NYT: The Constitution Is An Out-Dated, Anti-Democratic Relic | |
Callin User ID: 63658239 United States 08/09/2018 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They are mad that the framers wrote it in such a way as to protect us from assholes like them. Quoting: LoneStarRising ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Think the Constitution Will Save Us? Think Again The subversion of democracy was the explicit intent of the framers. Consider a few facts: Donald Trump is in the White House, despite winning almost three million fewer votes than Hillary Clinton. The Senate, the country’s most powerful legislative chamber, grants the same representation to Wyoming’s 579,315 residents as it does to 39,536,653 Californians. Key voting rights are denied to citizens in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and other United States territories. The American government is structured by an 18th-century text that is almost impossible to change. These ills didn’t come about by accident; the subversion of democracy was the explicit intent of the Constitution’s framers. For James Madison, writing in Federalist No. 10, “Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention” incompatible with the rights of property owners. The byzantine Constitution he helped create serves as the foundation for a system of government that rules over people, rather than an evolving tool for popular self-government. [link to www.nytimes.com (secure)] You're God Damned right it was. The United States was founded as a Constitutional Republic. Amen brother! The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it - Orwell If you’re backed by Hollywood, social media, the government, and practically the entire globalist system, you are not the resistance -- you're part of the problem |
snuffly User ID: 6155559 United States 08/09/2018 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
1-2-Follow User ID: 60863762 United States 08/09/2018 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | also, i thought the democrats loved citing the constitution again for the first time in 8 years since everything trump does is "unconstitutional" to them? Quoting: 1-2-Follow Ha ha, can't have it both ways, just saw a bumper sticker today to the effect that the ACLU was the only thing protecting the Constitution from Trump. Articles and "news" from liberal media shall now be known as catnip for libtards. Truth is schilling in the empire of retards. "Yep but for now we dub you toast guy." - AC520845 *PROCLAIMED PROPHET OF THE DOW* ® Let me know when the climate STOPS changing, then i'll be worried. |
Runswithwulvs User ID: 64584652 United States 08/09/2018 05:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to abcnews.go.com (secure)] 'N.Y. Times' parent gets $250M from Mexican billionaire You can't take it with you - anyway. |
An Average American Patriot User ID: 8547422 United States 08/09/2018 05:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | from the article: These perspectives are vital at a time when many progressives regard the Constitution as our only line of defense against a would-be autocrat in the White House. THAT right there is the epitome of lunacy. Progressives DO NOT revere the Constitution in ANY way other than when it suits them. That is why they need it to be a "living document" that can bend and sway to their will at any given moment. That is why Obama's "fundamental transformation" of the government was so applauded. Eternal vigilance Is the price of liberty. Speak out and be heard. Be seen and get noticed. Stand up and be counted. Cherish freedom. |
Idaho Bullwinkle User ID: 76749956 United States 08/09/2018 05:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Read Lysander Sponners "No Treason. Constitution of no Authority". There are only 3 documents in the series. I, II, and VI. At the end of #6, he states that the Constitution created the government we have today or it is powerless to control it. In either case, it is unfit to exist. The Framers of the Constitution shoved it down the throats of the delegates to that convention. The convention was called to tweak the Articles of Confederation to pay for the war debt. Quoting: Idaho Bullwinkle G. Washington and his cohorts pulled off the greatest coup in all history. Wow...that's about as ignorant and convoluted as the insanity written in the NYT piece. I take it that you will not read any of Lysander Spooners works. Your ignorance is showing. There is enough documented evidence written by those who actually were there and participated. Reading the drivel of a man who was born long after the original founding occurred doesn't seem at all necessary. You think he is better informed than those who actually participated in the writing of the documents and attended the Constitutional Convention? How about all those who participated and voted to ratify the final draft of the Constitution? Those that were at the convention were sworn to secrecy and there were no notes taken. What little we know was given very late in the lives of the delegates. If it was such a wonderful piece of work, why the secrecy? There are many volumes of literature that contradict the propaganda of High School history classes. I am old enough to know how to read at a collage grade level. Your comments indicate that you have not gotten your nose out of your phone long enough to read a book, I will sit on the sidelines and watch both sides that are ignorant of the history of this Empire fight it out. Idaho Bullwinkle |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76022931 United States 08/09/2018 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If they want to destroy the document that defines the sovereignty and guidance of this country, then those responsible can be hunted down and destroyed, because the rule of law will no longer exist, and they won't be able to hide behind it. There should be no mercy for the guilty as they are dragged into the streets. Destroying the Constitution destroys their protection also. It goes both ways. |
saved User ID: 76817324 United States 08/09/2018 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Its not anti democratic. Its Pro Republic!!! The constitution is a timeless work, unfortunately for democrats it does not allow for rape and pillaging its why its so restrictive and inclusive at the same time if your honest and uphold the truth! Democrats want to subvert the truth around every corner. Come And Take It! |
FlashBuzzkill User ID: 75251329 United States 08/09/2018 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | also, i thought the democrats loved citing the constitution again for the first time in 8 years since everything trump does is "unconstitutional" to them? Quoting: 1-2-Follow Ha ha, can't have it both ways, just saw a bumper sticker today to the effect that the ACLU was the only thing protecting the Constitution from Trump. Truth is it's Trump protecting the Constitution from the ACLU; and the SPLC. Gen. John B Gordon and Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest were the finest citizen-soldiers birthed in America. |
snuffly User ID: 6155559 United States 08/09/2018 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If they want to destroy the document that defines the sovereignty and guidance of this country, then those responsible can be hunted down and destroyed, because the rule of law will no longer exist, and they won't be able to hide behind it. There should be no mercy for the guilty as they are dragged into the streets. Destroying the Constitution destroys their protection also. It goes both ways. Quoting: TunedOut ^ well said. goes both ways. mhhmm snuffly |
VeeEyeSea User ID: 21337117 United States 08/09/2018 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | His father is from Lebanon. Under the constitution most powers within a state are granted to the state. So the difference between California and Wyomings populations only matters in areas the federal government was granted power. The constitution has been so corrupted in it's application that rollback of those excesses is necessary. How many times has 'interstate commerce' been used to regulate and make laws about things that the federal govt has no business being in? To learn who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize. When the government is wrong, it's dangerous to be right. The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant. -Robspierre |
JoeyZ User ID: 76378385 United States 08/09/2018 05:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | annnnnddddddd at the end of the article it says this This article is part of the Opinion Today newsletter. David Leonhardt, the newsletter’s author, is on a break until Aug. 27. While he’s gone, several outside writers are taking his place. This week’s authors are Meagan Day, a writer for the socialist magazine Jacobin, a writer for the socialist magazine Jacobin LOL Joeyz |
Redcat1 Redcat User ID: 76783048 United States 08/09/2018 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Bill of Rights is actually a bill of restrictions. Restrictions on what the central government is not allowed to do. Since this limits the tyrannical power of the central government - of course the NYT tyranny supporting entity will dislike it. |
LittleNikita User ID: 76803147 United States 08/09/2018 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
FlashBuzzkill User ID: 75251329 United States 08/09/2018 05:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is scary: " Our ideal should be a strong federal government powered by a proportionally elected unicameral legislature" Federal government isn't big enough to suit them? It's already way too big, any more is a guarantee of absolute despotism which I suppose is precisely what they want. Like the Soviet Union - only bigger and more powerful. Last Edited by FlashBuzzkill on 08/09/2018 05:30 PM Gen. John B Gordon and Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest were the finest citizen-soldiers birthed in America. |
100011 User ID: 74273450 United States 08/09/2018 05:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73398970 United States 08/09/2018 05:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think maybe the forefathers knew exactly what the fuck they were doing. I've never seen such cry babies triggered by the liberty they have. They don't give a shit about America. They want to turn it into another shithole. There's plenty of shitholes already. I recommend they try one of those out and get back to us about how "unfair" the Constitution is. |
CowCookies User ID: 72761608 United States 08/09/2018 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Trisherella User ID: 76809166 United States 08/09/2018 05:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
shovelbum User ID: 75430122 United States 08/09/2018 05:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They are mad that the framers wrote it in such a way as to protect us from assholes like them. Quoting: LoneStarRising ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Think the Constitution Will Save Us? Think Again The subversion of democracy was the explicit intent of the framers. Consider a few facts: Donald Trump is in the White House, despite winning almost three million fewer votes than Hillary Clinton. The Senate, the country’s most powerful legislative chamber, grants the same representation to Wyoming’s 579,315 residents as it does to 39,536,653 Californians. Key voting rights are denied to citizens in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and other United States territories. The American government is structured by an 18th-century text that is almost impossible to change. These ills didn’t come about by accident; the subversion of democracy was the explicit intent of the Constitution’s framers. For James Madison, writing in Federalist No. 10, “Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention” incompatible with the rights of property owners. The byzantine Constitution he helped create serves as the foundation for a system of government that rules over people, rather than an evolving tool for popular self-government. [link to www.nytimes.com (secure)] You're God Damned right it was. The United States was founded as a Constitutional Republic. Nuff said |
SilverPatriot User ID: 6366763 United States 08/09/2018 05:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74716373 United States 08/09/2018 06:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I wonder what its readership is now day's? Its hayday's were certainly decades ago. The NYT is a relic of the not so secret communist conspiracy in the USA. Its outer scales have worn off, it is thin, wrinkly, underfed and dependent on a few rich masters who feed it just enough to keep it alive. |
ElleMira User ID: 76494359 United States 08/09/2018 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Buzzcheeze User ID: 76817210 United States 08/09/2018 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That is a declaration of TREASON. There NEEDS TO BE PROSECUTIONS. MSM has gone WAY TOO FAR. "TRUMP WON" "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by" 'My ego is smaller than yours Why is abbreviation such a long word “When seconds MATTER, cops are only minutes away "Cut out a man's tongue and you dont prove him a liar. It just proves you fear what he has to say" |
Vicious Deplorable dollop You ain't seen nothing yet! User ID: 76826127 United States 08/09/2018 06:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | democrats hate the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. Kamala Harris is not a Natural Born Citizen. She's illegally running. Used by the Founders... Book I of The Law of Nations, Chapter XIX, § 212 (Joseph Chitty numbering) – “Citizens and natives” reads: 'The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.' 1758 Emerich de Vattel Oh' What the Hell, do I look like I want to die in some nursing home one day... America must have 4 new Constitutional Amendments... 1. Drug Tests and Mental Evaluations on all politicians and judges randomly five times per year. 2. Term Limits for Federal politicians and judges. 3. Mental and health standards for Supreme Court Justices and retirement age set. 4. A 'Star Chamber' of elected Natural Born Citizens (no attorney's) to ivestigate, try, and prosecute the politicians and government employee's as they see fit. Mandatory death penalty by public hanging is the merciful sentence for pedos and their associates. Democrats are a WMD, literally. Let Justice Be Done Though The Heavens Fall. |
VetsMom User ID: 76736558 Canada 08/09/2018 06:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What a shame that the 9/11 terrorists didn't fly planes into the NYT headquarters. But they probably knew it would be doing America a favor. Quoting: TheEndBeautifulFriend That would have done the world a favor! "The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional as to how they perceive the veterans of earlier wars were Treated and Appreciated by their nation." ~ George Washington |
shovelbum User ID: 75430122 United States 08/09/2018 06:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | His father is from Lebanon. Under the constitution most powers within a state are granted to the state. So the difference between California and Wyomings populations only matters in areas the federal government was granted power. The constitution has been so corrupted in it's application that rollback of those excesses is necessary. How many times has 'interstate commerce' been used to regulate and make laws about things that the federal govt has no business being in? Exactly. The constitution is nearly perfect. We do need the senators to be appointed by their respective State legislatures. The Senate is supposed to be where the State government receives its federal representation. But it proved too difficult to steal the States individual sovereignty when they were reoresented. And let the States regulate almost everything. The federal right to regulate interstate commerce really was all about keeping it free. They didn't want the States trying to impose tariffs or subsidize business in competition with one another. If Californians want gay marriage and abortion at 8 1/2 months let them. If Arkansans want no abortion and teachers with guns so be it. It really would solve so many problems. |
Deplorable Zenobia User ID: 6305700 United States 08/09/2018 06:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HAHAHA!!! I actually agree w/ this coming from NYT and suggest that upon the rewritten, revised spanking new version of our new Constitution that the very first fuckin' top line is appropriate modern lingo for our 'lost/missing 13th Amendment.' For those too lazy to go look that up, here's link to what soooo many did NOT want to be ratified back in it's day.... [link to constitutioncenter.org (secure)] And thought struggles against the results, trying to avoid those unpleasant results while keeping on with that way of thinking. That is what I call 'sustained incoherence.' ...David Bohm “How, O Zenobia, hast thou dared to insult Roman emperors?” ...Aurelian, 44th Emperor of the Roman Empire |
ISO User ID: 76734104 United States 08/09/2018 06:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They're right. Let's abolish the constitution. Then 5 minutes later, Trump can send troops in to take control of every media studio in America including CNN, and all the 3 letter networks. Afterall, it's only the Constitution protecting them from him doing what SHOULD be done. Then we can round up all the liberals and drop them off in blue states of their choice, forever abolished from Red states. Sounds good. Then we can re-adopt the Constitution to be followed by civilized people. |
Festus Hoggbottom User ID: 72217239 United States 08/09/2018 06:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They are mad that the framers wrote it in such a way as to protect us from assholes like them. Quoting: LoneStarRising ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Think the Constitution Will Save Us? Think Again The subversion of democracy was the explicit intent of the framers. Consider a few facts: Donald Trump is in the White House, despite winning almost three million fewer votes than Hillary Clinton. The Senate, the country’s most powerful legislative chamber, grants the same representation to Wyoming’s 579,315 residents as it does to 39,536,653 Californians. Key voting rights are denied to citizens in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and other United States territories. The American government is structured by an 18th-century text that is almost impossible to change. These ills didn’t come about by accident; the subversion of democracy was the explicit intent of the Constitution’s framers. For James Madison, writing in Federalist No. 10, “Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention” incompatible with the rights of property owners. The byzantine Constitution he helped create serves as the foundation for a system of government that rules over people, rather than an evolving tool for popular self-government. [link to www.nytimes.com (secure)] Damn right! We have never been and never will be a Democracy. We don't care how they feel about it and neither did the framers. I did it. I did it on purpose. And I'll do it again. |