hoax”. The assertion is ridiculous. Even if those things were in play, you couldn’t keep everyone involved quiet.

You know you are wrong on this. Stop perpetuating this silliness.

Keep typing and revealing your idiocy.

60 years later all we have to do , or any country for that matter, to prove we went is to go back. Mark my words and this is a prediction. something will happen to scuttle our plans to return to the Moon. We will change Presidents. And that admin will announce a budget emergency and push the program back or cancel it . which to me is suspicious . even if you believe we did go to the moon.

You can attack me all you want. I am only trying to help you see the truth. As I have said, I know it is difficult to admit the truth when you have been so bought in for so long. However when that time comes and you allow yourself to admit that we did go to the moon, you will grieve a bit for the time wasted but it will actually be a relief for you after the grief. That time is coming, as we are headed back to the moon with many new missions which will includes regular manned missions and probably a base, space station or both. We will have so much more confirmation that even the deniers like you won’t be able to continue in your denial. Ask yourself this question-how will you feel when that happens? Best to be prepared for it.

Hahahahahahah.

Two agents having a talk.

Then I post the information and neither one makes a single comment.

You two keep it up!

Good day.

I guess what is most interesting about these three cropped stills of the visor reflecting a stagehand is the fact that in the first one (on the left), the moon buggy is on an lowered portion of the set, and the view is looking up so the artificial horizon is about midway across the stagehand.


In the second and third, or middle and right crops, the buggy is elevated, as can be seen by the lowering of the artificial horizon.

This is exactly what it should look like if something is reflected in the visor, and the buggy is moving as I described.

[link to imgur.com (secure)]

That is very funny since the people with emotional investment are those that say that the Apollo program landed on the Moon as shown on TV.

Among rational adults the accuser has the burden of proof.
All the non-losers know very well why the hoaxies are so desperately trying to reverse that burden.
They can't meet it, and they know they can't meet it.

You not even knowing what 98.3% of the evidence that you claim was faked is just makes it funnier.




How do you intend to prove that it is not a smudge?
Other than whining "Is so!"

Have you tried comparing it to the photographs taken around the same time?




LOL.
You really believe that anyone would be willing to spend even a single penny of public funds trying to prove something to idiots who have already hand-waved away a shit-load of proof?
You can't reason people out of an opinion they didn't reason themselves into in the first place.
The opinion of unreasonable people simply doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things.
You've publicly declared yourself as someone who can't be taken serious, and therefore you won't.

Bless your heart. You poor thing.

Imagine... The first man climbs Everest. 5 other expeditions manage it in the next 3 years. Then no one is capable of replicating the feat for 50 years.

Imagine... The first man to sail the Atlantic accomplishes the feat, shows you paintings of what it looked like. 5 other expeditions manage it in the next 3 years. Then no one is capable of replicating it for 50 years.

Imagine... The first solo airplane flight over the vast oceans. 5 times, it is replicated, but then for 50 years, no one can manage it. Its too expensive! We've already done it! Everyone knows we did it, we can see the airstrip where they landed, from space!

When will we go 'back'? That is my only question. When?

You guys wanna know what projection looks like? It is a psychological phenomenon.

I present to you, our very own, Halcyon Dayz:
"All the non-losers know very well why the hoaxies are so desperately trying to reverse that burden.
They can't meet it, and they know they can't meet it."

Yeah, its not NASA that has to prove they landed a man on the Moon, it is up to skeptics to prove they didn't! RIGHT!

So, additionally I just noticed that in the very last frame [far right] the stage hand is running, presumably to not be in the shot when the rover camera is turned back forward.

I had previously presumed the stagehand was just painted out of the footage and they overlooked the reflection, now I realize the entire thing must have been choreographed.

You can also see the stagehand is wearing shorts.